Up Like Trump

[Spendulus]

Don't forget, Trump is also fun . Just look at this clip during Jimmy Fallon's Interview yesterday --> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u0BYqzdiuJc

Wow, I am impressed.

Earlier today I googled "Trump contribute."

Google gave me back a bunch of pages of sleazy lying articles about how bad Trump was.  Like one about how a Canadian muslim donated to his campaign and how wrong that was.  (Obama got $92 million in foreign donations and the media never said a thing about how wrong that was.)  And Trump is returning that donation.

I started out intending to do $150, but after getting angry at the Google corruption nonsense i did two thousand.

Fuck the bastards.

[RoomBot]

Gotta respect a man for putting his money where his mouth is.

No worries:  there's just as much cr*p out there about Hillary.

Of course most of it is true.

#Parkinsons

[Spendulus]

Gotta respect a man for putting his money where his mouth is.

No worries:  there's just as much cr*p out there about Hillary.

Of course most of it is true.

#Parkinsons

Really.

You be the judge.

https://duckduckgo.com/?q=contribution+trump&t=ffsb&ia=news

https://duckduckgo.com/?q=contribution+hillary&t=ffsb&ia=web

Assholes.

[RoomBot]

duckduckgo is not exactly Google-worthy, LOL

Obama / Romney got so ugly, I didn't think another election could ever get worse.

Trump & Clinton have taken this game to Warp Speed nastiness, with the "media" working hard to make it even uglier, as @Spendulus points out.

I don't think one is getting more tin foil hat coverage than the other. 

There is plenty of weirdness to go around.

[herrdrone]

duckduckgo is not exactly Google-worthy, LOL

Obama / Romney got so ugly, I didn't think another election could ever get worse.

Trump & Clinton have taken this game to Warp Speed nastiness, with the "media" working hard to make it even uglier, as @Spendulus points out.

I don't think one is getting more tin foil hat coverage than the other. 

There is plenty of weirdness to go around.

Agree, even POTUS is involved in the trash talking. Like He had nothing else better to do.

[Spendulus]

duckduckgo is not exactly Google-worthy, LOL

Obama / Romney got so ugly, I didn't think another election could ever get worse.

Trump & Clinton have taken this game to Warp Speed nastiness, with the "media" working hard to make it even uglier, as @Spendulus points out.

I don't think one is getting more tin foil hat coverage than the other. 

There is plenty of weirdness to go around.

Well,let us check.

https://www.google.com/?gws_rd=ssl#q=trump+contribution

https://www.google.com/?gws_rd=ssl#q=hillary+contribution

Appears that the results are definitely skewed toward a positive link sent on Hillary, and toward a negative link set on Trump.  But not as obviously prejudiced as the duck-duck-go.

You and I are basically in agreement, though.

[Masha Sha]

duckduckgo is not exactly Google-worthy, LOL

Obama / Romney got so ugly, I didn't think another election could ever get worse.

Trump & Clinton have taken this game to Warp Speed nastiness, with the "media" working hard to make it even uglier, as @Spendulus points out.

I don't think one is getting more tin foil hat coverage than the other. 

There is plenty of weirdness to go around.

Well,let us check.

https://www.google.com/?gws_rd=ssl#q=trump+contribution

https://www.google.com/?gws_rd=ssl#q=hillary+contribution

Appears that the results are definitely skewed toward a positive link sent on Hillary, and toward a negative link set on Trump.  But not as obviously prejudiced as the duck-duck-go.

You and I are basically in agreement, though.

P2P search engines have still a lot of progress to make...

[Bitbobb]

duckduckgo is not exactly Google-worthy, LOL

Obama / Romney got so ugly, I didn't think another election could ever get worse.

Trump & Clinton have taken this game to Warp Speed nastiness, with the "media" working hard to make it even uglier, as @Spendulus points out.

I don't think one is getting more tin foil hat coverage than the other. 

There is plenty of weirdness to go around.

Well,let us check.

https://www.google.com/?gws_rd=ssl#q=trump+contribution

https://www.google.com/?gws_rd=ssl#q=hillary+contribution

Appears that the results are definitely skewed toward a positive link sent on Hillary, and toward a negative link set on Trump.  But not as obviously prejudiced as the duck-duck-go.

You and I are basically in agreement, though.

P2P search engines have still a lot of progress to make...

Yeah I agree Masha p2p has far to go.  And now with the new legislation set to be passed during the election the ICANN registry databases will be forever under the control of different nation states...leading to the great firewall of China being implemented around the world.  Hillary said she will destroy her critics like Alex Jones and Breitbart.  Problem is she cannot do that without first having great change in the internet.  So once this legislation gets passed then she will be able to destroy them via ICANN registry redirects.  Good luck people of the world you will need it.

[Spendulus]

duckduckgo is not exactly Google-worthy, LOL

Obama / Romney got so ugly, I didn't think another election could ever get worse.

Trump & Clinton have taken this game to Warp Speed nastiness, with the "media" working hard to make it even uglier, as @Spendulus points out.

I don't think one is getting more tin foil hat coverage than the other. 

There is plenty of weirdness to go around.

Well,let us check.

https://www.google.com/?gws_rd=ssl#q=trump+contribution

https://www.google.com/?gws_rd=ssl#q=hillary+contribution

Appears that the results are definitely skewed toward a positive link sent on Hillary, and toward a negative link set on Trump.  But not as obviously prejudiced as the duck-duck-go.

You and I are basically in agreement, though.

P2P search engines have still a lot of progress to make...

Yeah I agree Masha p2p has far to go.  And now with the new legislation set to be passed during the election the ICANN registry databases will be forever under the control of different nation states...leading to the great firewall of China being implemented around the world.  Hillary said she will destroy her critics like Alex Jones and Breitbart.  Problem is she cannot do that without first having great change in the internet.  So once this legislation gets passed then she will be able to destroy them via ICANN registry redirects.  Good luck people of the world you will need it.

To be effective this censorship has to be implemented in the search engines, and my examples above indicate that it is currently being done.

Control of ICANN does not matter because people can still type in the physical Internet address and/or have a downloaded list of ICANN name to Internet address.  And a search engine can provide such relations on a query.  So again, the search engine rules.

[Bitbobb]

duckduckgo is not exactly Google-worthy, LOL

Obama / Romney got so ugly, I didn't think another election could ever get worse.

Trump & Clinton have taken this game to Warp Speed nastiness, with the "media" working hard to make it even uglier, as @Spendulus points out.

I don't think one is getting more tin foil hat coverage than the other. 

There is plenty of weirdness to go around.

Well,let us check.

https://www.google.com/?gws_rd=ssl#q=trump+contribution

https://www.google.com/?gws_rd=ssl#q=hillary+contribution

Appears that the results are definitely skewed toward a positive link sent on Hillary, and toward a negative link set on Trump.  But not as obviously prejudiced as the duck-duck-go.

You and I are basically in agreement, though.

P2P search engines have still a lot of progress to make...

Yeah I agree Masha p2p has far to go.  And now with the new legislation set to be passed during the election the ICANN registry databases will be forever under the control of different nation states...leading to the great firewall of China being implemented around the world.  Hillary said she will destroy her critics like Alex Jones and Breitbart.  Problem is she cannot do that without first having great change in the internet.  So once this legislation gets passed then she will be able to destroy them via ICANN registry redirects.  Good luck people of the world you will need it.

To be effective this censorship has to be implemented in the search engines, and my examples above indicate that it is currently being done.

Control of ICANN does not matter because people can still type in the physical Internet address and/or have a downloaded list of ICANN name to Internet address.  And a search engine can provide such relations on a query.  So again, the search engine rules.

Yes busting the search engines for their bias is a huge topic that needs attention. 

As for the typing in of ip numbers directly you are correct that will work...the problem is that it lowers security for the website host and most people do not know the ip address for their websites they need if they have not yet found the website.  So the search engine thing goes hand in hand with the ip registry games.  Unless you are the rare one who knows ever website you will use for the rest of your life.  Plus many web site owners do not have static ip so they do not even have a number to give their viewers that will not change.

[Spendulus]

duckduckgo is not exactly Google-worthy, LOL

Obama / Romney got so ugly, I didn't think another election could ever get worse.

Trump & Clinton have taken this game to Warp Speed nastiness, with the "media" working hard to make it even uglier, as @Spendulus points out.

I don't think one is getting more tin foil hat coverage than the other. 

There is plenty of weirdness to go around.

Well,let us check.

https://www.google.com/?gws_rd=ssl#q=trump+contribution

https://www.google.com/?gws_rd=ssl#q=hillary+contribution

Appears that the results are definitely skewed toward a positive link sent on Hillary, and toward a negative link set on Trump.  But not as obviously prejudiced as the duck-duck-go.

You and I are basically in agreement, though.

P2P search engines have still a lot of progress to make...

Yeah I agree Masha p2p has far to go.  And now with the new legislation set to be passed during the election the ICANN registry databases will be forever under the control of different nation states...leading to the great firewall of China being implemented around the world.  Hillary said she will destroy her critics like Alex Jones and Breitbart.  Problem is she cannot do that without first having great change in the internet.  So once this legislation gets passed then she will be able to destroy them via ICANN registry redirects.  Good luck people of the world you will need it.

To be effective this censorship has to be implemented in the search engines, and my examples above indicate that it is currently being done.

Control of ICANN does not matter because people can still type in the physical Internet address and/or have a downloaded list of ICANN name to Internet address.  And a search engine can provide such relations on a query.  So again, the search engine rules.

Yes busting the search engines for their bias is a huge topic that needs attention. 

As for the typing in of ip numbers directly you are correct that will work...the problem is that it lowers security for the website host and most people do not know the ip address for their websites they need if they have not yet found the website.  So the search engine thing goes hand in hand with the ip registry games.  Unless you are the rare one who knows ever website you will use for the rest of your life.  Plus many web site owners do not have static ip so they do not even have a number to give their viewers that will not change.

The IP must be entered in when registering a website with ICANN.

Many websites have large numbers of IP addresses, such as Amazon.

What is happening right now is subtle doses of bias.  Nothing so overt that it gets noticed and creates outrage.

[RoomBot]

Well, I'm outraged!  But that's just me......

[vokain]

[RoomBot]

OK now this is VERY disturbing, because we've never seen them in the same place at the same time!!!

And they both LOVE the BOMB!!!

[Bitbobb]

duckduckgo is not exactly Google-worthy, LOL

Obama / Romney got so ugly, I didn't think another election could ever get worse.

Trump & Clinton have taken this game to Warp Speed nastiness, with the "media" working hard to make it even uglier, as @Spendulus points out.

I don't think one is getting more tin foil hat coverage than the other.  

There is plenty of weirdness to go around.

Well,let us check.

https://www.google.com/?gws_rd=ssl#q=trump+contribution

https://www.google.com/?gws_rd=ssl#q=hillary+contribution

Appears that the results are definitely skewed toward a positive link sent on Hillary, and toward a negative link set on Trump.  But not as obviously prejudiced as the duck-duck-go.

You and I are basically in agreement, though.

P2P search engines have still a lot of progress to make...

Yeah I agree Masha p2p has far to go.  And now with the new legislation set to be passed during the election the ICANN registry databases will be forever under the control of different nation states...leading to the great firewall of China being implemented around the world.  Hillary said she will destroy her critics like Alex Jones and Breitbart.  Problem is she cannot do that without first having great change in the internet.  So once this legislation gets passed then she will be able to destroy them via ICANN registry redirects.  Good luck people of the world you will need it.

To be effective this censorship has to be implemented in the search engines, and my examples above indicate that it is currently being done.

Control of ICANN does not matter because people can still type in the physical Internet address and/or have a downloaded list of ICANN name to Internet address.  And a search engine can provide such relations on a query.  So again, the search engine rules.

Yes busting the search engines for their bias is a huge topic that needs attention.  

As for the typing in of ip numbers directly you are correct that will work...the problem is that it lowers security for the website host and most people do not know the ip address for their websites they need if they have not yet found the website.  So the search engine thing goes hand in hand with the ip registry games.  Unless you are the rare one who knows ever website you will use for the rest of your life.  Plus many web site owners do not have static ip so they do not even have a number to give their viewers that will not change.

The IP must be entered in when registering a website with ICANN.

Many websites have large numbers of IP addresses, such as Amazon.

What is happening right now is subtle doses of bias.  Nothing so overt that it gets noticed and creates outrage.

There were 14 websites that suffered immediate soft censorship within 1 minute of the internet going under title 4 jurisdiction AKA the FCC.  This was done under "net neutrality"  And it is obvious the websites were preselected for this soft censorship.  Many of them do not know about this still to this day.  The web site owners do not know why no one is buying their books or their message does not get out.  Their breaking news never gets heard.  Only the ones that hand coded their entire website and rewrote the startup (to remove SUDU) portion of their linux live boot cd even noticed the bug running in the background.

The soft censorship is so complete that we are arguing about search engines which is outrageous while entire websites never come up in those search engines because they are not being found at all due to the ip games via registry manipulation.

  And the fact that the ip numbers are registered at the time of ICANN registration still does not mean the viewers know the numbers or that the website publishes them.  Plus they may not be static so now you need to try many.  Plus how do you know the numbers of the websites you have not yet visited?  I can not predict what I will like to read tomorrow.  That was the job of search engines.

Let's review:

Main stream media =  Failed

State primary elections  =  Failed

DNC fraud exposed

Internet search engines = Failed

Impartiality of supreme court justices in the political arena  = Failed

Impartiality of the president in current race for President  = Failed

There are not many failures left before we must admit we are underwater/
If you are reading this you are now taking on water what do you do?

The greatest hope of the globalist is that your brains is as soft as your money you have been using.

[RoomBot]

RE: Impartiality of the president in current race for President  = Failed

One should never expect that to begin with.

Popular presidents almost always support their party.  They're obliged.

It's just that recently, our presidents are better left quiet.

Gore didn't want Cheatin' Clinton to stump for him!

Romney didn't want "W"  (Duh-Bull-You) either, LOL.

2-Party System has got 2 go.  It's incestuous & inbred.

Edit:  Watch  "JFK to 911 Everything Is A Rich Man's Trick"  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U1Qt6a-vaNM

[groll]

When I saw one of his speeches, I tend to see and feel a honest and sincere man that willing to help his country.  Yes, he is kinda straight forward and very tactless sometimes but you see a guy who is really tired of all the hypocrisy of his country.  I am routing for this guy but sadly I am not a voter of US but I wanted him to win.  People are fed up of super good president with all its promises but never become reality.

[Spendulus]

When I saw one of his speeches, I tend to see and feel a honest and sincere man that willing to help his country.  Yes, he is kinda straight forward and very tactless sometimes but you see a guy who is really tired of all the hypocrisy of his country.  I am routing for this guy but sadly I am not a voter of US but I wanted him to win.  People are fed up of super good president with all its promises but never become reality.

A lot of people do seem to feel that way.

By the way, here is how to find IP addresses.

http://www.wikihow.com/Find-a-Website%27s-IP-Address

[RoomBot]

Not these people!  Funny GIF:

https://secure.actblue.com/x/object/actblue-cyanotypes/replaced_images/list/155882/b29362f9be8649fa-trump_flint.gif


“Mr. Trump, I invited you here to thank us for what we’ve done in Flint. Not to give a political speech.”

"That's how Flint Pastor Faith Green Timmons shut down Trump yesterday as he began to illegally turn what was supposed to be a thank you speech at her church into a typical, partisan campaign spew.

REVEREND Green Timmons, a Black woman, confronted Trump immediately--and Trump, looking like a child that just got chastised, quickly reverted back to his thank you speech."

[vokain]

Not these people!  Funny GIF:

https://secure.actblue.com/x/object/actblue-cyanotypes/replaced_images/list/155882/b29362f9be8649fa-trump_flint.gif


“Mr. Trump, I invited you here to thank us for what we’ve done in Flint. Not to give a political speech.”

"That's how Flint Pastor Faith Green Timmons shut down Trump yesterday as he began to illegally turn what was supposed to be a thank you speech at her church into a typical, partisan campaign spew.

REVEREND Green Timmons, a Black woman, confronted Trump immediately--and Trump, looking like a child that just got chastised, quickly reverted back to his thank you speech."

 

I Didn't Invite You Here To "Give A Political Speech"


No speech......just observe how successful our progressive policies have been!

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-09-15/trump-heckled-flint-i-didnt-invite-your-here-give-political-speech