M1ST3R
Member
 Offline
Activity: 89
Merit: 10
|
 |
April 24, 2016, 05:28:50 AM |
|
2 more cpus for your list - hashrate based on wallet miner Intel Pentium G3258 20th anniversary edition 3.2GHz == 25 h/s Intel i7 920 2.67GHz == 40 h/s BTW, good job!!!!! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Once a transaction has 6 confirmations, it is extremely unlikely that an attacker without at least 50% of the network's computation power would be able to reverse it.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
samsmith16
|
|
April 24, 2016, 06:40:18 AM |
|
It's been going sideways for about 2 weeks at about 6000 sats. That's pretty good considering i) the bonus rate on unlocked funds is 1365% APR! (Double that for HODLd funds) ii) Bitcoin has been appreciating in value Don't forget we also have c-cex as well.. volume seems to be shifting there latley.. https://c-cex.com/index.html?p=hodl-btc |
▐ Royalties▐ pays interest on Term Deposits up to 15%!! Yes even Cold Storage!! |
|
|
Jabba
Member
Offline
Activity: 109
Merit: 11
|
|
April 24, 2016, 07:05:15 AM |
|
Some more for your list:
Core i5 4200U @ 2.27 Ghz (Stock) ~ 50H/s - Wolfminer
Core i5 2520M @ 2.4 Ghz (Stock) ~ 50/s - Standardminer
2 x Xeon E5520 (Gainestown, Socket 1366) @ 2.26 GHz (Stock) ~ 80 H/s - Standardminer
|
|
|
|
jesterRPG
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 18
Merit: 0
|
|
April 24, 2016, 03:18:10 PM
Last edit: April 24, 2016, 03:31:30 PM by jesterRPG |
|
i7 6700K @ 4.6 Ghz ~330 hash/s - Hodlminer AES-NI Wolf https://i.imgur.com/DjwbI1F.png |
|
|
|
|
|
Billyboy4022
|
|
April 25, 2016, 03:03:05 AM |
|
i5 4670K @ ~100 hash/s - Hodlminer AES-NI Wolf vs CPUminer ~80hash/s
|
|
|
|
|
moink80
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 4
Merit: 0
|
|
April 25, 2016, 07:20:32 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stein
|
|
April 25, 2016, 07:46:21 AM |
|
Intel Core i5 4690 @ 3.50GHz
Wallet - 71-84 h/S
New Hodlminer AES-NI Wolf0 Optimized Miner Windows Binaries
hodlminer-haswell-broadwell.exe
seems to be lower at like 46-64 h/S
Dunno why ?
Using this command line :
hodlminer-haswell-broadwell.exe -a hodl -o stratum+tcp://hodl.suprnova.cc:4693
|
|
|
|
|
|
USScrypto
|
|
April 25, 2016, 07:57:12 AM |
|
Intel Core i5 4690 @ 3.50GHz
Wallet - 71-84 h/S
New Hodlminer AES-NI Wolf0 Optimized Miner Windows Binaries
hodlminer-haswell-broadwell.exe
seems to be lower at like 46-64 h/S
Dunno why ?
Using this command line :
hodlminer-haswell-broadwell.exe -a hodl -o stratum+tcp://hodl.suprnova.cc:4693
Try with other binary, your result seems way too low. Or reboot the computer and run only the miner, maybe something else is also using the CPU giving you lower results. |
|
|
|
|
|
Stein
|
|
April 25, 2016, 09:06:18 AM |
|
Try with other binary, your result seems way too low.
Or reboot the computer and run only the miner, maybe something else is also using the CPU giving you lower results.
Intel Core i5 4690 @ 3.50GHz Wallet - 71-84 h/S Ok I rebooted and ran hodlminer-haswell-broadwell.exe -a hodl -o stratum+tcp://hodl.suprnova.cc:4693 -u name.worker - p password and got 87-106 I ran hodlmine.exe -a hodl -o stratum+tcp://hodl.suprnova.cc:4693 -u name.worker - p password and got 95-108 So, much better than the 71-84 with the wallet!!! Success! |
|
|
|
|
kanoptx
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 406
Merit: 250
www.cryptocompare.com
|
|
April 25, 2016, 11:33:41 AM |
|
nop, it just made me sad because mine wont do that well xDDDDD. thank you, good info!  |
|
|
|
|
USScrypto
|
|
April 25, 2016, 11:54:34 AM |
|
Anyone with AMD supporting AES try the wolf optimized hodlminer with the bdver binaries?
|
|
|
|
|
djoser
Member
Offline
Activity: 122
Merit: 16
|
|
April 25, 2016, 03:07:26 PM |
|
Hi everyone!
Is there a way to use the latest wolf0 miner for solo mining?
How do have i to configure the conf-file of the wallet and how would the start string for the miner look like?
Thanks and regards,
djoser.
|
Why mine when you can research? - GRIDCOIN - REAL cryptocurrency without wasting hashes! https://gridcoin.us |
|
|
|
USScrypto
|
|
April 25, 2016, 04:34:46 PM |
|
Not sure that solo mining is a great choice with all of the network hashrate at the moment, especially if it is with a single CPU only.
|
|
|
|
|
xandry
Staff
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3444
Merit: 4040
Crypto Swap Exchange
|
|
April 25, 2016, 04:47:31 PM |
|
Anyone with AMD supporting AES try the wolf optimized hodlminer with the bdver binaries?
Yep. My AMD FX-8320 works very well with hodlminer-bdver3. |
|
|
|
|
USScrypto
|
|
April 25, 2016, 04:48:46 PM |
|
What hashrate are you getting from that CPU?
|
|
|
|
|
djoser
Member
Offline
Activity: 122
Merit: 16
|
|
April 25, 2016, 05:14:44 PM
Last edit: April 25, 2016, 05:45:40 PM by djoser |
|
Not sure that solo mining is a great choice with all of the network hashrate at the moment, especially if it is with a single CPU only.
Great answer, thanks! My question was about the feasibility, not if it makes sense! Btw: i found 4 blocks in a week mining solo with 85 H/s...that was 3 times more profitable than pool mining...with wallet standard miner :-) So my question still stands. Any advice? |
Why mine when you can research? - GRIDCOIN - REAL cryptocurrency without wasting hashes! https://gridcoin.us |
|
|
xandry
Staff
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3444
Merit: 4040
Crypto Swap Exchange
|
|
April 25, 2016, 06:06:45 PM |
|
What hashrate are you getting from that CPU?
About 139 h/s.  |
|
|
|
joblo
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1470
Merit: 1114
|
|
April 25, 2016, 07:10:38 PM |
|
Yet another suggestion that might already be in the works...
I think I've mentioned before that the process for selecting a TD deposit address
is a bit clumsy. In summary: go to receive tab, click on address, click show, click copy address,
go to deposit tab, paste address, ...
It would be nice if we could select the address from the deposit tab. The button is there but
no previously used addresses are listed.
But today's suggestion is to display the maturing block number when a TD is created. You have
chosen to model TD based on time, but technically it is based on blocks. The familiarity
of the time model may be comforting to some but I'm a geek, I want the technical details.
My ideal model would be to have the choice of selecting the duration of a TD in number of blocks,
or the maturation block number, in addition to the current time based option. This would also
provide more granularity as multiple TDs can mature the same day but at different block numbers.
Currently, to find the maturation block number of a TD I have to find it in the random list after creating
it. That can get boring with lots of TDs.
|
|
|
|
|
samsmith16
|
|
April 25, 2016, 07:17:30 PM |
|
Yet another suggestion that might already be in the works...
I think I've mentioned before that the process for selecting a TD deposit address
is a bit clumsy. In summary: go to receive tab, click on address, click show, click copy address,
go to deposit tab, paste address, ...
It would be nice if we could select the address from the deposit tab. The button is there but
no previously used addresses are listed.
But today's suggestion is to display the maturing block number when a TD is created. You have
chosen to model TD based on time, but technically it is based on blocks. The familiarity
of the time model may be comforting to some but I'm a geek, I want the technical details.
My ideal model would be to have the choice of selecting the duration of a TD in number of blocks,
or the maturation block number, in addition to the current time based option. This would also
provide more granularity as multiple TDs can mature the same day but at different block numbers.
Currently, to find the maturation block number of a TD I have to find it in the random list after creating
it. That can get boring with lots of TDs.
The list of previously used addresses only include addresses outside of ones in that local wallet.. Maybe we could expand this.. Yes this is why we added "blocks" as a unit of measure in the drop down box when making a TD.. |
▐ Royalties▐ pays interest on Term Deposits up to 15%!! Yes even Cold Storage!! |
|
|
|
Mantome
|
|
April 25, 2016, 07:22:24 PM |
|
Try with other binary, your result seems way too low.
Or reboot the computer and run only the miner, maybe something else is also using the CPU giving you lower results.
Intel Core i5 4690 @ 3.50GHz Wallet - 71-84 h/S Ok I rebooted and ran hodlminer-haswell-broadwell.exe -a hodl -o stratum+tcp://hodl.suprnova.cc:4693 -u name.worker - p password and got 87-106 I ran hodlmine.exe -a hodl -o stratum+tcp://hodl.suprnova.cc:4693 -u name.worker - p password and got 95-108 So, much better than the 71-84 with the wallet!!! Success! Which miner you using ? Can you upload that ,please . i tried some miners but all of them failed! |
|
|
|
|
|
