... won't burning them make the rest of the BCH proportionally worth more? (assuming BCH isn't forked to remove the 21M hard limit) Sorry if I have missed something but why would BCH coins be burnt? A win-win between BCH true believers who'll dispose of the BTC they call "1MB cripple coins" (-Roger Ver) in exchange for making their BCH more scarce and BTC true believers who don't want to sell their split BCH ( pronounced 'bish') into circulation between true believers and BCH victims, possibly incurring criminal or civil liability, but do want to be compensated for the split value-destroyed |
|
|
|
... won't burning them make the rest of the BCH proportionally worth more? (assuming BCH isn't forked to remove the 21M hard limit) |
|
|
|
|
Payment address PMd.
ETA: Paid, another in-kind donation of goods to charity pending.
|
|
|
|
TheButterZone, here's a word of advice: Ignore that shill account and save yourself the time. It is likely someone that got denied entry to a campaign or got booted out of one since both aTriz and Aventhe are campaign managers. Therefore, their concern is not legitimate but rather just a vendetta out of spite.
 |
|
|
|
Well i can't go alone to bring this revolution  The world is a dangerous place to live; not because of the poeple who are evil, but because of people who don't do anything about it. - Albert Einstein Again, quote properly. Legendary members, the forum's global moderators, all complaining, wasting our time/money (because time IS money). You're not alone. Be the one who finally gives us enough leverage to tear down this wall! |
|
|
|
No, they haven't LITERALLY admitted that, in their posts I quote below. Fucking English, how does it work?
They were libeled/bullied into proxy bullying ME/micromanaging MY trust page - removing honest ratings in accordance with the feedback page's instruction that Positive="or had a successful trade". Well guess what? I'll change my freely-given ratings when the feedback page no longer instructs me to do so as-is status quo, and makes Neutral ratings for "had a successful trade", rather than Positive. The problem is not you but them! They knew they will get positive feedback if they trade with you, You are not the problem right now, Their intentions are. Fix my quote, stalker. No, they know they should get positive feedback if they have a successful trade with whom, on this forum (who actually obey the feedback page's instruction)? That's right...  Well i guess, you too are the part of the problem! You are not seeing the bigger picture here. A Scammer buys an email from you, gets a +1, Does a few trades, gets more green. Then finally Tries to get a loan or starts an escrow and runs away with a good amount of BTC. If people start giving out the positive feedback for cents or few dollars, the community will suffer a lot. Well I guess, fuck you and your libelous SHIT. I didn't make the forum rule I've cited over and over and over again. But I'm damn sure going to abide by it as long as our complaints don't result in change. How about instead of trying to micromanage ratings, you try to macromanage them & get the forum's rule changed? Nobody's stopping you. How much BTC do you have to "bribe" with? |
|
|
|
No, they haven't LITERALLY admitted that, in their posts I quote below. Fucking English, how does it work?
They were libeled/bullied into proxy bullying ME/micromanaging MY trust page - removing honest ratings in accordance with the feedback page's instruction that Positive="or had a successful trade". Well guess what? I'll change my freely-given ratings when the feedback page no longer instructs me to do so as-is status quo, and makes Neutral ratings for "had a successful trade", rather than Positive. The problem is not you but them! They knew they will get positive feedback if they trade with you, You are not the problem right now, Their intentions are. Fix my quote, stalker. No, they know they should get positive feedback if they have a successful trade with whom, on this forum (who actually obey the feedback page's instruction)? That's right... Fucking HATE having to be redundant, but: If you want to prove that you're actively using my email forwarding service, sign this message inside the quotes with the BTC address in your contract & PM it only to TheButterZone: "I waive the right to privacy specifically limited to TheButterZone publicly posting only the dates from my email forwarding traffic log."
|
|
|
|
So in this case why are Atriz and Aventhe not getting their red paint? (...) They have literally admitted that they bought the emails to gain trust. No, they haven't LITERALLY admitted that, in their posts I quote below. Fucking English, how does it work? They were libeled/bullied into proxy bullying ME/micromanaging MY trust page - removing honest ratings in accordance with the feedback page's instruction that Positive= "or had a successful trade". Well guess what? I'll change my freely-given ratings when the feedback page no longer instructs me to do so as-is status quo, and makes Neutral ratings for "had a successful trade", rather than Positive. 1. I needed funds for a short amount of time for my own reason, this is just miscommunication between lender and me.
2. I'm using my business email for this account, one email per btt account.
3. Ok? Is not wanting to spend that much money on coins a problem?
I really can't prove that you're telling the truth. You can keep making excuses, I want to see what other people have to say. 2. You know how shitty SMF is. It even says that the email has to be active. Ive tried making accounts with the same email, and with invalid domains and they still work. Sure okay. I guess the trust for email is a bit too much. I'll shoot a pm and get that removed. The rest are all valid though. I too would like to apologize for this, as aTriz said for himself, it is not how I would like to be portrayed.
I have asked both TBZ and Taras to change the trust rating to a neutral one or remove it if they wish to. The loan from Taras was also for a private reason, though it got repaid as soon as I got paid by my employers.
I would have to agree that it sounds shady in this case, yet it was never my intention to do so. As for the scamming as you said, a user already knows my address.
Once more I apologize for this, and I hope to be on this forum for years to come, with or without trust.
Regards, - Aventhe
|
|
|
|
Quoted for the future, but it seems your PGP will expire beginning 2018.
I just keep bumping its expiration date every year. That plus the revcert should be enough in case SHTF & I need to generate a new primary key. Bumped: -----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----
Version: PGP Universal 2.9.1 (Build 347)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=SV8c
-----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK----- |
|
|
|
To save BCH from going to $0, you must burn it! |
|
|
|
Is ViaBTC's accelerator still running? My bookmark failed last time I checked. At least with them you could only submit exactly at the top of each hour (before they got full the other at least 59 minutes of the hour), so it required setting an alarm to remind you to get to your computer minutes early, refreshing to get past server lag, having the TXID in your clipboard ready to keystroke combo that bastard in, at the exact moment your time server-synced clock struck xx:00:00. I accelerated a few on Periscope screencast for those who couldn't manage to do that. You mean I could have charged for that game?  |
|
|
|
WTF!? So that, plus "Risked BTC amount", plus "or had a successful trade"...
Well, it seems that you are confused about it. I tried to clarify that there's a huge difference between adding a ~Ļand keeping/removing a rating from someone. I tend to rarely leave positive ratings, regardless of whether there were deals with someone or not.  Can Bitcointalk's feedback system have just a single aspect that isn't a steaming pile of useless shit?
IMO it isn't too difficult to understand if you give it some time and think it really through. So, you understand it well enough to rarely use 1/3 of the steaming pile of useless shit. Why then, should the forum have any rating level other than negative? I do remember reading theymos' post somewhere that the new forum was going to be released "next year". That was multiple years ago.
That doesn't necessarily imply a completely revamped trust system. With this much donated & ongoing transactional BTC at stake, why in the fuck would we want not only to keep Bitcointalk SMF's feedback system a steaming pile of useless shit because dev time is ostensibly focused on the new forum, but to also celebrate the release of the new forum with a similarly-steaming pile of useless shit for its feedback system? |
|
|
|
Should be able to revcert this one if need be... 84D0 3070 F720 471F 5DB2 FF1D 4C8F 5066 43AB 27C3
-----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----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=lsvl
-----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK----- |
|
|
|
Instead, since I don't understand how DT works & probably never will, here are the newest additions to my trust list that I appended & got mixed in after I hit Update (or maybe I should just replace my entire trust list with "~DefaultTrust" or whatever will fuck the entire membership out, because you assholes can't or won't properly manage & read feedback):
-snip-
Excluding them doesn't do what you think it does IMO. Adding ~ to someone's name, as a DT2 member has the following effects: 1) It makes their ratings worthless from your perspective. This does nothing if they are not DT1, DT2 and you don't use any lower tiers (whichever they may be on). It does not affect what others see. 2) It may discredit their own ratings. 3) Your rating still has an effect on their total trust score and will be seen by others by default. WTF!? So that, plus "Risked BTC amount", plus "or had a successful trade"... Can Bitcointalk's feedback system have just a single aspect that isn't a steaming pile of useless shit? |
|
|
|
I won't be giving any more positive feedback for the time being.
Not being able to honestly follow the forum feedback page's instruction for "or had a successful trade" because the rating system is shit & includes "Risked BTC amount" for apparently no fucking reason (not even weighting, as I explained my thoughts on above), makes me want to ragequit. Instead, since I don't understand how DT works & probably never will, here are the newest additions to my trust list that I appended & got mixed in after I hit Update (or maybe I should just replace my entire trust list with "~DefaultTrust" or whatever will fuck the entire membership out, because you assholes can't or won't properly manage & read feedback): ~Chevas Regal
~Lone Shark
~LuanX3
~betudontbet
~bL4nkcode
~subSTRATA
~Roboabhishek
~zupdawg
~SM23031997
~CoolWave
~aTriz
~Decoded
~Aventhe
~BlockEye
~jamalaezaz These now-excluded users (except aTriz & jamalaezaz) picked my 3letter1number.com domain. Why are you so certain nobody would want a short uncommon email domain anymore, hilariousetc? I personally am sick of seeing @gmail.com all the time, both aesthetically & because it makes everyone an easier target for having their emails hacked or legally/illegally viewed by totalitarians. You seem to have ignored where I said this: On that front, save 1 person, the preference has been for my 3letter1number.com domain over my 13letter.com - which makes sense, as I'm not sure how many 3letter.com (did I forget about any 2letters?) email services are still alive other than Cox & AOL. ICQ, MSN (now Live.com, spammer/scammer central)? ETA: Send everyone (except jamalaezaz the mystery box customer, obviously) in the code box above, a PM with this paragraph quoted: If you want to prove that you're actively using my email forwarding service, sign this message inside the quotes with the BTC address in your contract & PM it only to TheButterZone: "I waive the right to privacy specifically limited to TheButterZone publicly posting only the dates from my email forwarding traffic log." |
|
|
|
But for example Quickseller (escrowing to himself with alts) and Bobsurplus (known for altcoin pump&dumps with several connections to scams/scammer) are quite questionable/shady members on your trust list.
... "Fuck's sake, man, you're amateur." -Christian Bale Prefix a user's name with a tilde (~) if you want to exclude them from your trust network. |
|
|
|
You're using the feedback system as intended, but this isn't really an issue with anything you are doing, but (arguably) others just buying things merely for the default trust feedback (which like it or not people obviously want to help make them look more trusted/established) for whatever reason, hence why some people are likely just buying things they very probably don't need, want or use. On that front, save 1 person, the preference has been for my 3letter1number.com domain over my 13letter.com - which makes sense, as I'm not sure how many 3letter.com (did I forget about any 2letters?) email services are still alive other than Cox & AOL. ICQ, MSN (now Live.com, spammer/scammer central)? Nope. My problem is when someone does a trade, just for that number. That number holds a disgusting amount of weight around here. And it just ends up with people looking for others who can give it to them easily.
Basically people looking for another CanaryInTheMine.
I've either forgotten or wasn't fully briefed on CITM. Are the feedback instructions the same now as they were back then? Was CITM putting down risked BTC to add undeserved weight to those who sent first/before contracts were in force? If I recall correctly CITM was leaving feedback for anyone who did a trade with him then adding them to his trust list so he was artificially inflating his own score and people would then be only trading with him for the inevitable feedback and the inclusion onto default trust (thus essentially just buying their way onto it). Ok, well for what it's worth, my depth is 2 & this is my list: ~theymos
~Luke-Jr
dooglus
~grue
gmaxwell
~piuk
Tomatocage
~BadBear
~GlooBoy
~Bicknellski
~Wardrick
~Xialla
Mitchell
~cornfeedhobo
~yogg
~BitWhale
~bitcoinlitcoinbtcltc
~Bobsurplus
~fruito
~n3rvi0zz0
~Quickseller
~Graven
~BitcoinDistributor
~adzino
~GiovanniDiCosimo
~bitswapp
~valduz10 |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
