Cryptix Your Digital Currency for the Future Launch Now !!!

[Cryptix-Network]

Here is the part about this Topic in our Whitepaper, was written BEFORE the first Genesis was mined allready:



What is Premining?

Premining refers to the creation or distribution of coins before the official launch of the blockchain or network, without offering the community equal access to them. This typically involves the coins being allocated through the genesis block or mined before the community or users have access to the source code. Premining is often seen as unfair or centralized, as it allows certain individuals (like developers, early investors, or project teams) to hold a significant portion of the coins prior to the public launch. This can undermine trust in the project.


What is Not Premining?

If the source code is publicly available and accessible at the time of the official launch, it is not considered premining—especially if the genesis block does not include any payouts. Premining specifically refers to the prior distribution of coins to select individuals before the official start of the network. The official launch of a project is generally marked by the activation of the network (mainnet), the creation of the first block, and the public release of the source code. If the source code is published, and the mining process starts simultaneously with the launch, there is no premining involved.

Cryptix Case Example:
In the case of Cryptix, no blocks were mined before the source code was publicly available via the website or GitHub. The source code was accessible to the public for weeks, even during the development phase. As a result, we encountered issues with existing miners before the final genesis block was mined and the network was officially launched, which disrupted our development. The Cryptix team will begin mining immediately upon the release, which will occur as soon as the final genesis block is created. We estimate that we will mine 6-9% of the total coins, which is relatively low compared to other projects. Many projects impose 20-40% developer fees, meaning the developers take a portion of transaction fees or block rewards (i.e., a percentage of all coins). In the case of tokens, founders may even own 100% of the tokens and still charge developer fees for transactions. Cryptix, however, operates with a 0% developer fee. The coins we mine will primarily be used for future development, long-term community engagement, liquidity, exchange listings, and other strategic purposes. The Cryptix Genesis had no Payout.



It is important to understand that the development of a cryptocurrency and blockchain project requires significant financial resources and a lot of time. Development environments must be paid for, seed servers are needed for network launch, licenses, additional servers, security systems, domain systems, email systems, and more. All of this costs money, which developers must often pay out of their own pockets. The months or even years of work and time invested are not even factored in. Users and miners often expect developers to work for free, but this is far from reality. Why should developers pay for everything and give away their time and effort? Moreover, further steps towards the success of a cryptocurrency, such as listing on centralized exchanges (CEX), require even more financial resources. Listing on these platforms is not free. Additionally, the coin itself is necessary for initiating trading. In our opinion, it would be impossible for a developer to create a successful crypto project without owning their own coin. Another important consideration is long-term motivation—cryptocurrency projects should be supported and developed over the years, not just until the initial release. Developer fees or early mining of a coin are essential for developers and the team to cover costs and ensure the success of the project. The key is that these fees are fair and reasonable. Unfortunately, this has often been abused in the past by "pump and dump" projects. The same applies to trading platforms, pool providers, and mining software developers. A pool provider has significant costs for servers, a trading platform must ensure server capacity and security, and a mining software provider must continuously update the software and support each coin individually. Anyone who has ever written a GPU driver knows how complex and time-consuming that work can be.

[visibleplayer]

You made genesis 50 million coins stop talking nonsense. Even if someone started mining before mainnet 50 million coins is almost 2 month mining. You cheated anyway.
https://ibb.co/kszsknRC  54 million coins supply 30 jan
https://ibb.co/Wp5YDjN9 Why hiding supply?
The question is not (why you have premine) You should've say guys i have premine. But why you hiding it?

[Cryptix-Network]

As I already mentioned, the numbers may not have been correct initially, but as we observed, they should correct themselves at pruning points. The value should now be accurate and match expectations. And even if it were the case? So what? It aligns perfectly with our planned distribution of 24% by 03/2025 or 54% by 01/2026. A fast coin distribution is in our interest and has been intentionally designed this way. Since we are not a meme coin but an end-use system, this is necessary.

No, the genesis had no payout—this can be verified in the source code.

Next: Whom did we cheat? Who was scammed, and in what way? We can release our coin however we want—when, how, and where. We don’t need to ask for your permission. Especially not from a user running three fake accounts simultaneously, who has already launched five coin projects with highly questionable outcomes. That says it all.

Even if it were a premine, that is completely allowed and entirely normal. Since we have no developer fees, there is no issue. And legally, this does not need to be stated in the whitepaper. If you believe otherwise, then please provide me with the relevant law. Our lawyer has reviewed EU and US regulations, and everything has been legally overseen and complied with. But in our case, this wasn’t even a premine, as the source code is public and accessible to all users. This, too, was legally supervised.

Hiding a developer fee of, for example, 1-5% within transactions without informing users and not mentioning it in the whitepaper—that would be "cheating." The same applies to secretly implementing it afterward, especially after drunkenly burning your premine coins and deleting the Discord.

Looking at your failed projects, it's clear that you have no understanding of laws or obligations. You simply don’t get it—even after being told five times. And I won’t explain it to you again. I won’t respond to your fake account anymore. Log in with your real account, and we can continue this
conversation.


But to answer your question: Yes, we launched the Genesis block and were likely the first miners in the network while the source code was public and other users had access to mining. However, since we already had miners in the network during the first Testnet Genesis, we were not "alone." We also mined a significant number of coins—proportionally reasonable for long-term development and associated costs.

Our initial plan was to mine around 10-12% of the coins, but since there were already miners in the network, we adjusted this to 6-9%. As a result, we couldn’t mine as many coins as originally planned. And let’s be honest—there are projects with 20-40% actual premine, plus additional developer fees. Even well-known, successful projects like ETH had over 50%. Long-term development requires funding, especially if the coin is meant to have real-world utility. For example, in order to develop and distribute NFC cards to our community, we need significant financial resources. Just do the math—what does it cost to produce 1,000 cards at $10 each? And that’s just one example. Partnerships with POS systems or ATM providers are even more expensive—we have already gathered offers for such collaborations. This isn’t about system development but simply securing cooperation with providers.

At this moment, we cannot provide an exact figure for how many coins the team has accumulated in total. Due to the release and the related challenges, we haven’t had the time to calculate it yet. However, we plan to compile the numbers and attempt to extract tables from the database for a clearer overview. Since we weren’t the only miners, we cannot precisely determine how many coins were mined at any given time—whether the database filler worked or not. That’s why the current estimate is 6-9%.

At the time of your screenshot—which I believe is incorrect—about 9.5% had been distributed. However, we didn’t mine all of those coins ourselves. Despite our request for the community to refrain from mining, users did the exact opposite. Even if 11% had been reached at that point, it would have been only ~2% more than planned. This happened because, immediately after Genesis, a difficulty of 1 was set (which was a mistake on our part), leading to a flood of blocks and significant percentage fluctuations.

[visibleplayer]

Next: Whom did we cheat? Who was scammed, and in what way? We can release our coin however we want—when, how, and where. We don’t need to ask for your permission. Especially not from a user running

You cheating right now at miners by hiding circulated supply

[TMKCodes]

I'm not here to disrupt you or your project; I'm here to clarify and bring some sense to the claims you're making, which you're sharing with others.

This screenshot demonstrates a misunderstanding of how Kaspa handles blocks, transactions, and transaction confirmations.
https://i.ibb.co/FL7j6jQs/1111111111111.png

As I've pointed out before, the "Accepting Block hash -" and "Not Accepted" messages in the explorer don't indicate an invalid block. They simply mean that the virtual chain hasn't yet accepted (or confirmed) the transactions within that block. Additionally, the IAm3R database filler is known to crash occasionally, which restarts the database filler and it's virtual chain processor, causing updates to transaction confirmations to temporarily pause. As a result, the explorer database can be in an incomplete state. The most reliable block information is retrieved directly from the node via the GetBlock gRPC call. If the case is that explorer database filler has missed update of information, it does not stop the coinbase UTXO reward of mining the block from moving to your wallet.  

Regarding the launch date and premining, it was initially set for 1.2.2024 but changed to 30.1.2024. You were mining before the official launch, which constitutes pre-mining, regardless of whether others were mining at the same time. This could have been prevented with proper firewall management.

Finally, I question why I should assist someone who hides behind anonymity, lies, and threatens and verbally attacks others simply for questioning your understanding of the technology.

On another matter, I won't believe any estimated number of premine wallet balances. Since you know the wallet addresses that was premined into and you know the amounts the wallets hold, so you don't need to estimate how much was premined.

[Cryptix-Network]

Now Mr. Kobra, Mr. Pool Operator, and all of you colleagues, we have already reported you to the police in your countries and filed charges for defamation, hacking, stalking, and unfair competition or illegal competition through our lawyer. All the reports have been received by the police, and we will see each other in court. Your identities are already known because you aren't as anonymous as you thought, due to server and domain registrations. You even forgot to use your VPN in some cases. Unfortunately, there is no other way to stop you, so let the court and the police do it.

P.S. Kobra, your payload attacks were easily predictable. We intentionally let them through and acted like we didn’t know what was happening to obtain the IP addresses and hoped you'd forget the VPN, which you did. After we had gathered all the evidence we needed, we stopped your attacks, or rather, your attacks. It wasn't just you. We know your exact location and the police already know your name through the telecommunications provider. That was the last coin you extorted and harmed with. We will stop you through the police and the law.

[igotek]

I see an active exchange: https://mecacex.com
There are a few active minnig pool.
Good project.

is it possible to add how many coins in 24 hours calculation to any pool or your web site.
We can just put our hashrate and get the results.

[safebase]

Hello Cryptix Team,

I think your project is fantastic, and I can tell from the effort put into the website that it was created with passion. I also run a crypto project and have experienced the same challenges as you—fake accounts on this forum and Discord, lies, accusations, as well as DDoS attacks and breaches on interfaces. I was even blackmailed.

Because of this, I created a new account here to share information with you anonymously. In our project, the name "Mr. Kobra" also came up, and we were able to gather data about the attacker. I am willing to provide this information to the police as well:

The attacker targeting your network (who is also behind the fake accounts here) is:
Alexey Volkov, also known as Mr. Kobra – he runs the KobraDag coin.

He claims to be from Dubai, including on his coin project, but that is false. He is actually in Russia, living in a poor district on the outskirts of a city. He pretends to be from Dubai because a "Dubai Coin" sells better than a "Russia Coin," all while falsely accusing other coins of being scams.

Additionally, the names like "Sarah Johnson" that he has listed as members/operators are completely fabricated—they do not exist.

Message me via PM, and I will share his full details, including his full address, photo, and more. We have already filed a police report—perhaps it will help if multiple people do the same.

[Cryptix-Network]

Thank you for taking the time – I really appreciate it.

According to our lawyer, we are currently not allowed to provide any information about the attackers, as the investigations are still ongoing. For the same reason, we cannot confirm any names.

However, we can say that we have engaged specialized lawyers in the target countries to handle and follow up on the criminal complaints. One complaint has indeed been filed with the public prosecutor's office in Moscow, Russia. But not only there—complaints have also been filed in two other countries. In total, 12 different offenses have been reported, including extortion, stalking, attempted hacking, and anti-competitive behavior.

We are also in contact with other blockchain operators who were likely attacked by the same individuals—whether through social engineering, DDoS attacks, or other methods. These operators have now joined forces and filed criminal complaints with the same attorney.

If you'd like, send me a private message on Discord, and I can provide you with the contact details of the attorneys handling the cases in each country.

It would be great if we could stop these criminals.

Hello Cryptix Team,

I think your project is fantastic, and I can tell from the effort put into the website that it was created with passion. I also run a crypto project and have experienced the same challenges as you—fake accounts on this forum and Discord, lies, accusations, as well as DDoS attacks and breaches on interfaces. I was even blackmailed.

Because of this, I created a new account here to share information with you anonymously. In our project, the name "Mr. Kobra" also came up, and we were able to gather data about the attacker. I am willing to provide this information to the police as well:

The attacker targeting your network (who is also behind the fake accounts here) is:
Alexey Volkov, also known as Mr. Kobra – he runs the KobraDag coin.

He claims to be from Dubai, including on his coin project, but that is false. He is actually in Russia, living in a poor district on the outskirts of a city. He pretends to be from Dubai because a "Dubai Coin" sells better than a "Russia Coin," all while falsely accusing other coins of being scams.

Additionally, the names like "Sarah Johnson" that he has listed as members/operators are completely fabricated—they do not exist.

Message me via PM, and I will share his full details, including his full address, photo, and more. We have already filed a police report—perhaps it will help if multiple people do the same.

[visibleplayer]

what a cringe 

[Cryptix-Network]

We'll see after the police have been to your place. And then you can speak about "infected" Nodes on other Coin Projects too, yes we know this too. And about your russian "Dubai" Coin.

[bugo4ka1]

dev is just lying..
https://cryptix-network.org/cryptix-tx-ai this is not an AI! It's just transaction processor.

[safebase]

You are so incompetent that calling yourself a developer is practically fraud. And that’s actually the least of the issues with KobraDAG. So you can’t even open a ZIP file to see that there are .PKL files inside for machinal learning? How can training values ​​change without machine learning? What exactly is machine learning? You lack basic knowledge, the only thing you know is how to create fake accounts. And you don’t understand what .PKL files are either? You also can’t distinguish between technology (AI) and function (scanner, etc.). Its clear visible, its using IsolationForest, DBSCAN as a data-based model, cause its using python based pkl files for machinal learning.

Are you jealous, Mr. Kobra?
Your roadmap has listed three AIs for over a year, and not a single line of code has been written? Meanwhile, Cryptix had its first AI just two weeks after release. Maybe you should learn to code—there are some good beginner tutorials on YouTube.

dev is just lying..
https://cryptix-network.org/cryptix-tx-ai this is not an AI! It's just transaction processor.

[Cryptix-Network]

Unfortunately, there are always false claims circulating about Cryptix & its developers, so we want to clarify this topic:

It all started back in the testnet phase. During development—weeks before the genesis block was mined—people from other cryptocurrencies joined our channel. Some used fake accounts, others joined with their real developer accounts. Even team members from other cryptocurrencies and pool operators were among them.

Some of them were quite negative and critical. At first, we made an effort to respond to questions, clarify things, and address concerns. However, we quickly realized that it didn't matter what we wrote or how much information we provided. It was never about understanding or constructive criticism—it was an attempt to suppress, discredit, and block us. That became clear very quickly, though we didn’t yet understand why.

Miners frequently joined the testnet, not realizing that it wasn’t the final genesis. Even though we repeatedly announced this, they continued mining—just in case it turned out to be the real genesis. With each reset, the number of miners decreased—partly due to changes in the PoW hash and partly due to laziness in redownloading everything. Some miners, however, were persistent. Within five minutes of us changing the PoW and resetting the database, they had already updated and were back online. At that time, we had no idea who these miners were. Later, by analyzing IP addresses, we found that some of them were possibly team members or operators themselves (though it’s impossible to say for sure).

We could have made our GitHub repository private, but that might have led to regulatory issues regarding securities classification, as we would no longer be considered open-source. So, we left everything public and accessible from the testnet phase—weeks before the real blockchain launch.

We estimated a possible release date of 01/02/2025 (DD/MM/YYYY), always emphasizing that it was an approximate date and not a fixed deadline. We planned to release as soon as development allowed. There was never a firm promise of a specific date—it was always marked with "" and words like "approximately." This was mainly due to multiple issues with the first pruning point, which we initially didn’t understand. Later, we discovered the genesis block itself was the issue, which we then resolved.

Before the release, around 100 people were in the Discord group, and over 20 miners were already on the network. The exact number was hard to determine since IP addresses kept changing. Some even used scripts to constantly switch IPs to avoid possible bans. This significantly disrupted our development work and delayed everything.

When we launched, we knew we wouldn't receive many coins—yet we needed them for development, community events, server costs, and so on. Unlike other cryptocurrencies, we have no developer fee on blocks. The only fee currently in place is a 1% fee on the mining software, which can be removed and operates under an MIT license. There are also external mining software options. Additionally, our mining pool has a 1% fee, but users can mine on their own node or use external pools. Otherwise, there are no fees—it’s entirely possible to use Cryptix without any fees.

Other cryptocurrency projects falsely claimed that we had a developer fee. Where? Check the transactions—there is none.

So how were we supposed to cover our costs? What about the work, time, and development effort? How should a long-term crypto project survive? If it’s a legitimate project and not some pump-and-dump scam that buys expensive listings and traps retail investors, it needs sustainable funding.

Of course, we had to mine at the very start of the blockchain to obtain enough coins. Our initial goal was to mine around 10–12%. As a side note, Ethereum, for example, had around a 60% premine/pre-distribution.

In the end, the entire Cryptix team collectively mined about 8%. This was below our expected range but still acceptable for a long-term project. Testnet miners were also very active at launch, some with significant hash power. We have never hidden this fact—why would we? Are we expected to pay for everything out of our own pockets forever? Is it illegal for us to own coins? Are we expected to work for free? That’s absurd and completely detached from reality.

To clarify: by the official definition, there was no "premine." The source code was always online and accessible, meaning anyone could have mined at any time. Some people did.

Apparently, some just missed their chance. On launch day, we already had 250 GH/s, meaning they weren’t the first miners. Maybe they were asleep? One particular project owner who missed the start became our biggest hater.

Similarly, a pool operator claimed—three days before release—that everything was set up and tested. However, at launch, it turned out he was still running an old version of the node with an outdated PoW hash—about three weeks old. This means he hadn’t actually done anything and even lied about being "ready" and having "tested everything." How could he have tested it with an outdated node? I had no idea he had done nothing, but I did notice an old node on the network and repeatedly asked in Discord who it belonged to. The pool operator knew there was a new PoW hash available for a week but still didn’t update in time. That’s incredibly unprofessional.

When the launch happened, he and his friends demanded that we reset the blockchain—just because they missed out on early mining and didn’t update their pools in time. Some team members even pressured us, saying we had to reset. But miners were already mining, and there was no technical reason to reset—only their own failure to prepare. They literally tried to blackmail us, saying that if we didn’t reset, they would "destroy" our coin.

We didn’t reset the blockchain, as everyone knows.

Afterward, fake accounts started spreading misinformation—coming from these same crypto project operators, their team members, and the pool operator’s group. They falsely claimed there was a premine, that the genesis block had high payouts (it had none—this is verifiable), and that our GitHub repository wasn’t always public (it was). They called us scammers—always the same people, always from fake accounts. Some were just upset they missed the early mining opportunity; others were jealous or saw us as competition. Some were simply asleep when we launched.

We have since cut all contact with these people, blocked them, and ignored their private messages (of which there were many attempts).

As the lead developer, I’ve heard a lot of wild claims about my identity. First, I was a Chinese student. Then, I was a crypto developer named "GOR" from another project. Then, I was a Finnish water company owner. Now, apparently, I’m from Israel. I’ve even seen photos of "me" that were completely fake. Every single claim has been wrong—not even the country was correct. No one on our team has ever been involved with another cryptocurrency. But think about how insane these people are—how much time they spend on this nonsense instead of developing their own projects.

And that brings me to my next point: I’ve looked into these people’s projects. Their coins are 6–12 months old, yet they’ve developed nothing. Absolutely nothing. Just copy-paste code and minor tweaks to make it look like progress. They advertise AI, but after a year, there’s still none. They claim to fix security flaws that never existed. Not a single one of these projects has real development—just superficial code changes from other sources.

Some of them are outright criminals. I know of fraud cases involving mining pools manipulating algorithms to falsely claim rewards. This is fraud in every country.

My advice: research crypto projects carefully. Don’t just trust roadmaps—anyone can write anything. Look at real development. Check how long a project has been around and what unique innovations it offers. Protect yourself as a miner or user.

And when a crypto project only talks about other projects, especially with lies or negative tone, then you know for sure that they are not focused on the progress of their own cryptocurrency. A normal developer focuses on his own project and not on others. It already shows everything.


We will no longer respond to these fake accounts. If you have any questions, come to our Discord with a real account. We are transparent and have nothing to hide.

[energy_xxx]

There is no withdrawal on the Mecacex exchange. I cannot withdraw the cytx I purchased to my wallet or another exchange.


Withdraw Status

×
Close
fail
WITHDRAW IS FAILED
Bad Request

[Cryptix-Network]

That's why we warn against MecaCex.
MecaCex should not be used, as many users have been scammed. Even if MecaCex tries to attract users with seemingly cheaper prices.

There are special posts on our website and in Discord that expressly advise against using MecaCex.