[BitFunder] Asset Exchange Marketplace + Rewritable Options Trading

[Deprived]

Reserved amounts are now totally wrong.

It shows a reserved amount of  ฿0.5186460 for me on all assets - whether I have zero bids on them or a lot more than .5 BTC in bids.

This problem still exists.

It nows shows a reserved amount of ฿6.46497350 for me on all assets - whether or not I have any bids at all on them.

I'd guess that it's displaying the reserved amount I have on some security - whether or not it's the one I'm actually looking at.  It's entirely likely I DO have that exact amount in bids on some security.

Unfortunately it's also now rejecting bids at the server based on that amount.

[Ukyo]

Reserved amounts are now totally wrong.

It shows a reserved amount of  ฿0.5186460 for me on all assets - whether I have zero bids on them or a lot more than .5 BTC in bids.

This problem still exists.

It nows shows a reserved amount of ฿6.46497350 for me on all assets - whether or not I have any bids at all on them.

I'd guess that it's displaying the reserved amount I have on some security - whether or not it's the one I'm actually looking at.  It's entirely likely I DO have that exact amount in bids on some security.

Unfortunately it's also now rejecting bids at the server based on that amount.

This is correct.
I had picked a few accounts to allow them to reserve on a per asset basis to test with, yours being one of them since you asked for the feature.
As stated in irc and another thread, I have decided against the per-asset reserve funding reserves.
It does not add any real liquidity to the system in my and many others opinions, it just offers a false pretense of that liquidity.

Once you bring your total reserve under your balance you will be able to place more orders on the books once again.
This goes for the other few users who are in the same situation.

There may be a reserves bug, and if someone notices the system adding/removing incorrect reserves based on their orders please let me know.
I have not been able to duplicate such thing on the sandbox which uses the exact same code at this time.

[Ukyo]

Reserved amounts are now totally wrong.

It shows a reserved amount of  ฿0.5186460 for me on all assets - whether I have zero bids on them or a lot more than .5 BTC in bids.

This problem still exists.

It nows shows a reserved amount of ฿6.46497350 for me on all assets - whether or not I have any bids at all on them.

I'd guess that it's displaying the reserved amount I have on some security - whether or not it's the one I'm actually looking at.  It's entirely likely I DO have that exact amount in bids on some security.

Unfortunately it's also now rejecting bids at the server based on that amount.

This is correct.
I had picked a few accounts to allow them to reserve on a per asset basis to test with, yours being one of them since you asked for the feature.
As stated in irc and another thread, I have decided against the per-asset reserve funding reserves.
It does not add any real liquidity to the system in my and many others opinions, it just offers a false pretense of that liquidity.

Once you bring your total reserve under your balance you will be able to place more orders on the books once again.
This goes for the other few users who are in the same situation.

There may be a reserves bug, and if someone notices the system adding/removing incorrect reserves based on their orders please let me know.
I have not been able to duplicate such thing on the sandbox which uses the exact same code at this time.

I have cancelled all my buy orders, but it still says I have some reserved, I think this is a bug?

Ah hah! Let me take a look at the debug.

[Ukyo]

You should be good now Peter.

I am going to be adding a full range of debugs on the 3 places in the code where reserves are handled tonight to track it down easier.

Thanks

[Ukyo]

I cancelled some orders and the funds are stuck in reserve, help please.

This was corrected earlier.

[EskimoBob]

Any plans to clear up this mess?
How many "Price" can you have there?

I think that this is one of the most annoying "features" of bitfunder. This can be fixed by using "standard" terminology. You got about 3 "price" labels to many in that box.
 
After you have fixed that, can you please drop this cross eyed BS - having Buy and Sell boxes, above "wrong" columns - or to be more precise, you show Ask price in "buy" window above Bid column. Your Sell is above Ask column,  but uses prices form Bid column.
It looks and feels wrong and is counter intuitive - aka bad usability

[Peter Lambert]

When placing an order, currently it says "Trade complete", even when no trade happens. When an order is put onto the book, it should say something like "Order placed successfully", I keep seeing that "trade complete" message and saying to myself "oh, crap, I didn't want to sell at the current prices, what did my fat fingers do?"

[Ukyo]

When placing an order, currently it says "Trade complete", even when no trade happens. When an order is put onto the book, it should say something like "Order placed successfully", I keep seeing that "trade complete" message and saying to myself "oh, crap, I didn't want to sell at the current prices, what did my fat fingers do?"

Ahh, actually this is my fault because I had fixed this. But for only one type of trade.
It should say "Trade completed and/or posted!". Which I have put up now.

In the future I will have it display a box that tells you What was immediately purchased/sold, and what was posted.

Thanks for letting me know!

[Ukyo]

I am glad to say that thanks to Usagi's help the reserves issue has now been corrected.

Only 3 people have incorrect reserves balances at the moment, and they are the per-asset reserve testers.

To be able to place more orders again, they will need to cancel orders below their current balance.

If these users have not opted to cancel the bids on their own within 3 days, I will cancel them starting with the highest costs until the are at or below balance.

[Ukyo]

Random suggestion:

Asset transfers currently only show up in the transaction history. I would like to see them in the My Assets -> Trade History section.
Could you create a yellow button for and place transfers into the Type column titled "transfer" and allow us to insert the Price Per ?

Wonderful idea, I will look into adding it in.

[tulkos]

I can no longer connect using a secure connection, is it just me or the site?

[🏰 TradeFortress 🏰]

I can no longer connect using a secure connection, is it just me or the site?

Same :/

[Ukyo]

I can no longer connect using a secure connection, is it just me or the site?

One of our upstream providers thought it would be funny to block all port 443 traffic passing through their network.
I just de-peered the network and things should resume.

I have enabled people to use http://bitfunder.com for the meantime.

Only a few people who happened to be routing through them will be affected.

[burnside]

I can no longer connect using a secure connection, is it just me or the site?

One of our upstream providers thought it would be funny to block all port 443 traffic passing through their network.
I just de-peered the network and things should resume.

I have enabled people to use http://bitfunder.com for the meantime.

Only a few people who happened to be routing through them will be affected.

Whoa, what provider?

Edit/add:

I don't know if this helps or not, but I'm seeing the issue over your nlayer peer:

  5    24 ms    24 ms    23 ms  cr2.la2ca.ip.att.net [12.123.30.250]
  6    21 ms    39 ms    23 ms  gar29.la2ca.ip.att.net [12.122.129.233]
  7    21 ms    38 ms    22 ms  ae-6.r05.lsanca03.us.bb.gin.ntt.net [129.250.9.5]
  8    34 ms    26 ms    47 ms  xe-3-0-1.ar1.lax2.us.nlayer.net [69.31.127.182]
  9    53 ms    19 ms    18 ms  ae1-80g.cr1.lax1.us.nlayer.net [69.31.127.129]
 10    32 ms    26 ms    22 ms  ae2-50g.ar1.lax1.us.nlayer.net [69.31.127.142]
 11    38 ms    34 ms    19 ms  as13335.xe-11-0-6.ar1.lax1.us.nlayer.net [69.31.125.106]
 12    27 ms    38 ms    44 ms  108.162.197.89

Cheers.

[Ukyo]

The issue was originally routing through XO/Allegiance Telecom where they were blocking/breaking all HTTPS traffic.
I have a ticket open with one of the providers and they are working to isolate and correct it. HTTPS on BitFunder works fine.
A source in the middle is currently causing a connection refused.

[romerun]

so am I affected

[Ukyo]

so am I affected

If you feel safe, you can use http://bitfunder.com

I just got word that the problem network has been identified, and that they are attempting to contact them to resolve it. It is not limited to just this one site.
My understanding is that if they do not get a resolution soon they will make routing changes.

[romerun]

nah, I rather wait, unless you can enable SSL on another port if the problem is to persist for a while

[Ukyo]

nah, I rather wait, unless you can enable SSL on another port if the problem is to persist for a while

The problem should be fixed now.

[SpaceJelly]

nah, I rather wait, unless you can enable SSL on another port if the problem is to persist for a while

The problem should be fixed now.

Yup, working again here