Bitcoin Forum
March 29, 2024, 11:35:08 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 26.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  

Warning: Moderators do not remove likely scams. You must use your own brain: caveat emptor. Watch out for Ponzi schemes. Do not invest more than you can afford to lose.

Pages: « 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 »  All
  Print  
Author Topic: GLBSE Payment Claims (Announce your payment here)  (Read 44351 times)
chungenhung
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1134
Merit: 1005


View Profile
October 18, 2012, 04:33:22 PM
 #81

Is there a way to contact glbse?
Nefario have blocked all PMs. And the email that he sent out to me have a "do not reply" to this email clause.

How do I distinguish who sent me the coins? glbse or any of the asset issuers could have sent me the coins.
As the address I gave to GLBSE, they said they will forward those to asset issuers.
I have balance in GLBSE, and have shares on some assets. Now I am confused as to who paid me.
1711712108
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1711712108

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1711712108
Reply with quote  #2

1711712108
Report to moderator
1711712108
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1711712108

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1711712108
Reply with quote  #2

1711712108
Report to moderator
In order to achieve higher forum ranks, you need both activity points and merit points.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1711712108
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1711712108

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1711712108
Reply with quote  #2

1711712108
Report to moderator
1711712108
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1711712108

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1711712108
Reply with quote  #2

1711712108
Report to moderator
augustocroppo
VIP
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 756
Merit: 503


View Profile
October 18, 2012, 05:11:36 PM
 #82

The address 1NN5FpxxWGLojfN5cMkKS8EhL7HETJsTr3 cited by the user Rygon shows other user's address in the taint analysis (received):

http://blockchain.info/taint/1NN5FpxxWGLojfN5cMkKS8EhL7HETJsTr3

Code:
Branch Address Taint Count
1MHciu1SLh4HtEPym5R9GdXmbUnY49WBmK 100% 1
1M4Su727K6WzLFTtLXgkp4v7EL6mUVJbyE 100% 1

Both address were reported by the user tsakf and dishwara.

The address 17QFCyrPhBui5CLpLez3sRcH2F4cf8xKrm cited by the user Smoovious shows another user's address in the taint analysis (received):

http://blockchain.info/taint/17QFCyrPhBui5CLpLez3sRcH2F4cf8xKrm

Code:
Branch Address Taint Count
1F43zt7qbTiCZW2bDqgEUKT66HTTbV9CWc 55.0234474322% 1
      
The above address was reported by the user DutchBrat.
jbreher
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3038
Merit: 1660


lose: unfind ... loose: untight


View Profile
October 18, 2012, 05:20:56 PM
 #83

I did not receive an email. But I received some coin.

Two days later. Still no email. The disturbing aspect of this is the apparent variability in procedure. It would suggest an opportunity for a mistake that may cost someone some coin.

Anyone with a campaign ad in their signature -- for an organization with which they are not otherwise affiliated -- is automatically deducted credibility points.

I've been convicted of heresy. Convicted by a mere known extortionist. Read my Trust for details.
SebastianJu
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2674
Merit: 1077


Legendary Escrow Service - Tip Jar in Profile


View Profile WWW
October 18, 2012, 05:32:22 PM
 #84

Please, post the ID transaction to prove your claims!

How could you prove their claims? Do you have access to the real numbers of btc they had in the database?

Anyway... her is the transaction id: 38a82210856e8afe0c274bd6df72d218b584a6fbc6b44b05346023bafccfa090

I had some numbers behind the 6 so i think he took it as a fee without asking or rounded it. Unfortunately some got their amounts round up, some down. So i lost.

I didnt get an email at all.

How do I distinguish who sent me the coins? glbse or any of the asset issuers could have sent me the coins.
As the address I gave to GLBSE, they said they will forward those to asset issuers.
I have balance in GLBSE, and have shares on some assets. Now I am confused as to who paid me.

The coins are from glbse because the issuers didnt get info till now.

Please ALWAYS contact me through bitcointalk pm before sending someone coins.
Bogart
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 966
Merit: 1000


View Profile
October 18, 2012, 06:37:38 PM
 #85

If I may, I suggest a table be built and maintained in OP something like:

Username \t BTC expected \t BTC received \t Transaction ID(s)

"All safe deposit boxes in banks or financial institutions have been sealed... and may only be opened in the presence of an agent of the I.R.S." - President F.D. Roosevelt, 1933
RHA
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 392
Merit: 250


View Profile
October 18, 2012, 07:32:12 PM
 #86

It looks like the rest of the payments has started.
The chain begins from tx 286b4172160ba21c8129e08dd43a9567ea55973be6038a54f8f35c92d6d34d20 of 975.8160973 BTC.

However instead of be paid the missing 10%, I was paid once again the 90% of my coins (31.05 BTC):
The first payout (proper): c1c3372e1bedd22afd5c55c381840ea2ef697fc44528a50da10291e04907d75b
The second (duplicated): 5264a57d8eaf761d81f7fe4507fbc3e21d53ebeb1f0095424e8794a6e1b85711
Maybe there is some charity giving the coins away to people, but I bet it's simple human error in Nefario's scripts.
Let's hope the error is single.

I'll return the excess to Nefario, to let him to be able to refund others completely.
I have to ask him by PM for proper address for the return. It may take a while before he answers.
bitfair
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 362
Merit: 250


View Profile
October 18, 2012, 07:41:09 PM
Last edit: October 18, 2012, 07:55:43 PM by bitfair
 #87

It looks like the rest of the payments has started.
The chain begins from tx 286b4172160ba21c8129e08dd43a9567ea55973be6038a54f8f35c92d6d34d20 of 975.8160973 BTC.

However instead of be paid the missing 10%, I was paid once again the 90% of my coins (31.05 BTC):
The first payout (proper): c1c3372e1bedd22afd5c55c381840ea2ef697fc44528a50da10291e04907d75b
The second (duplicated): 5264a57d8eaf761d81f7fe4507fbc3e21d53ebeb1f0095424e8794a6e1b85711
Maybe there is some charity giving the coins away to people, but I bet it's simple human error in Nefario's scripts.
Let's hope the error is single.

I'll return the excess to Nefario, to let him to be able to refund others completely.
I have to ask him by PM for proper address for the return. It may take a while before he answers.

I followed the chain a little and saw several duplicate payments too. (I suggest Nef stop payments and double-check, before half of the people get double-up and the rest get nothing...)

Edit: Looks like all the payments made today were dupes of payments made on Tuesday  (an additional example: http://blockchain.info/address/12NcPjtX6wjYLfmsTYvuTdXYwZ91tE1GFw) - Nef could actually have accidentally spent 975 BTC of user funds! (Pity I didn't have BTC there, I could have got back double!!)
stochastic
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 532
Merit: 500


View Profile
October 18, 2012, 07:44:52 PM
 #88

It looks like the rest of the payments has started.
The chain begins from tx 286b4172160ba21c8129e08dd43a9567ea55973be6038a54f8f35c92d6d34d20 of 975.8160973 BTC.

However instead of be paid the missing 10%, I was paid once again the 90% of my coins (31.05 BTC):
The first payout (proper): c1c3372e1bedd22afd5c55c381840ea2ef697fc44528a50da10291e04907d75b
The second (duplicated): 5264a57d8eaf761d81f7fe4507fbc3e21d53ebeb1f0095424e8794a6e1b85711
Maybe there is some charity giving the coins away to people, but I bet it's simple human error in Nefario's scripts.
Let's hope the error is single.

I'll return the excess to Nefario, to let him to be able to refund others completely.
I have to ask him by PM for proper address for the return. It may take a while before he answers.

He blocked his PMs on bitcointalk.

Introducing constraints to the economy only serves to limit what can be economical.
Akka
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1232
Merit: 1001



View Profile
October 18, 2012, 08:08:49 PM
 #89

I have recieved the double paiment, too.

I had hoped as first that I had more funds in there as I thought due to some of my sell orders went through, but now that I'm reading this.  Embarrassed

I will return the funds of course, as soon as I hear from GLBSE.

Nefario has a mail address associated with my account.

All previous versions of currency will no longer be supported as of this update
stochastic
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 532
Merit: 500


View Profile
October 18, 2012, 08:12:05 PM
 #90

I have recieved the double paiment, too.

I had hoped as first that I had more funds in there as I thought due to some of my sell orders went through, but now that I'm reading this.  Embarrassed

I will return the funds of course, as soon as I hear from GLBSE.

Nefario has a mail address associated with my account.

If 100% was paid out initially, then those accounts could have been checked off instead of having to be paid again and none of the double payments could have occurred.

Introducing constraints to the economy only serves to limit what can be economical.
Smoovious
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 504
Merit: 500

Scattering my bits around the net since 1980


View Profile
October 18, 2012, 08:16:04 PM
 #91

I have recieved the double paiment, too.

I had hoped as first that I had more funds in there as I thought due to some of my sell orders went through, but now that I'm reading this.  Embarrassed

I will return the funds of course, as soon as I hear from GLBSE.

Nefario has a mail address associated with my account.

If 100% was paid out initially, then those accounts could have been checked off instead of having to be paid again and none of the double payments could have occurred.
if he would have just left the site up, and suspended all trading, we could have just withdrew our own coin using the site's existing accounting/withdrawal system, and there would have been no problem at all.

now? he's got a clusterfuck...

love how people gotta keep making things harder on themselves...

-- Smoov
bitfair
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 362
Merit: 250


View Profile
October 18, 2012, 08:19:29 PM
 #92

I have recieved the double paiment, too.

I had hoped as first that I had more funds in there as I thought due to some of my sell orders went through, but now that I'm reading this.  Embarrassed

I will return the funds of course, as soon as I hear from GLBSE.

Nefario has a mail address associated with my account.

The double-payment chain seems to start here: http://blockchain.info/address/1NBtx9EiPKouwrnfCmPULbLSvxQctj11dA, that 1000BTC input was all spent in chained transactions made in about 10 minutes time.
theymos
Administrator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 5152
Merit: 12580


View Profile
October 18, 2012, 08:29:05 PM
 #93


1NXYoJ5xU91Jp83XfVMHwwTUyZFK64BoAD
stochastic
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 532
Merit: 500


View Profile
October 18, 2012, 08:29:24 PM
 #94

I have recieved the double paiment, too.

I had hoped as first that I had more funds in there as I thought due to some of my sell orders went through, but now that I'm reading this.  Embarrassed

I will return the funds of course, as soon as I hear from GLBSE.

Nefario has a mail address associated with my account.

The double-payment chain seems to start here: http://blockchain.info/address/1NBtx9EiPKouwrnfCmPULbLSvxQctj11dA, that 1000BTC input was all spent in chained transactions made in about 10 minutes time.

Next you will see this email  Roll Eyes:

Quote
Your GLBSE account has been over processed. 180% of your funds have been returned to you...

Introducing constraints to the economy only serves to limit what can be economical.
Namworld (OP)
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 745
Merit: 501



View Profile
October 18, 2012, 08:44:19 PM
 #95

If I may, I suggest a table be built and maintained in OP something like:

Username \t BTC expected \t BTC received \t Transaction ID(s)

Noted and done.
dishwara
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1855
Merit: 1016



View Profile
October 18, 2012, 08:49:13 PM
 #96

I too got double payment. Just checked.
If Nefario gives any address to send, i am ready to send back.

May be by mistake,he used the script, which already paid, to pay again.
senor_coconut
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 69
Merit: 10


a big question mark


View Profile
October 18, 2012, 08:58:49 PM
 #97

I too got double payment. Just checked.
If Nefario gives any address to send, i am ready to send back.

May be by mistake,he used the script, which already paid, to pay again.

dishwara
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1855
Merit: 1016



View Profile
October 18, 2012, 09:04:20 PM
 #98

I don't know fully what that picture says.
If its about smoking bitcoin, then so far atleast ~100 people said, they got bitcoins.
That means Nefrio didn't smoke bitcoins.

Or the picture has some other meaning?

Seems many who told received coins, didn't gave tx id or address.
maybe don't want to show publicly.
senor_coconut
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 69
Merit: 10


a big question mark


View Profile
October 18, 2012, 09:07:13 PM
 #99

I don't know fully what that picture says.
If its about smoking bitcoin, then so far atleast ~100 people said, they got bitcoins.
That means Nefrio didn't smoke bitcoins.

Or the picture has some other meaning?

Seems many who told received coins, didn't gave tx id or address.
maybe don't want to show publicly.

no, exactly that .
[rotfl]
RHA
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 392
Merit: 250


View Profile
October 18, 2012, 09:08:20 PM
 #100

Not quite the same script.
The main point of start is here: http://blockchain.info/address/13H7si7r2VsoaDcESxZnweH18H939ndgZL
There begins a chain of 5000 BTC and 3762 BTC.
The latter ends at: http://blockchain.info/address/12rebn6xb2VJt5YfMokUJvV4msdr7KohfG with amount of 1,058.54 BTC
It was used today to the 1000 BTC chain with duplicates of part of the payments from 3762 BTC chain, but in different order.

Sometimes the same address was used for supposedly different accounts,
for instance: http://blockchain.info/address/19mvuvS2VgCWDtfGpsLnJAPhBp2ZcWM3xQ
(two of its payments, 139+ and 421+ BTC, are not duplicated, but one, 55+ BTC, is).

BTW: Bitcoin was meant to be anonymous. Wink
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 »  All
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!