Bitcoin puzzle transaction ~32 BTC prize to who solves it

[mcdouglasx]

I can give you some clues for this problem and you can reflect on it...
       *Addresses are in order.
       *Addresses are not random.
       * Addresses always have PVK values ​​that differ by one PVK value.
       * There is a pattern.

    The key is to use the common factor within each address pair and its PVK value.

     A common factor between addresses 1 and 2 is that their PVK value is equal to 3.

     A common factor between addresses 3 and 4 is that their PVK value is equal to 7.

     A common factor between addresses 5 and 6 is that their PVK value is equal to 21.

     Etc...



      PVK values ​​are always in a mathematical progression (in this case, I don't like to use the word "sequence") that appears to be in a progression of prime numbers.


       * What is important is not the PVK values ​​but the mathematical relationship between the PVK values.
       *Addresses are in a progression of prime numbers.
       *The addresses are always in order.
       * There is always a relationship between the PVK value of the following addresses.


       *PVK values ​​do not always have to be prime numbers.
       * PVK addresses are always generated mathematically and never randomly.
       * Don't look for the answer in the Bitcoin blockchain.

      * Think of the relationship between the directions as the common factor between two very large prime numbers.
       * The equation to be solved for the PVK values ​​is a unique mathematical solution.
       *Also remember that PVK addresses are always in order.

       *The key is the PVK value pattern.
       * The pattern goes beyond PVK values.


       * Use a mathematical relationship between the PVK values ​​to calculate the PVK values ​​of the directions in the depressed progressions.

    Some clues are a little more ambiguous, but if you think about it it can give you a little idea of ​​how to decipher the directions in this case.  I can't give you more information about the exact formula behind all this for security reasons, but I hope you have fun and someone very special sends you greetings.  ✌️

If you are satoshi try it by sending me 1 btc, just kidding.
Your analysis is very interesting, friend.

edit:
My doubt is that I believe that there is no common factor for 5 and 6 to have a result of 21.

[NAKAMOT0]

You are right, the common factor for PVK addresses is not just the difference in PVK values.

  I will tell you a mathematical relationship between PVK values that can be easily calculated.

 The PVK value of address 5 is 21 because address 4 has a PVK of 8, and address 5 is the next first value after 4. So, 21 = PVK 5 = PVK 4 + 8.

 Do you understand?  If you still don't understand, I'll give you another example.  Suppose we are looking for the PVK value of address 7. We know that the PVK value of address 6 is 49.

 We understand that the PVK value of address 7 is = to the nearest prime number after 49. The next prime number after 49 is 61.

 So address 7 is at PVK 61.

 Now you understand?

[dextronomous]

again but probably another digaran version?
really clear presentation, of it's own toughts on how to calculate this puzzle,
get it..

[nomachine]

Now you understand?

I've enlisted the help of my imaginary friends, Fibonacci and Euclid, for an epic escapade through the primeval forest of PVK values and the enigmatic realm of depressed progressions. Armed with nothing but a slide rule and a cat's evil eye, we've sacrificed Netflix binging to decode cryptographic riddles, as the crypto-gods eagerly await our impending mathematical breakthrough.

Let's ride the prime number rollercoaster together and unveil the grand secret hidden within the pattern that goes beyond PVK values. I'm convinced we're on the verge of a breakthrough that will shake the foundations of mathematical academia.
The pulse of the prime force guides our quest, and we stand on the cusp of a revelation that promises to echo through the corridors of intellectual history. Get ready for the revelation of the century!

Cheers to the thrilling adventure of PVK values and their clandestine connections. May the prime force be with us!  

[GR Sasa]

You are right, the common factor for PVK addresses is not just the difference in PVK values.

  I will tell you a mathematical relationship between PVK values that can be easily calculated.

 The PVK value of address 5 is 21 because address 4 has a PVK of 8, and address 5 is the next first value after 4. So, 21 = PVK 5 = PVK 4 + 8.

 Do you understand?  If you still don't understand, I'll give you another example.  Suppose we are looking for the PVK value of address 7. We know that the PVK value of address 6 is 49.

 We understand that the PVK value of address 7 is = to the nearest prime number after 49. The next prime number after 49 is 61.

 So address 7 is at PVK 61.

 Now you understand?

If you are the creator could you please sign a something to prove us? Alternative you can increase the puzzle by 10x again.

The Creator said once in 2017, that there is not an pattern. Now you are saying the opposite, so how would we believe you if you didn't prove yourself and you aren't digaran?

EDIT: We understand that the PVK value of address 7 is = to the nearest prime number after 49. The next prime number after 49 is 61.

Wrong? The next prime number after 49 is 53.

[nomachine]

probably another digaran version?

It's amazing how persistent he is in his imagination. It turns out that the real Satoshi Nakamoto has been living a double life. The digaran mysterious genius behind it all.  

If you are the creator could you please sign a something to prove us? Alternative you can increase the puzzle by 10x again.

Why would anyone prove anything when we already have a verified creator:

A few words about the puzzle.  There is no pattern.  It is just consecutive keys from a deterministic wallet (masked with leading 000...0001 to set difficulty).

[kalos15btc]

im asking the admin to ban digran and his multiple accounts, this thread become useless with his useless ideas
@modeator, verify those replies you will find the same ip address

[AlanJohnson]

Gee... it's getting worse with him ... He is not only mad but also thinks he is Satoshi Nakamoto now...

[mcdouglasx]

You are right, the common factor for PVK addresses is not just the difference in PVK values.

  I will tell you a mathematical relationship between PVK values that can be easily calculated.

 The PVK value of address 5 is 21 because address 4 has a PVK of 8, and address 5 is the next first value after 4. So, 21 = PVK 5 = PVK 4 + 8.

 Do you understand?  If you still don't understand, I'll give you another example.  Suppose we are looking for the PVK value of address 7. We know that the PVK value of address 6 is 49.

 We understand that the PVK value of address 7 is = to the nearest prime number after 49. The next prime number after 49 is 61.

 So address 7 is at PVK 61.

 Now you understand?

Satoshi is too busy doing things about gods to be commenting here on the theories of mere mortals.

What you're telling me is that as if I were saying the following.

Address 2, pvk decimal value: 3
Address 3, pvk decimal value: 7
Address 4, pvk decimal value: 8
Address 5, pvk decimal value: 21
Address 6, pvk decimal value: 49
Address 7, pvk decimal value: 76
Address 8, pvk decimal value: 224
Address 9, pvk decimal value: 467
Address 10, pvk decimal value: 514

9 and 10 =467

because 9*10 = (90 + (224 + 76 + 49 + 21 + 8 )) - 1= 467

What I did was create a mathematical pattern, conveniently to get the value I want, but this is just an illusion.
Therefore, I don't see much sense in your explanation.

I'm not one to judge, but in science we speak with evidence.

[NAKAMOT0]

You are right, the common factor for PVK addresses is not just the difference in PVK values.

  I will tell you a mathematical relationship between PVK values that can be easily calculated.

 The PVK value of address 5 is 21 because address 4 has a PVK of 8, and address 5 is the next first value after 4. So, 21 = PVK 5 = PVK 4 + 8.

 Do you understand?  If you still don't understand, I'll give you another example.  Suppose we are looking for the PVK value of address 7. We know that the PVK value of address 6 is 49.

 We understand that the PVK value of address 7 is = to the nearest prime number after 49. The next prime number after 49 is 61.

 So address 7 is at PVK 61.

 Now you understand?

Satoshi is too busy doing things about gods to be commenting here on the theories of mere mortals.

What you're telling me is that as if I were saying the following.

Address 2, pvk decimal value: 3
Address 3, pvk decimal value: 7
Address 4, pvk decimal value: 8
Address 5, pvk decimal value: 21
Address 6, pvk decimal value: 49
Address 7, pvk decimal value: 76
Address 8, pvk decimal value: 224
Address 9, pvk decimal value: 467
Address 10, pvk decimal value: 514

9 and 10 =467

because 9*10 = (90 + (224 + 76 + 49 + 21 + 8 )) - 1= 467

What I did was create a mathematical pattern, conveniently to get the value I want, but this is just an illusion.
Therefore, I don't see much sense in your explanation.

I'm not one to judge, but in science we speak with evidence.

You have used an interesting progression but in reality if you look at the value of direction 7 you determine it from another progression.

 What I have explained to you is the thought process to solve the progression that is equal to the PVK values of that address.

 It's a similar process to the one you use to calculate address 7, but here you need to take another mathematical progression into account.  You are right that what you have done in your example is an illusion.  But in the example that I have given you, there is a mathematical pattern behind each PVK value of each address following an order.  You yourself have given a clue about this: the common factor is not only the difference in PVK values but the mathematical relationship between one address and the next address.



It also goes without saying that I am not satoshi, we are not the same person.

[mcdouglasx]

I am the creator.

You are quite right, 161-256 are silly.  I honestly just did not think of this.  What is especially embarrassing, is this did not occur to me once, in two years.  By way of excuse, I was not really thinking much about the puzzle at all.

I will make up for two years of stupidity.  I will spend from 161-256 to the unsolved parts, as you suggest.  In addition, I intend to add further funds.  My aim is to boost the density by a factor of 10, from 0.001*length(key) to 0.01*length(key).  Probably in the next few weeks.  At any rate, when I next have an extended period of quiet and calm, to construct the new transaction carefully.

A few words about the puzzle.  There is no pattern.  It is just consecutive keys from a deterministic wallet (masked with leading 000...0001 to set difficulty).  It is simply a crude measuring instrument, of the cracking strength of the community.

Finally, I wish to express appreciation of the efforts of all developers of new cracking tools and technology.  The "large bitcoin collider" is especially innovative and interesting!

It also goes without saying that I am not satoshi, we are not the same person.

If the creator says there is no pattern, why do you say there is one?
If you found something magical, why don't you claim the puzzle yourself?
If you are the creator, why don't you reveal the pk of the solved puzzles?
Or if you are rich enough to not care about the amount of the puzzle, why don't you take the money from puzzle 66 and distribute it to someone here or by choosing random addresses?
because if you want to give clues to something, you must start by giving truthful evidence.
Because the truth is that many of us are navigating this world without money to walk along dead-end roads, it's a bit cruel to give false clues, right?

[citb0in]

don't feed the troll, make it simple --> ignore him. The creator of the puzzle has no intension to convince or teach anyone in here. This psycho digaran still insists in being crazy. Whenever you read something about substraction or difference in here, just ignore it, it's ill Digaran. I can highly recommend to ignore him as well his dupe fake accounts he's creating.

Back to the facts, remember what this puzzle is about and what facts were given. And don't forget that this guy (=creator of that BTC puzzle) has proven he controls the related addresses. Nothing more to say, just as simple - period

[saatoshi_falling]

Now you understand?

I've enlisted the help of my imaginary friends, Fibonacci and Euclid, for an epic escapade through the primeval forest of PVK values and the enigmatic realm of depressed progressions. Armed with nothing but a slide rule and a cat's evil eye, we've sacrificed Netflix binging to decode cryptographic riddles, as the crypto-gods eagerly await our impending mathematical breakthrough.

Let's ride the prime number rollercoaster together and unveil the grand secret hidden within the pattern that goes beyond PVK values. I'm convinced we're on the verge of a breakthrough that will shake the foundations of mathematical academia.
The pulse of the prime force guides our quest, and we stand on the cusp of a revelation that promises to echo through the corridors of intellectual history. Get ready for the revelation of the century!

I must say this is the funniest thing I've read in this thread. So much that I finally made an account after doing the pick photos with Motorcycles Captcha 5 times in a row.
A few words about digaran.  I've read through all your post, and I can safely say that you have transcended beyond the limits of the final keyspace. Congrats. 

[nomachine]

creator says there is no pattern

This is the fact that there is no pattern. But it's not random either. There is an exact math formula for making this puzzle with some script, errors = ZERO.  With high decimal precision (mp.dps = 20 at least)
And the formula is in the creator's mind. This is all I have to say in public and outside the SCIF room  

[citb0in]

saatoshi_falling = another candidate created to treat Digarans' psychosis
 

it's unbelievable, It's so ridiculous that it's funny again. Such a split personality with this delusion actually belongs in the Hall of *ame. The real creator of the puzzle would only come forward by proving his identity so that anyone following the thread here can confirm it for themselves. All the others are weak characters with split personalities and delusions of god.

[3dmlib]

Hello. If search key range for a key by different search methods simultaneously is it will change probability theory expected value? Thanks.

[nomachine]

Hello. If search key range for a key by different search methods simultaneously is it will change probability theory expected value? Thanks.

If you are using different search methods to find a key within a certain range, the probability distribution of the outcome may change based on the efficiency and characteristics of each search method. In practice, using multiple search methods may increase the chances of finding the key, but it doesn't change the fundamental concepts of probability theory.

This is more like poker game here . In poker, players make decisions based on their assessment of the probabilities of different outcomes. They consider factors like the cards they hold, the community cards on the table, and the potential actions of their opponents.

In any case, it is a gamble if you want to invest a large amount of resources to solve the puzzle.

[AlanJohnson]

Hello. If search key range for a key by different search methods simultaneously is it will change probability theory expected value? Thanks.

If you are using different search methods to find a key within a certain range, the probability distribution of the outcome may change based on the efficiency and characteristics of each search method. In practice, using multiple search methods may increase the chances of finding the key, but it doesn't change the fundamental concepts of probability theory.

This is more like poker game here . In poker, players make decisions based on their assessment of the probabilities of different outcomes. They consider factors like the cards they hold, the community cards on the table, and the potential actions of their opponents.

In any case, it is a gamble if you want to invest a large amount of resources to solve the puzzle.

In gambling you can be just lucky ... this shit is something far worse. People don't realize how low is the chance to "win" here. 

You  can be lucky and win buying a lucky lottery ticket  but here you are dealing with something like: "is it possible to when you go out you accidentally meet Elon Musk that will offer you a job as his assistant but then he will die in a heart attack an hour later and when you realize it the plane will crash right on your head ?"   Yes, theoretically it is possible ..but will that happen ?

[digaran]

A few words about digaran

Lol, even the great satoshi himself is obsessed with diggy.
When I was a little kid, the elders of family used to face my parents saying: this kid will either get you or himself killed with his grown ups political opinions (revealing the secrets behind government's behaviour type of stuff). Now this might be that day!

HELLO, wiki liks, smowden, hornets, easily traceable little cute troll, rings any bell? At least pay for my protection before shining the spotlight on me, lol.

So you have my post history archived to have a laugh later? Guess what? 😏 ..... lol
Your beloved community has let me down, I have lost more than I could gain(earn, learn). And your choice of a curve is proving to have the same Mr. Scrooge characteristics as it's foster father. 😉
Locking my account and leaving these treacherous shark infested waters would be the most logical decision.
Take care, be happy, be fruitful, truthful and support young and talented developers, they just need a little bit of love and motivation, make several teams to have your back in every field!

Thank you for the efforts and dedication, may we see each other on the other side.

[nomachine]

In gambling you can be just lucky ... this shit is something far worse. People don't realize how low is the chance to "win" here. 

I have discovered a multitude of scripts and programs on GitHub, numbering at least 96, all claiming to provide solutions for a specific puzzle. This abundance of solutions may give rise to unrealistic expectations, fostering a misleading belief that the puzzle is easily solvable. While some Python scripts may effectively tackle the puzzle within the 1-30 range, attempting to extend the solution beyond 40 seem to be practically unfeasible.

The widespread use of such scripts not only generates false hope but also implies a certain level of promotion for the developers themselves rather than a genuine commitment to solving the puzzle.