aizzaku
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 1146
Merit: 1006
|
 |
May 18, 2016, 08:21:08 AM |
|
so someone bought the 1080, for testing how the hashrate is in all the algo?
yes i want to know this too. has anyone here ? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
"With e-currency based on cryptographic proof, without the need to
trust a third party middleman, money can be secure and transactions
effortless." -- Satoshi
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Genoil
|
|
May 18, 2016, 08:52:40 AM |
|
Indeed this is a nice surprise. Response from AMD (Vega) prolly in 2017. Nvidia may be best for mining for the rest of this year. Expensive though. Cant wait to see what Genoil will get out of this chip  Architecturally on the inside it's not that much different from Maxwell. The large page size support could be very good for memory-hard algo's like ethash though. |
ETH: 0xeb9310b185455f863f526dab3d245809f6854b4d
BTC: 1Nu2fMCEBjmnLzqb8qUJpKgq5RoEWFhNcW
|
|
|
|
vaulter
|
|
May 18, 2016, 09:19:11 AM |
|
so someone bought the 1080, for testing how the hashrate is in all the algo?
For 1080 Decred 3200 Lyrarev2 16000 Quark 32000 Neosrypt and etherium needs clarifying - maybe will be bound to linux on release - cant tell the numbers yet All is at 180w 1070(maybe it will change a bit) Decred 2300 Quark 23000 At 120w |
|
|
|
|
Amph
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3206
Merit: 1069
|
|
May 18, 2016, 09:40:46 AM |
|
so someone bought the 1080, for testing how the hashrate is in all the algo?
For 1080 Decred 3200 Lyrarev2 16000 Quark 32000 Neosrypt and etherium needs clarifying - maybe will be bound to linux on release - cant tell the numbers yet All is at 180w 1070(maybe it will change a bit) Decred 2300 Quark 23000 At 120w good, this of course is without all the tweak that need to be done, and not to mention proper drivers, i can easily see 40mega on quark for a 1080 and 30mega for a 1070 those gpu with those number on decred, can make it once again profitable with lower consumption, pretty beastly, i can not wait to make a rig with those |
|
|
|
|
|
vaulter
|
|
May 18, 2016, 10:24:59 AM |
|
so someone bought the 1080, for testing how the hashrate is in all the algo?
For 1080 Decred 3200 Lyrarev2 16000 Quark 32000 Neosrypt and etherium needs clarifying - maybe will be bound to linux on release - cant tell the numbers yet All is at 180w 1070(maybe it will change a bit) Decred 2300 Quark 23000 At 120w good, this of course is without all the tweak that need to be done, and not to mention proper drivers, i can easily see 40mega on quark for a 1080 and 30mega for a 1070 those gpu with those number on decred, can make it once again profitable with lower consumption, pretty beastly, i can not wait to make a rig with those Dont expect much more with quark - overclocked it was 35000 - maybe with private kernel it might be more overclocked |
|
|
|
|
Amph
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3206
Merit: 1069
|
|
May 18, 2016, 10:28:16 AM |
|
so someone bought the 1080, for testing how the hashrate is in all the algo?
For 1080 Decred 3200 Lyrarev2 16000 Quark 32000 Neosrypt and etherium needs clarifying - maybe will be bound to linux on release - cant tell the numbers yet All is at 180w 1070(maybe it will change a bit) Decred 2300 Quark 23000 At 120w good, this of course is without all the tweak that need to be done, and not to mention proper drivers, i can easily see 40mega on quark for a 1080 and 30mega for a 1070 those gpu with those number on decred, can make it once again profitable with lower consumption, pretty beastly, i can not wait to make a rig with those Dont expect much more with quark - overclocked it was 35000 - maybe with private kernel it might be more overclocked yes but what driver are you using for those? nvidia didnt release proper driver for the new gpu, that alone can boost the performance also code on the miner can be tweaked to increase the performance, i remember the inital value for the 970 was lower than today standard, when it was released and tested with quark and other algo the hashrate on quark at the beginning, for example, for the 970 was only 10.5 mega, look now it's 17m without the private and with oc |
|
|
|
|
kahir
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1050
Merit: 1000
|
|
May 18, 2016, 04:36:05 PM |
|
so someone bought the 1080, for testing how the hashrate is in all the algo?
For 1080 Decred 3200 Lyrarev2 16000 Quark 32000 Neosrypt and etherium needs clarifying - maybe will be bound to linux on release - cant tell the numbers yet All is at 180w 1070(maybe it will change a bit) Decred 2300 Quark 23000 At 120w good, this of course is without all the tweak that need to be done, and not to mention proper drivers, i can easily see 40mega on quark for a 1080 and 30mega for a 1070 those gpu with those number on decred, can make it once again profitable with lower consumption, pretty beastly, i can not wait to make a rig with those Dont expect much more with quark - overclocked it was 35000 - maybe with private kernel it might be more overclocked yes but what driver are you using for those? nvidia didnt release proper driver for the new gpu, that alone can boost the performance also code on the miner can be tweaked to increase the performance, i remember the inital value for the 970 was lower than today standard, when it was released and tested with quark and other algo the hashrate on quark at the beginning, for example, for the 970 was only 10.5 mega, look now it's 17m without the private and with oc Amph what do you think will happen to the 900 series price wise |
|
|
|
|
Amph
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3206
Merit: 1069
|
|
May 18, 2016, 05:17:29 PM |
|
so someone bought the 1080, for testing how the hashrate is in all the algo?
For 1080 Decred 3200 Lyrarev2 16000 Quark 32000 Neosrypt and etherium needs clarifying - maybe will be bound to linux on release - cant tell the numbers yet All is at 180w 1070(maybe it will change a bit) Decred 2300 Quark 23000 At 120w good, this of course is without all the tweak that need to be done, and not to mention proper drivers, i can easily see 40mega on quark for a 1080 and 30mega for a 1070 those gpu with those number on decred, can make it once again profitable with lower consumption, pretty beastly, i can not wait to make a rig with those Dont expect much more with quark - overclocked it was 35000 - maybe with private kernel it might be more overclocked yes but what driver are you using for those? nvidia didnt release proper driver for the new gpu, that alone can boost the performance also code on the miner can be tweaked to increase the performance, i remember the inital value for the 970 was lower than today standard, when it was released and tested with quark and other algo the hashrate on quark at the beginning, for example, for the 970 was only 10.5 mega, look now it's 17m without the private and with oc Amph what do you think will happen to the 900 series price wise 250 euro already now, for used, probably around 200, when the other gpu will be released and face a drop in their value, so around august? |
|
|
|
|
|
fricircled
|
|
May 18, 2016, 07:10:03 PM |
|
so someone bought the 1080, for testing how the hashrate is in all the algo?
For 1080 Decred 3200 Lyrarev2 16000 Quark 32000 Neosrypt and etherium needs clarifying - maybe will be bound to linux on release - cant tell the numbers yet All is at 180w 1070(maybe it will change a bit) Decred 2300 Quark 23000 At 120w good, this of course is without all the tweak that need to be done, and not to mention proper drivers, i can easily see 40mega on quark for a 1080 and 30mega for a 1070 those gpu with those number on decred, can make it once again profitable with lower consumption, pretty beastly, i can not wait to make a rig with those Dont expect much more with quark - overclocked it was 35000 - maybe with private kernel it might be more overclocked yes but what driver are you using for those? nvidia didnt release proper driver for the new gpu, that alone can boost the performance also code on the miner can be tweaked to increase the performance, i remember the inital value for the 970 was lower than today standard, when it was released and tested with quark and other algo the hashrate on quark at the beginning, for example, for the 970 was only 10.5 mega, look now it's 17m without the private and with oc Amph what do you think will happen to the 900 series price wise 250 euro already now, for used, probably around 200, when the other gpu will be released and face a drop in their value, so around august? If the difficulty continue to rise, for the high electricity price miners, they can only make profit with the new cards. |
|
|
|
|
restless
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1151
Merit: 1001
|
|
May 18, 2016, 08:16:29 PM |
|
so someone bought the 1080, for testing how the hashrate is in all the algo?
Neosrypt and etherium needs clarifying - maybe will be bound to linux on release - cant tell the numbers yet Not working at all ?! |
|
|
|
|
|
vaulter
|
|
May 18, 2016, 08:23:54 PM |
|
so someone bought the 1080, for testing how the hashrate is in all the algo?
Neosrypt and etherium needs clarifying - maybe will be bound to linux on release - cant tell the numbers yet Not working at all ?! Working - but for neoscrypt - I need to test linux - and for ethereum its linux only - performance is low on windows at the moment... |
|
|
|
|
restless
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1151
Merit: 1001
|
|
May 18, 2016, 08:30:01 PM |
|
I heard 6MH for ethereum, is that correct? :O
unimpressive so far...
290 stock
X11 12100
X13 4700
Keccak 300000
X15 3000
Qubit 12200
Quark 19000 vs 32000
Lyra2REv2 15000 vs 16000
All only with GPL miners, quite sure there are even faster versions in the wild, I don't have access to optimized decred miner, but probably will be around 3000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Genoil
|
|
May 18, 2016, 08:48:20 PM |
|
I heard 6MH for ethereum, is that correct? :O
unimpressive so far...
290 stock
X11 12100
X13 4700
Keccak 300000
X15 3000
Qubit 12200
Quark 19000 vs 32000
Lyra2REv2 15000 vs 16000
All only with GPL miners, quite sure there are even faster versions in the wild, I don't have access to optimized decred miner, but probably will be around 3000
About 24MH/s on Linux, exactly like I predicted (can't find the proof tho  ) |
ETH: 0xeb9310b185455f863f526dab3d245809f6854b4d
BTC: 1Nu2fMCEBjmnLzqb8qUJpKgq5RoEWFhNcW
|
|
|
Amph
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3206
Merit: 1069
|
|
May 19, 2016, 05:13:56 AM |
|
I heard 6MH for ethereum, is that correct? :O
unimpressive so far...
290 stock
X11 12100
X13 4700
Keccak 300000
X15 3000
Qubit 12200
Quark 19000 vs 32000
Lyra2REv2 15000 vs 16000
All only with GPL miners, quite sure there are even faster versions in the wild, I don't have access to optimized decred miner, but probably will be around 3000
About 24MH/s on Linux, exactly like I predicted (can't find the proof tho ) is that the 1080? very underwhelming if yes |
|
|
|
|
Ayers
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2604
Merit: 1023
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
|
|
May 19, 2016, 05:41:15 AM |
|
I heard 6MH for ethereum, is that correct? :O
unimpressive so far...
290 stock
X11 12100
X13 4700
Keccak 300000
X15 3000
Qubit 12200
Quark 19000 vs 32000
Lyra2REv2 15000 vs 16000
All only with GPL miners, quite sure there are even faster versions in the wild, I don't have access to optimized decred miner, but probably will be around 3000
About 24MH/s on Linux, exactly like I predicted (can't find the proof tho ) what is the wattage? |
|
|
|
restless
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1151
Merit: 1001
|
|
May 19, 2016, 06:01:19 AM |
|
Probably between 100 and 150
|
|
|
|
|
|
mandica
|
|
May 20, 2016, 08:05:03 AM |
|
I heard 6MH for ethereum, is that correct? :O
unimpressive so far...
290 stock
X11 12100
X13 4700
Keccak 300000
X15 3000
Qubit 12200
Quark 19000 vs 32000
Lyra2REv2 15000 vs 16000
All only with GPL miners, quite sure there are even faster versions in the wild, I don't have access to optimized decred miner, but probably will be around 3000
About 24MH/s on Linux, exactly like I predicted (can't find the proof tho ) Do you mean the 1080 mine the Ethereum at 24 MH/s? What is the 290 stock above? Is that AMD R9 290? |
|
|
|
|
fredeq
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1537
Merit: 1005
|
|
May 20, 2016, 01:42:22 PM |
|
Genoil is it really only 24Mhash for 1080? Cant be  |
|
|
|
|
vaulter
|
|
May 20, 2016, 01:46:25 PM |
|
Genoil is it really only 24Mhash for 1080? Cant be It is 24mhs at 140w that is for 1080 - the big question is 1070 that will be better choice for mining anyway (or even other cheaper Pascal based GPUs) |
|
|
|
|
Amph
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3206
Merit: 1069
|
|
May 20, 2016, 02:31:17 PM |
|
Genoil is it really only 24Mhash for 1080? Cant be It is 24mhs at 140w that is for 1080 - the big question is 1070 that will be better choice for mining anyway (or even other cheaper Pascal based GPUs) well that's bad, because right now a 390 can do the same with the same wattage, now imagines what a 490 can do so i think if the new gpu will not be optimized in some way they will be out of the cryptoscene altogether |
|
|
|
|
|
