|
1621
|
Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: Time to switch on litecoin. BITCOIN IS DEAD for normal miner
|
on: December 22, 2012, 12:33:38 AM
|
Who made the rule that there is only room for ONE cryptocurrency? The market will decide that. There are lots of interesting ways for a lesser and greater cryptocurrency to complement one another.
Actually, no, there really isn't. Any reason I've ever been given that any other coin can "complement" BTC has been weak at best and amounts to "because I want to print my own money still *boohoo*". The only possible goal of LTC, as I've said before, is to ruin the idea of cryptocurrencies in general. There have been lots of people who have been turned off from BTC simply because LTC and other alt-coins exist. "Why waste time on money on BTC if people could just jump over to the exact same thing with a different name and leave me broke? Sounds like a scam" Hence: scamcoin Now, the market WILL decide. It'll decide that you're a victim of a pump-dump scam and you've just wasted your time. I'm just trying to help you out and tell you that you could be doing something productive with BTC instead of being an emo-kid that's upset you can't print your own money. You don't have to use LTC dumbass. All this talk about "economy building"...and what have you done so far for the Bitcoin Economy? Oh right nothing! LOL LOL LOL LOLFTFY you usually use more LOLs in caps. |
|
|
|
|
1623
|
Other / Off-topic / Re: To MPOE-PR
|
on: December 21, 2012, 10:55:21 PM
|
I'd like to sincerely apologize to MPOE-PR for my rudeness to her in the past. I've engaged in some trolling and it won't happen anymore. MPOE-PR, I appreciate the thought you put into your posts, and I have no business in needlessly detracting from them. You're not the propaganda account I originally perceived you to be.
Best wishes and happy holidays to all,
Bob
And you call yourself honest  |
|
|
|
|
1631
|
Economy / Goods / Re: [WTS] Samsung Galaxy Nexus [VZW, Toro]
|
on: December 19, 2012, 05:53:54 PM
|
Slight scuffing along the top of the plastic, otherwise perfect condition. I've got the original box too. Clean ESN, Currently running CM10. Taking reasonable offers.  I'd trade for a GSIII Whats the model number on it? |
|
|
|
|
1632
|
Other / Archival / Re: Bitcoinstore.com has encountered our first scammer.
|
on: December 19, 2012, 03:16:24 PM
|
This whole thread is such a joke.
It amazes me that it all revolves around Roger's own fuckup and $50
I think I'll be staying away from MD in the future.
I think you meant to say that this all revolves around one of my employee's fuckups, a dishonest customer, and my non-ability to let the customer get away with it. If I had let him get away with stealing $60, or if he had been an honest guy in the first place, none of this would be an issue. FTFY, get a PR person, you are doing it wrong. |
|
|
|
|
1634
|
Other / Archival / Re: Bitcoinstore.com has encountered our first scammer.
|
on: December 19, 2012, 02:02:16 PM
|
The point is, blockchain is a site you back which supports anonymity. By posting his info and declaring yourself part owner you were simultaneously pointing out that you have access to records that can track people, and showing that you can access them at any time for someone requesting them such as the authorities. Nethead wont do the right thing, he has 9 posts assuming its not just a puppet, just scam tag him and move on, dont wreck your reputation for 50 dollars.
All the information I posted here came from Bitcoinstore. None of it came from Blockchain.info (until after the scammer posted it himself) I am aware, I read the thread. But that does not matter, that is not what people will remember. It brings into question things like are the anonymous addresses actually anonymous? If the owners get raided for whatever reason will they just turn on all their users? I agree he owes you, but it is not worth it. |
|
|
|
|
1635
|
Other / Archival / Re: Bitcoinstore.com has encountered our first scammer.
|
on: December 19, 2012, 01:54:59 PM
|
|
The point is, blockchain is a site you back which supports anonymity. By posting his info and declaring yourself part owner you were simultaneously pointing out that you have access to records that can track people, and showing that you can access them at any time for someone requesting them such as the authorities. Nethead wont do the right thing, he has 9 posts assuming its not just a puppet, just scam tag him and move on, dont wreck your reputation for 50 dollars.
|
|
|
|
|
1638
|
Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: Devcoin
|
on: December 17, 2012, 02:40:18 PM
|
I have been successfully sending and receiving devcoins on the windows binary for a while now, grats Killer, excellent program and done quickly too! Please could you run the same test for the devda.ch wallet ? TY Yes, that one is in progress  |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
