Is Hillary Clinton Trustworthy?

[Wilikon]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gN6sNp0b1WE

[Wilikon]

State Department Turns Up Over 81,000 Emails From Top Hillary Clinton Aide They Swore Didn’t Exist…

State Department officials have uncovered thousands of emails between Philippe Reines, a top Hillary Clinton aide, and members of the media, they previously said did not exist.

In a court filing last Thursday, the State Department estimated that a recent search turned up more than 81,000 emails from Reines’s official account while at the State Department. And 17,855 potentially fall within a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit filed by Gawker earlier this year.

That is a reversal from 2013, when the State Department said a thorough search turned up no responsive records for Gawker’s request. In 2012, Gawker requested all emails between Reines and reporters from 34 media outlets.

The State Department did not explain the reversal in the court document, nor did it return a request for comment.

It will begin releasing a tranche of Reines’s emails by the end of September.

After it was revealed earlier this year that Clinton, and potentially some of her aides, used personal email accounts for official business, Gawker sued the State Department over its initial request for communications between Reines and reporters.


http://thehill.com/policy/technology/251297-in-reversal-state-turns-up-thousands-of-emails-from-top-clinton-aide

[Wilikon]

Clinton Email Scandal: A Long National Nightmare Looms



Corruption: The Hillary Clinton email scandal has become the Watergate of our time. But there's a significant difference. This time, America has a chance to stop a suspected crook from taking office.

The Watergate scandal was, in the words of President Ford "a long national nightmare." A sitting president was accused of being a party to illegal activity and covering it up. Ultimately he had to resign from office, the only president to do so.

Today we have a Democratic candidate who trails scandal behind her the way a dirt cloud follows the Peanuts character Pig Pen wherever he goes.

And though she leads the second-place candidate by a wide — 32.5 points — margin, a margin so large that it seems there's no way she won't be the Democrats' nominee, she is still outside the White House.

Unless we want another long national nightmare dragging down a president, this is where she should stay.

Like Watergate, Clinton's email scandal started slowly before it became a boulder rolling downhill. Now there's a fresh revelation nearly every day. Here are some of the crucial facts known through Monday:

• Clinton had a personal email account that she used for State Department business.

• That account was based in a private server located in the Clintons' Chappaqua, N.Y., compound.

• The server was professionally wiped clean before investigators were able to obtain it.

• At least 305 emails on Clinton's private account potentially contain classified material, and it's safe to say more like them will be found.

• At least two of the emails had top secret material.

• The FBI is conducting a criminal probe into the emails.

• Clinton's former chief of staff Cheryl Mills threatened to violate a court order and delete State Department emails.

• Clinton aide Huma Abedin had an email account on the Clinton server and exchanged government emails with Clinton on their private accounts.

• Abedin has family ties to the Muslim Brotherhood.

Given these facts, the Democrats need to ask themselves some hard questions:

• Do they want to stay behind a candidate who will be under investigation throughout the campaign?

• Do they still want to support a candidate who would start her term as president under investigation?

• Do they want to continue supporting a candidate for whom a Republican House would be drawing up articles of impeachment at the very moment she's taking the oath of office?

• Do they want a Democratic president who, after risking national security while secretary of state, shouldn't be allowed to have a security clearance?

The Democrats have the choice: They can stay with Clinton or move on to another candidate who doesn't have the scandal baggage she would empty on the Oval Office floor. That candidate is less likely to be elected, but also less likely to bring shame on the party and create a historical headache for the nation.

This really isn't a hard decision.


http://news.investors.com/ibd-editorials/081715-766902-democrats-can-avoid-long-national-nightmare-by-dumping-clinton.htm

[Spendulus]

....
• Do they want a Democratic president who, after risking national security while secretary of state, shouldn't be allowed to have a security clearance?

The Democrats have the choice: They can stay with Clinton or move on to another candidate who doesn't have the scandal baggage she would empty on the Oval Office floor. That candidate is less likely to be elected, but also less likely to bring shame on the party and create a historical headache for the nation.

This really isn't a hard decision.


http://news.investors.com/ibd-editorials/081715-766902-democrats-can-avoid-long-national-nightmare-by-dumping-clinton.htm

Don't worry.

If you want your liars you can keep them.

And if you like your lying lies, you can keep them too.

[Wilikon]

....
• Do they want a Democratic president who, after risking national security while secretary of state, shouldn't be allowed to have a security clearance?

The Democrats have the choice: They can stay with Clinton or move on to another candidate who doesn't have the scandal baggage she would empty on the Oval Office floor. That candidate is less likely to be elected, but also less likely to bring shame on the party and create a historical headache for the nation.

This really isn't a hard decision.


http://news.investors.com/ibd-editorials/081715-766902-democrats-can-avoid-long-national-nightmare-by-dumping-clinton.htm

Don't worry.

If you want your liars you can keep them.

And if you like your lying lies, you can keep them too.

She was the perfect crook, with the longest con ever... Until the rodeo clown pulled the rug under her feet in 2008... Now she looks like the very rug that was under her feet...

I mean no disrespect to rugs and carpets, including the flying ones...

[Wilikon]

EXCLUSIVE: Hillary's email firm was run from a loft apartment with its servers in the BATHROOM, raising new questions over security of sensitive messages she held


Democrat White House front runner used Platte River Networks of Denver, Colorado, to maintain her controversial 'home brew' server

Up to 60 emails with classified material have been found in a sample of those she did not delete - meaning there could be many more

Now Daily Mail Online reveals new questions over security of her emails when Platte River was involved in maintaining server

'Mom and pop' firm used converted residential apartment and had its own servers in a bathroom closet

Links between 'local' IT company and Clinton remain unclear but its VP of sales and marketing, who was sued for 'fraud' is said to be 'big Democrat'

'Mom and pop': Platte River Networks was housed in this apartment. The servers were in a closet off the bathroom, former employees tell Daily Mail Online

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3201367/Hillary-s-email-firm-run-loft-apartment-servers-BATHROOM-raising-new-questions-security-sensitive-messages-held.html

[Wilikon]

FBI Optimistic It Can Recover Some Data From Clinton Server



The FBI may be able to recover at least some data from Hillary Clinton's private email server even though there was an attempt to wipe it, two sources with direct knowledge of the process told NBC News on Tuesday.

The FBI is investigating the security of Clinton's personal server and the thumb drives that contain emails related to her work as secretary of state during President Barack Obama's first term. The Clinton campaign has previously acknowledged that there was an attempt to wipe the server before it was turned over last week to the FBI.


The FBI "will try to figure what's there, how it got there and who put it there," one of the sources said.


A team of intelligence community reviewers also looking at emails from the server have identified 305 documents that have been referred to their agencies for further consultation, State Department lawyers said in a court filing Tuesday intended to update a federal judge on efforts to release the emails.



http://www.nbcnews.com/politics/hillary-clinton/fbi-optimistic-it-can-recover-some-data-clinton-server-n411976




----------------------------------
Next time hillary, through the hard drives in there:






 

[Wilikon]

Who do you think is more likely to cry when Hillary is finally arrested, her or Bill?

Right. Bill.


It’s not just the e-mails they’re looking at potentially. Now that they have the server, they should be able to tell how many different users were accessing it, including unauthorized users. Which is to say, even if it can’t be proved that Hillary herself knowingly transmitted classified information in an insecure manner — not the criminal standard of culpability but the moral standard she’ll claim in doing damage control — the feds might be able to tell if foreign spies were reading her e-mail. It’ll be fun watching her on the trail trying to sell herself as the experienced adult in the room on national security when the papers are full of stories about the Chinese or Russians reading Top Secret documents right over her shoulder. At a minimum, the feds should be able to glean just how thorough her security protocols were. Did she do everything in her power to impede outside access into the system? The early bets on that are … not in her favor.

Another key question: When, precisely, was the server wiped? PolitiFact addressed that question last month and the closest it came to an answer was sometime in the fall of 2014, after the State Department had asked her for her work-related correspondence and she sent them a batch of e-mails in reply. Is that true, or did she actually wipe it much later, perhaps after Trey Gowdy subpoenaed her in March demanding that she produce all correspondence related to the Benghazi attack? If the answer is “after” then we have obstruction of justice in the form of destroying records to avoid compliance with a lawful demand. In fact, even if the answer is “before,” you could argue that we have obstruction of justice anyway. Law prof Ronald Rotunda made a compelling case back in March that if Hillary had reason to believe her e-mails might be subpoenaed eventually, then destroying them would make her guilty of anticipatory obstruction of justice. You shouldn’t be allowed to evade punishment, after all, just because you’re quick off the block in erasing damaging material while the authorities are still drawing up subpoenas and search warrants. If it turns out the server was wiped much later than we thought, when she clearly had reason to believe congressional investigators and even the FBI might have interest in it, she might be cooked.

Exit question: Why didn’t she have the server physically destroyed after she left the State Department so that nothing would be recoverable? For that matter, why didn’t she purge her archives and replace the server periodically, precisely so that she could claim it was a normal business practice if/when the feds came calling? The weirdest thing about this scandal is how haphazard Hillary’s behavior was throughout. She took a huge risk to begin with by putting her correspondence on an insecure private server, knowing that spies would be eager to infiltrate it, but instead of shelling out big bucks for the best security money could buy, she ran the operation out of her basement and then turned the old server over to a small mom-and-pop shop in the midwest. I would have thought the Clintons would hire their own white-hat hackers to defend their system from invasive attacks 24/7 and then run the latest server through an industrial shredder every year or so to make sure any data is good and gone. I don’t get it.


http://hotair.com/archives/2015/08/18/oh-yes-sources-tell-nbc-that-fbi-is-optimistic-it-can-recover-data-from-hillarys-wiped-server/

[Chef Ramsay]

I’m a Hillary Clinton fan. But I hope she bows out with grace

Hillary Clinton has a fundraising pot that is overflowing. She appears to be cruising to the 2016 Democratic presidential nomination: and then, if the stars align in her favour, on to a well-deserved place in history as the first female president of the United States.

Her supporters have wished it for so long, it seems almost impossible that it might not come to pass. And I would count myself among those supporters, ever since – as a Washington-based correspondent – I watched the lobbyists gang up to defeat her health plan, and observed how she toughed out the sordid revelations about her husband and “that woman, Miss Lewinsky”.

More...http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2015/aug/17/hillary-clinton-white-house-too-much-baggage

[Chef Ramsay]

Hillary Clinton Is Rooting for Jeb Bush

Thhere is an obvious subtext to the panicked effort to purge the GOP of Donald Trump: to allow the party’s true hero to emerge to vanquish Hillary Clinton and restore peace and justice throughout the land. To most GOP elites, of course, the savior is Jeb Bush, complete with the Clark Kent glasses and aw-shucks good guy demeanor. The Chamber of Commerce crowd is so convinced that Jeb is the man that it (so far) has placed a bet of more than $100 million on that proposition.
There’s just one problem—the Clintons want Jeb Bush to be the GOP nominee, too.

It was Trump himself who picked up on this fact when Hillary Clinton singled out Bush for criticism over his remark that “I’m not sure we need a half a billion dollars for women’s health issues.” Bush later said he “misspoke.” (This is supposed to be the safe, gaffe-free candidate, right?) By going after Jeb directly, and far from the first time, the Clintons want to “elevate” him, Trump charged, because they know they can beat him.

Here’s something you don’t hear, well, ever, in Washington: Donald Trump is right.

Regardless of whether Clinton survives her primary battle with a growing list of potential foes—that before long may include Joe Biden, blast-from-the-past Al Gore and heck, at this rate, maybe even Michael Dukakis—Republicans ought to think hard about the reasons why Bush might be the easiest of the serious GOP contenders for the Clintons to beat. And it’s not just because they’ve done it before.


Read more: http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2015/08/hillary-clinton-is-rooting-for-jeb-bush-121452.html#ixzz3jCyXRJNt

[Wilikon]

Question To Hillary: Did You Wipe The Server? Hillary: “You Mean Like With A Cloth Or Something?”

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T2OJwsit0WY

[Wilikon]

Todd: Three letters that changed the Hillary server saga — F, B, I



Whatever Hillary Clinton is selling, the panel on Morning Joe ain’t buying. The presumed Democratic frontrunner tried turning the Saga of the Secret Server into a joke this weekend, and then made it part of the Hillary fantasy of the vast right-wing conspiracy in further remarks. Not only does that not fly with the commentariat, Chuck Todd told the panel this morning, it’s no longer working on Democrat voters in Iowa, all thanks to three letters — F, B, and I:

Joe Scarborough: Forget the first problem, which was as you were saying, deciding to set up your own serve outside the State Department.

Chuck Todd: That’s why we’re here.

Scarborough: Let’s just go to last night. She’s in a fundraiser, this is much ado about nothing. And she is doing Snapchat jokes while the FBI is expanding their investigation, and now 305 emails and beyond, where all of us, who report the news, who you know read the news, look at it and go, well, that’s plainly not true. Just look at what se did last night and she’s digging herself if deeper in a a hole. By destroying her credibility. Why is she doing it?

Todd: You know, this is the only explanation is, it’s how they’ve handled these situations for the last 25 years.

Scarborough: But she’s fighting The New York Times, not Breitbart.

Todd: They believe they have been fighting The New York Times, by the way, for 50 years.

Scarborough: Let me say this, it’s the FBI, not Sean Hannity or Rush Limbaugh.

Todd: Which by the way, those three letters, because, look, I found the same thing. In my three days in Iowa when I was talking to Democrats out there and not just Democrats who want a job, right, Democrats who just simply are voting and taking their kids to the fair. The letters FBI is what changed this story. This is the difference between us and Washington and New York saying and her effectively a month ago being able to say this is you guys in the media that care about this, voters don’t. That was true a month ago. The three letters FBI totally changed the game.




http://hotair.com/archives/2015/08/18/todd-three-letters-that-changed-the-hillary-server-saga-f-b-i/

[cheetahman333]

Hillary clinton the criminal wiped the hard drives before turning them in 

Put this b*** in jail please

[chopstick]

Hillary clinton the criminal wiped the hard drives before turning them in  

Put this b*** in jail please

One could only fucking hope


Welcome our next fucking president.

She's all but been guaranteed the presidency by the globalists.

[Spendulus]

Hillary clinton the criminal wiped the hard drives before turning them in 

Put this b*** in jail please

Well, can The Country be ran from a jail cell?

Maybe it can.  Maybe we'll see.

[UMP Fourty 5]

No, you should use escrow with her.

[Wilikon]

CNN poll: Hillary’s lead over Trump in hypothetical match-up shrinks to just six points

[...]
Here’s my favorite of the many, many photoshops circulating on Twitter after Hillary’s trainwreck press conference yesterday. Oh, by the way: When registered Democratic voters were asked whether Biden should run, 53 percent said yes — which, coincidentally, equals the precise share of the primary electorate that’s not supporting Hillary in this poll. Not Hillary 53, Hillary 47?


http://hotair.com/archives/2015/08/19/cnn-poll-hillarys-lead-over-trump-in-hypothetical-match-up-shrinks-to-just-six-points/

[jayce]

So both Hillary and Trump are the strongest candidates for next US president so far. But seems Obama is still much better than all candidates. Unfortunately he can can't be elected for next period.

Edited

[Wilikon]

So both Hillary and Trump are the strongest candidates for next US president so far. But seems Obama is still much better than all candidates. Unfortunately he can be elected for next period.

Much better as a destroyer, on any level, that we can agree...

[Wilikon]

Clinton Refuses To Give Supporter A Hug


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zr4DOwk1lWg


It's a hug of love hillary... Love... Look it up.