What's your opinion of gun control?

[Okurkabinladin]

In my opinion.
Gun control is very good.
If it is not in control then every day there will be people dead due to guns.

Tightening or liberalization of the rules for obtaining a license for weapons is only for politicians. It is not possible to speak about the economy, they affect the second amendment to the U.S. Constitution. The weapon is an integral part of American society and never allow politicians to take it from the population.

I hope, that you are right, but never take your privileges for granted. Much of Europe used to be the same way, individual rights stripped away piece by piece by socialists.

Do you know, you would get arrested for pocket knife in Germany? Germany...

Trust me, liberal leftists are no better in America, than they are in Europe. They have the same aims.

I'm all for protecting myself with guns against other people who might use guns against me

I agree, but its not just that.

"God made man but samuel colt made them equal."

Simple pistol can erase any advantage, that 300 pound attacker would have over 100 pound woman.

[SingAlong]

In my opinion.
Gun control is very good.
If it is not in control then every day there will be people dead due to guns.

Tightening or liberalization of the rules for obtaining a license for weapons is only for politicians. It is not possible to speak about the economy, they affect the second amendment to the U.S. Constitution. The weapon is an integral part of American society and never allow politicians to take it from the population.

I hope, that you are right, but never take your privileges for granted. Much of Europe used to be the same way, individual rights stripped away piece by piece by socialists.

Do you know, you would get arrested for pocket knife in Germany? Germany...

Trust me, liberal leftists are no better in America, than they are in Europe. They have the same aims.

I'm all for protecting myself with guns against other people who might use guns against me

I agree, but its not just that.

"God made man but samuel colt made them equal."

Simple pistol can erase any advantage, that 300 pound attacker would have over 100 pound woman.

I strongly believe that every man has a right to protect themselves against to people who poses danger to them. Though I am in favor with gun control since the government should be serious about who should own a gun and those should not. But when you say banning guns then that would not be right since those people who received it (legally) undergo with the proper ways and needed skills with physical and mentally able.

But I believe that those who really want guns especially those who have a bad intention can acquire it without the approval of the government by hook or by crook. The issue really is to trace the origin of this unlicensed guns and put to justice those guys who have been selling it illegally.

[Okurkabinladin]

I strongly believe that every man has a right to protect themselves against to people who poses danger to them. Though I am in favor with gun control since the government should be serious about who should own a gun and those should not. But when you say banning guns then that would not be right since those people who received it (legally) undergo with the proper ways and needed skills with physical and mentally able.

But I believe that those who really want guns especially those who have a bad intention can acquire it without the approval of the government by hook or by crook. The issue really is to trace the origin of this unlicensed guns and put to justice those guys who have been selling it illegally.

Yes, you dont have to be a christian to inherently understand, that every organism by its nature will try to protect its life against agressor. The thing particular to guns (and why they are such big point of contention) is the fact, that they multiply force an individual is able to extert. Single woman can defend her family against gang of five, thats not possible with any other tool.

Guns can be made with equipment in garage, they are not Happy Potter sticks, but merely several pieces of metal setting off chemical reaction when fired. So you are right, they will continue to be made and their ban will merely exlude law abidding citizens from using them. Not terrorists or criminals.

Government regulation is indeed in place - nobody really needs immigrants, who just entered country or ex-criminals, who just left jail after previous violent behavior to be able to buy semiautomatic rifles.

Thats why I said to the guy before you: Being able to defend yourself is privilege, cherish it and protect. Others around the world were not so lucky, some (Swedish, Germans) even brainwashed into thinking, that its in their best interest to be completely at mercy of state and sociopaths at all times.

[TomUyamot]

I don't think civilians need guns, neither outside nor in their homes. Guns are only for those who have the permit, the license, the necessary training to handle them, the emotionally-fit, and so on. In other words, guns are only for those law enforcers.

Why should people other than them want to have one?    To protect themselves against possible intrusion and the like? For personal protection? To keep their properties safe? You name it. The list goes on and on. Everyone can cite such reasons. And before you know it, everyone is keeping one, and tadaan! shooting news are everywhere.

Keep the guns away from the hands of people and there would be less violence. 

[Okurkabinladin]

I don't think civilians need guns, neither outside nor in their homes. Guns are only for those who have the permit, the license, the necessary training to handle them, the emotionally-fit, and so on. In other words, guns are only for those law enforcers.

Why should people other than them want to have one?    To protect themselves against possible intrusion and the like? For personal protection? To keep their properties safe? You name it. The list goes on and on. Everyone can cite such reasons. And before you know it, everyone is keeping one, and tadaan! shooting news are everywhere.

Keep the guns away from the hands of people and there would be less violence. 

May I know how old are you?

Learn how the world looked like before gunpowder was around, since you are of notion, that indidual human beings cant make decisions for themselves. Thos "law enforcers" are born as civilians too.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ycEZIbQqA8A

The war, an actual war would be more present - as is terrorism more present in Europe today, when in countries such as United Kingdom not even cops are issued with firearms.

[BADecker]

Watch: This Thug Tries To Rob A Store Where Every Customer Is Armed

They fear that it would make firearm accidents more likely, and in the event that a robber or a mass shooter is on the loose, there would be a chaotic hail of gunfire from all directions.

It's a silly argument to make, considering that even in states where there are loose gun laws, and where it is easy to obtain a concealed carry permit, only a minority of citizens carry guns at all times. But for the sake of argument, what would happen if everyone was armed in the vicinity of a violent criminal?

Perhaps this footage of a liquor store robbery in Brazil can answer that question. It shows what happens when a robber tries to hold up a store where every customer is packing heat.

The footage, which was originally posted on Liveleak, is dated May 31st, 2017. The gunman enters the store with a motorcycle helmet to conceal his face, but appears to drop his weapon after he walks past one of the customers. Then he is shot after every customer draws a gun on him.

LiveLeak - Thief robs place where everyone was armed

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xzcJbUqFz90


Read more at http://www.shtfplan.com/headline-news/watch-this-thug-tries-to-rob-a-store-where-every-customer-is-armed_06052017.

[BADecker]

Despite All Expectations, Gun Sales Reached a Record High in May

His administration stoked plenty of fears that gun rights would be restricted, which resulted in shortages of firearms and ammunition, and drove record gun sales. During the second half of his administration, it seemed like gun sales were at times, breaking records every few months.

So when Trump was elected, most people assumed that gun sales were finally going to slow down, myself included. Last March I wrote:

But with a Republican in the Oval Office, it appears that gun sales are finally going to slow down for the first time since the early 2000's. Despite the fact that there aren't any recent statistics to back this up, we can safely assume that it's true based on a recent action taken by Remington.

The gun manufacturing company revealed last week that they are going to lay off 120 workers from their Ilion plant, and 16 workers from their plant in Kentucky. According to Zerohedge and the Wall Street Journal, Remington isn't alone. American Outdoor Brands, which used to be known as Smith & Wesson, is also losing sales. And this is a very recent trend. A month ago, the number of firearm background checks was still breaking records.

Read more and click the links at http://www.shtfplan.com/headline-news/despite-all-expectations-gun-sales-reached-a-record-high-in-may_06052017.

[Symphony_fr]

I believe that weapons can only be given to mentally healthy people to protect themselves and their families. Only here to check this health is not always possible by judging by the number of committed crimes.

[mostkey]

I believe that weapons can only be given to mentally healthy people to protect themselves and their families. Only here to check this health is not always possible by judging by the number of committed crimes.

Indeed your opinion is true, but do you know about the black market? There we can get many weapons of any model without a license, as long as we have a lot of money we can definitely get it,

Well there we can not have the authority or power to be able to stop the black market.

[matuson]

I believe that weapons can only be given to mentally healthy people to protect themselves and their families. Only here to check this health is not always possible by judging by the number of committed crimes.

Indeed your opinion is true, but do you know about the black market? There we can get many weapons of any model without a license, as long as we have a lot of money we can definitely get it,

Well there we can not have the authority or power to be able to stop the black market.

All people should have the right to arms because the criminals are assigned this right for themselves and no one is asking. Anyone who wants to restrict gun rights either themselves criminals and are afraid of armed resistance by the victim, or do not understand the subject.

[PeterTheGrape]

I believe that weapons can only be given to mentally healthy people to protect themselves and their families. Only here to check this health is not always possible by judging by the number of committed crimes.

Indeed your opinion is true, but do you know about the black market? There we can get many weapons of any model without a license, as long as we have a lot of money we can definitely get it,

Well there we can not have the authority or power to be able to stop the black market.

All people should have the right to arms because the criminals are assigned this right for themselves and no one is asking. Anyone who wants to restrict gun rights either themselves criminals and are afraid of armed resistance by the victim, or do not understand the subject.

Exactly true. Gun licenses should only be given to mentally ill people, since others, such as criminals don't need licenses.

Giving guns only to mentally ill people would reduce crime too, since a measured response to misbehavior could not be counted on.

If we give badges and uniforms to the crazies too then we can spot them before they attack us, which will increase public safety further.

[ethereumhunter]

I believe that weapons can only be given to mentally healthy people to protect themselves and their families. Only here to check this health is not always possible by judging by the number of committed crimes.

Indeed your opinion is true, but do you know about the black market? There we can get many weapons of any model without a license, as long as we have a lot of money we can definitely get it,

Well there we can not have the authority or power to be able to stop the black market.

All people should have the right to arms because the criminals are assigned this right for themselves and no one is asking. Anyone who wants to restrict gun rights either themselves criminals and are afraid of armed resistance by the victim, or do not understand the subject.

i think if someone wants to use a gun, he should have a license and he is register for his gun in the police database so if something bad happen with him and he doing a bad thing, the police can arrested that person. holding a gun in the neighborhood is a dangerous thing that we should thinking because in our environment, there are many children that will be victim if bad things is happen.

[livingfree]

Guns are made for one purpose, and that purpose is to kill.
I believe that guns are not weapons, they are tools. How they are used is up to the person holding it.
Guns are especially dangerous in the hands of people who don't know how to use them (i.e., kids and teenagers) as well as those who are mentally ill and/or have a temper problem.
Gun control will not stop violence because a violent person doesn’t need a gun to be violent.
After the Sandy Hook Elementary shooting in Newtown, Connecticut, support for gun control increased dramatically.

Generally in America, the support for gun control has outweighed the support for gun rights.
Are gun control laws constitutional?
What would be your ideal set of laws regarding firearms?

In my own opinion, I agree with the gun control because the leaders are able to regulate the usage of guns. A gun can kill a person in one snap. This will reduce incidents involving guns.

[Palmerson]

The gun can not only kill a person in one click, but just as a single click to stop the criminal and save someone's life. Why do you think that some clerk the right to decide I have the right to life or not. In many countries after the ban of weapons crime increased dramatically. You can on the numbers to prove that legal guns cause more harm than its absence.

[MCS23]

The gun can not only kill a person in one click, but just as a single click to stop the criminal and save someone's life. Why do you think that some clerk the right to decide I have the right to life or not. In many countries after the ban of weapons crime increased dramatically. You can on the numbers to prove that legal guns cause more harm than its absence.

Before thinking on this topic, you need to think and give yourself a question, restore this balance in society and whether it will be possible to legalize weapons, reduce the number of crimes related to the death of people. After all, the presence of weapons at home, entails consequences and often domestic violence.

[ecnalubma]

I dont want gun control but im in favor of total gun ban. Because in my country a lot killings occur day by day and guns are involved, many people innocent people lost their lives because of uncontrolably guns on the streets and the authorities are helpless.

[Okurkabinladin]

I dont want gun control but im in favor of total gun ban. Because in my country a lot killings occur day by day and guns are involved, many people innocent people lost their lives because of uncontrolably guns on the streets and the authorities are helpless.

Can you please elaborate on the issue? I am sure alot of us here would listen. What country and region are you from?

I am sure, that you understand, that firearms are ultimately - tools. Tools used by human beings. Neither wars nor violence were any less prevalent before gun powder, quite the opposite is true. Thats why tows around all of Euroasia had actual walls circling them off.

Now, please. Go on.

[CrownPolly]

I dont want gun control but im in favor of total gun ban. Because in my country a lot killings occur day by day and guns are involved, many people innocent people lost their lives because of uncontrolably guns on the streets and the authorities are helpless.

Can you please elaborate on the issue? I am sure alot of us here would listen. What country and region are you from?

I am sure, that you understand, that firearms are ultimately - tools. Tools used by human beings. Neither wars nor violence were any less prevalent before gun powder, quite the opposite is true. Thats why tows around all of Euroasia had actual walls circling them off.

Now, please. Go on.

I do not understand How does the way people kill a person affect the psyche of people? I still will shoot a person with a firearm or they will cut it with a knife, still the result will be the same. Therefore, if we talk about the legalization of firearms, we will need to talk about the legalization of cold weapons, as well as kitchen knives.

[Okurkabinladin]

I dont want gun control but im in favor of total gun ban. Because in my country a lot killings occur day by day and guns are involved, many people innocent people lost their lives because of uncontrolably guns on the streets and the authorities are helpless.

Can you please elaborate on the issue? I am sure alot of us here would listen. What country and region are you from?

I am sure, that you understand, that firearms are ultimately - tools. Tools used by human beings. Neither wars nor violence were any less prevalent before gun powder, quite the opposite is true. Thats why tows around all of Euroasia had actual walls circling them off.

Now, please. Go on.

I do not understand How does the way people kill a person affect the psyche of people? I still will shoot a person with a firearm or they will cut it with a knife, still the result will be the same. Therefore, if we talk about the legalization of firearms, we will need to talk about the legalization of cold weapons, as well as kitchen knives.

I am interested what the guy has to say, he may be from war torn region.

But you are right, that was my original point. Guns are tools, that are beside other things, good at killing humans and animals. If we ban them, then knives, axes, pickaxes, hammers, screwdrivers, cars, planes - all of those are just marginally worse tools at killing.

Pre-gunpowder world was actually full of constant warfare for the precise reason, that violence was not efficient. Developed countries never had less violence than they do today and our cities these days can exist without walls and guard towers.

[BADecker]

I dont want gun control but im in favor of total gun ban. Because in my country a lot killings occur day by day and guns are involved, many people innocent people lost their lives because of uncontrolably guns on the streets and the authorities are helpless.

Can you please elaborate on the issue? I am sure alot of us here would listen. What country and region are you from?

I am sure, that you understand, that firearms are ultimately - tools. Tools used by human beings. Neither wars nor violence were any less prevalent before gun powder, quite the opposite is true. Thats why tows around all of Euroasia had actual walls circling them off.

Now, please. Go on.

I do not understand How does the way people kill a person affect the psyche of people? I still will shoot a person with a firearm or they will cut it with a knife, still the result will be the same. Therefore, if we talk about the legalization of firearms, we will need to talk about the legalization of cold weapons, as well as kitchen knives.

I am interested what the guy has to say, he may be from war torn region.

But you are right, that was my original point. Guns are tools, that are beside other things, good at killing humans and animals. If we ban them, then knives, axes, pickaxes, hammers, screwdrivers, cars, planes - all of those are just marginally worse tools at killing.

Pre-gunpowder world was actually full of constant warfare for the precise reason, that violence was not efficient. Developed countries never had less violence than they do today and our cities these days can exist without walls and guard towers.

And most of world peace comes from the gun freedom in America and Switzerland. How does this work? Governments that would normally make slaves of their people are in a catch-22 situation.

First, the people of the world don't understand how their governments would make slaves of them. So, they think that they don't need guns.

Governments of the world can't enact slavery, because their people would get arms and ammo from America and Switzerland. If governments made a show of slavery, their sleeping people would wake up to how powerful gun freedom is.

This is happening in the Middle East, Africa, and areas of Pakistan right now. ISIS and others are trying to take away freedom from people. America is fighting to stop it, and to uphold freedom.