To clean scam gang, anyway presently I don't have time for moderating. Yep, I am not an alt of QS or Lauda. I may be ranking in billions, but what is Lauda's Tax number?
42 Where can I view with this number, website name etc. You can contact people in this hardworking agency, they might help you for free and give you full details of anything you like. nsa. gov/ about/ contact-us Someone knows why i can't write it in the same line or put a hyperlink? Thanks ::) Why I should contact people when someone given me Tax number. Here in India GST.gov.in and their is a Tax number that can be view-able, I dont think Lauda's tax number is 42 as it might be somewhere 15 to 20 digits. Due to my well-known empathy for the feeble-minded, I will explain this to you: People are ridiculing you and your mornic question. “What is Lauda's Tax number?” None of your business. What the hell is wrong with you, to even ask such questions? Is 42 also your IQ? It is the answer to everything...
This being the Internet, I have been carefully observing you for evidence that you’re really a doctor. (See also, “I’m a sexy girl.”) Cogent scientific discussion in a professional tone with reference to the literature—well, I found that unconvincing. It could be faked. But now that I see your penmanship, I will vouch on your trust page that you are genuinely a doctor! (Now, I must apply my skills at forensic handwriting analysis to revenge for your having doxed my name and photo...)
in the USA it can be a ssn which is private
If Lauda has a company it can be an EIN that may be public
Seriously? How many 42 IQs are there in this thread?
Ceterum censeo, Quickseller should kill himself. |
|
|
|
12$ for 1 transaction is a big fee to kill BTC
(Note that fees are denominated in BTC, not fiat.) I am regularly making transactions for between the equivalent of 2¢ and 20¢—that’s right, $0.02 to $0.20, depending on how heavily loaded the network is. Worst case recently was the equivalent of about a dollar. How the hell are you spending the equivalent of USD $12 for 1 tx? Are you using some stupid exchange? Are you not using Segwit? Even that would not explain it. For a typical transaction by an individual, you are overpaying by at least tenfold!Or are you just spreading FUD against Bitcoin due to some other agenda? I think BTC will die soon
I think another coin will change the world but not BTC
...and you? It's the same problem I guess and it's definitely unfair considering how much I'm sending and the crazy expensive the transaction fee is. I'm better of sending money using fiat instead. I don't really want to use bitcoins to transfer money if it is really cheap.
So, go ahead: Use fiat. Paypal sounds about right for you. Also, I suggest that you should try reading. How does all this complaining about fees appear in this stupid thread directly after I posted a notice that fees are low right now and you can make them lower by using Segwit addresses: |
|
|
|
FFS.
Anyone interested in Bitcoin who thinks "I'll go and check out the biggest, longest running forum there is, see what's up...." and reads shit like this thread (in Meta, already!), will run a fucking mile.
Welcome to the Internet. (You are right, of course; but what did you really expect?)
To clean scam gang, anyway presently I don't have time for moderating. Yep, I am not an alt of QS or Lauda. I may be ranking in billions, but what is Lauda's Tax number?
42 Where can I view with this number, website name etc. I own 42s.net if you can think of a good use for that name.  Are we starting a fork for this thread? Well, this thread certainly is in need of a useful topic! I recently e-mailed —@domainsbyproxy.com to inquire whether the proud owner of a GoDaddy parked page would be willing to let the name go to a good home where it would be well-loved, in exchange for modest compensation from someone who is not rich and wants it for a personal project. No response; I am guessing that my message hit /dev/null or the blackhole of a so-called “junk folder” before it could be seen by a human. The domain situation got out of hand about 25 years ago. Cf. the situation with the domain name “bitcoin.com”—which never had anything to do with Bitcoin, according to Satoshi. And it still doesn’t have anything to do with Bitcoin! Too bad it still fools people into reading articles there, and even into using Btrash. That said, I do have a knack for finding good names which are actually available to me. Vide nym.zone. What domain could better suit me for my net.home?
With this number you need to channel Douglas Adams through his "DEEP THOUGHT" access link; any and all answers will be relevant but won't make sense. Any chance it could provide us with an electronic Babel fish? Would be useful to translate the broken English in to something comprehensible. Ooh! We could try with that the same roundtrip-translation trick which once amused us with Altavista’s eponymous Babelfish. I predict the results will be: Lauda has a heavy instinct for the Bitcoyne.
Ceterum censeo, Quickseller should kill himself. |
|
|
|
New suggestion:Accounts at Full Member rank or higher should be able to grant an “avatar blessing” to accounts which they openly disclose as their alts. [...] Example use case (other than mine): Yes, I have it [Copper Memership] on my organization profile. It works well for including images in posts.
Best regards,
Ben
Otherwise, any paid avatar option must be made too expensive for people who are seeking free money. That should be balanced against not making it too expensive for individuals who are trying to bootstrap a small business on a shoestring budget ( cough). I think that at current rates, around 0.01 – 0.02 BTC would be a reasonable business-class expense (even for small business) while hopefully being cost-prohibitive to a Newbie who just wants to “use avatar campaign in the bounty”. I would support Mr. Cassio's suggestion, but it may be complicated to track if someone transfers their accounts to others. I do, however, agree with the concept that any paid upgrades should be sufficiently high in cost as to deter their use as a vehicle for spam. A fair price for a fair service. Perhaps removed from an account upon any spam violation, no tolerance policy? I do think you may be right about tracking privileges given between accounts. As for paid upgrades, I emphatically urge that any fee must be absolutely nonrefundable, and that moderation/bans be strict. This is already the case with Copper Membership. As I recently saw when setting up a special-purpose alt account, the current Copper Membership purchase page states: Be warned that: - You can still be banned if you break the rules. You will not get any special treatment.
- These memberships are not guaranteed to last forever, or to offer the same benefits forever.
- No refunds will be given.
I think the merit system is a great approach to cutting down on spam, over time that should have an increased effect.
Indeed. Best regards,
Ben
Sorry to post here. I need it working in less than a month. I will delete once problem is solved. I sent to 3PnU4WzCG1da3nSpzzeuVRiUwbDG7JcQnp, and my status is still newbie Also sent an email to mar18paybug@theymos.e4ward.com to complain Copper Membership does not change rank, and was never claimed to. You are currently a Newbie with 28 activity. If you purchase and wear Copper Membership, then your rank will continue to be “Newbie” with the title “Copper Member” added below it; and some restrictions (such as posting of images) will be relaxed. This is the benefit which I enjoyed as a Newbie with Copper Membership. There is no way to increase your rank above Newbie in less than a month. Even if you pay for it, activation of Copper Membership is not automatic. After the price is paid and the transaction is confirmed on the blockchain, you must go here and elect to “wear” your Copper Membership: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=credit;promoteE-mailing theymos will not help if you fail to heed basic instructions. |
|
|
|
It is possible. Let's say I have access to all computers and servers in the world and can use at least 10 % of their power to generate all bitcoin wallets and I have a big enough storage drive to get the results. It would take a few years, but I will have all those keypairs. Invent a better algorithm for generation, speed it up and maybe it will take even less time. Index the database and there you have it. The other reason as to why you will never know about it, is because nobody who would do such a thing would tell anyone about it. Why would they? Drop the bitcoin price? Set a world panic? Destroy bitcoin? Why would you, if you have access to all bitcoins? Why would you even take more than you need? Why not just empty the long lost wallets, and nobody would even notice. There are far better purposes for quantum computers than to generate bitcoin keypairs, let's do some calculations to get us further into space, move to Mars, improve statistics, make science breakthroughs, etc.
Translation: Ill-informed idiot who whines that merit should be awarded by bots (!) is fishing for merit by posting innumerate nonsense in Development & Technical Discussion. If you don’t know, then say you don’t know. I admit, the set of things I do not know is infinite. But don’t make stuff up and post it in an authoritative-sounding manner. Nobody is buying what you’re selling.
I even dont know what these quantum computers are because I am a newbie here in this ecosystem. Help me out of this threat  Try reading the thread. Many intelligent answers were given back in December. This is officially the spam megathread of Development & Technology Discussion.
Let's say I have access to all computers and servers in the world and can use at least 10 % of their power to generate all bitcoin wallets and I have a big enough storage drive to get the results. It would take a few years,
You might want to double check your maths... There are 2 160 different addresses. 2 160 = 1461501637330902918203684832716283019655932542976 [...correct maths...] The entire universe since the Big Bang has only existed for about 13.8 BILLION years. That means you'd have to continue this process from the beginning of the Big Bang until today, and then repeat that 453,508 more times! THAT SOUNDS LIKE A LOT MORE THAN "a few years" TO ME! (and with a lot more computing power than you were suggesting). nice one we don`t have to worry ... but there is a way if someday... someone.... create some ASIC kind of computer to generate 1PentaBillion addresses/second ?? (( “1PentaBillion” = 5 billion addresses. What did you think it meant? Although your “consumer-grade” laptop won’t be able to, there are already many computers which can generate that many addresses in a second. Easily. But it makes no difference. Compared to 2 160, the difference between 1 million and 5 billion is not so impressive. ASICs are not magical. They are simply Application- Specific Integrated Circuits, highly optimized to run one specific program which is literally cast in silicon. They cannot defy the laws of physics, much less the laws of mathematics. There is still a limit on how fast they can perform computations. Also, importantly: They need energy. 2 128 is an infinitesimal fraction of 2 160; and a 2 128 security level is already what I call “boil the oceans security”, because the energy required for 2 128 computations would boil the oceans (and more...). It is humanly impossible to perform such vast amounts of computation, and it will always be humanly impossible.You just do not get how big these numbers are. |
|
|
|
Reading the article, I was bemused to find out that banks will shut down an individuals account based on moral reasons. That's a very biased point of view, especially in a country which is supposed to free, fair and just. As long as it's not illegal to strip, which is the case in Las Vegas, then why deny them an account? Now I am beginning to re-think this whole KYC/AML thing, so banks or financial institutions could put in regulations not to accept payments from certain sources even though they are legit and are not involved in any illegal activities.
" Most likely because is an activity that is prone to money laundering and because most investors would rather not be involved in it. The sex "business" is many times linked to illegal activities. paxmao, that is a mixture of uninformed speculation and hasty generalization on your part. Cliché, too: “Money laundering” is a well-known catch-all excuse for actions desired on other grounds; and Bitcoiners of all people should be wary of such arguments, on same grounds that “money laundering” was one of the official “Four Horsemen” of the Infocalypse commonly seen in 90s-era crypto law discussions. Why do you want non-KYC, non-bank-controlled money? Are you a criminal? Although it’s certainly true that the “mainstream” of these types of businesses often have unsavoury links (especially in the U.S.), commercial suppression of sex-related businesses is driven by moral and social factors ( specifically in the U.S.). Banks often close the accounts of independent operators (think: swinger couple with a website). Even sex bloggers can run into trouble here. Add soft or hard rejection by Paypal (strictly against T.O.S.), Google, Apple, Facebook, Amazon, Patreon, GoFundMe, and many other such companies—really, it seems that the only ones who don’t have any problems staying in business are carnal charnel houses with deep pockets and shady connections. I’ve noticed that certain social media places for independent virtual sex trade carry warnings about Paypal and/or Google Wallet, which should be heeded by those who wish to keep their accounts. Paypal is notorious in this aspect; and I somewhat doubt that “money laundering” be their motivation. Curiously enough, /r/GirlsGoneBitcoin has no such problem. I have more information about this. Earlier, I drafted a long reply to TrumpD (before Jet Cash’s reply). However, it’s not yet quite ready. I may finish it up later, pending some other things.
Edit: My memory flaked out; it has been ( cough) awhile since I actually read the Cypherpunk FAQ, a/k/a the Cyphernomicon. I have corrected the text of that paragraph, and added a link for reference. “Money laundering” was one of T.C. May’s original “Four Horsemen” at § 8.3.4: “‘How will privacy and anonymity be attacked?’ [...] like so many other ‘computer hacker’ items, as a tool for the ‘Four Horsemen’: drug-dealers, money-launderers, terrorists, and pedophiles.” Now, compare the typical mass-media FUD agitprop scare stories which smear Bitcoin as a thing for underground criminals. |
|
|
|
Oh, dear. Please do not use brainwallets! Brainwallets are insecure. AVOID.I call brainwallets “wallets for the brainless”; but you needn’t take my word for it: I think it's amusing that the two people in this thread loudly trumpeting brainwallets are someone who says they have a fetish for cracking passwords and someone who has posted extensively about wallet cracking and tried to sell scam wallet cracking tools.
This fits right in with the fact that person who popularized the idea and created brainwallet.org was cracking these kinds of keys and complaining about how few he was finding online before creating the site.
Food for thought.
It is highly NOT RECOMMENDED to use brainwallets. Humans are a horrendously low source of entropy. There are multiple research papers and programs that show that brainwallets are horribly insecure and easily cracked as what you think is a strong password probably is not a strong password.
BIP 38 paper wallets will not be particularly helpful here. It only protects against someone stealing your paper wallet and trying to get the keys. BIP 38 does not protect against someone just guessing the password you used to create your brainwallet.
Generally, my assumption is that when an otherwise intelligent person advocates for brainwallets, it's because they are hoping that foolish people with weak passphrases will store significant sums of bitcoin that they can later steal.
If you want to personally use a brainwallet. Go ahead. None of us are stopping you. However, if you are going to advocate for them, then foolish people will read what you write and will lose money.
Not only that: Long-term storage of funds inside your head is more likely than you think to lead to funds being literally forgotten—and thus lost forever, if somebody else doesn’t helpfully steal them. - They don't require backups
Human memory is very fallible. We often just don't remember what we don't remember so we don't often realize how bad it is. A fever, blow to the head, or other illness can easily kill single memories even of things you used frequently-- a brain wallet is the hardest kind to remember: to be secure it must be unusually random, and you should not be using it frequently (if you use it frequently, you will end up leaking it somehow) and being almost right is not good enough!
Native Segwit Addresses aren't supported by the wallets Joe and Bill Gator use.
This is something I am looking to remedy for future rounds. I'm open to suggestions, but I'm thinking I will probably just use my Electrum wallet for Native SegWit addresses. I believe I can transfer from Core to Electrum, so that's probably what I'll do so that we don't discourage SegWit usage. I suppose I don't even need to transfer it over to Electrum, could just send it directly from Core to the Native SegWit addresses of participants. It's something I'm perfectly willing and happy to do for participants. I just had a bit of a brain hiccup when it came time to send the winnings at the end of last round, because I was in quite a rush and didn't have time to consider the solutions. There are no Nested SegWit wallets/clients that offer compatibility with Native SegWit addresses that I know of; is there such a thing currently? There might be technical complications that I'm failing to consider that make this impossible for now. I would have suggested Electrum, but now I’m confused. If you run Core, then what is the problem? Core v0.16 has full Segwit support, including in the GUI. It can send to both native (BIP173/Bech32) and P2SH-nested Segwit addresses, as well as generating both types of addresses for receiving. Bitcoin Core version 0.16.0 is now available from: https://bitcoincore.org/bin/bitcoin-core-0.16.0[...] ### Segwit Wallet Bitcoin Core 0.16.0 introduces full support for segwit in the wallet and user interfaces. A new `-addresstype` argument has been added, which supports `legacy`, `p2sh-segwit` (default), and `bech32` addresses. It controls what kind of addresses are produced by `getnewaddress`, `getaccountaddress`, and `createmultisigaddress`. A `-changetype` argument has also been added, with the same options, and by default equal to `-addresstype`, to control which kind of change is used. [...] ### BIP173 (Bech32) Address support ("bc1..." addresses) Full support for native segwit addresses (BIP173 / Bech32) has now been added. This includes the ability to send to BIP173 addresses (including non-v0 ones), and generating these addresses (including as default new addresses, see above). A checkbox has been added to the GUI to select whether a Bech32 address or P2SH-wrapped address should be generated when using segwit addresses. When launched with `-addresstype=bech32` it is checked by default. When launched with `-addresstype=legacy` it is unchecked and disabled. |
|
|
|
Serious discussion first: And you know that you don't HAVE to do something when people on the intertubes express their preference one way or another, right? If I advise you to fuck yourself with a bag of rusty nails - please think this through. I wouldn't want you to make any rash decisions but I fully support your freedom of choice in this matter.
I have said several times before on this forum that I know how to hit where it hurts. Quickseller is accustomed to criticism, to rather understate the matter; moreover, although he is not eloquent in the artistic sense, he does have above-average verbal skills (as do many smooth-talking scammers, including Alia). Yet here, suddenly and uncharacteristically, he flipped out:You both are a piece of shit. Seriously, what the fuck is wrong with you?
That wasn’t even the initial version of his reply. Initially, he just lashed out and called Vod and me “a piece of shit”; he then promptly edited to reinforce his point with a “ seriously” F-bomb. I saw the earlier version. Clearly, he was in a state of emotional agitation. Why? And why really drove him to create that insane attack thread which I have characterized as “Quickseller vs. The World”? This reminds me of the incident in which a Tor Project employee revenge-doxed someone (!) who had suggested on Twitter that she should kill herself. She rationalized her such hypocritical anti-privacy action by alleging that this remark could cause her serious harm, due to her publicly known problems with depression and suicidal tendencies. Triggering, y’know. Mentally stable people are not internally put off-balance by being told to kill themselves. I know that if somebody on the Internet told me to kill myself, I would find that either boring, or mildly amusing in the yah, sure sense. There is only one cause I can adduce for somebody becoming upset by being told to kill himself: He has actual suicidal tendencies, and his therapist told him that suicide talk is harmful to him. Really, you’ve seen Quickseller coolly slither about with his alts through 60+ page firestorms of clearly evidenced serious accusations against him. When did you ever see him react like this to a simple remark of the kind which has no power over any rational person? You both are a piece of shit. Seriously, what the fuck is wrong with you?
You both are a piece of shit. Seriously, what the fuck is wrong with you? It's quite obvious that nullius was merely suggesting the best way to find Jesus
You of all people should know this because this is 100% Quicksy logic. Hah. I had actually thought of that when posting. Then I realized, suicides go straight to the Sixth Circle of Hell. (Aside: Having no such religious objections, I myself support an almost unlimited right to suicide. Those who kill themselves either face such a great pain that I cannot judge them, or are such weak wretches that they benefit all mankind by passing final judgment on themselves.)
 "You now want me to write "Ceterum censeo, Quickseller se debet occidere." 100 times?
This is MADNESS !!!"< humour at Quickseller's expense> Well, if it isn’t the Doppelgänger of the merit-beggar whom I once awarded +1 for ironically begging me in Latin! Now, in grand Pythonic style, we must hold a discussion on the spot about whether your use of the indicative be proper. I know that the historic original “Ceterum censeo” used the indicative, in the sense of declaring a future which shall be, rather than a mere wish; but the English here being translated uses the word should, in the context of my copypaste of Vod’s clearly subjunctive statements (emphasis added): “I think Quickseller really should kill himself.” Repeat: “I really wish the guy would kill himself already.” Whereas you indicate: “...Quickseller shall kill himself.” I raise this question, as a proud user of the subjunctive in English.
Ceterum censeo, Quickseller should kill himself. |
|
|
|
[...]
I prefer to use your mother for my sperm needs fag :) Don't forget this account, it will bring you a lot of hassle. And don't forget the world is really small. Someday somehow if you meet me, i promise to make video for the community how you begging :) #992943 “Danos” is a criminal whom I have previously (2018-03-15) tagged for purporting to offer 1 BTC to buy negative trust feedback against others, and openly threatening to buy “stolen/hacked” accounts for the purpose of undermining the trust system.
Now, he has escalated to threats of physical violence against suchmoon:
https://web.archive.org/web/20180315204317/https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3126248.msg32399395#msg32399395
“I prefer to use your mother for my sperm needs fag :)
Don't forget this account, it will bring you a lot of hassle.
And don't forget the world is really small.
Someday somehow if you meet me, i promise to make video for the community how you begging :)”
I believe no further comment is hereby needed on this sadistic whackjob.
This feedback is made consistently with my trust feedback policy:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3009256.0
P.S., suchmoon, someday somehow if you meet me, you can buy me a beer. |
|
|
|
. Pleas Mr vod Sir , don’t give me red trust or ban me ! I maybe , kill myself ! (I did hyperlink Quickseller’s attack thread, which contained both quotes of you Vod Sir.)(I smile because copy pasting this is a good thing)
Aye, and it would make for a good meme for signing off every post in a Quickseller thread. (Too bad the Iago bit went over this Iago’s head.) Thus in the high style of classical antiquity: Ceterum censeo, Quickseller should kill himself.
You both are a piece of shit. Seriously, what the fuck is wrong with you? Ah, Quickseller, the great master of rhetoric. What’s wrong? Do the voices in your head agree? Did I hit close to home with the dark thoughts which plague you when you realize you are alone in a universe which so evidently hates you that it refuses to bow to your whims? I suggest that you convert to misotheism, for your last rites before you kill yourself. And by the way, why did you call Vod and me “a piece of shit”, singular? Do you think that I’m Vod’s alt? “ That is very clear. Anyone who does not see this is simply closing their eyes.” Ceterum censeo, Quickseller should kill himself. |
|
|
|
I would argue that it's better to contain QS in these threads while ridiculing him and hopefully take some of his time away from concocting new conspiracies. He's been at it for years, he won't get bored.
I had the same thought, but it’s a fallacy. Reductio ad absurdum, it would mean that we should petition to allow Alia back. Did you notice how these threads (and much else) dropped off after the Alia scandal broke? Alia got banned, but while she was still shitposting I made the same argument - better have her in one of those idiotic threads than trying to sell her scam script somewhere else. Agreed. Indeed, it was partly for that purpose (partly to seek information) that I wasted obscene amounts of my own time making around 200 posts sniping back and forth with her. At one point, I made a new thread for the immediate purpose of distracting and re-containing her right before the hammer came down. Ugh. Quicksy is unlikely to get banned, he knows how to slide just under the mods' interpretation of the rules. And he's unlikely to give up. The next best thing we can have is to waste his energy on moronic shit like this, and not something like farming up new DT accounts or whatever his current fetish is. And maybe, hopefully, accidentally he'll slip up and do something really monumentally stupid. Or grow up. Or find Jesus.
I have a better idea: I think Quickseller really should kill himself. Repeat: I really wish the guy would kill himself already. |
|
|
|
Verified PGP signed message. (Did not examine the below-quoted key.) See also below quote with archival link to another signed message, binding a PGP fingerprint of 0xBC2BB1D36104939BE924AA51A09E643F541C0FC5 to mattcode (uid #1361227). Crossposting this from the Stake your Bitcoin address here thread because I did not see this thread earlier  Hi, is it okay if I stake my PGP key here too? -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
Hi, it is mattcode and today is the 15th of March 2018.
My Bitcoin Talk user id is #1361227 and I am signing this message to stake my
PGP key
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=VN/7
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----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=C2vB
-----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----
From my 😈😈😈 PGP 256% AIRDROP old-school CRYPTO 😈😈😈 campaign: 😈😈😈 CAMPAIGN PARTICIPANTS 😈😈😈 Listed in chronological order. Further explanation/rules will be added here and in OP. (WIP) Note: All signatures have been verified by me. Timestamps given are the timestamps claimed in the signature, not the post timestamp. (Though if I see evidence of somebody playing games with this, I will use post timestamp for that person instead.)
|
|
|
|
Why I'm writing this? Because I've got to make 20 quality posts (Fuck quality) to get some sats to pay for my internet connection, so that I can continue reading this thread.  Oh my— Why did it take so long for the little light bulb to go on for me? Quickseller’s baseless attack threads are the spam megathreads of Meta and Reputation!If you are caught spamming unsubstantial posts just to farm or rank up your account your account(s) will be immediately permabanned without warning. An example of what threads aren't allowed and posts that won't be tolerated:  https://archive.is/qqd4BI suppose that those who post in these threads need their own kinds of spam megathreads, too: Mostly high-ranked accounts, the occasional staff member, me.... Subject: Post your Total time logged into BitcointalkLet's see who's the biggest fan!  Total time logged in: 17 hours and 36 minutes. --------------------- Updated 8/22/2014: Total time logged in: 16 days, 10 hours and 5 minutes. 
Do I hate QS? I dunno with all this excitement, s/he makes the day worthy of some entertainment. I suggest you actually write a novel on your ramblings on Lauda and send it to a published editor, it will be a good one, at least on par with J K Rowlings foray into detective fiction.
Every editor in the world just cringed. Well, at least Quicky would do no harm in producing a doorstop to be chucked in somebody’s recycle bin. It would keep him busy, and— contained.
Unless it gets mod-locked (possible but doubtful), this thread will probably limp along until everybody just loses interest. Then, Quickseller will eventually create another new thread accusing Lauda of kitten abuse. This cycle has repeated many times. If only we could agree that as a collective we should just ignore these threads. If we all stopped replying, he might get bored eventually...? (By replying I fully concede I am a rampant hypocrite.) I try. You may have noticed, at least, I don’t reanimate these threads with a bump when they’ve been dead for a few days. Cough.
I would argue that it's better to contain QS in these threads while ridiculing him and hopefully take some of his time away from concocting new conspiracies. He's been at it for years, he won't get bored.
I had the same thought, but it’s a fallacy. Reductio ad absurdum, it would mean that we should petition to allow Alia back. Did you notice how these threads (and much else) dropped off after the Alia scandal broke? |
|
|
|
Logically, knowing a language does not mean that you live in the country of which it originates.
True: Quickseller confuses language not only with geography, but also here specifically with legal jurisdiction for tax purposes (!). For example, if I learn French, I am not forced to be in France.
Though I observe, “school French” would not qualify you for editorial responsibilities in a French publication. (Whether forum moderation requires such a level of mastery is another question.) Besides learning, there is also a possibility of moving—maybe ancestrally. Croatia has suffered major strife and dislocations in the past century. Not all people who have grown up with Croatian language as a familial “mother tongue” have ever even set foot on Croatian soil; and of course, even today, Croats born in Croatia may move elsewhere as adults (just as is true as for most any other country). I have no doubts that some moderators do live in the country that the language hails from but it is wrong to assume that all moderators, past and present, live in the native country.
True, and true.
Where did you get this info from or are you just making stuff up?
As usual.
Lauda's True Identity Found!!!!!!!!!! After spending tons of BTC and many blisters on clicking fingers, the results are conclusive that Lauda is actually Ernest Hemingway reincarnated!
See picture below. Amazing discovery! Please start (yet) a(nother) new thread in Reputation!
Fuck I know Europeans who speak better English than 70% of Americans,
You must admit, that’s a terribly low standard. FWIW, of all my Americans acquaintances, the one with the best English-language skills has lived for years on the Continent. Hmmm.
Also, this whole not paying taxes in the US butthurt thing, holy fuck. Speak fluent English? Where's your bloody UK passport and why aren't you having tea at 5PM?
Bloody renegades. And Quickseller is a hypocrite who still owes his tea taxes to the Crown.
Am I the only one thinking that this topic will not lead to anything?
Two groups (maybe 3-neutral), two different points of view, too much speculation imo, no clear evidences. I suggest locking it until solid proof show up...
Good point. However, OP Quickseller is so determined to keep this thread going that he’s spent the past month struggling to keep it alive—repeatedly changing the topic title, and piling on new accusations per the “throw it at the wall and see what sticks” strategy. This thread generated 15 pages of heated discussion within its first 24 hours, a few more pages the next day—whereas now, for weeks, the thread has repeatedly died and been resurrected. The past dozen pages or so mostly consist people laughing at Quickseller, interspersed with Quickseller futilely trying to reignite controversy. Unless it gets mod-locked (possible but doubtful), this thread will probably limp along until everybody just loses interest. Then, Quickseller will eventually create another new thread accusing Lauda of kitten abuse. This cycle has repeated many times. |
|
|
|
Well he doesn't seem to be very smart either  You can say that again. the "threats" clearly aren't working.
And that. (AFAIK it would require like 3-4 negative ratings to bring suchmoon to Negative and I doubt that would happen as then given the "hype" that would create that would start petty rating wars)
Actually, no. (This is the point of my hereby post.) It would require negative ratings from trusted people to affect suchmoon in any way whatsoever. Check my trust page. With a relatively new account and moderate anti-abuse activity, I already have 5 negatives—all retaliatory red from morons. Do I like like I’m in the negative to you? Now, look at suchmoon’s trust page. I count about seven dozen red marks. Like mine, they show under “Untrusted feedback” unless you’re stupid enough to add people like Danos to your trust list. Or if you really want an eye-popping sight, look at Lauda’s trust page. There, in addition to about a zillion untrusted red marks from whining spammers and scammers, you may see a few allegedly “trusted” negatives from OgNasty and shorena. It is for this reason that I recommend setting exclusions, such as ~OgNasty. Or better still, dump DefaultTrust and set up your own trust list from scratch. I currently have the following at my Depth 0, and the world of the Bitcoin Forum looks quite different to me than it will to you: gmaxwell
~OgNasty
That is my “ trust list quick fix”. Lauda has more detailed recommendations; but I want to develop my trust list independently, and the foregoing suffices for me for now. There is much more to learn about the trust system. I suggest you start with theymos’ announcement thereof, although n.b. that some things have changed in the five years since his OP in that thread. Also, it’s ironic that the first reply was from TradeFortress, who subsequently pulled one of the worst long-con scams in Bitcoin Forum history. By the way (I know you replied there; though that thread may be difficult for you to understand if you don’t dig around and figure out the history of the characters involved). |
|
|
|
Please stop. I am becoming dizzy!
nullius' avatar is at least his second attempt, thus fully aware of how to replace it unless, that is, he paid alia to do it for him.
I paid alia 0.99 BTC, in exchange for which she provided to me a 3-line script which loses avatars.
O, New World Buddha,
LOL, nice one. New Age Buddha. I feel enlightened! I said, “New World Buddha”. 1492. Several major historical events occurred that year. For breakfast, I eat Columbus Eggs with my fresh-ground BWV 211. Thus, I picked the one which seemed the best fit; I may start on your avatar next...
nullius' avatar is at least his second attempt,
Actually, this is only avatar [2] if you count from [0] like a C programmer. nullius_avatar[0] was made from Regana’s “WANTED” poster upthread: nullius_avatar[1] was swapped into place after Toughit posted this in an active thread I had started: Merited by hilariousandco (1), figmentofmyass (1), BTCforJoe (1), nullius (1)[/color][/size] Some of the legendary don’t see the need for new ranks, for others, they would like something to work for, and for nullius, well there is… this Rank Threshold Newbie 0 Jr. Member 10 Member 30 Full Member 100 Sr. Member 250 Hero Member 500 Legendary 1000 Mythical 2000Nullius 7000So.. why not add a rank or two? Seriously, who does it hurt? For nullius to achieve the highest level (Nullius), at the current pace of 12.55/merit per day, it would take 506 days to rank up. Probably need more time for the activity to catch up. Going to need more coin… and an average post length line.  https://imgur.com/a/Te9lCWhat seems to be missing (a lot) is a sense of humor. Thus: Then, the h4x0rs pwned my account and changed everything. Help!
Duh, it's so easy. With the window open, on your keyboard, press the following keys simultaneously: Alt + F4
Problem solved.
I tried that, and my Internet Explorer window disappeared. I had to open the Internet again (click the blue e...). Do you think I should try Ctrl-Alt-Del? Or mayhap I ought unplug my computer to protect it from transient surges, throw it down an air shaft to perform quantum gravitational hermeneutics to better interpret and troubleshoot the problem, and then rub magnets over my backup disks to restore Gauss polarity to the RLL controller substrate? Would that restore my avatar and personal text? (If you want to be so “helpful”, then you’ll need to do better than “Alt + F4”.)
So. It's obvious, nullius = Stephen Hawking.
Hello Professor
Hello. A remote similarity I have to Dr. Hawking: 288d6234089781d126925cf63d241532e5d779b7cc357bbe8178d446cb0ade97
(I’m such a tease.) |
|
|
|
Hey, whatever happened to his plan to sell all the sMerit from all his alts for “U$1M“? That has me checking to see which countries have names starting with a “U”, and use the ”$” symbol for their currency. I want to know if any of them are appropriately priced like the Zimbabwe Dollar.
Hello. You post good!
Thanks. Understand your point that some old 'grandfathered' merit will soon run out, but I'm not sure the abusers are getting picked up. I mean, even in fairly obvious cases - If you check out this guy (chachacoin17) it is clear something isn't right. Its even been reported and still no negative trust here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2896910.msg31751372#msg31751372Please see what I wrote to HabBear downthread. One way to encourage people to report questionable merit would be to receive merit for correctly identifying someone who is abusing the system. You could even take the merit off the abusers. Just an idea.
Law of unintended consequences: Rewarding people for getting others in trouble is always problematic. It causes some people to hurl around spurious accusations, looking to their own gain. Investigators then need to waste more time carefully sorting through the noise—either that, or they wind up punishing innocent people. This and similar suggestions (such as merits for reporting spam to the moderators) are made semi-regularly; I do not think such things will happen.
(Did anybody understand my apparent gibberish? Pbzr ba, sbyxf, guvf vf n pelcgb sbehz!) |
|
|
|
I'm getting used to the new merit system, even though I timed my starting point badly and had to pay (not much admittedly) for the privilege of posting for the first time. Could've been a few steps up, but can't complain as for the first few months I was only using the forum now and then for reading, and wasn't posting anything. It has it's flaws for sure, but definitely makes you put the time and effort in to improve. [...]
It’s good that you lurked before starting to post. Some of us lurked before even creating an account, too. The one thing I don't like is the obvious playing around by some where I've seen 5/10/20/50 merit points earned for one or two line 'stock' posts, but I guess that will gradually decrease as the system plays out. Onwards and upwards.
Older spammish accounts who received “grandfathered” merit will soon run out of it. Moreover, abusers tend to get “red-tagged” (negative trust feedback). They can get away with it for awhile before somebody notices. A red tag doesn’t stop usage of an account, but does make it almost useless for money-making purposes. Spammers and spam-supporters effectually get their accounts ruined that way. Protip: I have developed the habit of checking the merit histories of new users who seem to be approaching a rank increase threshold, or just passed one. I doubt that I be the only one doing that; a quick check for any obvious signs of merit abuse can provide leads in many cases. But in your case (Jr. Member with 70 activity and 9 merits), I didn’t even need to click through to any posts: I immediately saw that much of your merit comes from well-known persons! Cheers. |
|
|
|
I am jealous! This scumbag called you a “sociopath and pedophile”, but he only called me a paedophile. Where is the accusation of sociopathy? (It’s not as if I haven’t been accused of it before!) How can I be more awesome like you, actmyname? How ironic. You were part of a group of individuals arguing that emotion is not necessary whereas I have the opposite opinion. I cannot remember the exact thread but it is funny to see this dichotomy flipped around. I never spoke against emotion. Rather, against empathy. The discussion started after a DT (whom I otherwise respect) said he felt sad over the plea of an allegedly impoverished spammer who allegedly really, really needed to spam. Even if the sob story be true, I have no empathy, compassion, or pity whatsoever for such a cretin. ( N.b. that if poverty were adequate cause for criminal behaviour, then I myself would have become a criminal at certain points in my life. I did not; and I have nothing but cold contempt for those who do.) How can I be a pedophile if I'm only 11? /s
I just set my profile birthday to my account’s creation date. Since my account is now only 11 months old, my profile now shows my age as 0. Beat that. |
|
|
|
New snapshot of this thread:https://web.archive.org/web/20180315013509/https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3126248.0Edit: Newer snapshot:https://web.archive.org/web/20180315014644/https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3126248.0;all
You got present you little pedophile Edit: It was time this account to go to the used list Everyone posted here say welcome to your new spam of 200 negative feedbacks on your profile till tomorrow. To lazy to start my bot rightnow./ For the record: Negative trust feedback from #992943 “Danos” to nulliusDate: 2018-03-15 Risked BTC amount (alleged): 111,111.00000000 Reference: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3126248.0 (this thread) This guy is pedophile.
Buying child gay porn, mostly under 6 age.
This guy is criminal who can steal your underage kid and bring his sexual fantasy's in thru your kids nightmares.
You were warned.
You got present you little pedophile Wow!! What a keyboard warrior you are!! I'm sure Nullius is crying in his pillow right now!! Sobbing my little heart out. Also, I am terrified. You really don't get it do you, idiot? You can neg rate everyone you want here but it won't mean shit. Just like the neg that pissed you off doesn't mean shit. Now you've just buried yourself in negative trust, brain warrior. He is also too stupid to realize that the only time administrators intervene in trust disputes is in clear-cut cases of spam.
Everyone posted here say welcome to your new spam of 200 negative feedbacks on your profile till tomorrow. Thanks! I'm looking forward to getting a free boost to my collection of useless, retaliatory negative feedback from 15 year-olds!
You would think that someone with 146 BTC acting so arrogantly would at least want to prove it to induce a little bit of despair. Or that their site would look less shitty. I am jealous! This scumbag called you a “sociopath and pedophile”, but he only called me a paedophile. Where is my accusation of sociopathy? (It’s not as if I haven’t been accused of it before!) How can I be more awesome like you, actmyname?
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
