I believe the keyword here is "will" (i bolded them), which means the said event happen in the future, as in "6th of March" future.

I'd like to add a classic answer of "the early bird get the freshest or fattest or chubbiest worm", ethlend has established its name on people before tokenlend even aired.

Go to their app, install metamask to proceed to signup, then you can start a loan request with ETH as your collateral. As for the interest rate, I am not really sure, but if you're really interested, you can join their telegram chanel, the team are more than ready to reply your inquires there.

Come to my mind, a significantly easier method, will be to join their telegram community, although I am also aware that not every project will have a telegram channel. With telegram, they would pin such important message as a swap, which make you only need to check back every now and then to read the pinned message. You can mute the channel if you feel they give too much notification. Check every once a week is enough, I think.

As in 100 projects? My advise would be to let go of some and only focus on those that you see most prospective. Hold some and sell the rest. Then, on those you hold, follow their news and update

You can check their site, it's been running for couple of months now, and funding hundreds of eth. They require you to install metamask in order to get in, though, just a precaution.

From a few projects that I followed, only little portions of project did swaps, most were --unfortunately-- meet the failure before they reached a stage where they need to swap, either because of they did an upgrade or because they want to fulfill market's demand.

One of the easiest way to follow a swap is, of course, by following their official thread and social account. Projects that will undergo a swap most likely will put an announcement about this several days or weeks before the first date of swap

So basically your goal to cut the company's budget is by offering the HR an already sorted and more focused list and of candidates so that they don't have to waste time to sort the candidates by themselves?

A slight confusion, one of your goal is to reduce cost spent by both job seeker and hirer by acting as a bridge for both side. While this aim can be reached and actualized on the job seeker's side, doesn't the opposite effect happen to the job hirer side? To recruit employee, companies had allocated certain funds bestowed to HR department. Now, because they hire you as their bridge, they'll need a higher cost as they had to pay to use your service as well as still has to funds their HR dept.

AFAIK, the swap terms and conditions are vary on each project, depends on the dev's decision. Some token just need to sit on an exchange and they'll automatically swapped to higher version while some needs you to "return" the coin to their desktop wallet for the swap. Furthermore, some dev allowed a special case where old token holders, under certain circumstances, can manually upgrade their token by sending it to dev's designated address and the dev will send them back the better version, while some, well some will just ignore you.

A good example that's based on my own experience is PSB (no longer exist, swapped to TOA). They upgraded their coin by simple method where holders only need to keep their coin on an exchange, and the coin will swapped automatically to newer version. A little while after the coin upgrade, they did another swap, rebranding or fusioning or whatever, to a coin called TOA. This time, they require you to transfer your coin to their wallet and it'll be swapped to TOA.

In case of someone missing the event... well, if you check their thread, there is someone missing the event, he just let that be, though, as the coin is a little bit worthless.

p.s.: does this topic belong to this board? Doesn't it have a better and more fitting board? Alt-coin discussion, maybe?

You missed my question.

Another question, wouldn't creating an escrow payment as a method (for the case of both party unsure of each side's trustability) better than creating a resolution center?

Better do it on the reserved childboard in "bounties".

Also, I wonder if it'll only be a big transaction gateway like shoppings that worth at least tens of dollars or it'll serve micro ones too?

---

Poke, poke... We meet

Typical spam. I don't think you even read the OP yet, let alone their WP. You can get updates easily by joining their telegram

Sepertinya belum ada yang menyatakan kalo bounty hunting itu sebenarnya agak gambling, karena hasilnya didapat di akhir periode ICO dan ada dua faktor yang mempengaruhi banget seberapa "kaya" kita pas bayaran, yaitu: (1) besarnya nilai token-per-btc atau token-per-eth atau apalah, dan (2) scam atau tidaknya proyek.

Agak gawat kalo kita udah fokus di hunting dan ternyata di minggu ke sekian ICO, dev kabur dan ga bayaran, makan angin deh. Atau, jika bayaran, ternyata rate nya kecil atau kurang layak jika dibandingkan dengan kebutuhan rumah tangga untuk beberapa bulan (rata-rata bayaran project ICO butuh beberapa bulan). Makanya, mungkin kerja di dunia nyata masih dibutuhkan, walau mungkin untuk sekedar ,emenuhi dana kebutuhan hidup.

ED is not really a good news. It is good to serve as a temporary platform for those who want to sell their coin quickly and didn't have any patience for a better exchange, but that's it. IMO, ED even scares and overwhelm new people that has little experience in trading, as ED has a huge learning curve compared to centralized exchange.

That "large sell orders", do you mean sell and buy wall? A wall is actually not something that need a "cause" (or "excuse") to be present in an orderbook. It is there, and every body know its presence, it exist to help maintain and support the price of coins. AFAIK, a lot (if not all) exchange has buy and sell wall, either created by their bot or a whale trying to keep their assets steady.

It sparked my curiosity, if you allow a mini transaction, from crypto to fiat, either from your side or from consumer's side, how will you (or they) cover the tx fees or avoid the infamous dust transaction? Given that by mini transaction can be translated as small as hundreds of satoshi

Dev team, it will be nice if you change your policy of anonymity by informing us your team. I mean, if you have nothing to hide, why not? It can be considered as fulfilling investor's demand, and I should agree that a project without clear team background is a huge red flag.

Not finished yet, the bounty sales (and by sales, I believe you mean distribution) happen for 2 millions worth of LEND every week

So the 0.12$ pegged IPC is only for early contributor while the other will have a rate that is not-pegged or... what?