It was an overstatement. There are no major differences between Sumokoin and Monero besides the pow diff algo ( which in my very humble opinion is better and more responsive than all cryptonight coins, giving a hard time to cpu farms and botnets thus making the coin more profitable to miners https://github.com/sumoprojects/sumokoin/pull/10 ), the RingCT from the start (thus having no traceable legacy in its blockchain), the 12 mixins from day one (which is an overkill in terms of privacy) and the better emission scheme (this last one is just a personal and subjective opinion of mine, i cannot prove it). Sumokoin is only 6 months old but it has a solid GUI wallet for all OSs ( Windows, Linux, Mac ), its very profitable to mine ( most of the time it is the most profitable cryptonight coin on whattomine ), has a nice, big community, lots of pools ( www.sumopools.com ), will implement subaddresses in the next GUI version the following month ( so will Monero I guess ), a very good roadmap and 4 devs that have proven their skill up to now and they deliver on what they promise on time. We strive to grow alongside Monero and not against it. There is no competition whatsoever. Monero will always be the first and 100% private cryptonote based coin and will be a pioneer in all future developments. Our devs strive to follow Monero's path and wherever they think its possible improve and implement some of its features Very nice, thanks for explanation  I will more look at it by myself. |
|
|
|
Sumokoin is just Monero with other name... I don't see bright future. I much more like AEON.
That is not true at all  Even though Sumo is very young, there already are a few major differences  Tell me the major differences pls. |
|
|
|
Yes, you can say that hashrate is two times higher for GPU and four times for CPU than with Monero. Those are very nice benchmarks I will add the link to your post |
|
|
|
|
Sumokoin is just Monero with other name... I don't see bright future. I much more like AEON.
|
|
|
|
Forgive my lack of knowledge about timing straps, I though that's how they are.
But i'm now hitting 31.3 Mh at 2100 clock and 4 out of 8 cards are doing it. So I'd say there's really potential depending on the card if it could be pushed higher.
I'll post pictures tomorrow after work.
It's how it works but you can't expect some big hashrate changes in just few MHz. I said if your card is good and you won the silicon lottery you can have 31MH/s with this timing. For example the Uber-mix 3.1 on 2000MHz you will have around 30MH/s on 2200MHz you might have 31.5MH/s, but most cards won't be able to run 2200MHz. |
|
|
|
This is not how these things work, but it's rather strap dependent. I mean i made a strap that gives 30mhs at 2030, so i should be able to go up to 2150 and get 35mhs , right ?  That would be awesome :3 |
|
|
|
Thanks!
And if things go south, i'd just change them back to the lower mem clock settings.
I've meant that you need better timing to achieve that. Only if your card is super awesome that timing from PBE will do 31MH/s and more. |
|
|
|
Ok, I have switched back to sgminer from xmr-stak-2.0. Sgminer gives me slightly more hashes (2602h/sec vs 2590h/sec average) and my rig uses a bit less power with sgminer (345 vs 350 Watt). Also it has 0% dev fee vs 1% for xmr-stak.
It's not meant for stable mining. You can disable fees when building in donate-level.h. You might tried 2 threads and also play with intensity, it seems to be different from AMD version. |
|
|
|
Hey Matt, do you have an experience of a Nitro+ 580 4gb hitting 31Mh stable?
I'm running 8x right now (just finished setting it up last night) and I could get them to run at 30.5 stable for >12hrs now. You think they can push 31?
If you are using timings from the PBE 1.6, so probably yes. Mattthev, Thanks for the great tutorial running RX 470 4G with Elpida memory and mining ETH with it. Stock: 20MHs After following the guide and a couple of questions: 26.4 MHs Happy with this for now. More tuning later. Mark You need also OC the memory. What does the temperature target in BIOS indicate. The values are 70 on RX 570 Gaming X. Will the card throttle if it crosses this limit? RX 580 Nitro+ has this at 75.
@Mattthev maybe you would like to add a note in the OP. While using ATIflash not to have HWInfo or other softwares that reads off BIOS. They interrupt the flashing process. Have experienced this several times.
I've never had problem with this. It's only recommended to close MSI Afterburner or other OC utilities. |
|
|
|
Hello guys, can someone share which hashrate can ryzen 1700 achieve with xmr-stak miner?
XMR have 600H/s so for AEON around 1200H/s, probably more. |
|
|
|
Additionally im not a fan of lowering the donation fee like that:/
The original dev asked formally the whole monero community if it would be ok to increase it to 2% to cover further developments and the community accepted it. We shouldnt be stingy on stuff like that in my opinion.
This is for AEON, their XMR pool won't work with that. BTW you can always send XMR to their wallets, not AEON. |
|
|
|
That's the Relive driver release, which don't include the blockchain driver fix. The driver that ships with v1709 also works (didn't test if it removes the limit), but doesn't have the Dag fix and the blockchain drivers cause the Windows UI to be unstable, so hopefully AMD will update the blockchain driver for v1709 as well.
I just told you it has blockchain drivers in it... Saying it does and confirming it does are two different things. The release notes for the beta Relive drivers don't say anything about including the blockchain drivers. holy crap you are dumb lol  Ehm... What? Quick update: tried reinstalling all the drivers, still no luck though. Max 8 cards of the same spec. Btw I'm running W10 Home edition, maybe it works on W10 Pro?
That's good point, there might be the difference too. So who will test that? Everybody was exciting from mining mobos with 10+ PCI-E and bought them, seems like actually nobody have them |
|
|
|
I tried the new xmr-stak but not sure how multiple threads work I tried 6 threads on 3 cards but got weird results followed by crash 3 Vega Fe with 64GB ram 5.6 MH/s , pity it wasn't real! https://www.imageupload.co.uk/image/DOE7 currently running 3 gpu threads at 2016 for 4350 I played around with other higher numbers but kept locking up That would be great There are VEGA recommended values for XMR-STAK for 2 threads in the VEGA thread. This is unofficial pre-release... it might not be stable enough. |
|
|
|
Well, I'm curious. Someone who will try that? I have mobos max for 8 GPUs |
|
|
|
For the Nvidia there is almost nothing to change, only better options for build with CUDA 9. There are no better XMR-STAK sources like for the AMD version. And the variables you've changed are good. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
