Bitcoin Forum
June 20, 2024, 01:19:21 AM *
News: Voting for pizza day contest
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 [142] 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 ... 2269 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [ANN][LSK] Lisk | Blockchain Application Platform for JavaScript Developers  (Read 3073111 times)
cryptoboy.architect
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 513
Merit: 500


View Profile
March 12, 2016, 11:52:14 PM
 #2821

lisk = risk

lisk = low risk
Skatebird
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 882
Merit: 1000



View Profile
March 13, 2016, 12:03:09 AM
 #2822

Risk = money Wink

                  ▄█▄
              █████████
           ███    █    ███
       ████       █       ████
    ███           █           ███
████              █              ████
█████             ███             █████
██   ███         █████         ████  ██
██      ███▓    ██ █ ██     ███      ██
██         ██████  █  ██████         ██
██           █████ █ █████           ██
██          ██   █████   ██          ██
██         ██ ███  █  ███ ██         ██
██        ████     █     ████        ██
██     ███ ███     █     ███ ███     ██
██ ████       ████ █  ███       ████ ██
███              █████              ███
  ███             █             ███
     ████         █         ████
         ███      █      ████
            ████  █   ███
               ███████
                 ▀█▀














 
                  ▄█▄
              █████████
           ███    █    ███
       ████       █       ████
    ███           █           ███
████              █              ████
█████             ███             █████
██   ███         █████         ████  ██
██      ███▓    ██ █ ██     ███      ██
██         ██████  █  ██████         ██
██           █████ █ █████           ██
██          ██   █████   ██          ██
██         ██ ███  █  ███ ██         ██
██        ████     █     ████        ██
██     ███ ███     █     ███ ███     ██
██ ████       ████ █  ███       ████ ██
███              █████              ███
  ███             █             ███
     ████         █         ████
         ███      █      ████
            ████  █   ███
               ███████
                 ▀█▀

 














 
.
TELEGRAM
FACEBOOK
TWITTER
REDDIT

 














 
.
LINKEDIN
INSTAGRAM
GITHUB
BITCOINTALK
Wolf Rainer
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1960
Merit: 1022


View Profile
March 13, 2016, 01:01:00 AM
 #2823

How much time it takes to confirm the deposit?
cannabanana
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 518
Merit: 501


View Profile
March 13, 2016, 01:02:02 AM
 #2824

How much time it takes to confirm the deposit?

whenever your btc transfer has its first confirmation
cannabanana
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 518
Merit: 501


View Profile
March 13, 2016, 01:05:19 AM
 #2825

42 more BTC and we'll hit 3500 BTC donated.  doing pretty good.  I bet early on it would be 2500 BTC at the end but shit, I was way wrong.   Lots of interest in this coin.  The guy who said 5000 BTC looks like he might be right lol.
Wolf Rainer
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1960
Merit: 1022


View Profile
March 13, 2016, 01:07:29 AM
 #2826

How much time it takes to confirm the deposit?

whenever your btc transfer has its first confirmation

One confirmation and still nothing...
karmacoma24
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 178
Merit: 100

LiskHQ CTO


View Profile WWW
March 13, 2016, 01:13:54 AM
 #2827

How much time it takes to confirm the deposit?

whenever your btc transfer has its first confirmation

One confirmation and still nothing...

Deposits are confirmed after 3 confirmations.

LISK    Develop Decentralized Applications & Sidechains in JavaScript with Lisk!
Arrakeen
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 532
Merit: 500


Offer escrow, receive negative trust


View Profile
March 13, 2016, 01:58:34 AM
 #2828

Hi guys,

Glad to finally be a part of Lisk Smiley

Quick question: what now?!



Per OP, I've documented & saved the three phrases/keys/what have you that were generated for this purchase.  Now do I just...wait until ICO is over?  When hopping on the lisk train, I didn't realize my ICO buy also came with a bonus: a free, lingering feeling of anxiety as my funds are floating around somewhere out of my grasp  Embarrassed 

Not that I expect to be scammed - the only thing that had me worried was that, although I used a mobile device to purchase LISK, there was no option to 'download keys' as seen in this image.  Despite this, I do have the 'Keys have been accepted' status upon receiving my three different keys/ten word phrase/whatever the last one is (hash?)

Just making sure I'm not missing anything here.  Just want to see that gray arrow turn blue!  Thanks in advance Smiley
Bubba-Gump
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 39
Merit: 0


View Profile
March 13, 2016, 02:07:15 AM
 #2829

This is a story about an exchange

It has 33% of all lisk. It has 101 votes. It votes for 101 of it's 1 lisk wallets.

Everyone else is fucked.

Discuss
cannabanana
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 518
Merit: 501


View Profile
March 13, 2016, 02:09:54 AM
 #2830

This is a story about an exchange

It has 33% of all lisk. It has 101 votes. It votes for 101 of it's 1 lisk wallets.

Everyone else is fucked.

Discuss


You're retarded.  Discuss that.
Bubba-Gump
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 39
Merit: 0


View Profile
March 13, 2016, 02:15:32 AM
 #2831

This is a story about an exchange

It has 33% of all lisk. It has 101 votes. It votes for 101 of it's 1 lisk wallets.

Everyone else is fucked.

Discuss


You're retarded.  Discuss that.


You didn't convince anyone with that outburst. Explain what prevents this from happening.
Alexthesalamander
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 326
Merit: 250


View Profile
March 13, 2016, 02:15:50 AM
 #2832

Why not make LISK into a Dapp on the Ethereum blockchain?

Buy high and sell low
Bigcabrito
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 504
Merit: 500


Communications Lead


View Profile
March 13, 2016, 02:16:35 AM
 #2833

This is a story about an exchange

It has 33% of all lisk. It has 101 votes. It votes for 101 of it's 1 lisk wallets.

Everyone else is fucked.

Discuss


Exchanges do not use any of the current crypto wallets with funds to vote or to stake coins.

If they do this, it would not be considered an exhange anymore and could be liable for huge legal repercussions.


Lisk.
    Develop Decentralized Applications & Sidechains in JavaScript with Lisk!
    Website | Blog | BTT Thread | Chat - Lisk Community Manager
Bubba-Gump
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 39
Merit: 0


View Profile
March 13, 2016, 02:23:45 AM
 #2834

This is a story about an exchange

It has 33% of all lisk. It has 101 votes. It votes for 101 of it's 1 lisk wallets.

Everyone else is fucked.

Discuss


Exchanges do not use any of the current crypto wallets with funds to vote or to stake coins.

If they do this, it would not be considered an exhange anymore and could be liable for huge legal repercussions.




With all due respect, relying on an exchange to obey the laws of some arbitrary jurisdiction is a pretty weak argument. What if they operate in Somalia where there is no functional government?

cannabanana
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 518
Merit: 501


View Profile
March 13, 2016, 02:26:28 AM
 #2835

This is a story about an exchange

It has 33% of all lisk. It has 101 votes. It votes for 101 of it's 1 lisk wallets.

Everyone else is fucked.

Discuss


Exchanges do not use any of the current crypto wallets with funds to vote or to stake coins.

If they do this, it would not be considered an exhange anymore and could be liable for huge legal repercussions.




With all due respect, relying on an exchange to obey the laws of some arbitrary jurisdiction is a pretty weak argument. What if they operate in Somalia where there is no functional government?



the fact is that the exchanges cant have all the nodes because they would have to be voted in by the people.  Gawd your Fkn stupid.
Bubba-Gump
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 39
Merit: 0


View Profile
March 13, 2016, 02:30:35 AM
 #2836

This is a story about an exchange

It has 33% of all lisk. It has 101 votes. It votes for 101 of it's 1 lisk wallets.

Everyone else is fucked.

Discuss


Exchanges do not use any of the current crypto wallets with funds to vote or to stake coins.

If they do this, it would not be considered an exhange anymore and could be liable for huge legal repercussions.




With all due respect, relying on an exchange to obey the laws of some arbitrary jurisdiction is a pretty weak argument. What if they operate in Somalia where there is no functional government?



the fact is that the exchanges cant have all the nodes because they would have to be voted in by the people.  Gawd your Fkn stupid.


The exchange would have enough of the money supply to control all the delegates. They wouldn't need votes from the people.

If they control delegates proportional to their holdings, that's one thing. But with delegates, they don't even need a majority if the rest of the vote is split.

There is nothing in the protocol to prevent full control by a minority holder. No other blockchain security system has this sort of weakness.

cannabanana
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 518
Merit: 501


View Profile
March 13, 2016, 02:37:44 AM
 #2837

This is a story about an exchange

It has 33% of all lisk. It has 101 votes. It votes for 101 of it's 1 lisk wallets.

Everyone else is fucked.

Discuss


Exchanges do not use any of the current crypto wallets with funds to vote or to stake coins.

If they do this, it would not be considered an exhange anymore and could be liable for huge legal repercussions.




With all due respect, relying on an exchange to obey the laws of some arbitrary jurisdiction is a pretty weak argument. What if they operate in Somalia where there is no functional government?



the fact is that the exchanges cant have all the nodes because they would have to be voted in by the people.  Gawd your Fkn stupid.


The exchange would have enough of the money supply to control all the delegates. They wouldn't need votes from the people.

If they control delegates proportional to their holdings, that's one thing. But with delegates, they don't even need a majority if the rest of the vote is split.

There is nothing in the protocol to prevent full control by a minority holder. No other blockchain security system has this sort of weakness.



Dude, if that happens they could just get kicked off the delegate list and a new person gets a chance. Fucking turd.
Bigcabrito
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 504
Merit: 500


Communications Lead


View Profile
March 13, 2016, 02:49:35 AM
 #2838


The exchange would have enough of the money supply to control all the delegates. They wouldn't need votes from the people.

If they control delegates proportional to their holdings, that's one thing. But with delegates, they don't even need a majority if the rest of the vote is split.

There is nothing in the protocol to prevent full control by a minority holder. No other blockchain security system has this sort of weakness.



This 51% attack can occur with any cryptocurrency. Lisk, as with all other cryptocurrencies, is fully dependent on their base users.

If the majority (> 50%) of Lisk owners choose to use unregulated Somalian exchanges to trade, it is the end-users fault if the unregulated Somalian exchange decides to control the Lisk network by using end-user funds for voting their own delegates into the active delegation.

Fortunately, exchanges are fairly regulated these days. These exchanges do not use funds for voting or staking.

Lisk.
    Develop Decentralized Applications & Sidechains in JavaScript with Lisk!
    Website | Blog | BTT Thread | Chat - Lisk Community Manager
Bubba-Gump
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 39
Merit: 0


View Profile
March 13, 2016, 03:03:31 AM
 #2839

This is a story about an exchange

It has 33% of all lisk. It has 101 votes. It votes for 101 of it's 1 lisk wallets.

Everyone else is fucked.

Discuss


Exchanges do not use any of the current crypto wallets with funds to vote or to stake coins.

If they do this, it would not be considered an exhange anymore and could be liable for huge legal repercussions.




With all due respect, relying on an exchange to obey the laws of some arbitrary jurisdiction is a pretty weak argument. What if they operate in Somalia where there is no functional government?



the fact is that the exchanges cant have all the nodes because they would have to be voted in by the people.  Gawd your Fkn stupid.


The exchange would have enough of the money supply to control all the delegates. They wouldn't need votes from the people.

If they control delegates proportional to their holdings, that's one thing. But with delegates, they don't even need a majority if the rest of the vote is split.

There is nothing in the protocol to prevent full control by a minority holder. No other blockchain security system has this sort of weakness.



Dude, if that happens they could just get kicked off the delegate list and a new person gets a chance. Fucking turd.


They will kick themselves off?
cannabanana
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 518
Merit: 501


View Profile
March 13, 2016, 03:11:53 AM
 #2840

This is a story about an exchange

It has 33% of all lisk. It has 101 votes. It votes for 101 of it's 1 lisk wallets.

Everyone else is fucked.

Discuss


Exchanges do not use any of the current crypto wallets with funds to vote or to stake coins.

If they do this, it would not be considered an exhange anymore and could be liable for huge legal repercussions.




With all due respect, relying on an exchange to obey the laws of some arbitrary jurisdiction is a pretty weak argument. What if they operate in Somalia where there is no functional government?



the fact is that the exchanges cant have all the nodes because they would have to be voted in by the people.  Gawd your Fkn stupid.


The exchange would have enough of the money supply to control all the delegates. They wouldn't need votes from the people.

If they control delegates proportional to their holdings, that's one thing. But with delegates, they don't even need a majority if the rest of the vote is split.

There is nothing in the protocol to prevent full control by a minority holder. No other blockchain security system has this sort of weakness.



Dude, if that happens they could just get kicked off the delegate list and a new person gets a chance. Fucking turd.


They will kick themselves off?


with nodes costing like $50 I think anyone can afford to become one.  You're just worrying about absolutely nothing and trying to cause a scene also for no real reason.  Or your reason is fucking greed.
Pages: « 1 ... 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 [142] 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 ... 2269 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!