kahir
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 1050
Merit: 1000
|
 |
May 12, 2016, 04:24:04 PM |
|
More like 40% more speed at half the power of current NVidia cards used in mining, from the early benchmarks I've been seeing, *IF* their mining potential matches their increased clockrate.
Have to see if the changes to the archetecture make them more efficient on some coins that current higher-end NVidia cards do NOT mine efficiently on like Ethereum.
mining is never compared to gaming preformance wise its just impossible to compare them head to head |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
"If you don't want people to know you're a scumbag then don't be a scumbag." -- margaritahuyan
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
|
|
vaulter
|
|
May 12, 2016, 07:40:44 PM |
|
I think its around 15mhs
This is sp-mod opensource release 62 mining lyra2v2 (980ti 1275MHZ core)  The sp-mod private #5 does 16.2MHASH at the same clocks. I'll check 62 later and report, will try to overclock it as well Ive got 16.3 at 180W without OC and 80 build |
|
|
|
|
sp_
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2898
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
|
|
May 12, 2016, 07:55:06 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
iglasses
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1148
Merit: 1000
|
|
May 12, 2016, 08:24:31 PM |
|
They will be too expensive for ETH mining. Not be worth the power efficiency in the end.
NVIDIA is talking about a card running at 2000Mhz drawing 180 watts of power @ 67 degrees centigrade. How does that NOT change the world of (ethereum) mining? |
I only have a signature because I'm allowed.
|
|
|
sp_
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2898
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
|
|
May 12, 2016, 08:32:32 PM |
|
They will be too expensive for ETH mining. Not be worth the power efficiency in the end.
NVIDIA is talking about a card running at 2000Mhz drawing 180 watts of power @ 67 degrees centigrade. How does that NOT change the world of (ethereum) mining? In this forum people care about MHASH and not mhz. Etherum@12MHASH must be a joke right? |
|
|
|
adaseb
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3752
Merit: 1709
|
|
May 12, 2016, 08:38:15 PM |
|
I think its around 15mhs
This is sp-mod opensource release 62 mining lyra2v2 (980ti 1275MHZ core) The sp-mod private #5 does 16.2MHASH at the same clocks. I'll check 62 later and report, will try to overclock it as well Ive got 16.3 at 180W without OC and 80 build Can you test the ethminer speeds ? |
|
|
|
Amph
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3206
Merit: 1069
|
|
May 13, 2016, 05:50:16 AM
Last edit: May 13, 2016, 10:06:40 AM by Amph |
|
They will be too expensive for ETH mining. Not be worth the power efficiency in the end.
NVIDIA is talking about a card running at 2000Mhz drawing 180 watts of power @ 67 degrees centigrade. How does that NOT change the world of (ethereum) mining? In this forum people care about MHASH and not mhz. Etherum@12MHASH must be a joke right? geonoil said it has to do with with the bus interface thing, i asked him to see if it is at 0%, no response it can probably be improved with the right tool |
|
|
|
|
|
Genoil
|
|
May 13, 2016, 07:35:44 AM |
|
They will be too expensive for ETH mining. Not be worth the power efficiency in the end.
NVIDIA is talking about a card running at 2000Mhz drawing 180 watts of power @ 67 degrees centigrade. How does that NOT change the world of (ethereum) mining? In this forum people care about MHASH and not mhz. Etherum@12MHASH must be a joke right? geonoil said it has to do with with the bus interface thing, i asked him to see if it is at 0%, no response it can probably be proved with the right tool  !!! |
ETH: 0xeb9310b185455f863f526dab3d245809f6854b4d
BTC: 1Nu2fMCEBjmnLzqb8qUJpKgq5RoEWFhNcW
|
|
|
|
Genoil
|
|
May 13, 2016, 11:42:48 PM |
|
They will be too expensive for ETH mining. Not be worth the power efficiency in the end.
NVIDIA is talking about a card running at 2000Mhz drawing 180 watts of power @ 67 degrees centigrade. How does that NOT change the world of (ethereum) mining? In this forum people care about MHASH and not mhz. Etherum@12MHASH must be a joke right? You mean 650KH/s  |
ETH: 0xeb9310b185455f863f526dab3d245809f6854b4d
BTC: 1Nu2fMCEBjmnLzqb8qUJpKgq5RoEWFhNcW
|
|
|
Amph
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3206
Merit: 1069
|
|
May 14, 2016, 05:44:29 AM |
|
They will be too expensive for ETH mining. Not be worth the power efficiency in the end.
NVIDIA is talking about a card running at 2000Mhz drawing 180 watts of power @ 67 degrees centigrade. How does that NOT change the world of (ethereum) mining? In this forum people care about MHASH and not mhz. Etherum@12MHASH must be a joke right? You mean 650KH/s how so, the guy said 12. mega which is still bad, but 650 is worse than a bad joke... |
|
|
|
|
|
Genoil
|
|
May 14, 2016, 06:10:18 AM |
|
They will be too expensive for ETH mining. Not be worth the power efficiency in the end.
NVIDIA is talking about a card running at 2000Mhz drawing 180 watts of power @ 67 degrees centigrade. How does that NOT change the world of (ethereum) mining? In this forum people care about MHASH and not mhz. Etherum@12MHASH must be a joke right? You mean 650KH/s how so, the guy said 12. mega which is still bad, but 650 is worse than a bad joke... I don't know who 'this guy' is but I saw it with my own eyes. |
ETH: 0xeb9310b185455f863f526dab3d245809f6854b4d
BTC: 1Nu2fMCEBjmnLzqb8qUJpKgq5RoEWFhNcW
|
|
|
QuintLeo
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1498
Merit: 1030
|
|
May 14, 2016, 06:21:16 AM |
|
I'd still like to see what F@H PPD are like out of a GTX 1080 and a GTX 1070.
|
I'm no longer legendary just in my own mind!
Like something I said? Donations gratefully accepted. LYLnTKvLefz9izJFUvEGQEZzSkz34b3N6U (Litecoin)
1GYbjMTPdCuV7dci3iCUiaRrcNuaiQrVYY (Bitcoin)
|
|
|
Amph
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3206
Merit: 1069
|
|
May 14, 2016, 06:36:38 AM |
|
They will be too expensive for ETH mining. Not be worth the power efficiency in the end.
NVIDIA is talking about a card running at 2000Mhz drawing 180 watts of power @ 67 degrees centigrade. How does that NOT change the world of (ethereum) mining? In this forum people care about MHASH and not mhz. Etherum@12MHASH must be a joke right? You mean 650KH/s how so, the guy said 12. mega which is still bad, but 650 is worse than a bad joke... I don't know who 'this guy' is but I saw it with my own eyes. vaulter the guy who posted the hashrate with 1080 before everyone else, in this thread |
|
|
|
|
|
Genoil
|
|
May 14, 2016, 06:52:20 AM |
|
They will be too expensive for ETH mining. Not be worth the power efficiency in the end.
NVIDIA is talking about a card running at 2000Mhz drawing 180 watts of power @ 67 degrees centigrade. How does that NOT change the world of (ethereum) mining? In this forum people care about MHASH and not mhz. Etherum@12MHASH must be a joke right? You mean 650KH/s how so, the guy said 12. mega which is still bad, but 650 is worse than a bad joke... I don't know who 'this guy' is but I saw it with my own eyes. vaulter the guy who posted the hashrate with 1080 before everyone else, in this thread Yes and I'm is the guy who wrote the ethash CUDA kernel and studied effects of TLB trashing for about a year now and made it an agenda point at nvidia dev teams. I know what I did, I kind of saw this coming too. And i also know that there is a chance that it will get fixed this time. And then we may even see speeds well beyond 19.6MH/s, which it what 1080 currently clocks with a 1GB DAG file. |
ETH: 0xeb9310b185455f863f526dab3d245809f6854b4d
BTC: 1Nu2fMCEBjmnLzqb8qUJpKgq5RoEWFhNcW
|
|
|
Amph
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3206
Merit: 1069
|
|
May 14, 2016, 07:28:54 AM |
|
They will be too expensive for ETH mining. Not be worth the power efficiency in the end.
NVIDIA is talking about a card running at 2000Mhz drawing 180 watts of power @ 67 degrees centigrade. How does that NOT change the world of (ethereum) mining? In this forum people care about MHASH and not mhz. Etherum@12MHASH must be a joke right? You mean 650KH/s how so, the guy said 12. mega which is still bad, but 650 is worse than a bad joke... I don't know who 'this guy' is but I saw it with my own eyes. vaulter the guy who posted the hashrate with 1080 before everyone else, in this thread Yes and I'm is the guy who wrote the ethash CUDA kernel and studied effects of TLB trashing for about a year now and made it an agenda point at nvidia dev teams. I know what I did, I kind of saw this coming too. And i also know that there is a chance that it will get fixed this time. And then we may even see speeds well beyond 19.6MH/s, which it what 1080 currently clocks with a 1GB DAG file. based on what you know how much they might be pushed if everything is fixed? 30MH? |
|
|
|
|
|
Genoil
|
|
May 14, 2016, 07:59:29 AM |
|
They will be too expensive for ETH mining. Not be worth the power efficiency in the end.
NVIDIA is talking about a card running at 2000Mhz drawing 180 watts of power @ 67 degrees centigrade. How does that NOT change the world of (ethereum) mining? In this forum people care about MHASH and not mhz. Etherum@12MHASH must be a joke right? You mean 650KH/s how so, the guy said 12. mega which is still bad, but 650 is worse than a bad joke... I don't know who 'this guy' is but I saw it with my own eyes. vaulter the guy who posted the hashrate with 1080 before everyone else, in this thread Yes and I'm is the guy who wrote the ethash CUDA kernel and studied effects of TLB trashing for about a year now and made it an agenda point at nvidia dev teams. I know what I did, I kind of saw this coming too. And i also know that there is a chance that it will get fixed this time. And then we may even see speeds well beyond 19.6MH/s, which it what 1080 currently clocks with a 1GB DAG file. based on what you know how much they might be pushed if everything is fixed? 30MH? I can't tell. 19.6MH/s at least, 40MH/s in theory (320GB/s of bandwidth divided by 8KB of DAG data per hash) |
ETH: 0xeb9310b185455f863f526dab3d245809f6854b4d
BTC: 1Nu2fMCEBjmnLzqb8qUJpKgq5RoEWFhNcW
|
|
|
|
vaulter
|
|
May 14, 2016, 07:32:33 PM |
|
They will be too expensive for ETH mining. Not be worth the power efficiency in the end.
NVIDIA is talking about a card running at 2000Mhz drawing 180 watts of power @ 67 degrees centigrade. How does that NOT change the world of (ethereum) mining? In this forum people care about MHASH and not mhz. Etherum@12MHASH must be a joke right? You mean 650KH/s how so, the guy said 12. mega which is still bad, but 650 is worse than a bad joke... I don't know who 'this guy' is but I saw it with my own eyes. vaulter the guy who posted the hashrate with 1080 before everyone else, in this thread Sorry guys - its bad news so far - I was wrong about 12.5mhs - I just couldnt belive it would be... 1.25mhs - its because tlb - i'll try to find out if they can fix this or not... It might be the same reason why neoscrypt is 0.450mhs but im not sure... |
|
|
|
|
chup
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 736
Merit: 262
Me, Myself & I
|
 |
May 14, 2016, 07:56:38 PM |
|
The world of mining will be changed to.... AMD?  |
|
|
|
Zivdafast
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 57
Merit: 0
|
|
May 14, 2016, 08:23:36 PM |
|
Maybe the nVidia cards needs more miner optimisation. Does it mean our old AMD cards can last longer?
|
|
|
|
|
Amph
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3206
Merit: 1069
|
|
May 14, 2016, 09:01:07 PM |
|
They will be too expensive for ETH mining. Not be worth the power efficiency in the end.
NVIDIA is talking about a card running at 2000Mhz drawing 180 watts of power @ 67 degrees centigrade. How does that NOT change the world of (ethereum) mining? In this forum people care about MHASH and not mhz. Etherum@12MHASH must be a joke right? You mean 650KH/s how so, the guy said 12. mega which is still bad, but 650 is worse than a bad joke... I don't know who 'this guy' is but I saw it with my own eyes. vaulter the guy who posted the hashrate with 1080 before everyone else, in this thread Sorry guys - its bad news so far - I was wrong about 12.5mhs - I just couldnt belive it would be... 1.25mhs - its because tlb - i'll try to find out if they can fix this or not... It might be the same reason why neoscrypt is 0.450mhs but im not sure... what % it report in the bus interface, using gpu-z? |
|
|
|
|
|
