Bitcoin Forum
May 10, 2024, 07:47:31 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 [19] 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 ... 377 »
361  Economy / Reputation / Re: How do you guys feel about trust farming? on: November 12, 2017, 02:05:47 AM
Nope. My problem is when someone does a trade, just for that number. That number holds a disgusting amount of weight around here. And it just ends up with people looking for others who can give it to them easily.

Basically people looking for another CanaryInTheMine.

I've either forgotten or wasn't fully briefed on CITM. Are the feedback instructions the same now as they were back then? Was CITM putting down risked BTC to add undeserved weight to those who sent first/before contracts were in force?

Here we go again with the fucktarded debate about trust because people just look at useless colored/formatted numbers & are too lazy or stupid to click a hyperlink called Trust:, then read text and the numbers that actually matter:

What is the purpose with entering "Risked BTC amount"? To weight the rating, whether positive, negative, or neutral. What "Risked BTC amount"/weight did I place on the "or had a successful trade" positives for email forwarding? That's right, zero, zilch, zip, nil, nought, nothing, nix, diddly-squat, BECAUSE THEY SENT FIRST - no BTC or theft of services was risked on my end, because their contracts only came into force as soon as they paid & I saw at least 1 confirm.

When I do fill the "Risked BTC amount" involving a contract, it's because it was already in force, and the person either deserved the weight of +/- trust for breaking or not breaking contract, or a neutral if the trade was successful in less than every sense of the word.

Would you prefer dishonesty; not categorizing successful trades as successful trades, as the feedback page instructs us all to do?

Quote
Date Registered:   June 22, 2012, 07:06:12 AM

You should definitely know that people only look at colors and usually dont check the trustpage.

Hence my first sentence/paragraph. Do you even read, bro?

It is fine to report a successful trade whatever the size/value but you could just give neutral trust in case of i.e. email and sms forwarding. Roll Eyes

I could, but then I would be dishonest and not following the forum's instruction to categorize successful trades as Positive, as bolded in my second paragraph and reiterated in my last. Do I need to take a screenshot of /index.php?action=trust;u=xxxx so you can NOT read that, as well? Again: Do you even read, bro?

You should know how much DT is worth for scams because people always fall for it. Since 2009.

If people not being caveat emptor is your problem, then join the rest of us wailing at a brick wall about how the feedback functionality is poorly coded in this forum...
Quote from: Bitcointalk.org footer
Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines
362  Economy / Reputation / Re: How do you guys feel about trust farming? on: November 12, 2017, 01:40:27 AM
Here we go again with the fucktarded debate about trust because people just look at useless colored/formatted numbers & are too lazy or stupid to click a hyperlink called Trust:, then read text and the numbers that actually matter:

What is the purpose with entering "Risked BTC amount"? To weight the rating, whether positive, negative, or neutral. What "Risked BTC amount"/weight did I place on the "or had a successful trade" positives for email forwarding? That's right, zero, zilch, zip, nil, nought, nothing, nix, diddly-squat, BECAUSE THEY SENT FIRST - no BTC or theft of services was risked on my end, because their contracts only came into force as soon as they paid & I saw at least 1 confirm.

When I do fill the "Risked BTC amount" involving a contract, it's because it was already in force, and the person either deserved the weight of +/- trust for breaking or not breaking contract, or a neutral if the trade was successful in less than every sense of the word.

Would you prefer dishonesty; not categorizing successful trades as successful trades, as the feedback page instructs us all to do?
363  Economy / Goods / Re: [WTS] Trivial Pursuit Bet You Know It & Scrabble - non-game trades considered on: November 08, 2017, 09:11:50 PM
bump
364  Other / Archival / [Auction] 1 Mystery Box - Round 10 on: November 07, 2017, 08:00:34 AM
All I will say is that the box will be worth about the same as the auction price. Will prioritize new items, then descend in condition if I run out of new items or the new items can't add up close enough. If the auction price is sufficiently high & my biggest box can't hold everything, I'll split everything across multiple packages.

Auction Terms (should go without saying, but: if violated, negative feedback with risked BTC will be left)

Only bid if YOU will receive my mystery box in 1 of the 50 United States of America.

Minimum Starting Bid: BTC0.02
Minimum Bid Increment: BTC0.005
Shipping: Free packaging, but the cheapest USPS shipping service based on dimensions, destination & weight counts towards auction price
End Date: 11/15/2017 @ 23:59:59 UTC-8 -> https://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/usa/los-angeles
Payment Deadline: My BTC address will be sent to winner at end of auction, and payment must be at least broadcast to the network within 8 hours
Late Payment Penalty: Negative feedback, which will be removed after you pay 2x the amount of your winning bid (you'll get 2x the mystery box)
365  Economy / Auctions / Re: [Auction] 1 Mystery Box - Round 9 on: November 07, 2017, 08:00:13 AM
PMed payment address.
366  Economy / Auctions / Re: [Auction] 1 Mystery Box - Round 9 on: November 06, 2017, 09:12:20 PM
bump
367  Economy / Auctions / Re: [Auction] 1 Mystery Box - Round 9 on: November 05, 2017, 08:11:59 PM
bump
368  Other / Meta / Re: Last 2 private message email notifications missed on: November 04, 2017, 09:19:56 PM
With 2 minute email check interval, local time zone, forum time vs network-synced computer time...
PM at 11:49:47 not received hit email at 17:00:00
PM at 12:51:39 not received hit email at 16:33:43
PM at 13:05:12 not received hit email at 14:36:50
PM at 13:10:28 not received hit email at 16:49:40
PM at 13:25:50 hit email at 13:43:17
PM at 13:43:09 not received was filtered to spam folder for having 2 email addresses in the message body? IDK
PM at 13:57:39 not received hit email at 14:32:46
PM at 14:29:37 not received hit email at 15:50:41
PM at 14:30:14 not received hit email at 14:47:37
PM at 14:47:42 hit email at 15:09:23
PM at 16:57:08 hit email at 16:58:06
PM at 17:48:37 hit email at 17:50:08
369  Other / Meta / Last 2 private message email notifications missed on: November 04, 2017, 08:05:50 PM
Not filtered by Cox to spam or trash.

Cox receiving problem or forum sending problem?
370  Economy / Goods / Re: TheButterZone's Mystery Boxes OF HATE on: November 04, 2017, 08:35:06 AM
I have room in my heart for a box of your hate.

If you'd like I have room in other people's hearts for your hate as well.

But you don't want to make room in your wallet? Show me the BTC#!

1J58WZ948mo3QCzhpZKWuVgaYvZQ6tjiTF <- this number has room

How many people do you think will get my mystery boxes OF HATE with only BTC0.00095014? Pathetic.

that's just my inbox

Begging?

371  Economy / Goods / Re: TheButterZone's Mystery Boxes OF HATE on: November 03, 2017, 06:33:54 PM
buttslam

You are retarded and I will cockslap you soon!

"soon"?

372  Economy / Auctions / Re: [Auction] 1 Mystery Box - Round 9 on: November 02, 2017, 10:05:44 PM
bump
373  Economy / Goods / Re: TheButterZone's Mystery Boxes OF HATE on: October 31, 2017, 06:20:27 PM
Hello,

No, Could you send them for worldwide? I'd to ship them to Indonesia.

Best regards,
++

So, you wanted negative feedback, moron? Happy to oblige!

I will pick something(s) ~worth the BTC you send (cost of shipping counts, but packaging is free)
& ship it USPS+delivery confirmation in my United States of America (FUCK YEAH!)
and I hope you will HATE IT
so much you donate it to a thrift store that benefits war criminals!

If you want me to ship outside my United States of America (FUCK YEAH!),
come to America (FUCK YEAH!) like it was the sexiest human alive & go blind!

374  Economy / Auctions / Re: [Auction] 1 Mystery Box - Round 9 on: October 31, 2017, 07:08:19 AM
bump
375  Bitcoin / Mycelium / Re: Claiming Bitcoin Cash From Mycelium Wallet on: October 29, 2017, 02:31:59 AM
Do you plan to write a guide on Mycelium and the BTG and BTX claiming processes? That would be very helpful!

BTX= https://bitcore.cc/claim.php
376  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Marketplace (Altcoins) / Re: [WTS] 13.81606722 CLAM on: October 27, 2017, 08:09:34 PM
If you don't like the USD/CLAM high above...

You will get 13.81606722 CLAM (my entire wallet balance; you choose the transaction fee subtracted from it) for BTC0.31086151.

Offer valid as long as https://poloniex.com/exchange#btc_clam shows the (intentional) all-time high (as someone unintentionally traded them for 1:1 on Bittrex) is 0.02250000 BTC/CLAM (7-7-2014, set zoom to All).
377  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Marketplace (Altcoins) / Re: [WTS] 729.18643499 BTX + charity donation for BTC (offer open/ignore lock) on: October 27, 2017, 08:09:15 PM
If you don't like the USD/BTX high above...

You will get 729.18643499 BTX (minus fee) & I will make an in-kind donation of goods in your name to charity, for the difference between your payment of BTC13.13272061 & average spot price, until I run out of my inventory to donate.

Offer valid as long as https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/bitcore/ shows the BTC/BTX all-time high is 0.0180101 BTC/BTX (4-28-2017 01:49:53 UTC).

378  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Marketplace (Altcoins) / Re: [WTS] 11,690.1493427 XLM + charity donation for BTC (offer open/ignore lock) on: October 27, 2017, 08:08:14 PM
If you don't like the USD/XLM high above...

You will get 11,690.1493427 XLM (minus fee) & I will make an in-kind donation of goods in your name to charity, for the difference between your payment of BTC0.72654278 & average spot price.

Offer valid as long as https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/stellar/ shows the all-time high is 0.00006215 BTC/XLM (1-4-2017 08:19:03 UTC).
379  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Marketplace (Altcoins) / Re: [WTS] 16.383488421 GBYTE + charity donation & 8696592797 BB on: October 27, 2017, 08:07:43 PM
If you don't like the USD/GBYTE high above...

You will get 16.383488421 GBYTE (minus fee) & I will make an in-kind donation of goods in your name to charity, for the difference between your payment of BTC6.36495035 & average spot price, until I run out of my inventory to donate.

Offer valid as long as https://bittrex.com/Market/Index?MarketName=BTC-GBYTE shows the all-time high is 0.38849787 BTC/GBYTE (6-30-2017/7-1-2017, depending on timezone).

I can either send the GBYTE directly to you after I receive (1 confirm) your BTC, or set up a bound payment so that as soon as the oracle sees 2 confirmations that you've paid me BTC, you can claim your GBYTE.



I will send you 8.696592797 gigablackbytes (minus fee) for BTC1.68930388. Offer subject to change.
380  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Marketplace (Altcoins) / Re: [WTS] 50000.666395 XRP + charity donation (offer open/ignore lock) on: October 27, 2017, 08:06:22 PM
If you don't like the USD/XRP high above...

I will give you my XRP wallet and private key* of 50000.666395 + its password & I will make an in-kind donation of goods in your name to charity, for the difference between your payment of BTC12.1985 & average spot price, until I run out of my inventory to donate.

Offer valid as long as the ATH (on https://athcoinindex.com/currencies/xrp) is 0.00024397 BTC/XRP (1-4-2018).

*called "secret key" in Ripple.
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 [19] 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 ... 377 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!