Bitcoin Forum
May 09, 2024, 07:10:57 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 [23] 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 ... 94 »
  Print  
Author Topic: Nefario  (Read 198629 times)
oldschool
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 168
Merit: 100



View Profile
October 07, 2012, 03:15:10 PM
 #441

Quote
Would you or somebody else be so kind as to show the proof of the Mt Gox spike?

A spike on mtgox doesnt show that nefario has sold coins  Huh why is this even relevant?

a transaction ID that links a BTC transaction to the GLBSE just before closing would be incriminating.

however the person making this claim has in the same post as he made the claim admitted that it is fine to jump to his own concllusions with no evidence therefore IMO weaking his own allegations. If he is going to make allegations such as this after discrediting himself he should need to provide evidence if he is to be taken seriously.

Are you ignorant or have you just not read my posts?

I am guessing he is converting btc to fiat and OMG OMG OMG WHERE IS YOUR PROOF THAT YOU ARE GUESSING AND YOU THINK THIS

You keep thinking I am admitting to jumping to my own conclusions.  I wasn't admitting anything, I was clarifying what my original statement was to you.
1715238657
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715238657

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715238657
Reply with quote  #2

1715238657
Report to moderator
1715238657
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715238657

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715238657
Reply with quote  #2

1715238657
Report to moderator
It is a common myth that Bitcoin is ruled by a majority of miners. This is not true. Bitcoin miners "vote" on the ordering of transactions, but that's all they do. They can't vote to change the network rules.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1715238657
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715238657

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715238657
Reply with quote  #2

1715238657
Report to moderator
MPOE-PR
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 756
Merit: 522



View Profile
October 07, 2012, 04:07:50 PM
 #442

Just gather some private investment and dont allow public trading of the shares. Thats how the company that runs glbse itself functions.

Nice to see you were shitting all over MPEx while being secretly involved with the Global Scam Exchange, you despicable shill you.

Yeah pot WTF WHY YOU SO BLACK, Kettles like me would never be that black.

You're a little confused, aren't you.

The guy was withholding his relationship while making false claims about MPEx. Just like that MrBiggs failpiece. I was never withholding my relationship while making factual claims about GLBSE.

My Credentials  | THE BTC Stock Exchange | I have my very own anthology! | Use bitcointa.lk, it's like this one but better.
jasinlee
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 742
Merit: 500


Its as easy as 0, 1, 1, 2, 3


View Profile
October 07, 2012, 04:10:54 PM
 #443

You do however constantly ignore questions about the pron that is hosted on the domain that is beyond forgiveness. Why would you even be willing to work with a company that hosts child porn. Its disgusting, and I doubt you will even respond to this post.

I would count that as withholding your relationship.

BTC 1JASiNZxmAN1WBS4dmGEDoPpzN3GV7dnjX DVC 1CxxZzqcy7YEVXfCn5KvgRxjeWvPpniK3                     Earn Devcoins Devtome.com
SebastianJu
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2674
Merit: 1082


Legendary Escrow Service - Tip Jar in Profile


View Profile WWW
October 07, 2012, 04:15:07 PM
 #444

child porn

oO What the fuck... such persons are here?

Please ALWAYS contact me through bitcointalk pm before sending someone coins.
jasinlee
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 742
Merit: 500


Its as easy as 0, 1, 1, 2, 3


View Profile
October 07, 2012, 04:15:55 PM
 #445

The owner of mpex hosts it on his servers. Just search the forums lots of people reference it.

BTC 1JASiNZxmAN1WBS4dmGEDoPpzN3GV7dnjX DVC 1CxxZzqcy7YEVXfCn5KvgRxjeWvPpniK3                     Earn Devcoins Devtome.com
theymos (OP)
Administrator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 5194
Merit: 12976


View Profile
October 07, 2012, 04:19:39 PM
 #446

Actually he was asked to send the coins to CHM before the meeting, when he said he was going to sell his shares.

He refused because he wanted to hand them over to the new guy who bought his shares or whoever took over his position.

bitcoin.me is a BitcoinGlobal shareholder who is clearly being fed lies by Nefario.

Nefario previously asked me to send him the entire treasury because I was selling my shares. I refused because I am still the treasurer and it is my duty to hold the funds and dispense them according to shareholder motions until I am no longer treasurer.

The recent motion was to send the funds to BitcoinGlobal's accountant, ColdHardMetal. He never sent me an address because he's uncomfortable with handling such large amounts of BTC. CHM just sent an email to all shareholders about this.

1NXYoJ5xU91Jp83XfVMHwwTUyZFK64BoAD
theymos (OP)
Administrator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 5194
Merit: 12976


View Profile
October 07, 2012, 04:27:01 PM
 #447

Regarding the 800BTC you hold. When he really still would hold 8000BTC why should he need the 800BTC? Didnt he want them for lawyer cost? And doesnt this imply that he doesnt even has 800BTC to pay the lawyer?
Or you think he only want them to put them into his new project?

He doesn't need the 800 BTC to start paying back users.

Quote
Others say you should send it to ColdHardMetal and not to nefario. Whats correct?

I'm to send it to ColdHardMetal, who will presumably send it to Nefario at some point.

Quote
So you mean 4-5 shareholders have the password and 2-3 would make a backup? That would be cool if it happens because then it doesnt all depend on nefario. In case he runs crazy we would have still the list of assets owned by what person. Even better 2 shareholders independently downloaded the datebase so that not one shareholder could manipulate it and we could compare.
So if possible i would try this. Just in case.

Nefario encrypted his entire password database with a shared key using Shamir's secret sharing. 4 out of the 5 shareholders Nefario selected would need to agree in order to access the database at all. There aren't enough people in agreement.

Quote
And is that correct then theymos? Or dont you think its the correct address? I mean its not hard to guess who are the shareholder in the thread and i dont see your actions here as if you want to scam. But hearing that usermoney isnt sent while you could do probably could be a bit worrying for persons that hold money at glbse.

This is not true.

1NXYoJ5xU91Jp83XfVMHwwTUyZFK64BoAD
HorseRider
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1120
Merit: 1001


View Profile
October 07, 2012, 04:33:46 PM
 #448

Actually he was asked to send the coins to CHM before the meeting, when he said he was going to sell his shares.

He refused because he wanted to hand them over to the new guy who bought his shares or whoever took over his position.

bitcoin.me is a BitcoinGlobal shareholder who is clearly being fed lies by Nefario.

Nefario previously asked me to send him the entire treasury because I was selling my shares. I refused because I am still the treasurer and it is my duty to hold the funds and dispense them according to shareholder motions until I am no longer treasurer.

The recent motion was to send the funds to BitcoinGlobal's accountant, ColdHardMetal. He never sent me an address because he's uncomfortable with handling such large amounts of BTC. CHM just sent an email to all shareholders about this.



theymos, have you discussed on your shareholders' meeting about why GLBSE don't just use the exiting trading platform to return the bitcoin to its users? why he create the trouble and delay to start another new system to return the bitcoin?

16SvwJtQET7mkHZFFbJpgPaDA1Pxtmbm5P
theymos (OP)
Administrator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 5194
Merit: 12976


View Profile
October 07, 2012, 04:35:30 PM
 #449

theymos, have you discussed on your shareholders' meeting about why GLBSE don't just use the exiting trading platform to return the bitcoin to its users? why he create the trouble and delay to start another new system to return the bitcoin?

He wants to require AML info before allowing withdrawals.

1NXYoJ5xU91Jp83XfVMHwwTUyZFK64BoAD
Bogart
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 966
Merit: 1000


View Profile
October 07, 2012, 05:01:18 PM
 #450

Does anyone have the glbse account address so we can check it against blockchain and find that tx?

http://blockchain.info/address/1FX22c76vybHJSJdCCjKHDHhcMDhDX87nw

My 50 BTC deposit is still sitting in this address.  I believe this is the small fund that Theymos controls (or a part of it).

Earlier Theymos was very careful to say that these are anonymous user funds and do not belong to any user in particular, and that if he ends up distributing them to users, that it will be a fair and equitable distribution among all users.

This seems fair to me.  I will not insist that my deposit be returned to me in full while other users go empty-handed just because of where it happened to end up.

When considering who you want to trust to hold and distribute these funds, consider the behavior of the involved parties so far.  I don't think you'll need to look far to realize who has been forthright with us, engaged us, and given us reasonable answers, and who has told us nothing and made demands that make little sense if the intent were to actually repay users, but make lots if sense if the intent is to abscond with all of the user funds.

Maybe some other depositor can trace their funds to find this supposed 4000-8000 BTC address, and see if they are in fact still unspent.  Or maybe someone who is inherently privy to this knowledge can just post the address.  :hint: :hint:

"All safe deposit boxes in banks or financial institutions have been sealed... and may only be opened in the presence of an agent of the I.R.S." - President F.D. Roosevelt, 1933
HorseRider
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1120
Merit: 1001


View Profile
October 07, 2012, 05:07:14 PM
Last edit: October 07, 2012, 05:23:55 PM by HorseRider
 #451

Matthewh3 has provide us useful information (or claim)

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=117009.msg1249833;boardseen#new

16SvwJtQET7mkHZFFbJpgPaDA1Pxtmbm5P
legolouman
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 504
Merit: 500


Decent Programmer to boot!


View Profile
October 07, 2012, 06:09:00 PM
 #452

I honestly can't follow this saga fast enough.

If you love me, you'd give me a Satoshi!
BTC - 1MSzGKh5znbrcEF2qTrtrWBm4ydH5eT49f
LTC - LYeJrmYQQvt6gRQxrDz66XTwtkdodx9udz
stoppots
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 271
Merit: 250


View Profile
October 07, 2012, 06:09:24 PM
 #453

Does anyone have the glbse account address so we can check it against blockchain and find that tx?

http://blockchain.info/address/1FX22c76vybHJSJdCCjKHDHhcMDhDX87nw

My 50 BTC deposit is still sitting in this address.  I believe this is the small fund that Theymos controls (or a part of it).

Earlier Theymos was very careful to say that these are anonymous user funds and do not belong to any user in particular, and that if he ends up distributing them to users, that it will be a fair and equitable distribution among all users.

This seems fair to me.  I will not insist that my deposit be returned to me in full while other users go empty-handed just because of where it happened to end up.

When considering who you want to trust to hold and distribute these funds, consider the behavior of the involved parties so far.  I don't think you'll need to look far to realize who has been forthright with us, engaged us, and given us reasonable answers, and who has told us nothing and made demands that make little sense if the intent were to actually repay users, but make lots if sense if the intent is to abscond with all of the user funds.

Maybe some other depositor can trace their funds to find this supposed 4000-8000 BTC address, and see if they are in fact still unspent.  Or maybe someone who is inherently privy to this knowledge can just post the address.  :hint: :hint:

Felt your post needed to be unburried from the bottom of the page
capn noe
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 98
Merit: 10


View Profile
October 07, 2012, 06:42:36 PM
 #454

There are a few accounts with large number of BTC that have received from the account Bogart linked to.

Any more clues to be had out there? Nefario, that wallet that you have control of... can you confirm it's wallet address? Can you confirm that it has received and/or sent funds to the wallets that Nefario has control of?
MPOE-PR
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 756
Merit: 522



View Profile
October 07, 2012, 07:15:14 PM
 #455

You do however constantly ignore questions about the pron that is hosted on the domain that is beyond forgiveness. Why would you even be willing to work with a company that hosts child porn. Its disgusting, and I doubt you will even respond to this post.

I would count that as withholding your relationship.

I ignore a lot of stupid shit. A bunch of forum retards repeating stupid shit doesn't make it any less stupid.

My Credentials  | THE BTC Stock Exchange | I have my very own anthology! | Use bitcointa.lk, it's like this one but better.
jasinlee
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 742
Merit: 500


Its as easy as 0, 1, 1, 2, 3


View Profile
October 07, 2012, 07:23:12 PM
 #456

For example, if I had a host who happened to be on the same server as 4chan, I would move my site especially if I was personally acquainted with the owner like you.

There is a difference between allowing unhindered freedom of speech on a site/image board/forum, but even criminals in maximum security prisons hate child molesters and you have willingly associated yourself with someone who supports them. You say there is none on the server? The reason no one wants to check is because sites of that style attract pedophiles like flies since they have no chance of being caught. I would suggest you move your defense to its own thread, no one is going to check your story and neither will I, the server is a cesspool and I like many others would not want to be apart of it even if it is only somewhat true.

BTC 1JASiNZxmAN1WBS4dmGEDoPpzN3GV7dnjX DVC 1CxxZzqcy7YEVXfCn5KvgRxjeWvPpniK3                     Earn Devcoins Devtome.com
k3t3r
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 183
Merit: 100


View Profile
October 07, 2012, 07:25:13 PM
 #457


Maybe some other depositor can trace their funds to find this supposed 4000-8000 BTC address, and see if they are in fact still unspent.  Or maybe someone who is inherently privy to this knowledge can just post the address.  :hint: :hint:


If it is any help here is the address of last deposit I made into GLBSE. http://blockchain.info/address/15Va2FL7bHvzcNZMy5xt66fSS3H34TRLJN?filter=1

It was for 22.3377BTC.  The deposit was made on Sunday but the funds were not credited to my balance and I had to chase this up with support and this was added to my account balance on Tuesday by Nefario.

The funds were moved on the 2nd that would probably be when they were credited to my balance. I dont know where they go from there.
jasinlee
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 742
Merit: 500


Its as easy as 0, 1, 1, 2, 3


View Profile
October 07, 2012, 07:30:45 PM
 #458

I wonder if they are in a cold wallet by now.

BTC 1JASiNZxmAN1WBS4dmGEDoPpzN3GV7dnjX DVC 1CxxZzqcy7YEVXfCn5KvgRxjeWvPpniK3                     Earn Devcoins Devtome.com
k3t3r
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 183
Merit: 100


View Profile
October 07, 2012, 07:32:48 PM
 #459

I wonder if they are in a cold wallet by now.
It is not moved into any address with a larger amount it is actually broken into smaller chunks on th 4th, 5th and 6th Oct.
jasinlee
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 742
Merit: 500


Its as easy as 0, 1, 1, 2, 3


View Profile
October 07, 2012, 07:34:08 PM
 #460

Yeah and that usually indicates laundering, but there should be even smaller chunks than that too, but I dont see them.

BTC 1JASiNZxmAN1WBS4dmGEDoPpzN3GV7dnjX DVC 1CxxZzqcy7YEVXfCn5KvgRxjeWvPpniK3                     Earn Devcoins Devtome.com
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 [23] 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 ... 94 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!