What's your opinion of gun control?

[helloeverybody]

At my opinion gun control is okay, cause it's prevent many accidents, many people have trouble with emotions and head, they should not own guns at my opinion.

this is common sense to most people, allow those who have reason and can be trusted to have guns, those that have anger issues/criminal records/mental conditions shouldn't be allowed to own guns for obvious reasons. Its simple, if you can stop the bad guys getting guns then do it.

[1714610550]

1714610550

[1714610550]

1714610550

[BADecker]

At my opinion gun control is okay, cause it's prevent many accidents, many people have trouble with emotions and head, they should not own guns at my opinion.

this is common sense to most people, allow those who have reason and can be trusted to have guns, those that have anger issues/criminal records/mental conditions shouldn't be allowed to own guns for obvious reasons. Its simple, if you can stop the bad guys getting guns then do it.

This would keep the police from having guns.   

[Cresciuanto]

Guns are made for one purpose, and that purpose is to kill.
I believe that guns are not weapons, they are tools. How they are used is up to the person holding it.
Guns are especially dangerous in the hands of people who don't know how to use them (i.e., kids and teenagers) as well as those who are mentally ill and/or have a temper problem.
Gun control will not stop violence because a violent person doesn’t need a gun to be violent.
After the Sandy Hook Elementary shooting in Newtown, Connecticut, support for gun control increased dramatically.

Generally in America, the support for gun control has outweighed the support for gun rights.
Are gun control laws constitutional?
What would be your ideal set of laws regarding firearms?

but for your kind information i want to tell you that USA is the major gun supplier country. they are almost suppling weapons to all over the world. and they have a good income from that trading side. so how can you say that they are the  the supporter of gun control programe?

yes it is a fact that USA has a decent income from gun bargaining. and that is the reason they always try to produce violance in the world. so if USA is supporting gun trafficking then how can think to control it. 

[BADecker]

<>

yes it is a fact that USA has a decent income from gun bargaining. and that is the reason they always try to produce violance in the world. so if USA is supporting gun trafficking then how can think to control it.  

This is the exact problem with good people. They look at bad people and say, "Its the USA, or Britain, or Russia, or China, etc." They seldom realize that people in all these governments are acting independently of government, on their own, except that they often use their governmental office to pull strings that they wouldn't be able to pull otherwise.

This isn't always the complete truth. Sometimes their boss has them do governmental things, officially. But this really serves to open up many more private opportunities for them when the real government job is done.

[criptix]

At my opinion gun control is okay, cause it's prevent many accidents, many people have trouble with emotions and head, they should not own guns at my opinion.

this is common sense to most people, allow those who have reason and can be trusted to have guns, those that have anger issues/criminal records/mental conditions shouldn't be allowed to own guns for obvious reasons. Its simple, if you can stop the bad guys getting guns then do it.

This is called Gun Control 

[BADecker]

At my opinion gun control is okay, cause it's prevent many accidents, many people have trouble with emotions and head, they should not own guns at my opinion.

this is common sense to most people, allow those who have reason and can be trusted to have guns, those that have anger issues/criminal records/mental conditions shouldn't be allowed to own guns for obvious reasons. Its simple, if you can stop the bad guys getting guns then do it.

This is called Gun Control 

To say it shorter, gun control is people controlling other people.   

[Cyaren]

At my opinion gun control is okay, cause it's prevent many accidents, many people have trouble with emotions and head, they should not own guns at my opinion.

this is common sense to most people, allow those who have reason and can be trusted to have guns, those that have anger issues/criminal records/mental conditions shouldn't be allowed to own guns for obvious reasons. Its simple, if you can stop the bad guys getting guns then do it.

This is called Gun Control 

To say it shorter, gun control is people controlling other people.   

My humble take on this is that government is controlling its people and avoid people from uprising against the government with the use of guns.

Come to think of it, if people can freely access to high powered guns and almost every individual get to have a possession of it, it would be difficult for the government forces to stop them when people are fed up with their government and want to overthrow an administration. It would be bloody as hell.

Well, I was just exaggerating. But isn't it make sense? I mean, the government are afraid of the people when it will convene and fight against the former, period.

[gilangIDR]

This is a great idea. control gun use will make our lives comfortable. everyone civilians do not have access to a gun. retained control only of law enforcement officers. it will make our lives comfortable and happy. I fully support it.

[helloeverybody]

At my opinion gun control is okay, cause it's prevent many accidents, many people have trouble with emotions and head, they should not own guns at my opinion.

this is common sense to most people, allow those who have reason and can be trusted to have guns, those that have anger issues/criminal records/mental conditions shouldn't be allowed to own guns for obvious reasons. Its simple, if you can stop the bad guys getting guns then do it.

This is called Gun Control 

To say it shorter, gun control is people controlling other people.   

My humble take on this is that government is controlling its people and avoid people from uprising against the government with the use of guns.

Come to think of it, if people can freely access to high powered guns and almost every individual get to have a possession of it, it would be difficult for the government forces to stop them when people are fed up with their government and want to overthrow an administration. It would be bloody as hell.

Well, I was just exaggerating. But isn't it make sense? I mean, the government are afraid of the people when it will convene and fight against the former, period.

The usual method for civilised country's to get their government out of power if they don't like what their doing is to vote them out.  What hell hole do you live in that needs the people to arm themselves to overthrow their own elected government?

[TheButterZone]

At my opinion gun control is okay, cause it's prevent many accidents, many people have trouble with emotions and head, they should not own guns at my opinion.

this is common sense to most people, allow those who have reason and can be trusted to have guns, those that have anger issues/criminal records/mental conditions shouldn't be allowed to own guns for obvious reasons. Its simple, if you can stop the bad guys getting guns then do it.

This is called Gun Control  

To say it shorter, gun control is people controlling other people.    

My humble take on this is that government is controlling its people and avoid people from uprising against the government with the use of guns.

Come to think of it, if people can freely access to high powered guns and almost every individual get to have a possession of it, it would be difficult for the government forces to stop them when people are fed up with their government and want to overthrow an administration. It would be bloody as hell.

Well, I was just exaggerating. But isn't it make sense? I mean, the government are afraid of the people when it will convene and fight against the former, period.

Using the "gun control" advocate's logic:

No government with enough nuclear weapons to extinct the human race should be afraid enough of lesser weapons to feel the need to ban them for their own safety.

So logically, that only leaves government wanting to watch violent criminals safely victimize we the disarmed with impunity, so they can dance in our blood and on our graves as they "justify" disarming even more of we the people for violent criminals to safely victimize us.

[omegaaf]

No one needs guns personally. Just the army needs to for war. Otherwise unless your a hunter there is no reason to have a gun personally.

Yes, only the army and hunters need guns to hunt disarmed humans with and commit genocide against us.

Until the perp comes back as a zombie, there's no need to discuss whether a jury would need to guarantee he will never possess any deadly weapon again. Which no jury as we know it could, as everything can be a deadly weapon, so the safest place to put a living or undead attempted or successful murderer is prison, where he will only be able to murder other murderers, and people who volunteer to guard murderers.

Has the jury reached a verdict?

Yes we have, Your Honor.

Will the Undead please rise?

LMFAO

No humans are hunted in my state unless its the gangsters hunting them but for that we have the police and they have gins.

[omegaaf]

No one needs guns personally. Just the army needs to for war. Otherwise unless your a hunter there is no reason to have a gun personally.

Having guns personally makes some people to feel saved especially if they live in areas with high level of criminal. How else to protect themselves if government can't do that?

The pen is stronger then the sword.
Just talk out conflicts, not shoot them out.

[BADecker]

No one needs guns personally. Just the army needs to for war. Otherwise unless your a hunter there is no reason to have a gun personally.

Having guns personally makes some people to feel saved especially if they live in areas with high level of criminal. How else to protect themselves if government can't do that?

The pen is stronger then the sword.
Just talk out conflicts, not shoot them out.

The gun is stronger than the pen.
Often people won't accept what is written.

[BADecker]

No one needs guns personally. Just the army needs to for war. Otherwise unless your a hunter there is no reason to have a gun personally.

Yes, only the army and hunters need guns to hunt disarmed humans with and commit genocide against us.

Until the perp comes back as a zombie, there's no need to discuss whether a jury would need to guarantee he will never possess any deadly weapon again. Which no jury as we know it could, as everything can be a deadly weapon, so the safest place to put a living or undead attempted or successful murderer is prison, where he will only be able to murder other murderers, and people who volunteer to guard murderers.

Has the jury reached a verdict?

Yes we have, Your Honor.

Will the Undead please rise?

LMFAO

No humans are hunted in my state unless its the gangsters hunting them but for that we have the police and they have gins.

The police ARE the gangsters.   

[BADecker]

At my opinion gun control is okay, cause it's prevent many accidents, many people have trouble with emotions and head, they should not own guns at my opinion.

this is common sense to most people, allow those who have reason and can be trusted to have guns, those that have anger issues/criminal records/mental conditions shouldn't be allowed to own guns for obvious reasons. Its simple, if you can stop the bad guys getting guns then do it.

This is called Gun Control  

To say it shorter, gun control is people controlling other people.    

My humble take on this is that government is controlling its people and avoid people from uprising against the government with the use of guns.

Come to think of it, if people can freely access to high powered guns and almost every individual get to have a possession of it, it would be difficult for the government forces to stop them when people are fed up with their government and want to overthrow an administration. It would be bloody as hell.

Well, I was just exaggerating. But isn't it make sense? I mean, the government are afraid of the people when it will convene and fight against the former, period.

Using the "gun control" advocate's logic:

No government with enough nuclear weapons to extinct the human race should be afraid enough of lesser weapons to feel the need to ban them for their own safety.

So logically, that only leaves government wanting to watch violent criminals safely victimize we the disarmed with impunity, so they can dance in our blood and on our graves as they "justify" disarming even more of we the people for violent criminals to safely victimize us.

Right!

In addition, what are police and the military? Are they simply not people? Yes. They are people. They are men and women.

Train the whole population to be police and military, and you won't need to pay for a police department or the military.

 

[Cyaren]

Guns are made for one purpose, and that purpose is to kill.
I believe that guns are not weapons, they are tools. How they are used is up to the person holding it.
Guns are especially dangerous in the hands of people who don't know how to use them (i.e., kids and teenagers) as well as those who are mentally ill and/or have a temper problem.
Gun control will not stop violence because a violent person doesn’t need a gun to be violent.
After the Sandy Hook Elementary shooting in Newtown, Connecticut, support for gun control increased dramatically.

Generally in America, the support for gun control has outweighed the support for gun rights.
Are gun control laws constitutional?
What would be your ideal set of laws regarding firearms?

Banning guns for civil people is the worst thing the goverment may do...
Criminal always can get gun because he is a criminal! but civil person can not,so if criminal threatens him with a gun,he can only cry and hope the police will come ( they will in next 30 minutes,after u get shot and robbed ) . Knifes are not banned,but they are made also for killing people lol.
We should ban knifes!!!!!!! they may harm someone!!!!!!! just death penalty for killers=problem solved

[BADecker]

Guns are made for one purpose, and that purpose is to kill.
I believe that guns are not weapons, they are tools. How they are used is up to the person holding it.
Guns are especially dangerous in the hands of people who don't know how to use them (i.e., kids and teenagers) as well as those who are mentally ill and/or have a temper problem.
Gun control will not stop violence because a violent person doesn’t need a gun to be violent.
After the Sandy Hook Elementary shooting in Newtown, Connecticut, support for gun control increased dramatically.

Generally in America, the support for gun control has outweighed the support for gun rights.
Are gun control laws constitutional?
What would be your ideal set of laws regarding firearms?

Banning guns for civil people is the worst thing the goverment may do...
Criminal always can get gun because he is a criminal! but civil person can not,so if criminal threatens him with a gun,he can only cry and hope the police will come ( they will in next 30 minutes,after u get shot and robbed ) . Knifes are not banned,but they are made also for killing people lol.
We should ban knifes!!!!!!! they may harm someone!!!!!!! just death penalty for killers=problem solved

Train the whole population to be police and military, and you won't need to pay for a police department or the military.

[ardentvolcanoes]

Guns are made for one purpose, and that purpose is to kill.
I believe that guns are not weapons, they are tools. How they are used is up to the person holding it.
Guns are especially dangerous in the hands of people who don't know how to use them (i.e., kids and teenagers) as well as those who are mentally ill and/or have a temper problem.
Gun control will not stop violence because a violent person doesn’t need a gun to be violent.
After the Sandy Hook Elementary shooting in Newtown, Connecticut, support for gun control increased dramatically.

Generally in America, the support for gun control has outweighed the support for gun rights.
Are gun control laws constitutional?
What would be your ideal set of laws regarding firearms?

Banning guns for civil people is the worst thing the goverment may do...
Criminal always can get gun because he is a criminal! but civil person can not,so if criminal threatens him with a gun,he can only cry and hope the police will come ( they will in next 30 minutes,after u get shot and robbed ) . Knifes are not banned,but they are made also for killing people lol.
We should ban knifes!!!!!!! they may harm someone!!!!!!! just death penalty for killers=problem solved

yeah that's right , the government should allow the civilian to own a gun because not only the police needs it , we can consider it to the civil that guns are just for their protection because like what you have said the criminals are carrying firearms that is not licensed . and maybe death penalty would also a good solution for them if they made a crime .

[TheButterZone]

No one needs guns personally. Just the army needs to for war. Otherwise unless your a hunter there is no reason to have a gun personally.

Having guns personally makes some people to feel saved especially if they live in areas with high level of criminal. How else to protect themselves if government can't do that?

The pen is stronger then the sword.
Just talk out conflicts, not shoot them out.

The gun is stronger than the pen.
Often people won't accept what is written.

Mass murders only successful in "gun-free zones". "Gun-free zone" signs work perfectly.

[helloeverybody]

No one needs guns personally. Just the army needs to for war. Otherwise unless your a hunter there is no reason to have a gun personally.

Having guns personally makes some people to feel saved especially if they live in areas with high level of criminal. How else to protect themselves if government can't do that?

The pen is stronger then the sword.
Just talk out conflicts, not shoot them out.

The gun is stronger than the pen.
Often people won't accept what is written.

Mass murders only successful in "gun-free zones". "Gun-free zone" signs work perfectly.

I dont think this is strictly true, there was a piece on radio 2 some time ago just after the shooting in California or wherever it was and they spoke and asked if there have actually ever been any times when a mass shooting has been stopped by a gun holder and no one phoned in to say there had. the only thing ive ever read about a legal gun holder stopping a mass shooting was the article baddecker posted earlier. Maybe it just never actuall makes the news.