ushba
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 31
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/question.gif) |
May 13, 2016, 06:37:52 AM |
|
Can somebody explain me one thing? Total hashrate of hodl.blockquarry.com is less then total hashrate of hodl.maxminers.net. Why blocks in hodl.blockquarry.com are found more often then in pool hodl.maxminers.net?
Thank you!
|
|
|
|
Ayers
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2730
Merit: 1024
Vave.com - Crypto Casino
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 13, 2016, 06:43:26 AM |
|
do you guy think this can reach 100k satoshi before the deposit end?
|
|
|
|
uowner
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 10
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 13, 2016, 06:45:12 AM |
|
Can somebody explain me one thing? Total hashrate of hodl.blockquarry.com is less then total hashrate of hodl.maxminers.net. Why blocks in hodl.blockquarry.com are found more often then in pool hodl.maxminers.net?
Thank you!
Also very interested in this
|
|
|
|
Fuzzbawls
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 13, 2016, 07:20:49 AM |
|
Can somebody explain me one thing? Total hashrate of hodl.blockquarry.com is less then total hashrate of hodl.maxminers.net. Why blocks in hodl.blockquarry.com are found more often then in pool hodl.maxminers.net?
Thank you!
Also very interested in this pretty simple really: hashrate alone isn't what determines the speed at which a pool will find blocks. Number of miners also plays a big factor in it. looking at the number of workers on the 3 pools now, suprnova: 1095 blockquarry: 635 maxminers: 50 and the reported pool hashrates: suprnova: 338kh/s blockquarry: 101kh/s maxminers: 151kh/s difference in hashrate between blockquarry and maxminers really isn't that large, but the difference in number of workers is. the larger offset in number of workers is more than likely attributing to the higher count of blocks solved. Now, when maxminers DOES solve a block, each miner will end up getting a bigger piece of the pie (for that block) because it is distributed amongst fewer users, so take that into consideration too.
|
|
|
|
ushba
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 31
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 13, 2016, 08:31:05 AM |
|
Can somebody explain me one thing? Total hashrate of hodl.blockquarry.com is less then total hashrate of hodl.maxminers.net. Why blocks in hodl.blockquarry.com are found more often then in pool hodl.maxminers.net?
Thank you!
Also very interested in this pretty simple really: hashrate alone isn't what determines the speed at which a pool will find blocks. Number of miners also plays a big factor in it. looking at the number of workers on the 3 pools now, suprnova: 1095 blockquarry: 635 maxminers: 50 and the reported pool hashrates: suprnova: 338kh/s blockquarry: 101kh/s maxminers: 151kh/s difference in hashrate between blockquarry and maxminers really isn't that large, but the difference in number of workers is. the larger offset in number of workers is more than likely attributing to the higher count of blocks solved. Now, when maxminers DOES solve a block, each miner will end up getting a bigger piece of the pie (for that block) because it is distributed amongst fewer users, so take that into consideration too. Thank you!!!!!!!!
|
|
|
|
uowner
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 10
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 13, 2016, 09:06:39 AM |
|
Can somebody explain me one thing? Total hashrate of hodl.blockquarry.com is less then total hashrate of hodl.maxminers.net. Why blocks in hodl.blockquarry.com are found more often then in pool hodl.maxminers.net?
Thank you!
Also very interested in this pretty simple really: hashrate alone isn't what determines the speed at which a pool will find blocks. Number of miners also plays a big factor in it. looking at the number of workers on the 3 pools now, suprnova: 1095 blockquarry: 635 maxminers: 50 and the reported pool hashrates: suprnova: 338kh/s blockquarry: 101kh/s maxminers: 151kh/s difference in hashrate between blockquarry and maxminers really isn't that large, but the difference in number of workers is. the larger offset in number of workers is more than likely attributing to the higher count of blocks solved. Now, when maxminers DOES solve a block, each miner will end up getting a bigger piece of the pie (for that block) because it is distributed amongst fewer users, so take that into consideration too. For 3 years of mining firstly hear about that
|
|
|
|
Fuzzbawls
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 13, 2016, 09:29:30 AM |
|
Can somebody explain me one thing? Total hashrate of hodl.blockquarry.com is less then total hashrate of hodl.maxminers.net. Why blocks in hodl.blockquarry.com are found more often then in pool hodl.maxminers.net?
Thank you!
Also very interested in this pretty simple really: hashrate alone isn't what determines the speed at which a pool will find blocks. Number of miners also plays a big factor in it. looking at the number of workers on the 3 pools now, suprnova: 1095 blockquarry: 635 maxminers: 50 and the reported pool hashrates: suprnova: 338kh/s blockquarry: 101kh/s maxminers: 151kh/s difference in hashrate between blockquarry and maxminers really isn't that large, but the difference in number of workers is. the larger offset in number of workers is more than likely attributing to the higher count of blocks solved. Now, when maxminers DOES solve a block, each miner will end up getting a bigger piece of the pie (for that block) because it is distributed amongst fewer users, so take that into consideration too. For 3 years of mining firstly hear about that its basic probabilities. mining isn't done in a linear fashion so the more people mining a block together, the greater probability that they can overcome a difference in raw speed against another individual/group...like 10 people searching a haystack for a needle vs 100 people searching, even if each of the 100 people are slower at searching than the 10, as a collective they have a higher probability at finding the needle given the nearly infinite "starting points" of searching.
|
|
|
|
eule
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 13, 2016, 12:06:28 PM |
|
Over the long term the pool with the higher hashrate will find more blocks though, even if it's only one user mining.
|
|
|
|
uowner
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 10
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 13, 2016, 12:33:55 PM |
|
Over the long term the pool with the higher hashrate will find more blocks though, even if it's only one user mining.
Then whats the problem with maxminers.net then? Last 24h its 400% unlucky block found.
|
|
|
|
joblo
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1470
Merit: 1114
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 13, 2016, 02:00:38 PM |
|
Over the long term the pool with the higher hashrate will find more blocks though, even if it's only one user mining.
Then whats the problem with maxminers.net then? Last 24h its 400% unlucky block found. I am not a statistician but I have an opinion: luck. I agree with uowner, over time it's the hashrate that will win. The distribution of block time varies from 0 to infinity. Slow blocks can take mutiples of the average time so a couple of very slow blocks would require a larger number of fast blocks to average out. Let's look at an example of finding 2 blocks with a estimated TTF of 1 hour. The first blolck is found immediately but the second takes 4 hours. That's an average of 2 hours/block even though the luck seems evenly distributed, one very good, one very bad. It would take two more blocks found in zero time to match the average 1 hour TTF.
|
|
|
|
uowner
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 10
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 13, 2016, 02:22:58 PM |
|
Over the long term the pool with the higher hashrate will find more blocks though, even if it's only one user mining.
Then whats the problem with maxminers.net then? Last 24h its 400% unlucky block found. I am not a statistician but I have an opinion: luck. I agree with uowner, over time it's the hashrate that will win. The distribution of block time varies from 0 to infinity. Slow blocks can take mutiples of the average time so a couple of very slow blocks would require a larger number of fast blocks to average out. Let's look at an example of finding 2 blocks with a estimated TTF of 1 hour. The first blolck is found immediately but the second takes 4 hours. That's an average of 2 hours/block even though the luck seems evenly distributed, one very good, one very bad. It would take two more blocks found in zero time to match the average 1 hour TTF. Yeah, but maxminers have about 90% "slow" block (about 200-700% above required shares)
|
|
|
|
MaxMinersNet
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 13, 2016, 02:44:27 PM |
|
Over the long term the pool with the higher hashrate will find more blocks though, even if it's only one user mining.
Then whats the problem with maxminers.net then? Last 24h its 400% unlucky block found. I am not a statistician but I have an opinion: luck. I agree with uowner, over time it's the hashrate that will win. The distribution of block time varies from 0 to infinity. Slow blocks can take mutiples of the average time so a couple of very slow blocks would require a larger number of fast blocks to average out. Let's look at an example of finding 2 blocks with a estimated TTF of 1 hour. The first blolck is found immediately but the second takes 4 hours. That's an average of 2 hours/block even though the luck seems evenly distributed, one very good, one very bad. It would take two more blocks found in zero time to match the average 1 hour TTF. Yeah, but maxminers have about 90% "slow" block (about 200-700% above required shares) Sorry guys we had an error in our hashrate calculation, the hashrate was displayed about twice as much as normal which also resulted in wrong or false stats. Big thanks to ocminer who helped us finding it, its now corrected and the pool is showing correct values at all places.
|
|
|
|
PeaMine
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 13, 2016, 04:49:40 PM |
|
In regards to the 5%~ standard interest, is there a way to find how much has been earned from this from the wallet or blockchain? Also, to confirm, after 30 days worth of blocks, you no longer earn interest and just need to send it via wallet to another address in your wallet?
|
Datacenter Technician and Electrician. If you have any questions feel free to ask me as I am generally bored looking at logs and happy to help during free time.
|
|
|
samsmith16
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 13, 2016, 05:25:51 PM |
|
In regards to the 5%~ standard interest, is there a way to find how much has been earned from this from the wallet or blockchain? Also, to confirm, after 30 days worth of blocks, you no longer earn interest and just need to send it via wallet to another address in your wallet?
You can find interest earned on each "unlocked" output you own in Coin Control.. Locked (deposits) show this in the deposit table already.. We are working on a better way to identify older then 30 days.. But for now you can just check the confirmation count in Coin Control.. Any output over 16,830 confirmations it's time to move it.. Simply send it back to yourself.. If you need help finding or using Coin Control reference my video below http://youtu.be/_7CUiORCZGY
|
▐ Royalties▐ pays interest on Term Deposits up to 15%!! Yes even Cold Storage!!
|
|
|
joblo
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1470
Merit: 1114
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 13, 2016, 05:39:16 PM |
|
Hey Fuzzballs, love your charts.
Is there a way to zoom out? Some charts (ie net hashrate, net diff) only cover a small set of blocks. It would be nice to be able to see the big picture.
I also don't get the "hold shift to pan". I shift, click drag but nothing happens.
|
|
|
|
kampretkabur
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 13, 2016, 08:40:58 PM |
|
which 1 is the latest miner? reinstalling my windows and cant get any miner works for suprnova
|
|
|
|
joblo
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1470
Merit: 1114
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 13, 2016, 08:46:25 PM |
|
which 1 is the latest miner? reinstalling my windows and cant get any miner works for suprnova
Probbaly missing some dependencies, did you install openssl? There may be others.
|
|
|
|
kampretkabur
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 13, 2016, 08:50:01 PM |
|
which 1 is the latest miner? reinstalling my windows and cant get any miner works for suprnova
Probbaly missing some dependencies, did you install openssl? There may be others. it keeps saying stratum requested work restart
|
|
|
|
joblo
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1470
Merit: 1114
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 13, 2016, 10:39:17 PM |
|
which 1 is the latest miner? reinstalling my windows and cant get any miner works for suprnova
Probbaly missing some dependencies, did you install openssl? There may be others. it keeps saying stratum requested work restart That's not you. Read back a bit about the DDOS at Suprnova.
|
|
|
|
adamvp
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 13, 2016, 10:57:44 PM |
|
same issue with bloquarry..
|
I am looking for signature campaign ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif) pm me
|
|
|
|