Up Like Trump

[Megaquake]

All year, the polls have shown Hillary Clinton ahead of Donald Trump, by as much as 13 percent. The betting odds have been as much as 5:1 in her favor, and Nate Silver, of FiveThirtyEight, has been giving her an 80% chance of winning the presidency. Until now. Tuesday, he said, if the election were held today, Trump would have a 57% chance of winning. That sounds like a landslide.

[Megaquake]

Hillary’s ANTI-TRUMP Playbook Leaked:
https://www.scribd.com/doc/315828104/DNC-Trump-Opposition-Files

[bryant.coleman]

All year, the polls have shown Hillary Clinton ahead of Donald Trump, by as much as 13 percent. The betting odds have been as much as 5:1 in her favor, and Nate Silver, of FiveThirtyEight, has been giving her an 80% chance of winning the presidency. Until now. Tuesday, he said, if the election were held today, Trump would have a 57% chance of winning. That sounds like a landslide.

Hitlery is clearly ahead, and there are no doubts about it. Trump is having a very difficult task on his hand. The minorities (more than 30% of the voters) will never vote for him, and therefore he needs to win the vast majority of the remaining white vote. But his popularity rating has remained at dismal levels among the white women and white youth, which has dimmed his chances of an electoral victory.

[Racey]

Statistician Warn Of "Systemic Mainstream Misinformation" In Poll Data

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-10-15/statisticians-warn-systemic-mainstream-misinformation-poll-data


Donald Trump: "A moment of reckoning.

If you have not seen it, watch it now, if you have seen it watch again, its the truth.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZFQcZMGe4p0

[BADecker]

BREAKING: FBI in Revolt -- Top FBI Official Exposes Massive Corruption Which Let Clinton's Crime

The anonymous source that worked intimately on the Clinton investigation told Fox News that FBI agents working the case, as well as DOJ attorneys on the case, unanimously believed that Clinton should have her security clearance revoked, with the "vast majority" believing she should be criminally charged.

"It was unanimous that we all wanted her [Clinton's] security clearance yanked," the senior FBI official told Fox news. "It is safe to say the vast majority felt she should be prosecuted. We were floored while listening to the FBI briefing because Comey laid it all out, and then said 'but we are doing nothing,' which made no sense to us."

The entire team was stunned when FBI Director Comey announced on July 5 that he would not be recommending a criminal indictment to the Attorney General's office, according to the source.

"No trial level attorney agreed, no agent working the case agreed, with the decision not to prosecute — it was a top-down decision," said the source, whose identity and actual role in the case were vetted and verified by Fox News.

Read more at http://thefreethoughtproject.com/fbi-revolt-official-exposes-corruption/.

[Spendulus]

All year, the polls have shown Hillary Clinton ahead of Donald Trump, by as much as 13 percent. The betting odds have been as much as 5:1 in her favor, and Nate Silver, of FiveThirtyEight, has been giving her an 80% chance of winning the presidency. Until now. Tuesday, he said, if the election were held today, Trump would have a 57% chance of winning. That sounds like a landslide.

Hitlery is clearly ahead, and there are no doubts about it. Trump is having a very difficult task on his hand. The minorities (more than 30% of the voters) will never vote for him, and therefore he needs to win the vast majority of the remaining white vote. But his popularity rating has remained at dismal levels among the white women and white youth, which has dimmed his chances of an electoral victory.

Nothing can be believed.

[Sithara007]

All year, the polls have shown Hillary Clinton ahead of Donald Trump, by as much as 13 percent. The betting odds have been as much as 5:1 in her favor, and Nate Silver, of FiveThirtyEight, has been giving her an 80% chance of winning the presidency. Until now. Tuesday, he said, if the election were held today, Trump would have a 57% chance of winning. That sounds like a landslide.

Hitlery is clearly ahead, and there are no doubts about it. Trump is having a very difficult task on his hand. The minorities (more than 30% of the voters) will never vote for him, and therefore he needs to win the vast majority of the remaining white vote. But his popularity rating has remained at dismal levels among the white women and white youth, which has dimmed his chances of an electoral victory.

Nothing can be believed.

May be. May be not. The average American is not that intelligent to understand the lies spread by the mainstream media. From the beginning, Trump was facing a united opposition from minorities, Arabs, liberals, LGBTs, banksters, and criminals. And to make things worse, even his own colleagues in the GOP are not supporting him anymore.

[Karartma1]

Billionaire tech investor Peter Thiel, whose Founder’s Fund invested in Bitcoin payment’s startup BitPay, recently gave $1.25 million to Republican candidate for President, Donald Trump, “through a combination of super PAC donations and funds given directly to the campaign.”

https://www.cryptocoinsnews.com/bitpay-peter-thiel-trump/

[BADecker]

All year, the polls have shown Hillary Clinton ahead of Donald Trump, by as much as 13 percent. The betting odds have been as much as 5:1 in her favor, and Nate Silver, of FiveThirtyEight, has been giving her an 80% chance of winning the presidency. Until now. Tuesday, he said, if the election were held today, Trump would have a 57% chance of winning. That sounds like a landslide.

Hitlery is clearly ahead, and there are no doubts about it. Trump is having a very difficult task on his hand. The minorities (more than 30% of the voters) will never vote for him, and therefore he needs to win the vast majority of the remaining white vote. But his popularity rating has remained at dismal levels among the white women and white youth, which has dimmed his chances of an electoral victory.

Nothing can be believed.

May be. May be not. The average American is not that intelligent to understand the lies spread by the mainstream media. From the beginning, Trump was facing a united opposition from minorities, Arabs, liberals, LGBTs, banksters, and criminals. And to make things worse, even his own colleagues in the GOP are not supporting him anymore.

The average American feels the pain when things become painful. Trump is trying to at least forestall the pain of Americans who are feeling the pain caused by the neocon one-worlders and the things they do.

[herrdrone]

Rigging the Election - Video I: Clinton Campaign and DNC Incite Violence at Trump Rallies

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5IuJGHuIkzY


Rigging the Election - Video II: Mass Voter Fraud

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hDc8PVCvfKs


And more videos to come on James O'Keefe series...

https://twitter.com/@Pveritas_Action
https://twitter.com/JamesOKeefeIII

[BADecker]

New BOMBSHELL video just released by James O'Keefe on MASS VOTER FRAUD

In the second video of James O'Keefe's new explosive series on the DNC and Hillary Clinton campaign, Democratic party operatives tell us how to successfully commit voter fraud on a massive scale. Scott Foval, who has since been fired, admits that the Democrats have been rigging elections for fifty years.

Rigging the Election - Video II: Mass Voter Fraud

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hDc8PVCvfKs


Read more at http://therightscoop.com/watch-new-bombshell-video-just-released-james-okeefe-mass-voter-fraud/.

[notbatman]

According to CNN the O'Keefe undercover video is just "locker room talk" from a "discredited activist". I LOL'd when I heard the crowd chanting in the background at the end of the clip.





‘Sometimes the Crazies Bite’: CNN Shows Undercover Video of Democrats Plotting Trump Protests
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lz7GaQYJ3zA

[bryant.coleman]

Some good news for Trump, finally. A few of the opinion polls (IBD/TIPP, Rasmussen Reports, LA Times/USC Tracking) are showing him either tied with Hitlery, or slightly ahead. But worryingly, a few of the polls are showing him trailing even in deep-red states such as Arizona. I won't give much importance to one-off polls. But this seems to have developed into a trend as of now.

[Bitbobb]

[tvbcof]

I was conversing with one of my NPR-ish progressive informants recently and stated my position that 'if the election is demonstrably stolen and some other groups who I could have some degree of confidence in stages a coup, I would support it.'

My informant was shocked.  I tried to describe my philosophy which is, in my opinion very rational, but I'm not sure it sunk in.

My philosophy is that if the election is stolen, the 'victors' are thieves.  If a coup is undertaken successfully, the participants are also thieves.  So it is a matter of picking the thief who one considers to have the highest probability of producing a good outcome.  'Good' is subjective and means different things to different people of course.  For my part, 'good' means furthering of the nation in something close to the form that the framer's envisioned.

Indeed, in the case of a coup dealing with a stolen election in a putative Democracy, it is a matter of a thief stealing from another thief.  In a double-negative-ish sort of way it could be the case that a natural non-thief was converted into one by a bad situation.  So, there is more hope for the coup participants who might be OK than for the election subverters who are 'bad' by definition...as I define it at least.

I also pointed out, or tried to, that there are nations in which coups are not all that uncommon in modern times and those who have pulled them off (often the military) have relinquished power as the threats to the nation diminished.  Or as support drained away, or whatever.  From my crude understandings, Turkey is a good example of this.

---

With respect to the election, I'm sensing quite strongly that there is a media psy-op regarding the polls.  The goal is just to provide some cover for an election theft.  Part of what makes me suspicious is that it is what I'd do as a strategy if I were 'evil' (and paid.)  The other part is that even given the massive media efforts to assult Trump and prop up Clinton, it makes not much logical sense that the polls are doing what is reported (for the most broadly reported of them) and it doesn't square with the on-the-ground support which can be seen/sensed through the media smokescreen.

I'm not saying that my senses here are right, but in just about every other part of this campaign my senses, when they have been this solid, have been right on.  The volumes of Wikileaks data, as well as other sources such as PVeritas, have time and time again simply provided fairly bullet-proof confirmation of something I've sensed with a high degree to be the reality.  It's almost spooky.

I'd almost bet money that we'll at one point see leaked confirmation of a polling psy-op as I've described.  The main reason I would not is that I have little confidence that leaks will be common, or even possible, if the Clinton side 'wins'.  It has ever likelihood of being an earth-changing development and a gateway between today's relative mobility (in multiple ways) and a world with is significantly different in this regard.

[hdbuck]

I was conversing with one of my NPR-ish progressive informants recently and stated my position that 'if the election is demonstrably stolen and some other groups who I could have some degree of confidence in stages a coup, I would support it.'

My informant was shocked.  I tried to describe my philosophy which is, in my opinion very rational, but I'm not sure it sunk in.

My philosophy is that if the election is stolen, the 'victors' are thieves.  If a coup is undertaken successfully, the participants are also thieves.  So it is a matter of picking the thief who one considers to have the highest probability of producing a good outcome.  'Good' is subjective and means different things to different people of course.  For my part, 'good' means furthering of the nation in something close to the form that the framer's envisioned.

Indeed, in the case of a coup dealing with a stolen election in a putative Democracy, it is a matter of a thief stealing from another thief.  In a double-negative-ish sort of way it could be the case that a natural non-thief was converted into one by a bad situation.  So, there is more hope for the coup participants who might be OK than for the election subverters who are 'bad' by definition...as I define it at least.

I also pointed out, or tried to, that there are nations in which coups are not all that uncommon in modern times and those who have pulled them off (often the military) have relinquished power as the threats to the nation diminished.  Or as support drained away, or whatever.  From my crude understandings, Turkey is a good example of this.

---

With respect to the election, I'm sensing quite strongly that there is a media psy-op regarding the polls.  The goal is just to provide some cover for an election theft.  Part of what makes me suspicious is that it is what I'd do as a strategy if I were 'evil' (and paid.)  The other part is that even given the massive media efforts to assult Trump and prop up Clinton, it makes not much logical sense that the polls are doing what is reported (for the most broadly reported of them) and it doesn't square with the on-the-ground support which can be seen/sensed through the media smokescreen.

I'm not saying that my senses here are right, but in just about every other part of this campaign my senses, when they have been this solid, have been right on.  The volumes of Wikileaks data, as well as other sources such as PVeritas, have time and time again simply provided fairly bullet-proof confirmation of something I've sensed with a high degree to be the reality.  It's almost spooky.

I'd almost bet money that we'll at one point see leaked confirmation of a polling psy-op as I've described.  The main reason I would not is that I have little confidence that leaks will be common, or even possible, if the Clinton side 'wins'.  It has ever likelihood of being an earth-changing development and a gateway between today's relative mobility (in multiple ways) and a world with is significantly different in this regard.

Behold the Final Curtain! This election is le Grand Finale! Bottoms up!

[Bitbobb]

I was conversing with one of my NPR-ish progressive informants recently and stated my position that 'if the election is demonstrably stolen and some other groups who I could have some degree of confidence in stages a coup, I would support it.'

My informant was shocked.  I tried to describe my philosophy which is, in my opinion very rational, but I'm not sure it sunk in.

My philosophy is that if the election is stolen, the 'victors' are thieves.  If a coup is undertaken successfully, the participants are also thieves.  So it is a matter of picking the thief who one considers to have the highest probability of producing a good outcome.  'Good' is subjective and means different things to different people of course.  For my part, 'good' means furthering of the nation in something close to the form that the framer's envisioned.

Indeed, in the case of a coup dealing with a stolen election in a putative Democracy, it is a matter of a thief stealing from another thief.  In a double-negative-ish sort of way it could be the case that a natural non-thief was converted into one by a bad situation.  So, there is more hope for the coup participants who might be OK than for the election subverters who are 'bad' by definition...as I define it at least.

I also pointed out, or tried to, that there are nations in which coups are not all that uncommon in modern times and those who have pulled them off (often the military) have relinquished power as the threats to the nation diminished.  Or as support drained away, or whatever.  From my crude understandings, Turkey is a good example of this.

---

With respect to the election, I'm sensing quite strongly that there is a media psy-op regarding the polls.  The goal is just to provide some cover for an election theft.  Part of what makes me suspicious is that it is what I'd do as a strategy if I were 'evil' (and paid.)  The other part is that even given the massive media efforts to assult Trump and prop up Clinton, it makes not much logical sense that the polls are doing what is reported (for the most broadly reported of them) and it doesn't square with the on-the-ground support which can be seen/sensed through the media smokescreen.

I'm not saying that my senses here are right, but in just about every other part of this campaign my senses, when they have been this solid, have been right on.  The volumes of Wikileaks data, as well as other sources such as PVeritas, have time and time again simply provided fairly bullet-proof confirmation of something I've sensed with a high degree to be the reality.  It's almost spooky.

I'd almost bet money that we'll at one point see leaked confirmation of a polling psy-op as I've described.  The main reason I would not is that I have little confidence that leaks will be common, or even possible, if the Clinton side 'wins'.  It has ever likelihood of being an earth-changing development and a gateway between today's relative mobility (in multiple ways) and a world with is significantly different in this regard.

Thank you for your opinion.  I really enjoyed.  In USA we have coup's behind the scenes.  The last few happened during Kennedy where a very dangerous group shot there way into power.  They have been there ever since.  During this time we have seen the elimination of the federal position in the judiciary department that investigates corrupt fed. gov. officials (last one was poisoned at a sporting event with a hot dog).  And the increase in corruption at the federal level.

     The election is the peaceful way we transfer power in the USA and there is a reason for the second amendment.  Because the people must prosecute this election with threat of violence.  If only the gov has guns then they will never transfer power without balance of power from the people who are angry enough to use it.  

     The democrats are being provided a peaceful alternative in Trump and they are showing us that they are doubling down on the lies and censorship instead determined to steal this election from the people and deny us a Trump presidency after he is showing 85+% in real data

     Voluntary exit polls must be conducted with HD cameras on polling locations.  Verification of voters must be done with the local records book.  Many reports are coming in where 4 voters are registered to each address where it should only be two.  So far the fraudulent names are usually Spanish sounding names blended with the family name of the people living at the address.  And PVeritas just exposed how this is being done.

    1) So now the fight is going to be getting new voter to the polls on voting day or help with the absentee ballots.  2) Verification of how many voters are at your address and make sure it is you and not someone else (you have a right to look at this book).  3) if you find others registered at you address grab the book, take photos and run and yell "VOTER FRAUD AUDITOR,  VOTER FRAUD AUDITOR!  AND PEOPLE WILL HELP YOU THEY ARE SICK OF THE FRAUD TOO.  PUBLISH THIS FAR AND WIDE."
4)  HD camera all polling exits in USA on NOV 8th and compare online for double voters that get bussed around
5)  Someone needs to click the number of people that go in and out of each polling location
6)  Conduct voluntary exit polls on paper, or anyway possible to find margin of real error with the official results and the data from item # 5 above

If the globalists really had something wonderful going for them they would not need to steal and lie to us.  We would be happy to fund their wonderful idea.  But the truth is they want your vote, money, property and life and care not what you think.
7) wear red on voting day for Trump and write the words Trump on your shirt or wear a red Trump shirt.

    

[BADecker]

With regard to the above ^^^...

Hacking Democracy - The Hack

This is the hack that proved America's elections can be stolen using a few lines of computer code. The 'Hursti Hack' in this video is an excerpt from the feature length Emmy nominated documentary 'Hacking Democracy'. The hack of the Diebold voting system in Leon County, Florida, is real. It was verified by computer scientists at UC Berkeley.

Hacking Democracy - The Hack

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t75xvZ3osFg

[cryptasm]

did trump just win this debate but the media is paid to be against it? I mean he was actually not doing a bad job.

[RoomBot]

YES!  I agree.

I am not a Trump fan, but he won the debate.

CNN, MSNBC both say Shillary won.....  NOT!