What's your opinion of gun control?

[Lancusters]

The theme of weapons of artificially thrown into the society by politicians to divert attention to the poor efficiency of police work and the split in the society on a very important issue. If you compare statistics on the number of dead people in car accidents then it will be much more than those killed in all mass shootings, but anybody in a head does not come to prohibit the use of cars.

[Deathmist]

In my opinion, they should do tests before giving someone weapon license. Because there is a case like Eliot Rodger's one, I mean how can you let a mentally disturbed guy own a gun?

[coinits]

I am of the view that not everyone should have access to a gun, not everyone is mentally sound enough to have a gun and people who have committed serious offenses should not be allowed to have access to weapons n

And who gets to judge that someone is too mentally ill to own a gun? A liberal shrink? Just by calling out Liberals as gun control shills is enough for some of them to declare someone mentally ill.

[PeterTheGrape]

In my opinion, they should do tests before giving someone weapon license. Because there is a case like Eliot Rodger's one, I mean how can you let a mentally disturbed guy own a gun?

In the U.S. there is testing for everything.

If a person does poorly enough on tests in high school, they are given a rifle and sent to kill dark skinned people in other countries.

When they get back, they are given an intelligence test. Those that score low enough are given badges and additional weapons.  http://www.nytimes.com/1999/09/09/nyregion/metro-news-briefs-connecticut-judge-rules-that-police-can-bar-high-iq-scores.html

[BADecker]

In my opinion, they should do tests before giving someone weapon license. Because there is a case like Eliot Rodger's one, I mean how can you let a mentally disturbed guy own a gun?

They went a step beyond that in Arizona and some other States. In AZ you don't even have to have a license for concealed carry.

[tikboyhere]

Gun control should implement strictly to the world because gun is built to kill someone. Though it can be form of self defense there are authorities that will be responsible to judge these bad people. I still believe that there are always reason for living and as long as we live, change is always an option. But make sure there is no drugs involved because it will cook your mind. And as a result you will not be able to think and to change for your future. Gun is evil it never been good because it kills people. Im also against if it will put as a hobby. But then again this is just my opinion.

[allohha]

Gun control should implement strictly to the world because gun is built to kill someone. Though it can be form of self defense there are authorities that will be responsible to judge these bad people. I still believe that there are always reason for living and as long as we live, change is always an option. But make sure there is no drugs involved because it will cook your mind. And as a result you will not be able to think and to change for your future. Gun is evil it never been good because it kills people. Im also against if it will put as a hobby. But then again this is just my opinion.

We must also take into account the fact that we have a very active outbreak of crime at the domestic level. And if legalize the weapon, then it will necessarily be applied in solving family problems. I think that family violence will only raise its level if the eyebrows are legalized.

[BADecker]

Gun control should implement strictly to the world because gun is built to kill someone. Though it can be form of self defense there are authorities that will be responsible to judge these bad people. I still believe that there are always reason for living and as long as we live, change is always an option. But make sure there is no drugs involved because it will cook your mind. And as a result you will not be able to think and to change for your future. Gun is evil it never been good because it kills people. Im also against if it will put as a hobby. But then again this is just my opinion.

How do you implement gun control against those who have guns? Do you attack them with sticks and stones?

If you attack them with guns and win, will you really willingly destroy your own guns like you destroyed theirs?

You sound like a world control freak.

[warrior333]

In my opinion, they should do tests before giving someone weapon license. Because there is a case like Eliot Rodger's one, I mean how can you let a mentally disturbed guy own a gun?

They went a step beyond that in Arizona and some other States. In AZ you don't even have to have a license for concealed carry.

With this approach to gun crime there is 22% less than in the States where it is forbidden to carry weapons.There are cities of Chicago, new York, Washington, Detroit, Washington where the weapon cannot have both. These cities are home to only 6 % of the population. And committed 20 % of all us murders!

[Hazir]

See what is happening in Europe right now, terrorists don't need to use guns to kill people. They will just use cars/trucks and then slaughter bystanders with long knives.
It is really sad and bit of funny that we have policemen armed only with nightsticks to battle them.
So here is my short conclusion: If terrorists knew that society is armed with guns they wouldn't be so eager to strike.

[Lampaster]

Should be able to keep a small gun for safety reasons, but I think the owner should get checked up on his psychological history etc before allowing him to get one.

And what will happen if the owner of the weapon will get mental disorder after receiving a license for the right to keep and bear arms? Is the same and so. It is impossible to prevent everything, but if guns save lives then it should be.

[VadikZimnyayaRezina]

Should be able to keep a small gun for safety reasons, but I think the owner should get checked up on his psychological history etc before allowing him to get one.

And what will happen if the owner of the weapon will get mental disorder after receiving a license for the right to keep and bear arms? Is the same and so. It is impossible to prevent everything, but if guns save lives then it should be.

So you need to go to the doctor every six months and confirm that the weapon holder has not lost his mind during this time. But this is too complicated and does not give any guarantees. The right to own weapons is a very complex issue

[sindikat]

In the USA in the State of Florida there was a firing, is reported about "the numerous victims". Reports office of the sheriff of the city of Orlando about it.
"The staff of office of the sheriff works at the scene, the situation is taken under control. There are numerous victims. The sheriff will give additional information as soon as possible" — it is said in the message of police on Twitter.
According to CNN, firing has happened in one of industrial zones in the suburbs. Around firing several streets are blocked, the police has gathered on the parking near the warehouses located near the place of an incident.

[Xester]

Should be able to keep a small gun for safety reasons, but I think the owner should get checked up on his psychological history etc before allowing him to get one.

And what will happen if the owner of the weapon will get mental disorder after receiving a license for the right to keep and bear arms? Is the same and so. It is impossible to prevent everything, but if guns save lives then it should be.

So you need to go to the doctor every six months and confirm that the weapon holder has not lost his mind during this time. But this is too complicated and does not give any guarantees. The right to own weapons is a very complex issue

The right to own should be complex to avoid any incident like shooting incident on cinemas, malls, schools, and recently casinos.  It is okay to put all the aspirant to have guns to be checked regularly but maybe not every 6 months.  Every year or every renewal of right to own is okay and the person should undergo the psycho test.  But as you said it will not still guarantees that the holder will not do any illegal matters.  

[Proton2233]

Today in the Australian Melbourne explosion and fire in one of the houses. Police found in the foyer of a housing complex shot and killed a man. Then the shooting happened. The gunman wounded two police officers, took a hostage and barricaded in one of apartments. And this despite the fact that in Australia it is forbidden to have weapons. If they lived in America they would have a chance to survive.

[tvbcof]

Should be able to keep a small gun for safety reasons, but I think the owner should get checked up on his psychological history etc before allowing him to get one.

And what will happen if the owner of the weapon will get mental disorder after receiving a license for the right to keep and bear arms? Is the same and so. It is impossible to prevent everything, but if guns save lives then it should be.

So you need to go to the doctor every six months and confirm that the weapon holder has not lost his mind during this time. But this is too complicated and does not give any guarantees. The right to own weapons is a very complex issue

The right to own should be complex to avoid any incident like shooting incident on cinemas, malls, schools, and recently casinos.  It is okay to put all the aspirant to have guns to be checked regularly but maybe not every 6 months.  Every year or every renewal of right to own is okay and the person should undergo the psycho test.  But as you said it will not still guarantees that the holder will not do any illegal matters.  

Let's see.  Say 10% of the population owns a gun.  Rounding down, say, 30,000,000 people.  A 'check' is going to require several people and at least one with some law enforcement experience for safety reasons.  Let's say they average 1 check per hour (which seems highly optimistic to me in noting how government employees and their contractors tend to work.)  That's 8 checks per day.  The back of my envelope reads a cost of about $6,000,000,000.  Six Billion dollars per year.

This doesn't include the 'psycho tests'.  It also doesn't include medical care for people who get their asses shot off by either showing up at someones door demanding to inventory their guns, or the people who get their asses shot off by the swat team because they shot the bureaucrats ass off in the first place.

[bittmattic]

I'm all for protecting myself with guns against other people who might use guns against me

[hovrah]

Should be able to keep a small gun for safety reasons, but I think the owner should get checked up on his psychological history etc before allowing him to get one.

And what will happen if the owner of the weapon will get mental disorder after receiving a license for the right to keep and bear arms? Is the same and so. It is impossible to prevent everything, but if guns save lives then it should be.

So you need to go to the doctor every six months and confirm that the weapon holder has not lost his mind during this time. But this is too complicated and does not give any guarantees. The right to own weapons is a very complex issue

The right to own should be complex to avoid any incident like shooting incident on cinemas, malls, schools, and recently casinos.  It is okay to put all the aspirant to have guns to be checked regularly but maybe not every 6 months.  Every year or every renewal of right to own is okay and the person should undergo the psycho test.  But as you said it will not still guarantees that the holder will not do any illegal matters.  

Let's see.  Say 10% of the population owns a gun.  Rounding down, say, 30,000,000 people.  A 'check' is going to require several people and at least one with some law enforcement experience for safety reasons.  Let's say they average 1 check per hour (which seems highly optimistic to me in noting how government employees and their contractors tend to work.)  That's 8 checks per day.  The back of my envelope reads a cost of about $6,000,000,000.  Six Billion dollars per year.

This doesn't include the 'psycho tests'.  It also doesn't include medical care for people who get their asses shot off by either showing up at someones door demanding to inventory their guns, or the people who get their asses shot off by the swat team because they shot the bureaucrats ass off in the first place.

And in my country there is already talk about not only storing but also carrying a firearm with a comma, but only to all law enforcement officers and even former employees. But not one Civil this right will not have.

[Gelap]

In my opinion.
Gun control is very good.
If it is not in control then every day there will be people dead due to guns.

[Lieldoryn]

In my opinion.
Gun control is very good.
If it is not in control then every day there will be people dead due to guns.

Tightening or liberalization of the rules for obtaining a license for weapons is only for politicians. It is not possible to speak about the economy, they affect the second amendment to the U.S. Constitution. The weapon is an integral part of American society and never allow politicians to take it from the population.