|
logictense
|
|
March 01, 2017, 12:46:34 AM |
|
Good job @ Poly#Crypto 👍👍 Thanks @Limx Dev ^^^ sorry for my typo, this is my third report, not my seconddo not worry, your reports are always transparent. Good work Poly
And everyone can see most delegates don't sell, they donate some LSK for good actions and hold a lot of forging rewards, in this case over 90%.
I totally agree with you Delegates are in for ideological principles, most of them dont hold any lsk. Smart ones dont hold any alts, totally disregarding the superiority of the tech or potential to grow. But u wont understand that as u aint smart, quite the otherwise u are the puppet on strings and every ur move is dictated by my will.
|
|
|
|
|
Equalizer1970
|
|
March 01, 2017, 01:50:36 AM |
|
Man, I hope Max takes this to heart. Everybody with a little common sense knew the hiring process was way too slow and legal entity should really have only taken a month with a good lawyer. Max's age and lack of experience is really showing.
|
|
|
|
bangomatic
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1246
Merit: 1000
ARK Team likes to ban and delete posts in reddit.
|
|
March 01, 2017, 02:10:00 AM |
|
Lisk team your time table for planning/building the SDK is way too long. Why not hire additional coders to get this done within a couple months?
Because then they wouldn't be able to pay themselves their high wages for the rest of their lives . and perhaps not all of the fund is in reality available to authentically spend. who knows what arrangements were in place at the beginning of the ICO with BTC whales, leading the charge with their oversized donations to suck others in. who knows. One year to stabilize the core and another year to plan/develop SDK is just too long in cryptoland. I mean you can work at your own pace, but that doesn't mean that when you finish the project it will still be useful, the project may in fact not even matter by then. Crypto moves/evolves at a fast pace. The current time timetable is comfy for lisk team but is really hurting investors. The team will grow in the upcoming months, but we're taking into account the amount of time it takes for a new developer to get acquainted with the code. It may be seen as "too long" in the cryptocurrency space, but it is not long for software development. Every release is a step forward towards the right direction. Yes but this IS crypto and you have nearly unlimited funds for development. The pace at which this project is moving forward is not acceptable. You guys had the past year to plan the SDK but didnt, and that just doesnt make any sense. Very aggravating.
|
|
|
|
seektree
Member
Offline
Activity: 104
Merit: 10
|
|
March 01, 2017, 02:18:13 AM |
|
Lisk team your time table for planning/building the SDK is way too long. Why not hire additional coders to get this done within a couple months?
Because then they wouldn't be able to pay themselves their high wages for the rest of their lives . and perhaps not all of the fund is in reality available to authentically spend. who knows what arrangements were in place at the beginning of the ICO with BTC whales, leading the charge with their oversized donations to suck others in. who knows. One year to stabilize the core and another year to plan/develop SDK is just too long in cryptoland. I mean you can work at your own pace, but that doesn't mean that when you finish the project it will still be useful, the project may in fact not even matter by then. Crypto moves/evolves at a fast pace. The current time timetable is comfy for lisk team but is really hurting investors. The team will grow in the upcoming months, but we're taking into account the amount of time it takes for a new developer to get acquainted with the code. It may be seen as "too long" in the cryptocurrency space, but it is not long for software development. Every release is a step forward towards the right direction. Yes but this IS crypto and you have nearly unlimited funds for development. The pace at which this project is moving forward is not acceptable. You guys had the past year to plan the SDK but didnt, and that just doesnt make any sense. Very aggravating. exaclty. what the fuck have they been doing? i wouldnt be suprised if another project beats list to the punch. MAX, hire more people as suggested. you just lost a HUGE asset to lisk. HUGE. one of the main reasons I bought more lisk after charles was hired. now im sitting on a bag of dicks. thanks max. a bag of dicks. lol
|
|
|
|
42savage
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 3
Merit: 0
|
|
March 01, 2017, 03:35:13 AM |
|
Lisk team your time table for planning/building the SDK is way too long. Why not hire additional coders to get this done within a couple months?
Because then they wouldn't be able to pay themselves their high wages for the rest of their lives . and perhaps not all of the fund is in reality available to authentically spend. who knows what arrangements were in place at the beginning of the ICO with BTC whales, leading the charge with their oversized donations to suck others in. who knows. One year to stabilize the core and another year to plan/develop SDK is just too long in cryptoland. I mean you can work at your own pace, but that doesn't mean that when you finish the project it will still be useful, the project may in fact not even matter by then. Crypto moves/evolves at a fast pace. The current time timetable is comfy for lisk team but is really hurting investors. The team will grow in the upcoming months, but we're taking into account the amount of time it takes for a new developer to get acquainted with the code. It may be seen as "too long" in the cryptocurrency space, but it is not long for software development. Every release is a step forward towards the right direction. Yes but this IS crypto and you have nearly unlimited funds for development. The pace at which this project is moving forward is not acceptable. You guys had the past year to plan the SDK but didnt, and that just doesnt make any sense. Very aggravating. exaclty. what the fuck have they been doing? i wouldnt be suprised if another project beats list to the punch. MAX, hire more people as suggested. you just lost a HUGE asset to lisk. HUGE. one of the main reasons I bought more lisk after charles was hired. now im sitting on a bag of dicks. thanks max. a bag of dicks. lol yeah but what about those byteballs?
|
|
|
|
Johnny00
|
|
March 01, 2017, 04:49:38 AM |
|
I've been wondering why list keeps dropping. I'm glad I sold at 33. Seems slow development and I didn't like the idea of the delegates earning.
|
|
|
|
Selsonblue
|
|
March 01, 2017, 04:59:54 AM |
|
Lisks MC is too low. They got 20m in capital, Ill invest in that.
TLDR: Dont listen to what people say on these forums... follow your plan!
|
|
|
|
vested
|
|
March 01, 2017, 05:15:55 AM |
|
WTF is lightcurve and why did Lisk pay them €200k??! Sounds like a shell company to launder their Bitcoin money through if you ask me.
|
|
|
|
Bobo81
|
|
March 01, 2017, 06:16:19 AM |
|
So sad to see that price...
|
|
|
|
Revelations86
|
|
March 01, 2017, 06:21:57 AM |
|
I've been wondering why list keeps dropping. I'm glad I sold at 33. Seems slow development and I didn't like the idea of the delegates earning.
I got at 25 unfortunately. I think Lisk is below ICO price now. Sad to see a project with great potential fail due to terrible execution.
|
|
|
|
lestherat
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 986
Merit: 1001
|
|
March 01, 2017, 06:38:37 AM |
|
I dont know if this price is good re entry point or wait for new ATL, maybe just wait few days. Yes is sad this price, i remember start trading LSK at 200k on poloniex long time ago I dont think will go to 5k but who knows, crypto is crazy.
|
|
|
|
|
wavespump
|
|
March 01, 2017, 06:57:49 AM |
|
Lisk has no future, is the biggest scam alongside with waves created in last year. The devs got the fund but didn't release software in the roadmap. ICO investors lost tons of money, and the players who bought above ICO price has a huge losses on capitalization.
|
|
|
|
LiskHQ (OP)
|
|
March 01, 2017, 07:38:49 AM |
|
How do you think about it, Max? You need to respond it. And need to edit lisk.io We are issuing an official statement today.
|
Lisk.io - Blockchain Application Platform
|
|
|
bitbitch
|
|
March 01, 2017, 08:15:42 AM |
|
WTF is lightcurve and why did Lisk pay them €200k??! Sounds like a shell company to launder their Bitcoin money through if you ask me. scary possibility. it's not a transparent entity. we have no idea where the money is going.
|
|
|
|
PikachuYou
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 238
Merit: 100
Me is Cute
|
|
March 01, 2017, 08:35:08 AM |
|
HEY SONIX LISK IS F U C K E D
|
|
|
|
s0nix
|
|
March 01, 2017, 08:37:45 AM |
|
I dont know if this price is good re entry point or wait for new ATL, maybe just wait few days. Yes is sad this price, i remember start trading LSK at 200k on poloniex long time ago I dont think will go to 5k but who knows, crypto is crazy. 200k? no. Maybe you mean the first buy order at Poloniex, 2 minutes after the listing? After one month LSK moved in the range 50-60k
|
|
|
|
s0nix
|
|
March 01, 2017, 08:45:09 AM |
|
Lisk has no future, is the biggest scam alongside with waves created in last year. The devs got the fund but didn't release software in the roadmap. ICO investors lost tons of money, and the players who bought above ICO price has a huge losses on capitalization.
Then you have a great account If Waves is supposed to be a scam, then wavespump is a scammer pumper supporter?
|
|
|
|
|