Taken from another thread: |
|
|
|
Looks like it has something to do with being " out of memory"... Have you tried monitoring the memory usage upon clicking any of the export buttons? Took another cable, I know it's not relevant but just in case, and tried to export the transactions...
If it's not a data cable, it might not work [I don't have one to test]. After I open the suit I go to my accounts and then just go to the "..." and then "export to PDF".
~Snipped~
How long time it takes to get file done?
This shouldn't take longer than a few seconds, but sometimes I have to refresh my PC in order for it to appear on my desktop. |
|
|
|
Trust wallet was my first choice but later I discovered that it lacks the desktop option and I'm not a huge fan of smartphones.
I am looking for something where I can also store my USDT TRC20 coins along with some other major ones, hence have to stick with Trust Wallet.
There's another multi-cryptocurrency wallet [Exodus] that supports it: Which TRON tokens does Exodus support?- It has a desktop app and you can "also" use it with a hardware wallet, but it's closed source.
Note: I prefer to not vouch [DYOR]! |
|
|
|
Will Apple make payments itself or will it work through partners with a license to work with cryptocurrencies?
From the look of things, it's going to be the latter, but it's also worth noting that enabling BTCitcoin payments through Strike doesn't mean all of us can use their services [unfortunately, it's limited to users in the "US (except for two states), El Salvador and Argentina"]. |
|
|
|
This seems like fake news to me.There isn't any valid evidence about those rumors.
When Natalie Brunell interviewed him last week, he gave a hint by mentioning his tweet while also saying " we need to get more merchants on board".
@safar1980 There's a small error in the subject field [20202]. |
|
|
|
Let me know one thing, if you choose a range, from date to date, are only those transactions for this period listed below or there are the transactions since the beginning?
Only the transactions for that particular period of time will remain in that section, but the same thing doesn't apply when I export them [all of them are included].
If you're still keeping one of its previous version files, you can try downgrading the Trezor Suite temporarily [I've done it before when I was dealing with another issue and it worked]. Note: Make sure everything is backed up! |
|
|
|
But when you come to the export menu and try to export the data into CSV ... it goes to infinite loading. I updated the suite, updated the HW it self (trezor one) to the last versions and it's still the same. Tried trough the web based suite. Changed the PC, tried both solutions and still the same  ~Snipped~ Anyone else having this issue with Trezor One? I have no issues with exporting data in all of the available formats and it's worth mentioning that you can export your data without connecting the Trezor One to your PC [make sure the "remember" function on Trezor Suite is checked for that wallet, then try the export function again (perhaps it's conflicting with something)]. Have you checked if both of your PCs are fully updated? |
|
|
|
- Trezor users who have never signed up to any newsletter claim to have received the phishing emails as well.
That's not good [SMH]! Why did they give those emails to MailChimp [those emails have nothing to do with their newsletter]? - I'm glad I bought my HW from one of their official resellers.- Reddit posts warning users about the attack are being downvoted.
IIRC, there was a way to either disable or hide that feature on each subreddit [they should temporarily do it]. This user claims he lost £55.000 after he received a phishing email. Another " victim".
List of other domains: |
|
|
|
So does the latest version of SMF (the software currently being used here)...
It seems that you're right [source], but considering the fact that the current forum software [SMF 1.1.19] has been heavily modified, I'm assuming it'd take an equal amount of time [or more] to modify the latest version; hence, it made sense to opt for Epochtalk! |
|
|
|
this one call the Trezor Model One looks decent
|
|
|
|
Nagkausap din kami ng ibang kasamahan ko sa trabaho na hindi pa pumasok dito at sabi nya ay mae-expire daw yong domain nila later this year pero di ko lang alam kung saan yon makikita (di kasi ako masyadong technical sa ganitong mga bagay).
Yes, tama sila... You can find that information sa previous post ko [click mo lang yung link sa huling quote]. Kung totoo ito, maglalaho ba sila na parang bula?
Kahit irenew pa nila yung domain, that could happen at any time [unfortunately] at mukhang mayroon na silang back up website: |
|
|
|
Because next millionth would after 50 years and then after another 50th year.
The first part [and almost 3/4th of the latter part] will happen sooner than that [refer to @Lucius's post]. Now people start thinking of possible ways to increase the limit from 21 million to a higher number.
But why would they think of such things [it doesn't really make sense, unless I'm missing something]? But I do have a question: is this 19,000,000th bitcoin in circulation right. What about bitcoin that isn't moving at all, such as Satoshi's 1 million holdings? this still in the circulation of bitcoin? or how many bitcoins that are sleeping right now which means that it is not in the circulation since it is not moving .
Technically, it's still part of the circulation... There's a difference between "not having any kind of activities" and "no longer having the ability to use them [only the latter is considered not part of the circulation]". |
|
|
|
It's like they have a gun pointed at them and someone forcing them to release software and hardware solutions before they have had a chance to test them properly.
Exactly, this might explain why few of the genesis editions have scratches: Just got the ledger nano S plus in the mail. Slight scratches on the metal.Perhaps he/she completely forgot the firmware and secure element parts 
It seems that apart from its cheap-looking screen, the " buttons feels cheaper" than the non-plus version! |
|
|
|
Sana maging mobile friendly rin tulad ng iba na madali lang magamit sa mga android na alam naman natin napakaimportante lalong lalo na kapag usapang cryptocurrency
Usually, pag hindi complicated or rather madaling gamitin yung mga ganitong apps, it's a trade off between convenience and security... If ever nagawa ko ito, update din ako sa thread about my personally experience with the said application and bank.
Looking forward to it  ~Snipped~
Salamat sa detailed review... Halos lahat ng mga bagong platforms, maganda ang services nila sa una, pero unfortunately, pumapanget in the long run [e.g. fees], but the fact na you mentioned lately, maraming bug sa app na ito, it's a major concern since papasok sila sa crypto and AFAICS, mas madaming issues ang pwedeng mangyari with crypto transactions. Is this a local bank who goes to digital?
AFAIK, they started as a neobank. |
|
|
|
By searching the web for reviews, there are nothing elsewhere.
That's due to the fact that they used to have a slightly different domain [powerrfactoryinc.com (archived)], but it seems that their hosting provider took down their website... |
|
|
|
Definitely a scam.
I registered 2 random accounts. The deposit address for each coin is the same:
(address scammer, don't send anything)
~Snipped~
looks like this scammer has got a lot of victims
Good catch... I'm surprised there's no report about the BTCitcoin address in question! Duplicate site found: https://forexlegaltrade.com , https://www.assetfxmarket.com
Found a few more [might come in handy in reporting it to their registrar]:
Domain name: bitverge.co
Creation Date: 2021-08-06T13:41:07.36Z
Registrar: NAMECHEAP INC
Registrar Abuse Contact Email: abuse@namecheap.com
Registrar Abuse Contact Phone: +1.9854014545 |
|
|
|
Parang malabo na yata mangyari na magsstable ang price ngayon.
Mukhang nag recover agad after nung nangyari kagabi [temporary market shock]. Apektado nito yung mga crypto user na gumagamit ng DEX.
Wala itong impact kung ang ginagamit nating platform is really a decentralized exchange. In short bawal na mag trade or mag hold ng crypto sa mga hindi rehistradong wallet.
AFAICS, pwede mo paring ihold yung funds sa mga non-custodial wallets, pero once na mag padala ka sa addresses from custodial wallets, kailangan mong iprovide ang certain information para maverify nila ito. Gusto ko lang malaman ang magiging epekto nito sa atin at sa crypto world.
As long as hindi ka mag tatransact sa isang user from EU na gumagamit ng centralized exchanges, safe yung information mo. Bilang isang user ng CEX o ibang custodial crypto services, obliged ka ilagay info ng sender at receiver kada-transaction (over EU 1,000) na gagawin mo.
Unfortunately, it's slightly worse than that [source]. |
|
|
|
Meron po akong dalawampu't anim na pirasong USPI Silver Coins na collection mga kapatid bebenta ko po Thirty Thousand Pesos plus shipping
Base dun sa presyo nila, am I correct in assuming na hindi sila graded? If "YES", then baka mahirapan ka sa pag benta ng mga ito [unfortunately]. at cp ko defective na rin dahil nabasa parehong nag ghost touch no choice na po ako.
Not sure kung gaano kasevere yung issue, pero if you can do what @ Sanitough suggested, you should follow " this" format. |
|
|
|
They are requiring the whole lot of information from the exchanges to discharge the recipient details worth over 1000 Euros which is insane because these amounts are way too low.
Based on the first bullet point on that screenshot, it's slightly worse than that... So every time when you send something from a hardware wallet like ledger of trezor and the balance is written to a new address in the same wallet you will have to re-verify that new address ??
Something like that, but realistically, I don't think they'd be able to ask for such information if the other end is "not" a centralized exchange. On top of that all of your crypto must now be held in an exchange, meaning you cannot hold your private keys and when a hack happens you lose everything...
AFAICS, there's no restriction with keeping your funds on a non-custodial wallet. I think the next step will be to try to kill DEX.
I don't think they'd be able to successfully kill a real decentralized exchange. |
|
|
|
we are only going to allow smart people to post.
~Snipped~
starting next week, everyone with an IQ below 120 will be banned.
Inner voice: But my mother always told me that those who have high IQ scores aren't really smart and the score/number in question, is an accurate representation of the time it takes for their brain to process information!
@nc50lc Wait for me |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
maybe that is true in some parallel universe.
