I am not sure if there is a difference between people who registered their wallet prior to the date and those who doesn't, but wasn't this an error that the dev team still trying to resolve? Although it's been a while now since this happens. There are some people at the telegram asking about this and the team said they were trying to resolve this.

Plus, there will be a reputation-based loan. This is one of LEND future goal, isn't it?

With reputation based loan, the borrower will more or less be forced to return his loan as a case of default will taint his record

If you look at the post above and below you, you'll see that they have a bounty project, which covers the social channels too. So yeah, they actually are focusing on marketing too.

A little advise, you'll need to start building your post history and quality from as early as you can. You'll need merit to rank up. And this kind of post is clearly made in seconds without reading carefully. Read this page, and you'll get the idea of what is currently happening

Uhh... Can you be sure of this? And if you can, what factor does make you so sure that the coin would exactly reached that point at the said time?

It would be a plus if you can add team's personal LinkedIn to each of their profile. With so many ICO turned unfortunate these days, usually a LinkedIn profile would help people considering the legality of your project

I see. Thank you for answering. As long as a soft cap is reached, we are good to go. A hard cap, although good and really handy if reached, it doesn't have to be reached for a project to run

So why do you have to have two threads and having a possibility of creating confusion for people to properly follow your updates and discuss with other investors? One thread that's combined and giving people one same room to discuss would be better.

I would actually address to this problem in order to clear the situation and helps people understand that not all of those scam accusation by users who didn't get payment was actually because the team abandoned their project, scamming investors, etc. I am not part of the team. I was simply someone who was here from the first time ETHLend started, supporting them, holding my tokens, and of course (as I am a sane investors with brain) I'd like to see the price grow. And this kind of post would easily scare people away if not explained correctly.

His claim of so many people not receiving payments, it's been explained over and over that some was simply because of misunderstanding, the payment will be done in batches, every week, for 2 millions token each week. with first come first serve basis. If you're late and you got to the last of the line, despite you're being an early investors or early supporters, the fault was yours because you missed the announcement, but rest assured that the payment will be done, sooner or later. You'll receive your payment.

Some people are also got their payment late because of other people trying to manipulate the system by claiming his reward. This fake claim got reported, the payment got delayed because of the report, etc. Such an unfortunate event, really, but on the bright side, at least the true eligible user will get their payment, hopefully when the price is right.

And then... there is this kind of people... I don't know how to categorize him, so I left it out to you to decide which category he fell into.

You see, based on his post below,


you can't conclude if he actually finally followed the binance bounty or not, because his question was left unanswered, or if he follow other bounty program or not. But we can safely assume that if he followed any, it should be (at least) binance program. I've tried to search for his username "eldiablo666" on both of the binance spreadsheet and the final spreadsheet, and I found none. I can only conclude 2 things from this, either

(1) he never enrolled and it will be safe to assume that his post is merely to further create confusion on this thread, or

(2) he did enrolled to binance program, but he never submitted the form, which resulting his name would never appear. And of course, it won't be fair to blame the admins for this, as we had a huge degree of responsibility on checking if our name is already listed on any bounty spreadsheet or not. Even if he forgot to fill it on the first place, on the first form submission, he could easily fix this by contacting admin about this mistake and/or submitted the final form and explained later to bounty manager about why his name didn't appear on the binance list, but he claimed a portion on the final form. As we can see that his name never appear on any form, (except if he use his telegram name, and if that's the case, then I'll humbly asked you to informed us of your telegram name here) I think we can say he indeed never actually submitted any form, despite the instruction. Ultimately, whose fault will this be? Manager's?

Given that the project admin's last activity was one month ago, and that this thread is barely living, we can conclude that they are not serious with their project, I won't advise you to invest before they show any significant movements, like update or answering questions about their project.

You'll need ETH to pay gas, so technically you'll only need to have as much as it needs to pay the fee, although (just like how MEW advice), it's better to have some stored there in case of future use.

Yes, they do. I suggested a feature and they discussed it with their team, and the dev themselves are very frequently coming here these days to address to people's concern. I can't see where did your opinion that they didn't give attention come from

Have you try to edit the config file? The needed conf is on the OP. The dev team is quite active, they'll reply soon to address this problem

According to the whitepaper I read from the web link, the ICO will end at mid april (I can only guessed from their table of discount list) but someone on telegram informed that it'll start on April 20th and end on June?

Awalnya saya mau abaikan sih, ga guna banget memperdebatkan masalah sepele, apalagi di post bawahnya udah pasang pernyataan kalo hanya menyampaikan pendapat, walau (sejujurnya, buat saya) mungkin agak memancing dan kurang enak karena berkali-kali mempertegas bitcoin dengan nge bold kata tersebut.

Kemudian, ini topik yang awalnya cuma "memberikan pendapat" kok d ulang lagi dengan cara penyampaian yang kian kurang enak. Entah mau kejar post atau gimana.

Ok, mari saya klarifikasi.


Post saya menuliskan, "bisa" dan bukan "adalah". Saya menyadari dan tahu bahwa EtherDelta adalah exchange, dan untuk token kompatibel dengan ether.

Saya pun sudah menyampaikan alasan saya mengatakan dia bisa dipakai sebagai wallet, yaitu karena kita pegang sendiri private dan public key nya, sehingga secara keamanan, mungkin bisa dibilang lebih baik daripada beberapa exchange yang ada.


Ya, ini thread diskusi wallet bitcoin. Dan ya, saya tahu EtherDelta tidak kompatibel dengan bitcoin. Tapi, silahkan baca post saya sekali lagi, saya tidak menyatakan bahwa ED bisa untuk menjadi wallet bitcoin, saya hanya mengatakan ED bisa jadi wallet, dan itu juga saya merujuk wallet untuk ether. Anda sendiri yang menyimpulkan saya menyatakan wallet itu untuk bitcoin.

Lalu, untuk post yang sedikit melenceng, ini thread wallet bitcoin, tapi kenapa saya turut memanggapi pernyataan tentang ether? Saya merujuk pada post saya ini


Sebagai catatan kecil untuk anda, thread ini dibuat pada Januari 2015, dan ether diluncurkan di Juli 2015 kalau saya tidak salah ingat.

Saya rasa, jika ether diterbitkan lebih cepat dari thread ini, mungkin ETFBitcoin juga akan mengajukan judul yang membahas wallet sekaligus, bukannya terbatas pada bitcoin. Pendapat pribadi, tentunya.

Jadi, ya saya paham benar bahwa thread ini awalnya (dan seharusnya) membahas wallet bitcoin, akan tetapi seperti post saya, thread akan menjadi lebih hidup jika judul sedikit diperluas, mengingat bitcoin bukan lagi satu-satunya blockchain yang berdiri saat ini. Kemudian, sedikit melenceng karena menanggapi pertanyaan seseorang akan lebih baik daripada membahasnya dari sisi negatif berkali-kali.

Terakhir, saya rasa kalimat "koar-koar tapi salah" kurang tepat untuk menggambarkan saya, karena saya lebih dari bersedia membaca sekian banyak artikel dan memberikan rujukan atau tautan untuk mendukung post saya.

Silahkan lihat history saya dan bandingkan dengan milik anda. Terima kasih.

Although more exchange means more visibility and liquidity, solely being listed on big exchange themselves is not enough. I'm referring to a token project that runs on dental health (whose name better left hidden) that's successfully being listed on hitbtc, a prestigious achievement at that time, but instead of growing they just stuck and slowly sinking due to having a huge sell orders and less buy orders. I believe this is because they have a less strong community, people who are not enthusiastic enough.

My opinion would be, although a good exchange(s) is very welcome, having listed without a strong community and support can lead to a backfire.

Salam dari India,

Saya ingin membagikan informasi tentang proyek Ponzi MLM bernama GB21 yang belakangan ini mengincar Indonesia. Mereka menanamkan akar mereka melalui proyek scam yang berkembang dengan amat cerdik di India seperti gainbitcoin, bitcoingrowthfund.com, dst. Penipu (scammers) dibalik proyek tersebut kini memiliki program baru dengan nama GB21 di negara-negara Asia Tenggara dan terutama Indonesia. Saya yakin anda semua cukup waspada untuk menghindari proyek ini, namun beberapa orang mungkin masih akan terperosok ke dalamnya.

Ini adalah permintaan untuk membagikan informasi ini ke sebanyak mungkin orang. Orang-orang ini tidak mengincar mereka yang melek teknologi ataupun orang-orang yang mengunjungi forum bitcointalk. Sebaliknya, mereka menincar pelaku bisnis berskala kecil, dan profesional berusia paruh baya yang umumnya tidak memiliki waktu untuk mencaritahu tentang legitimasi mereka. Mereka umumnya menyebarluaskan diri mereka melalui word of mouth (getok tular, omongan dari mulut ke mulut) di kota-kota tingkat 2 (kalau saya terjemahkan bebas dan referensi dari sini, kurang lebih seperti Surabaya, Bandung, Medan, Semarang, Palembang, Makassar, Jogja, dan Pekanbaru) dan meyakinkan orang untuk mendanai mereka dengan janji yang amat tinggi.

Tolong sebarluaskan informasi ini kepada masyarakat umum agar mereka tidak jatuh ke dalam skema ponzi ini. Banyak orang di India yang telah kehilangan uang mereka dan orang-orang ini tengah diselidiki.

Silahkan cek link di bawah ini untuk informasi yang lebih detail mengenai FIR (First Information Report) dst.

Is this the beginning of the endgame for Amit Bhardwaj?

Topik yang sudah cukup tua, tapi disusun berdasarkan penelitian mendalam di board lokal India oleh tmfp berjudul Amit Bhardwaj/Kumar and a HashOcean clone called Gainbitcoin.

Mungkin anda semua telah mengetahui tentang hal ini, tapi yang terpenting adalah menyebarkan informasi ini kepada mereka yang tidak terlalu paham akan teknologi. Orang-orang ini (maksudnya si scammers) menyebabkan nama cryptocurrency menjadi jelek dan membawa kemunduran pada seluruh ekosistemnya.

Original thread and courtesy: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3164897.0

---

Sedikit tambahan penelitian dari BitrentX, mereka sudah ada di Bali, dan berikut link yang mungkin bisa ditonton

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L_WgZhhW9Bk
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K4jzxUy6YgQ
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dorI_WhZG5A

Kalau baru beberapa kali kena report, maksudnya dalam skala kecil, ban nya memang sedikit lebih lama dari ban pertama, tapi eventually sama mereka akan dibuka lagi. Beda kasus dengan kalau kakak udah professional spammer 

Lengkapnya mungkin bisa dilihat di sini, page khusus buat FAQ ban

https://telegram.org/faq_spam

Kalo udah dirasa cukup info nya, bisa bantu di lock threadnya biar ga pada spam

I'm afraid that even though some people who careful enough would first confirm this "investment" to indodax's HQ, there are lots of new people that wouldn't do that. IMO, having little to no experience, it wont cross their mind to contact HQ. Hopefully they'll search for some reference and information here, though. So, best thing I can think of to inform people here is by bumping this thread up (or temporarily pin this thread, if mods allowed), and relies on word of mouths to spread the info.

Having this in Indonesian would help too. If mod allow to temporarily pin this, I'll help translating on the post below

Edit: Link to the translated thread into Indonesian https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3183419.0

I checked the link just because of my curiosity and I can confirm that they have the mac wallet. It's above the incomplete android version.