I RAGE.

At any rate, do we have enough information that's agreed so that the core hackers can develop right now?

Hmm. I guess I might not just have the auction then.

That's interesting. I guess we adopt that.

I am going to do an auction for domain name generation rate.

Simply, put your bitcoin where your mouth is.

Those money raised will be going to the core developers of DomainChain.(Not me!)

Each blocks shall generate...

50 DCC. Bid: 0 BTC.

100 DCC. Bid: 0 BTC.

150 DCC. Bid: 0 BTC.

200 DCC. Bid: 0 BTC.

250 DCC. Bid: 0 BTC.

500 DCC. Bid: 0 BTC.

1000 DCC. Bid: 0 BTC.

I suppose the generation rate will gradually move toward the limit that people voted on(with their BTC).

Help...me...please!

Doesn't seem hard to me. It's a normal trade to me.

Wait, I am a bit confused. Alternative currency for DomainChain?

Oh, these represent addresses?

DDoS doesn't produce anything productive. It's a version of a mob.

We broke Most Online Today this December with 101, finally overcoming July's record of 98.

BTW, the liberty ads work well on...well LIBERTY related site. 

The post-slashdot community is only 5 months old, but I think a lot had change over the past 5 months.

100 domains per block is 25 years.

150 domains per block is 18.5 years.

200 domains per block is 12.5 years.

Personally, I don't feel like I am a rush to do a lot of domain registration fast. 15 years is good enough for me. We don't need to register tons of domain within a few short years, since not everybody will be willing to switch from central to decentralized.

Also, the population of humanity ain't likely to grow forever... So we can expect that growth at some taper off at some point in the future.

However, this generation rate have the potential to spark a long debate..so we need a method that let us decide quickly somehow.

Satoshi had essentially gave his words that we're going to stay low, at least for the time being.

In my opinion, this is the wise decision. There is no need to risk battle for high risk gain when we will obtain that anyway.

Plus, you also have to remember to factor in monetary inflation and federal reserve's policy. When the government does collapse, it will be incredibly m00t. Time is on our side, as long as we grow.

The value of wilicoin will be certainly almost worthless compared to bitcoin.

If people start using wilicoin and the currency become more popular, there may be the danger of wilicoin displacing bitcoin.

So the formula for creating problems and adjusting difficulty will be the same?(Forgive my ignorance)

The mobs might just be looking at him as a witchhunwfricklet.

Human judgement are fickle.

However, you could easily solve this problem by villagers owning the bridge outright.

Thanks for downloading when nobody else did.

You have to think through your example.

Suppose that bridge have access to a single village and the bridge owner decides to institute an annoying rule to annoy travelers and village people. That village will die out. The bridge will fall into disrepair and the owner will be left with a bridge that doesn't make any money.

In other words, the bridge owner have some incentive to maintain links or else he have to find another job.

Of course, if he doesn't have a profit motive, that's another matter.

However, the same thing can happen to people who put their money into a scam, or willingly sell the bridge to an evil property owner who have preferences outside of human norms.

If you institute a regulatory authority of some kind or have some kind of mob rules, the rule of laws will disappear, and the uncertainty cost will increase. This lead to less capital formation that alleviate your bridge problem.

I am please to announce that I am able to access bitpredict's VPS again thanks to aceat64.