Bitcoin Forum
May 03, 2024, 08:53:23 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 [74] 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 ... 200 »
1461  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: The real price of bitcoin, less than an iphone app on: March 16, 2014, 05:16:03 PM
If 400,000,000 people one day use Bitcoin, the value of all the bitcoins would exceed several trillion for sure.

This is once again apples to oranges.
1462  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Casascius coin address not showing up on blockchain? on: March 15, 2014, 02:43:48 PM
this address?
1Ag1qstBLPLsc8hwuJmEcrWJN9dc8LGndB

had 1 btc..and now reads empty.


Yup thats it! Thank you for helping me out here.

So what happened? Was the bitcoin you had infact empty?
I've been thinking of buying some casascius coins?

He already spent it a while ago:

Had a casascius silver coin and opened it when BTC spiked to $1100 couple months back.

He just wants to find the address because he wants to refill it perhaps? I personally don't think thats a good idea because the resell value is now gone anyway.
1463  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: I like ripple more than bitcoin on: March 12, 2014, 01:28:12 PM
I do not believe in ripple and wonder why it is so succesful on the marketcap charts.

Only several percent of the currency has ever been released, with 95%++ in control by the founders or the company. When supply is severely limited so that only a handful of units exist, it's easy to get ridiculous marketcaps.

It's like I sell a billionth of my company for $10. On paper the company is now worth $10,000,000,000. This is the exact same situation with Ripple.
1464  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: I like ripple more than bitcoin on: March 12, 2014, 01:25:23 PM
Ripple is more efficient than Bitcoin, it only takes a few seconds to transfer your Ripple and complete the transaction, before you get bored when you are using Bitcoin.

You need to understand why this is. Paypal and VISA are faster than Bitcoin in a way due to the underlying mechanisms. I believe Ripple has some type of trust based system where the nodes agree on who to trust. Bitcoin is fundamentally solving a different problem. Many people in the community are interested in Bitcoin because of the trustless nature of the network more so than the transaction speeds.

Also this shows you're very much unfamiliar with the speed at which Bitcoin operates. It's likely point of sale nodes will have code that checks the network for double spend attempts when accepting a transaction. Thus this means that 0 confirmation transactions are indeed likely to become the norm. Do you know how fast a 0 confirm is? It's very fast.

Ripple is more valuable in the future. In the near future Ripple will be the most popular digital currency around the world.

And where is your argument? All I see is immature naive wishful thinking. Nothing of substance at all.

since the price of it will be smooth rather than the Bitcoin. so, I prefer ripple more than bitcoin.

Market forces dictate the price, and Ripple has already had a rollercoaster of its own, thus negating your point entirely.
1465  Economy / Securities / Re: [ActiveMining] Official Shareholder Discussion Thread [Moderated] on: March 12, 2014, 10:38:34 AM
On the topic of finding a safe home for ActiveMining shares (one that is free from random DDOS, hacks, SEC closure and even theft by the owner itself) ;

Counterpartyd version 6.6 allows dividend payments to be made in bitcoin: https://www.counterparty.co/pay-dividends-with-bitcoin/

Very cool.

Yes but how many counterparty coins will Ken need to buy to make this work? Also how does Ken issue more shares? Because it's 10,000,000 in the wild until 0.0025 is paid, and then another 15,000,000 enter the wild. So does counterparty allow Ken to issue more shares? Or if not, can he issue all 25,000,000 at once but force a logic rule on the 15,000,000 preventing dividends until the 0.0025 is paid?
1466  Economy / Securities / Re: [ActiveMining] Official Shareholder Discussion Thread [Moderated] on: March 12, 2014, 05:24:42 AM
hi.  Cry
Very long time ago, I bought ACtM shares at the BTC-TC exchange.
How to me to receive them on Crypto-Trade?  Huh

Please give me the instruction.

Only shares bought on Crypto-Trade can be traded on Crypto-Trade. All shares bought on BTCTC and Bitfunder are in lock down and are blocked from trading.

Somehow it's legal for the Crypto-Trade shares and not the rest. Go figure.
1467  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Dorian SIGNED Satoshi's PGP key on APRIL FOOL'S DAY last year on: March 07, 2014, 02:46:57 AM
I don't understand. Can someone chime in and prove the details.
1468  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Satoshi ruined a poor man's life on: March 07, 2014, 02:43:40 AM
Satoshi must immediately sign a message from the genisis block proving he is not this Dorian guy.
1469  Economy / Securities / Re: [ActiveMining] Official Shareholder Discussion Thread [Moderated] on: March 06, 2014, 05:34:43 PM

[snip]

What I am most concerned with to be addressed promptly is a signed message proving the existence of the coins held.  I do not see this as an unreasonable request and would show good faith on your part.
Does it matter?

We gave Ken 25,000 coins. What makes you think he has <1,500 left? Is it not enough that we've basically spent 23,500 coins and have precisely zero to show for it (literally, no proof of anything)? Will proof of 1,500 coins really set your mind at ease?

Not all shares cost 0.0025 at IPO.
1470  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: **Breaking news** Satoshi Nakamotos identity revealed on: March 06, 2014, 05:19:51 PM
If this is not the guy then maybe the real Satoshi will came out of his cave just to save him. Maybe that's the whole master plan..

No way, if there is a real Satoshi, after seeing the inevitable media shit storm within just 2 hours he is not going to reveal himself.
1471  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: **Breaking news** Satoshi Nakamotos identity revealed on: March 06, 2014, 05:18:10 PM
I'm guessing he just expected things to progress a lot more slowly, and never thought bitcoin crest at over $1000 just 4-5 years after launch.

I can totally see this.

Imagine he was mining at least 3000 bitcoins a day, I bet he never thought that it's kind of like mining $3,000,000 a day, all you do is wait 5 years.

Bitcoin probably took off beyond his expectations.

1472  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: **Breaking news** Satoshi Nakamotos identity revealed on: March 06, 2014, 04:53:53 PM
2.  Even though the world knows that he is rich, he will be okay.  Bill Gates is the world's richest man and his life has not been compromised, yet.  Satoshi's $600 million is tiny compared to Gate's $70 billion.

There are very few known locations on Earth with almost half a billion dollars up for grabs. Money that can be irrevocably moved across the globe within seconds.

You could break into Bill's house and not find anything anywhere near that valuable. And stocks/cash transfers? All reversible. You're just trading on a central exchange or to another bank after all.

The reward for breaking into Bill's house and holding him at gunpoint is perhaps $100,000 at most.
1473  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: If that really is Satoshi, how can we help him? on: March 06, 2014, 04:50:32 PM
Exactly, with fiat or gold you would physically need to move the money you robbed which is a lot more difficult when we talk about 400 million dollars, or about 9 metric tonnes of gold.

Even compared to stealing paper stocks/bonds it's not the same. A low net worth millionaire could pay someone who is poor in russia to come over and get the keys and then kill himself. The poor guy sends the bitcoin to an address before committing suicide.

What just happened? Well now the poor guys family get some money and the millionaire is now a potential billionaire. This original millionaire could have even threatened the poor guys family.

Anyway, there is no need to escape the country or state with a ton of paper bonds. It's all gone in seconds.

Also it's better than stealing money via wire transfer. A lot of rich people (even gates) don't have $400,000,000 in cash waiting for a long drawn out potentially reversible wire transfer.

I am not exaggerating, this guy is in for some crazy trouble. And if Bitcoin keeps going up this location will become a prime target for all criminal masterminds.

1474  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: So do Bitcoiners actually claim the foundation wasn't infiltrated? on: March 06, 2014, 04:42:06 PM
bitcoind and bitcoin-qt are the same thing, qt just have the GUI. Gocoin is not a client, it is a payment platform.

If so that means there is only one client, so what is MPOE talking about? If no one takes the Foundation client seriously, what client is being taken seriously?
1475  Economy / Securities / Re: [ActiveMining] Official Shareholder Discussion Thread [Moderated] on: March 06, 2014, 04:40:00 PM
Can a signed message be sent from a cold wallet without compromising the private key? ie entering it online?


Armory can do this.

Ken hasn't said he is using Armory though I don't think. There is a security issue here we need to be aware of. You are asking Ken to confirm he has a million dollars of BTC on a laptop with Armory on it (for example) and his work address is public knowledge. Do you see the issue? I would think the cold wallet keys are kept in a safety deposit box in a bank in Springfield or Kansas and there they should stay until they are needed and their safety shouldn't be compromised just to supply a signed message. Surely we want evidence of chips and not just company cash deposits?

I want to know about those coins real bad, but you do make a good point. It is a safety issue.

Perhaps go into the bank and run Armory there?
1476  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: If that really is Satoshi, how can we help him? on: March 06, 2014, 04:37:41 PM
Seems like a easy target for a $400M theft? If he does hold them.
People get robbed for a fraction of that money... sometimes even for hundred bucks
This is why the guy is in trouble.

Beyond trouble.

If true he might have the highest concentration of easy to access/steal wealth on the planet.

Where else can you kidnap someone and force them to reveal a passcode to move $400,000,000 across the world?

There are no other targets for such a easy take that cannot be reversed. This is insane.
1477  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: So do Bitcoiners actually claim the foundation wasn't infiltrated? on: March 06, 2014, 04:29:14 PM
Is there an alternative full client?

- bitcoind
- Bitcoin-Qt
- Gocoin

Both bitcoind and Bitcoin-Qt are the main backbone of the Bitcoin network. I'm not sure what ratio of nodes are bitcoind or bitcoin-qt.

I would actually say the bitcoind is more important because this is the one all the services would use.
1478  Economy / Securities / Re: [ActiveMining] Official Shareholder Discussion Thread [Moderated] on: March 06, 2014, 04:25:43 PM
Can a signed message be sent from a cold wallet without compromising the private key? ie entering it online?


Armory can do this.
1479  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: So do Bitcoiners actually claim the foundation wasn't infiltrated? on: March 06, 2014, 04:21:44 PM
Kinda why nobody serious actually follows the Foundation client anymore.

Are you talking about the reference client?

No.

MPOE-PR is talking about bitcoin-qt, the client distributed from bitcoin.org.

Ok. But it's not possible to download the original GUI reference client right? So isn't the Bitcoin network essentially dictated by Bitcoin-qt?
1480  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: **Breaking news** Satoshi Nakamotos identity revealed on: March 06, 2014, 04:16:39 PM
If this man is not Satoshi, it would be quite simple for the real Satoshi to come out and make an anonymous statement (signed tx) that it is not him.

How so?

How would the 'real' Satoshi prove it?

If there was an easy way to just sign a tx and be done, surely the Newsweek Satoshi would just do that right?
Pages: « 1 ... 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 [74] 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 ... 200 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!