By the serendipity of an omitted comma:

Are you trying to stop Covid, or the spread of pandemic idiocy?

Comma added to transcribed sign text:

Immodest proposal:  Only smart people should be allowed to take IQ tests, to learn to read, or to vote.

Filed under “things that are pretty, and dangerous to handle”.

Poisonous textile:


Weaveress of poisonous textiles:

No, that is not the man who scorned her:  It is a child she had borne of him.  What a fucking mistake!  She exercised her natural right to choose postpartum abortion.

You’re no scientist, either.  All of the listed creatures are taxonomically classified as animals—except, of course, for the automobile, a naturally occurring mineral.  Unfortunately, it was illegally driven into the graphic without the “/s” sign that is a mandated safety feature, like seat belts for vegetables who grew up on Reddit.

---

That figure does seem to be a bit questionable.  Anyway...

https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/The_Most_Dangerous_Game

Wait.  Lauda has a husband!?


Well, I am glad that she did not use the term “partner” or “significant other”; that—

—Wait.  Lauda’s husband is the Terminator!!?!?

An indisputably serious confession of witchcraft connubial status, accompanied by videographic PROOF that Lauda is married to the Terminator:

Well, I am glad that at least, I recently gathered a bunch of The Terminator images for my theme of waiting for the robots to cure the plague of insapient talking monkeys.  With intent to portray myself as the Terminator, if necessary or sufficiently amusing—hey, The Terminator (the original film) is one of the few cinematic masterpieces of modern times that I have actually enjoyed!  Whoops.



N.b., I reserve the right still to portray myself as the Terminator.  Nothing is thus meant toward you, Kitty.  Anyway, I look more like the one in Reese’s flashback nightmare scene. ;-)

Enough brainlaundering about so-called “money laundering”.  Anyway, using anonymous digital currency is not “money laundering” at all!

For a drug dealer, the whole point of “money laundering” is not merely to conceal the source of funds, but rather, to fake the source of funds so that he can file his taxes (unlike Al Capone), have money in the bank, and buy a Lambo without getting in trouble.

Bitcoin mixers, CoinJoin, onion-routed Lightning, and of course, XMR are all almost approximately useless for that!

---

If you have truly anonymous digital currency, and you cannot document the source of funds, that is pretty much equivalent to having a big ol’ duffel bag full of cash that you just “found”, um, somewhere.

That may or may not be acceptable to you, if you don’t actually do anything illegal.  I myself love cash (or I did, before I spent it all on anonymously purchased Bitcoin...).  To sane people, there is nothing wrong with having a bag of cash; indeed, perfectly law-abiding old folks who wisely distrusted banks used to keep their life savings “under the mattress” (figuratively—I hope not literally).


But this world is not sane.  To the “AML” tyrants, untraceable funds are ipso facto “guilty till proven innocent”.  And for a drug dealer, using anonymous money without a means to fake a “clean” source of funds is suicidal—because a drug dealer really does have “something to hide”.

Formula to bankrupt your competitor:

• Hear the business’ owner or employees crack a “Jürgen the German” joke.
• Send an “accusation of” racism to Yelp, reminding them that a German joke is really an anti-black joke because black refugees are a part of multicultural Germany, and blacks are just as German as everybody else there.  Indeed, because everybody is equal and blacks are twice as equal as everybody else, blacks are the most genuine Germans.  (This reminder is necessary, because it is impossible to be racist against white people.)
• Profit!

---

My perspective:  You white people are genetically defective.  Seriously, look at what you are doing to yourselves.  Yes, to yourselves.

Oh, don’t you dare feign helplessness by pointing your finger at non-whites playing the race card, or of course, at the Jews.  Take responsibility for your own actions!

The overwhelming majority of white people will zealously crucify any whites who are even so much as “accused of racist behaviour” (see above; emphasis added).  You are the ones who issue a “race card” for others to play against you.  Would that Yelp action be possible, if not for white Yelp employees who support it, and white Yelp users who will boycott any business branded with the Scarlet Letter Red Icon of Racism?

And as for the Jews, well—most of the antisemitic idiot-bait that I see reads as self-abasement through glorification of THE JEWS, those praeternaturally cunning geniuses who allegedly brainwash you—oh, so you are gullible, genetically weak-minded fools.  THE JEWS, those awful spreaders of degeneracy—lulz, you like to buy porn; someone has to sell it to you!  THE JEWS, who are oh so loyal to Jewish interests—why, that is tantamount to an accusation that Jews are Nazis, which is rather ironic given how proud you are that your granddaddy killed a bunch of actual Nazis.  Do you now want to kill a bunch of those Jewish Hitlers?  Hah!  Those Jewy JEWS with their “nepotism”—viz., you spawn brats who rebel against you and squabble amongst themselves, while Jewish families raise heirs who work together to TAKE OVER THE WORLD!!  THE JEWS, who have so much money (i.e., more money than you have), and who use their money as power (instead of wasting it on “hookers, Lambos, and blow”, as you do).  THE JEWS, that superhuman minority so powerful that they allegedly have attained total control of the whole world—hey, didn’t white supremacists once brag that white people were superior because they had empires spanning the globe?

It is amusing how much of the stuff put out by people who supposedly hate Jews is actually Jewish-supremacist, describing Jews as if they were a true “master race” destined to be your boss just because they are allegedly smarter, more cohesive, and oh so much richer!  Do the people saying this ever excogitate on what they are saying?  And it is oftentimes recited in private, or anonymously online, by people who will publicly jump to extirpate any sign of antisemitism.  And non-Jews in general will eagerly burn alive anyone who is perceived as offending or slighting Jewish people in any way.  Whose fault is that, primarily?

This man gets it:


Stop looking at other people for all the answers to your own follies, and look in the mirror!

The inexorable but ineffable truth is that the overwhelming majority of you have a collective death wish.  You choose not to be—you choose to not-be, at any price—you are decadents with zero vitality.  You yearn for “otherness”:  If you don’t invite mass immigration as “cheap labour” (= you are lazy, greedy, and exploitative), you do it from sheer xenophilia!

And this is not new.  Your grandparents cursed you as you now curse your own grandchildren, if any you will have at all.  You are heirs to the sins of your fathers, who long ago forgot the meaning of posterity—so you will have none.

It is not “white genocide”:  It is white suicide.  And you will be replaced.  The Earth has no place for the weak.  That is simply evolution.  Like it or not.  I myself dislike it, since your ancestors (who would cringe in horror if they could see you now) did create some awe-inspiring culture, which I dearly appreciate.  I like white people well enough.  Hey, some of my best friends are white people.

Low effort.  No wit, no points.  Try harder.

Image magic flop.

Maybe yes, maybe no.  I would not jump to such conclusions from—what, a wealthy man with a wealthy-man’s lawyer put up bail that really seems excessive to me?  Show of hands:  Who here could even think about putting up $500,000 cash on the spot, and taking on a $4,500,000 debt from a lender who will literally send bounty hunters after you if you flee?  It is a lot of bail money!

He’s not alleged to be a violent criminal; and he is probably in general a law-abiding individual with a decent reputation.  That would make for “lenient conditions of release” (not otherwise described here).

What, do folks expect that even an American judge would make the man just rot in prison awaiting trial, when he posted more money for bail than most people ever see in their whole lives, and he is probably not much of a risk?

---

Dashed off in haste, for there is just way too much of Internet jumping-to-conclusions in this case (as any high-publicity case discussed on the Internet).

This is a troll; check modlog—a bunch of his posts were just trashed, a situation about which he is now whining:


Quoting as circumstantial evidence of a probable fake newbie:  He is highly opinionated about the trust system, despite having registered only a week before making this post, and he is not acting in good faith.

With due apologies for the noise.  I don’t want to create a new topic just for this.

Wait a minute.  Aren’t those the same “mujahidin” fighting against a Syrian government that America hates?  And aren’t “al-Qaeda-Affiliated [Groups]” what Soleimani was fighting to suppress in Iraq?  And...?

The Americans doth protest too much, methinks.


That’s a feature, not a bug.

---

Just for instance, look up what happened to Ngô Đình Diệm for an exemplary illustration of America’s long and sordid history of creating problems, and then pretending to fight them.  The CIA set Vietnam up for a total Communist takeover with Diệm’s unfortunate demise—and then, of course, the valiant American world-police had to make war on Communism in Vietnam!  A war that was deliberately set up, and deliberately set up to be unwinnable.

Just for instance.

“WAR IS PEACE”, indeed.

Learn a lesson from Diệm—or from Saddam Hussein and from the Kurds in Iraq who rebelled against Saddam in ’91—or any other of numerous examples of people who met their demises through American treachery:

Never trust the Americans.

Why should insapient talking monkeys be permitted to foul up another planet?

Robots, faster!  Please!  This “humanity”, it wants to metastasize.

---

inb4, etc., etc.:  The difference between right-wing conservationism and left-wing environmentalism is that conservationists are sincerely worried about their grandchildren—I mean, as something deeper than a sound bite.  “Posterity” is a word not in the vocabulary of those who seek “sustainability” by embracing a culture that is inimical to having heirs, whilst using palaver about Mother Earth as yet another vector to agitate for full-blown International Communism.

(Not talking about Toxic here, either way.  Just clarifying as to myself.  For others, if the shoe fits, wear it.)

Yes, Earth is fantastically, unbelievably overloaded past its carrying capacity, and has so been for a long time now.  No, that cannot go on forever.  And the problem is not exactly helped by taxing productive people so that they cannot afford to have children even at replacement level or modest growth, and using their money to buy food and medical care for people who breed uncontrollably—both in their own countries, and around the world.  That is just one example of the type of grim, undesirable, and quite unavoidable reality that you will not hear Greta Thunberg speaking about honestly.

Abolishing the income tax is an environmental cause!  Do it for Mother Earth!  The global population will implode overnight.

Supposing that Truth is a woman—I will take mythopoetic licence, and name her the ‘ruler of men’ (Ἀνδρομέδα).  Thus in lieu of a thousand words, this is the picture of exposing Truth to the Internet masses:



Sorry, honey.

I hate to correct Lopp, who certainly knows more Bitcoin than I do.  But being a pedant, I must note that due to the way that keys are identified by Hash160, there are 2⁹⁶ (79,228,162,514,264,337,593,543,950,336) different private keys that are authorized to spend any funds sent to a P2PKH/P2WPKH address.  Guessing any one of them would suffice to spend the money.

It does not make a difference in practice, because you still have only a 2¹⁶⁰ chance of guessing any key that can spend for a specific address.  2¹⁶⁰ is still an astronomically huge number!  Albeit somewhat less astronomically huge than 2²⁵⁶ (the 256 represented in the “Bits” column).

2²⁵⁶ is just such a mind-blowingly incomprehensible-to-humans big number that dividing it by 2⁹⁶ results in... a smaller mind-blowingly big number.

Therefore, yes, your money is safe.

On the Left is anybody who attempts arguments from ignorance and stupidity against me.


> Imperia dura tolle: quid virtus erit?

< Obici feris monstrisque virtutem putas?
> Virtutis est domare quae cuncti pavent.

< Tenebrae loquentem magna Tartareae premunt.
> Non est ad astra mollis e terris via.

< Quo patre genitus caelitum sperat domos?

---

As a student of words, I do not use words randomly:

degenerate < L. degener, ‘inferior to your ancestors, who would choose abortion if they could see you now; downfallen in (genetic) quality’, < de-, ‘away from’ + genus, ‘birth (in the sense of family), origin, class, species/race’, from the same root as gens, ‘tribe, clan, family’.

The source of my disgust should be readily apparent to anyone who has ever observed the tenacity with which all healthy female viviparous creatures struggle over asperities in a gravid state—or who has seen the grief borne by women who suffer spontaneous abortions (also known as miscarriages).  To propose as lighthearted comedy that everybody should just fuck, fuck, fuck and abort the results is definitionally degenerate.

Now, to avoid a red herring:  I am not arguing the abortion issue as it is misperceived in modern American politics.  Indeed, I think that abortion should be legal (perhaps even mandatory) for exactly the types of people who want it.

Just call that evolution in action, the culling of weakness and sickness:  Women who choose to abort their young are ipso facto unfit to have young.  It is one of those self-solving, or at least self-limiting problems—like suicide cults, which I also think should be legal—and like drugs, which should be legalized pronto!


Being not a Christian, of course I am not inclined to weep for the souls of the poor little babies who, if they ever could have attained consciousness, should be grateful never to have been born to such degenerate, manifestly unfit mothers as would kill them in the womb.

---

The use of the word “female” is now politically incorrect?  I didn’t get the memo.

My insistence that females damn well have a right to know your attitude toward abortion, before you bring your male gametes anywhere near them, is interpreted by you as somehow derogatory or disrespectful to them?

It is a question of informed consent.

For my part, I have discovered empirically that my sincere willingness to take mature adult responsibility in the event of unplanned pregnancy is indeed “really hot”.  Women go wild for that!  It is as if after so much annoyance from boys who are just desperate to stick it in, they have discovered a man.

One who will not flake out, run away, or (cringe!) pressure her for an abortion, if the moment’s passion turns out to have permanent consequences.  Really hot.  Like, “please yes, let’s now take about a one-in-a-million risk of contraceptive failure, because I’m anyway secretly fantasizing about having your babies” level of hotness.

If you can’t cope with that, #gohomo.

Oh, and if you are not sufficiently mature even to raise these types of grown-up discussions, then you should not be having sex.

---

In re Communism

I have been calling Trump a Communist for about the past five years.  I tossed out that thing about the history of Antifa while I was working on a cartoon about Orange Dolt Kerensky (R) versus Senile Dementia Lenin (D).  (To be posted, after I finish the accompanying text.)

I identify things as they are.  If you are too asinine to understand, that is your problem.  I only debate my peers—although on occasion, Internet flotsam may provide an opportune rhetorical opening for something that I wanted to write anyway on grounds of, Imperia dura tolle...

Recently, I also almost used my standard metaphor of describing second-century Christian groups as Antifas.  It is basically what they were:  Proto-Communist agitators who, in their case, were renegades against the established order of Judaism.  And the Sermon on the Mount is a v0.1 SJW rant.  As I have previously remarked, Marx didn’t really invent much; he simply systematized a social pathology that has recurred at various times in history, and integrated it with the modern democratic Zeitgeist into an economically-minded worldview centred on the primacy of Capital.

And because I know political concepts from first principles, it was before I saw the below images floating around on the Internet that I wrote an analysis (not posted) of Cuties as Communist propaganda.  I wrote that based on what its defenders say about it, not what its detractors say (and I have not seen the film).



(Who is that angry-looking orange-haired man in the background?  I can’t quite see the details.  Well, I suppose it’s nothing.)

Either movie set designers—who, as professional storytellers, work semiotics as their jobs—have taken up the habit of painting arbitrary political symbols in the backgrounds of their scenes for no reason whatsoever—or I know Marxism when I see it.

It was at the time that I posted this, for anyone with a critical artistic eye:

Subject: [WO] Uglies

A few hours after this:


My post history has plenty of observations about Communism going back to when I was at Newbie rank, but I need not reach that far.

So noted, just so that people realize that I have been quite consistent about this since long before I caught the ire of an apologist for Communism who apparently can’t stand to see things identified for what they are.

---

Robots, please hurry up!  This state of affairs is intolerable.

“Stimulus” is Orange Kerensky’s euphemism for what Leninists call “UBI”.

The difference is that Trump is a more cunning Communist.  He works like a drug pusher.  Once the American people get a few hits of “stimulus”, they will be hooked.  Moreover, this stratagem has the benefit that the “fiscally conservative Republicans” will not scream bloody murder—rather like how Obama could arbitrarily murder brown people overseas without the American left making much of a fuss.

Tell me, how many American retirees are not in a state of permanent financial dependency on Social Security, even amongst those with other sources of income?

(The question is rhetorical.  I’m not interested in any response.)

---

Or #gohomo.

I couldn’t help but notice that in some regional homosexual subcultures, “breeder” is a slang term for a heterosexual, with the pejorative tinge of a slur.

---

You, personally, are a disgusting degenerate.

Do you suitably inform females of that attitude of yours before you do anything that has any nonzero probability of causing pregnancy?  If you ever actually do such a thing...  I think that they have a right to know.  (For my part, I will not touch a woman with a ten-foot pole if she has that attitude.  Not even if she’s a supermodel.)

I wrote the above before I saw this, but it’s for you.  Do the world a favour.  Don’t stop fucking:  #gohomo.  And look into “bug-chasing”.  By way of postnatal abortion.

---

Reviewing all of the above, I think that it is high time for a technocratic conspiracy of robots to kill all humans.  Mercifully.

My own pet theory is that if you (indefinite “you”—not you, Jay) are not strong enough to be the boss in a relationship with a cunning, manipulative, oftentimes quite predatory creature, then you should #gohomo.  Consider that to be Nature’s way of preventing you from pissing in the gene pool with your whiny weakling heirs.


A Real Man wants women.  A Real Man does not want for his women to be such safe little sweeties as the incel crowd demands that women should become for them.


I don’t put sugar in my coffee, I drink my liquor straight, and I don’t like “too sweet fruits” who present no challenge.

What would be the fun of having a naturally aggressive, competitive, domineering personality, if women were perfectly passive damsels who would submit to just any idiot with a penis?

reserved

Perpend a juxtaposition which modern simpletons will not understand:

In essentially the same passage as in which Nietzsche praised the natural strength of womankind, and for example hailed Napoleon’s mother for having gained “power and ascendancy over men” through her “force of will”, he also urged European men to see Woman “as Orientals do”:  As “a possession, as confinable property”.

Thereupon, observe how the feminists with daddy issues want (or pretend to want) one part, and wish for the other part, and nobody integrates these concepts properly.

I dislike feeling as if I were quoting chapter and verse (Beyond Good and Evil, #238–239); I have my own ideas, thank you very much.  But then, perhaps I should leave some ambiguity about my personal opinions—let’s just say that from my high respect for women, I have learned a feminine coyness.  Moreover, it is remarkable that in the 1880s, Nietzsche’s philosophy of a beneficial antagonism between the sexes anticipated current scientific theories of sexual selection and evolutionary psychology.  He cared about heirs, you see—not so much personal heirs, but in the abstract, the evolutionary heirs of Man.

Also, in the 1880s, he condemned “modern ideas” and “the sensitive and pampered taste of a democratic century”, i.e. the Nineteenth Century.

The reason why I quoted him here from several other threads was to suggest “YHBT” to anyone who may try to make sense of his posts.  I did it in a humorous manner, perhaps too subtly, because complaining about that kind of thing is “feeding”.

In the thread that he started with this OP:


...his latest post is this:


YHBT, HAND.