Neither do I at the moment, although it smells like it. In other cases as soon as I saw the offer of the "system" I have tagged the OP as a scammer but in this case it has a certain plausibility as well as nuances, but certainly someone who knows how things work is not fooled by how he sells it (as if it were easy to earn thousands per month with his system).

Your first paragraph is especially a good framing Wind_FURY. 

In that regard, bitcoin provides us with a lot of various kinds of empowerment that is not merely about getting rich - even though getting rich seems to have had historically been an additional benefit that people have been receiving by building their BTC stash and mostly HODLing their BTC stash through many years.

Some people only come for the get-rich part of bitcoin and they are focused on the getting rich part and not even giving any shits about the empowering part, and surely some of these people will evolve in their thinking and understanding of bitcoin, but some of them will never get over the mere monetary focus, which I suppose in several senses if still valid, even though it is incomplete and somewhat superficial way of thinking about and understanding bitcoin... ..

even though as long as we keep building and holding our BTC, we can have very good chances of being able to end up doing both, too.. whether our original intentions had been exclusively on one or another, it still seems that both will continue to play out in the coming years.. and there are some who even say that it is inevitably based on math, even though many of us realize that it is not inevitable, yet bitcoin is a pretty amazingly designed system.. that is likely to persist and even to go up in value, which surely makes it more beneficial to any individuals to be sure to employ consistent, persistent, ongoing and perhaps even aggressive (without over doing it) accumulation strategies.

I don't worry too much about it, because of the "in good faith" clause. Not that I trust them, but I trust the American claim culture enough to know it would end up in a lawsuit if they screw their customers.

Welcome news.  This also lends credence to the notion that, rather than being a deliberate "attack", as some claim, this was largely just an inconsiderate use of resources.  A near-miss of a "Tragedy of the commons", if you will. 

If they're genuinely trying to make their usage more efficient, this should eventually bring some resolution to the conflict.  And is a far more constructive approach than looking to block or otherwise prevent people doing stuff.

Who is "the Sponsor" in this?

Even if they act in good faith picking the correct chain, I'm missing details on what happens to the value in a possible Fork chain. When the BCH Fork happened, the value of the Forkcoin varied, but could have been sold for 10-20% of the Bitcoin value. If they keep that instead of sharing it with the ETF investors, it just adds to the list of reasons to keep your own keys.

I'm going to hold back for now but the way the OP is selling his system sounds pretty scammy to me. If it's so easy to have an ROI of between 3 and 5% per day, let's say 4%, multiplied by 30 days average of a month a 120% monthly return. But if we dig a little we will see that it is nowhere near as easy as the OP paints it, and khaled0111 and others have explained it well.

All these systems that sound so wonderful are usually good only to fill the pocket of the one selling them.


A crypto forum but where many of us have been betting for over a decade, as well as knowing finance, statistics and scams.

--Snip--

Although it's an almost guaranteed profit, there are few problems with arbitrage betting (aka arbing)!
Usually, it's hard to find an opportunity like the one you mentioned in OP because of the difference between the odds.
Second, supposing you find one, you will need a huge bankroll to make a good profit not to mention that most casinos will limit your account after few wins.

Then and most importantly, many casinos consider arbing illegal and may ban your account if they find out about it.

If you had a 20k bankroll you could make $1054 in a day betting these games. Then you would have to withdrawal all the money, wait for it to deposit in your bank and then re add to the sites. (or if you're lucky, half the bets will win on each site so you don't need to reconcile on each)

As posted in X few hours ago, there will be $10k wager race on February 1st.
https://twitter.com/shufflecom/status/1750824664233136575

It will be 24 hours race so it will be really quick race and of course we need to have decent bankroll if we want to participate in this birthday race.

Not really sure how many winners will share the prize, but maybe you can try with few hundreds dollar if you are interested.

There will be 2 benefits if you can wager alot, first is the chance to win one of the prizes in the race and increased your VIP level to receive the revamped reward.

Maybe there will be giveaway as well for birthday celebration, so lets just wait

I don't think intelligence enters the equation on this one.  It's his morality I'd call into question.  I suspect any misinformation he spreads is deliberate.  He knows there won't be any consequences, because Bitcoin is not a company and there's no one to file libel or defamation cases against him.  He can effectively say what he likes without fear of penalty and he knows there are people out there who will believe him.

He's definitely not stupid, he's just a crook.  And one of the most prolific crooks of the modern age at that.

By under-employment I mean people whose salary is just enough for their basic needs and little savings but not enough to afford privileges like vacation, luxuries, even buying a house as they can only rent. Such people spend as much as 80% of their income on food, rent, school fees of children and normal healthcare but not serious surgeries. People at that stage easily resort to borrowing when they have serious emergencies which do not come always though.

Unfortunately, majority of workers in my country fall into this category. Minimum wage in my country is about $30 with inflation at 29%, a country of 200 million people that have over 83 million people living below $2.5 per day. So my use of that word is a reflection of the realities on ground here.

Under this circumstances, the best an individual can do is inject max 10% of their income to Bitcoin while setting up emergency fund with the remaining 10% since 80% is already expected to be used for basic needs. These are just my estimations, there could be variations.

Under-employed can still do $10 per week and still be fine with his needs. That one is under-employed does not mean he has no way of saving a little, just that such a person cannot do certain things that money can do because of financial limitations but nothing beats humble beginning. As a matter of fact, they even need the investment more if they have to remedy their situation.

What if the person is underemployed? You started your statement well that it depends on individual and by that individual I want to believe you are referring to individual needs, his income and other factors such as his confidence in Bitcoin. We must acknowledge the peculiarity of wealth distribution, which have some people living in surplus and others barely able to feed. So their investment decision will be determined by their circumstances. The percentage should not be a factor here before some persons will draw conclusion that a particular percentage is what should be invested in Bitcoin. It depends entirely on the situation of the individual.

It is in the planning that the amount to be invested into be Bitcoin will be calculated. The planning is a critical stage because it covers the most important aspect of the investment process, enabling the investor to follow the best course of action.

Or perhaps we can say every dip does not have a strong reason behind it because the crypto space is recognized for its volatility so if we find any dip we can consider a buying opportunity in the case of Bitcoin to fill our bags more. Indeed there maybe another opportunity of buying again before halving which is near.

Well, less taps means less features I believe, cus If a casino has a lot of features, then that simply and automatically translate to more taps, which means, you tap more to access all the features or a good number of it.
But for a Casino with less features, it's very understandable why it won't take more or alot of taps to navigate around such a casino and get things done, and the clear advantage here is that, things get done faster on a casino with less features, compare to the casino with more features..

Now, don't misunderstood or misquote me, I am not saying that shuffle has less features, I've never used or played on shuffle, so I think it will be inappropriate for me to judge, but what I said above is based on my observations in general terms, not talking about one casino in particular.

Recent months, Elon Musk was quite silent when he was asked severap times about his opinion on Bitcoin and cryptocurrency market. It is different than his attitude in the past and maybe it is because he is planning to do something with X as a super app includes digital payment.

Weeks ago he told that SpaceX still has big number of bitcoin but that company is not regulated to publicly report on their investment in Bitcoin, different than Tesla.

If Gray-scale does not stop selling bitcoins, the panic market of bitcoins will never end, but if they continue to sell bitcoins, the market is expected to decline more in February than this month. After the approval of the Bitcoin Spot ETF, the Bitcoin market fell from $49,000 to below $40,000, which is a 20% drop, according to statistics. However, since the sale of gray-scale Bitcoin, the market has declined by 15 percent, according to statistics. If this selling trend continues in February, the Bitcoin market is expected to fall further below 36,000 and the market is predicted to decline by 7%.

However, panic sales are not a new phenomenon in the Bitcoin market, but rather a well-known phenomenon that occurs regularly. Such panic sales before bitcoin halving have been seen many times in the past and we will face such panic sales before halving in the future as well. Grayscale sells 500k bitcoins in the bitcoin market creating a market bloody moment despite the temporary negative impact on the bitcoin market.This is expected to be the biggest dumping in the Bitcoin market before the halving. This may be the best time to invest in Bitcoin for those who are planning to invest in Bitcoin and hold it for the long term. Therefore, those who can use this panic sale and invest and hold Bitcoin at the highest DIP will have a 100% chance of getting potential profit after the halving.

Fair enough.

Regarding this part about such people "hating bitcoin", I'm not so sure. It is a possibility but it may also be that they just see Bitcoin as another tool to fill their pockets. Right now it benefits them to spread FUD about it and it could change in the future.

Remember Musk? He did this in reverse. It benefited him to praise Bitcoin while it was going on and he had a stake in it and was making profit but when the profit stopped and he wanted to exit, he started spreading FUD. Then he did the same with a shitcoin called Dogecoin and made some money there too.

I'm almost certain that if JPM were allowed to open bitcoin accounts (like they do bank accounts) for customers and they saw a profit there, Dimon will start praising Bitcoin. After all it is all about making money for this type of people.