|
deadpoolx
|
 |
March 18, 2016, 01:51:16 PM |
|
Look the ethereum drop. The whales are migrating like crazy  |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Be very wary of relying on JavaScript for security on crypto sites. The site can change the JavaScript at any time unless you take unusual precautions, and browsers are not generally known for their airtight security.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
|
Splatters
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 1232
Merit: 1000
★YoBit.Net★ 1400+ Coins Exchange
|
|
March 18, 2016, 01:51:26 PM |
|
Max says we continue the ICO for 64 hours as planned.
Btw I think you made an error, as first and great promoter and supporter of lisk it wasn't a good move change your path spreading "fud", alarming people about one guy that bought 1000+ btc and considering to end the ico @ 6000k btc, this move can only generate panic, if it's not said by a newbie account with one post. You understand what I mean. It was something you should have done only privately with devs. The ico rules can't be changed, and in fact dev didn't changed it even after your concern. If there's some whale we can't say what's going to do, we know how they act yes, but if it let us notice its buy, it was because the whale want us to panic. |
I know why your pray will never be answered!
|
|
|
|
Videodrome
|
|
March 18, 2016, 01:51:51 PM |
|
...and you guys are not considering that the 1000-BTC-whale and 300-BTC-whale could be the same guy...
almost for sure it's the same guy. do you mean the same chinese exchange?  |
|
|
|
|
lordoliver
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1666
Merit: 1020
expect(brain).toHaveBeenUsed()
|
|
March 18, 2016, 01:54:58 PM |
|
...and you guys are not considering that the 1000-BTC-whale and 300-BTC-whale could be the same guy...
almost for sure it's the same guy. do you mean the same chinese exchange? that would be the best case scenario nope. don't think so... people are pushing each other ridiculously. I predict 5 digits soon... Like this: "oh, they spent so much, then it has to be good" "oh, they spent even more, it has to be better" "wow, they spent even that, ok, it has to be really great" lets hope. that the expectations can be fulfilled in the end.. |
|
|
|
|
|
KhalDrago
|
|
March 18, 2016, 01:56:07 PM |
|
so how much is each lisk worth guys? hallo
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pietpiraat
|
|
March 18, 2016, 01:57:09 PM |
|
so how much is each lisk worth guys? hallo
about 8500 sat 10053 to be exact |
|
|
|
|
eskiboy
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 23
Merit: 0
|
|
March 18, 2016, 02:00:07 PM |
|
Can we see the address where all this ICO BTC is located ??
|
|
|
|
|
|
trolleroo
|
|
March 18, 2016, 02:01:51 PM |
|
Max says we continue the ICO for 64 hours as planned.
Btw I think you made an error, as first and great promoter and supporter of lisk it wasn't a good move change your path spreading "fud", alarming people about one guy that bought 1000+ btc and considering to end the ico @ 6000k btc, this move can only generate panic, if it's not said by a newbie account with one post. You understand what I mean. It was something you should have done only privately with devs. The ico rules can't be changed, and in fact dev didn't changed it even after your concern. If there's some whale we can't say what's going to do, we know how they act yes, but if it let us notice its buy, it was because the whale want us to panic. perfect |
|
|
|
|
|
bitbitch
|
|
March 18, 2016, 02:05:29 PM |
|
Max says we continue the ICO for 64 hours as planned.
Btw I think you made an error, as first and great promoter and supporter of lisk it wasn't a good move change your path spreading "fud", alarming people about one guy that bought 1000+ btc and considering to end the ico @ 6000k btc, this move can only generate panic, if it's not said by a newbie account with one post. You understand what I mean. It was something you should have done only privately with devs. The ico rules can't be changed, and in fact dev didn't changed it even after your concern. If there's some whale we can't say what's going to do, we know how they act yes, but if it let us notice its buy, it was because the whale want us to panic. yes. |
|
|
|
|
uqaz
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 25
Merit: 0
|
|
March 18, 2016, 02:06:03 PM |
|
...and you guys are not considering that the 1000-BTC-whale and 300-BTC-whale could be the same guy...
almost for sure it's the same guy. do you mean the same chinese exchange? that would be the best case scenario Guys, in stock exchanges, when a company goes IPO there's usually a limit of cap by investor (if a guy puts US$ 1mi, sometimes he gets just US$10.000 in shares). That aims situations like ours. I don't know how it works in America, but here each investor has an social security number that is a proof that there won't be multiple buys by the same person. I wonder how it would be solved in this crypto enviroment... We can't do anything now, rules were set. Let it be a warning for futures developments...by the do you know any cases (ethereum or maidsafe or ...) of a hostile action using this strategy? |
|
|
|
|
lordoliver
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1666
Merit: 1020
expect(brain).toHaveBeenUsed()
|
|
March 18, 2016, 02:11:27 PM |
|
...and you guys are not considering that the 1000-BTC-whale and 300-BTC-whale could be the same guy...
almost for sure it's the same guy. do you mean the same chinese exchange? that would be the best case scenario Guys, in stock exchanges, when a company goes IPO there's usually a limit of cap by investor (if a guy puts US$ 1mi, sometimes he gets just US$10.000 in shares). That aims situations like ours. I don't know how it works in America, but here each investor has an social security number that is a proof that there won't be multiple buys by the same person. I wonder how it would be solved in this crypto enviroment... We can't do anything now, rules were set. Let it be a warning for futures developments...by the do you know any cases (ethereum or maidsafe or ...) of a hostile action using this strategy? a big amout is not necessarily a hostile thing. for example if I had that much money and decided to invest here, I would consider it still as a long term investment without manipulating anything. The only thing I am afraid of, is overfunding. That the product can just not reach the expectations set and you set all on those 2 people doing the right decisions... It is still ok now, but its getting harder and harder... (and no, money does not solve all problems...) |
|
|
|
|
MalReynolds
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 938
Merit: 1000
|
|
March 18, 2016, 02:11:53 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
eskiboy
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 23
Merit: 0
|
|
March 18, 2016, 02:13:20 PM |
|
Can we see the address where all this ICO BTC is located ??
they post videos with the total every once in a while Videos of what? I would like to see the address where the funds are located... |
|
|
|
|
MalReynolds
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 938
Merit: 1000
|
|
March 18, 2016, 02:13:57 PM |
|
Max says we continue the ICO for 64 hours as planned.
Btw I think you made an error, as first and great promoter and supporter of lisk it wasn't a good move change your path spreading "fud", alarming people about one guy that bought 1000+ btc and considering to end the ico @ 6000k btc, this move can only generate panic, if it's not said by a newbie account with one post. You understand what I mean. It was something you should have done only privately with devs. The ico rules can't be changed, and in fact dev didn't changed it even after your concern. If there's some whale we can't say what's going to do, we know how they act yes, but if it let us notice its buy, it was because the whale want us to panic. yes. I admit to both making an error and panic. Onward. |
|
|
|
|
uqaz
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 25
Merit: 0
|
|
March 18, 2016, 02:15:45 PM |
|
...and you guys are not considering that the 1000-BTC-whale and 300-BTC-whale could be the same guy...
almost for sure it's the same guy. do you mean the same chinese exchange? that would be the best case scenario Guys, in stock exchanges, when a company goes IPO there's usually a limit of cap by investor (if a guy puts US$ 1mi, sometimes he gets just US$10.000 in shares). That aims situations like ours. I don't know how it works in America, but here each investor has an social security number that is a proof that there won't be multiple buys by the same person. I wonder how it would be solved in this crypto enviroment... We can't do anything now, rules were set. Let it be a warning for futures developments...by the do you know any cases (ethereum or maidsafe or ...) of a hostile action using this strategy? a big amout is not necessarily a hostile thing. for example if I had that much money and decided to invest here, I would consider it still as a long term investment without manipulating anything. The only thing I am afraid of, is overfunding. That the product can just not reach the expectations set and you set all on those 2 people doing the right decisions... It is still ok now, but its getting harder and harder... (and no, money does not solve all problems...) yes, that's a strategy of investment that i use: never get more of 5% of it. And, in my original post, i didn't mean it negatively lol. But, that's a chance...or not |
|
|
|
|
Bartske
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 7
Merit: 0
|
|
March 18, 2016, 02:18:15 PM |
|
Can we see the address where all this ICO BTC is located ??
they post videos with the total every once in a while Videos of what? I would like to see the address where the funds are located... Just follow your transaction to the adress where the bitcoins are stored. Not so hard. I posted the adress a while back (around page 150). It was an adress with 1K BTC, I assume there are more adresses like that. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
trolleroo
|
|
March 18, 2016, 02:20:37 PM |
|
...and you guys are not considering that the 1000-BTC-whale and 300-BTC-whale could be the same guy...
almost for sure it's the same guy. do you mean the same chinese exchange? that would be the best case scenario Guys, in stock exchanges, when a company goes IPO there's usually a limit of cap by investor (if a guy puts US$ 1mi, sometimes he gets just US$10.000 in shares). That aims situations like ours. I don't know how it works in America, but here each investor has an social security number that is a proof that there won't be multiple buys by the same person. I wonder how it would be solved in this crypto enviroment... We can't do anything now, rules were set. Let it be a warning for futures developments...by the do you know any cases (ethereum or maidsafe or ...) of a hostile action using this strategy? the thing is that there has never been a "perfect" cryptocurrency launch, as far as i can tell. but the launch not being perfect does not mean that the developers are not honest, or that the coin will not succeed. actually, the true fact is that there are too many trolls in this btctalk forum, and they will always complain, anyway. let's just stick to the rules, and all else will find its balance, eventually. |
|
|
|
|
lordoliver
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1666
Merit: 1020
expect(brain).toHaveBeenUsed()
|
|
March 18, 2016, 02:23:18 PM |
|
I have a modification proposal: Every amount bigger than 100 BTC will not receive any coins, but the amount will still be considered as a funding. LOL ;-) Where exactly stands, that this wouldn't be legit? (Although of course any lawyer would win against it... ) to make sure: I am just kidding... |
|
|
|
|
|
bitbitch
|
|
March 18, 2016, 02:28:52 PM |
|
I have a modification proposal: Every amount bigger than 100 BTC will not receive any coins, but the amount will still be considered as a funding. LOL ;-) Where exactly stands, that this wouldn't be legit? (Although of course any lawyer would win against it... ) it should be limited to 50 BTC per natural person/ legal entity, with verified identity. |
|
|
|
|
|
