BADecker
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3906
Merit: 1373
|
|
February 22, 2020, 04:57:06 PM |
|
LOL! You are such a puzzle. You find a NASA guy who takes the photos of the globe, and makes them into a video that displays the whole globe better. You make him out to be your hero. Then you try to say that the earth is flat. Maybe you are like a quantum computer qubit... off at the same time you are on, and on at the same time you are off.
|
|
|
|
BADecker
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3906
Merit: 1373
|
|
February 22, 2020, 05:04:27 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
notbatman (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2212
Merit: 1038
|
|
February 22, 2020, 05:06:01 PM |
|
When the clouds are painted on it's, it's not a photograph.
|
|
|
|
BADecker
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3906
Merit: 1373
|
|
February 22, 2020, 05:15:45 PM |
|
When the clouds are taken off a photograph so that the ground can be colored a bit better, and then the clouds are replaced onto the photo... who cares? It's simply a better picture of what was there in the first place.
|
|
|
|
notbatman (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2212
Merit: 1038
|
|
February 22, 2020, 05:25:27 PM |
|
When the clouds are painted on it's, it's not a photograph.
.
|
|
|
|
serbad
|
|
February 22, 2020, 05:28:43 PM Last edit: February 22, 2020, 10:11:36 PM by serbad |
|
He got alot of Faith.!................... but only in nasa.
edit: (and certain artists)
I sometimes dig for buttered rolls, Or set limed twigs for crabs; I sometimes search the grassy knolls For wheels of hansom-cabs. And that's the way" (he gave a wink) "By which I get my wealth-- And very gladly will I drink Your honor's noble health
I heard him then, for I had just Completed my design To keep the Menai bridge from rust By boiling it in wine. I thanked him much for telling me The way he got his wealth, But chiefly for his wish that he Might drink my noble health.
|
|
|
|
odolvlobo
Legendary
Online
Activity: 4438
Merit: 3341
|
|
February 22, 2020, 10:31:07 PM |
|
I remain unconvinced of the flat earth "buoyancy" theory of gravity because of the inconsistencies and contradictions, and because of the inability of proponents to explain it. I wonder if this one would be more suitable: Le Sage's theory of gravitation
|
Join an anti-signature campaign: Click ignore on the members of signature campaigns. PGP Fingerprint: 6B6BC26599EC24EF7E29A405EAF050539D0B2925 Signing address: 13GAVJo8YaAuenj6keiEykwxWUZ7jMoSLt
|
|
|
BADecker
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3906
Merit: 1373
|
|
February 22, 2020, 10:47:25 PM |
|
When the clouds are painted on it's, it's not a photograph.
. When you photograph a painting, it is a photograph.
|
|
|
|
serbad
|
|
February 22, 2020, 10:56:44 PM |
|
I remain unconvinced of the flat earth "buoyancy" theory of gravity because of the inconsistencies and contradictions, and because of the inability of proponents to explain it. I wonder if this one would be more suitable: Le Sage's theory of gravitationFrom where ever you are on earth up is up: plants grow up in the material world.. its where we are on this earth...or this density... things above this density are of less density and things below us are of more density in relation to Aether
|
|
|
|
BADecker
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3906
Merit: 1373
|
|
February 22, 2020, 11:06:34 PM |
|
I remain unconvinced of the flat earth "buoyancy" theory of gravity because of the inconsistencies and contradictions, and because of the inability of proponents to explain it. I wonder if this one would be more suitable: Le Sage's theory of gravitationFrom where ever you are on earth up is up: plants grow up in the material world.. its where we are on this earth...or this density... things above this density are of less density and things below us are of more density in relation to Aether But if you are up in America, Chinese and Aussies are down. Of course, they don't know it.
|
|
|
|
serbad
|
|
February 22, 2020, 11:07:48 PM |
|
I remain unconvinced of the flat earth "buoyancy" theory of gravity because of the inconsistencies and contradictions, and because of the inability of proponents to explain it. I wonder if this one would be more suitable: Le Sage's theory of gravitationFrom where ever you are on earth up is up: plants grow up in the material world.. its where we are on this earth...or this density... things above this density are of less density and things below us are of more density in relation to Aether But if you are up in America, Chinese and Aussies are down. Of course, they don't know it. Only on a globe.!
|
|
|
|
BADecker
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3906
Merit: 1373
|
|
February 23, 2020, 12:23:44 AM |
|
I remain unconvinced of the flat earth "buoyancy" theory of gravity because of the inconsistencies and contradictions, and because of the inability of proponents to explain it. I wonder if this one would be more suitable: Le Sage's theory of gravitationFrom where ever you are on earth up is up: plants grow up in the material world.. its where we are on this earth...or this density... things above this density are of less density and things below us are of more density in relation to Aether But if you are up in America, Chinese and Aussies are down. Of course, they don't know it. Only on a globe.! Or a cube.
|
|
|
|
notbatman (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2212
Merit: 1038
|
|
February 23, 2020, 09:29:39 AM Last edit: February 23, 2020, 09:44:53 AM by notbatman |
|
I remain unconvinced of the flat earth "buoyancy" theory of gravity because of the inconsistencies and contradictions, and because of the inability of proponents to explain it. I wonder if this one would be more suitable: Le Sage's theory of gravitation | | "Space and time", "planets", "galaxies" and "gravity"? In other words fucking nonsense! The Coulomb force (electromagnetism) ultimately drives any material particles in motion. "Space and time" along with relativistic "gravity" is a concept from Relativity (1905) and was falsified by D&P Sagnac (1939) at the University of Paris. What was proven, is that there is a static aether. The concept of "planets" as giant heavenly spheres reflecting sunlight over a distances of up to six billion miles and, the idea that the Earth is one of those balls of shit is batshit insanity! "galaxies" trillions upon trillions miles away? Go back to sleep man! The small lights you see moving in the sky are, #1 just small lights (not giant balls of shit) and, #2 are actually moving. To claim the stars are stationary and it's you that that's moving is nonsense, like the legs of your horse moving the ground below them. Le Sage's theory goes in the same basket as BADecker, who is permanently cucked on the heavenly spheres! If your answer to anything about the earth or the heavens involves ideas, concepts and theories from the satanic priests and their giant balls of shit then, you also go into that basket! These satanic priests are part of a cabal created by the Kabbalists. Einstein was both a Jew and a Jesuit!
|
|
|
|
BADecker
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3906
Merit: 1373
|
|
February 23, 2020, 02:17:01 PM |
|
I remain unconvinced of the flat earth "buoyancy" theory of gravity because of the inconsistencies and contradictions, and because of the inability of proponents to explain it. I wonder if this one would be more suitable: Le Sage's theory of gravitation | | https://i.imgur.com/nRzj0Ru.jpg"Space and time", "planets", "galaxies" and "gravity"? In other words fucking nonsense! The Coulomb force (electromagnetism) ultimately drives any material particles in motion. "Space and time" along with relativistic "gravity" is a concept from Relativity (1905) and was falsified by D&P Sagnac (1939) at the University of Paris. What was proven, is that there is a static aether. The concept of "planets" as giant heavenly spheres reflecting sunlight over a distances of up to six billion miles and, the idea that the Earth is one of those balls of shit is batshit insanity! "galaxies" trillions upon trillions miles away? Go back to sleep man! The small lights you see moving in the sky are, #1 just small lights (not giant balls of shit) and, #2 are actually moving. To claim the stars are stationary and it's you that that's moving is nonsense, like the legs of your horse moving the ground below them. Le Sage's theory goes in the same basket as BADecker, who is permanently cucked on the heavenly spheres! If your answer to anything about the earth or the heavens involves ideas, concepts and theories from the satanic priests and their giant balls of shit then, you also go into that basket! These satanic priests are part of a cabal created by the Kabbalists. Einstein was both a Jew and a Jesuit! Since you don't seem to think that there is much beyond what your eyes can see (except with a Nikon camera fitted with a telescopic lens), your life can be peaceful. After all, your faith is in the idea that ignorance is bliss. And as long as nothing painful comes to you because of your ignorance, you might have quite a comfortable life.
|
|
|
|
notbatman (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2212
Merit: 1038
|
|
February 23, 2020, 03:36:36 PM |
|
^^^ I can't say what's beyond the firmament with any certainty, so I'll go with "outer space" is not a vacuum and probably contains 99.999...% liquid water because God says so. Yup, good ol' H2O!
Your hard vacuum violates the second law of thermodynamics, have a good day.
|
|
|
|
BADecker
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3906
Merit: 1373
|
|
February 23, 2020, 07:39:27 PM |
|
^^^ I can't say what's beyond the firmament with any certainty, so I'll go with "outer space" is not a vacuum and probably contains 99.999...% liquid water because God says so. Yup, good ol' H2O!
Your hard vacuum violates the second law of thermodynamics, have a good day.
The second law of thermodynamics is relative to what we understand as standard material and energy. Go beyond that into the aether, the second law of thermodynamics doesn't apply in the same way. You are the one who says that the aether exists. This absolutely means that you don't accept the second law of thermodynamics anyway. No vacuum. The aether fills everything. If beyond the firmament means outside of the firmament for you, you are talking about outside of the universe.
|
|
|
|
BADecker
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3906
Merit: 1373
|
|
February 23, 2020, 08:46:04 PM |
|
Here is some more NASA proof that the earth is a globe.
NASA image reveals remains of an ancient lake that stretched 150,000 square miles...NASA shared an eerie image of what was once a lake larger than the Caspian Sea in central Africa.
Called Mega Chad, this massive body of water stretched 150,000 square miles across the Sahara and would have been the largest on Earth today.
Modern Lake Chad is just a fraction of its former size and sits inside the ancient body of water's shoreline that is still etched into the desert landscape.
The image highlights the dark lower-elevations of the area, along with sand spits and beach ridges that formed along Lake Mega Chad's northeastern shores.
Experts have noted that the enormous lake took just a couple hundred years to shrink to its current 137 square miles size.
The lake, which crosses the borders of Chad, Niger, Nigeria and Cameroon, has been further reduced in size by humanity siphoning off fresh water from it.
|
|
|
|
seoincorporation
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3276
Merit: 3066
|
|
February 23, 2020, 08:50:04 PM Last edit: February 25, 2020, 12:44:43 AM by seoincorporation |
|
Today someone dies trying to prove the Flat Earth theory. Mike Hughes gets into his homemade rocket and the landing doesn't goes fine. https://twitter.com/justindchapman/status/1231336002175717376I feel bad about Mike, he sacrifices himself and he couldn't prove the earth is flat. If he wants to see the earth curvature, there are better ways... Rest in peace Mike
|
|
|
|
BADecker
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3906
Merit: 1373
|
|
February 23, 2020, 08:57:22 PM |
|
Today someone dies trying to prove the Flat Earth theory. Mike Hughes gets into his homemade rocket and the landing doesn't goes fine. https://twitter.com/justindchapman/status/1231336002175717376I feel bad about Mike, he sacrifices himself and he could prove the earth is flat. If he wants to see the earth curvature, there are better ways... Rest in peace Mike Was that his parachute that was torn off during blast-off? Is that why he didn't parachute down?
|
|
|
|
|
|