4305
|
Bitcoin / Project Development / Re: BitCoin Wikipedia page DELETED!!!
|
on: December 13, 2010, 04:55:31 PM
|
Please stop your socking on wikipedia that is all I ask. However, trade in all of the bitcoins in existance and you wouldn't be able to buy my uncle's house.
ROFL. You think we are secretly sockpuppetting accounts on wikipedia. That is paranoia, pure and simple. If you EVER BOTHER[edit] to read the discussion here on the forum, you would realize that the founder of the community DO NOT LIKE being associated with wikileak. That shut down the discussion of getting wikileak to accept bitcoin donation. Of course, that was moot. The gossip mills spread too far from our control. This. Is. Hilarious.
|
|
|
4306
|
Bitcoin / Project Development / Re: BitCoin Wikipedia page DELETED!!!
|
on: December 13, 2010, 04:43:46 PM
|
Actually a lot of people care about the non-commercial no profit organisation wikipedia and the free sharing of quality information. I think take the number of people who care about bitcoin and multiply it by 1000000 and you are in the right ball park.
Dude, just be objective and do your job instead of being paranoid about a secret conspiracy by bitcoiners. You do realize that Bitcoin already received media coverage by PcWorld, IrishTime, and ComputerworldUk? If that doesn't make Bitcoin notable, I don't know what will.
|
|
|
4307
|
Bitcoin / Project Development / Re: BitCoin Wikipedia page DELETED!!!
|
on: December 13, 2010, 04:35:46 PM
|
Yes. That is fine. The pile on at wikipedia is not fine. Please understand that. Wikipedia is not there to promote your favourite e-currency.
Yeah, you don't have to tell us. A couple of Wikipedians in this community told us that to get included in wikipedia, we must be "notable", which mean newspaper, academic source, etc al.
|
|
|
4308
|
Economy / Marketplace / Re: Kiba's Art Thread
|
on: December 13, 2010, 04:22:55 PM
|
Wee! Thanks for another 50 BTC anonymous donation yesterday! Half of my saving now come from my art career earning. Your continued baconage is continuously welcomed.
|
|
|
4310
|
Bitcoin / Project Development / Re: BitCoin Wikipedia page DELETED!!!
|
on: December 13, 2010, 04:02:30 PM
|
An external discussion where you encourage each other to go and take action on wikipedia and then that happens is against wikipedia rules. No paranoia needed. And a discussion in which you call me an "ice-hole" meaning ass-hole is just amusing to me.
No, no, and no. We're just letting this deletion discussion run it course.
|
|
|
4311
|
Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Bitpredict Update Thread
|
on: December 13, 2010, 08:34:14 AM
|
Update:
I created two models; prediction and bid.
Prediction data: title, description, and by date.
Bid: PredictId, UserId, txn.
I also added a funds attribute to users.
Once the rudimentary detail is done, I'll work on a script to upload site to aceat64's server so that I can test it with a few people.
|
|
|
4316
|
Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Notoriety of bitcoin
|
on: December 13, 2010, 05:15:00 AM
|
Never. In order for the President of the United States to mention "bitcoin" before 2020, there must be a United States. When empires collapse, they also break apart. This grows more likely the older I get.
A mere 30 years after the collapse of the Soviet Union? Interesting.
|
|
|
4317
|
Bitcoin / Project Development / Re: We are on Slashdot. Again. This time next to "Wikileaks" and "Ron paul"
|
on: December 13, 2010, 04:05:38 AM
|
I think that we won't get noticed by the angry old men in DC until Wikileaks actually puts up a donation address on their site. NSA, DHS and all those guys should know about bitcoin by now but probably won't do anything about it until the angry old men start yelling at them, I mean it's not like they get bonuses for working extra time.
Its the banks that are the real problem. They have lobbyists at their beck and call. However we have the hive mind on our side. Distributed knowledge at our call! Also don't forget we also have no bureaucracy.
|
|
|
|