pattanan
Newbie
 Offline
Activity: 55
Merit: 0
|
 |
June 08, 2016, 09:10:24 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The grue lurks in the darkest places of the earth. Its favorite diet is adventurers, but its insatiable appetite is tempered by its fear of light. No grue has ever been seen by the light of day, and few have survived its fearsome jaws to tell the tale.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
Lucky - Luciano
|
|
June 09, 2016, 12:11:33 AM |
|
Nist5_tpruvot from nicehashminer 1.5  How much hashed for Ethereum? |
|
|
|
|
jimlite
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1848
Merit: 1018
|
|
June 09, 2016, 03:30:34 AM |
|
1070 mh/s with ethereum ? , work on windows 10 x64 ? .
Read up - 27mhs at 100w Win 10 will be available with July update or Insider preview build next week... that hash is only where, on linux? what about win 7? Linux and Win 10 Dont know about win 7 - maybe they release the driver for that.. Very good! only 100w!!! Thanks! And Gtx 1080 ? . The GTX 1080 is slower than the 1070 in mining the Ethereum. There is no point in getting that for mining. You are confused. There is no way the 1080 can be slower than the 1070. It is impossible, 1080 has more cores, faster memory, and wider memory bus. Don't be an idiot. If someone tested a 1080 as slower than a 1070, then there are software issues. |
|
|
|
pattanan
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 55
Merit: 0
|
|
June 09, 2016, 04:42:44 AM |
|
[/quote] How much hashed for Ethereum? Not sure if picture is not shown, its 4.2mh |
|
|
|
|
Amph
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3206
Merit: 1069
|
|
June 09, 2016, 06:49:53 AM |
|
Nist5_tpruvot from nicehashminer 1.5 what algo is that? lyra2v2? |
|
|
|
|
|
dumpida
|
|
June 09, 2016, 07:07:27 AM |
|
1070 mh/s with ethereum ? , work on windows 10 x64 ? .
Read up - 27mhs at 100w Win 10 will be available with July update or Insider preview build next week... that hash is only where, on linux? what about win 7? Linux and Win 10 Dont know about win 7 - maybe they release the driver for that.. Very good! only 100w!!! Thanks! And Gtx 1080 ? . The GTX 1080 is slower than the 1070 in mining the Ethereum. There is no point in getting that for mining. You are confused. There is no way the 1080 can be slower than the 1070. It is impossible, 1080 has more cores, faster memory, and wider memory bus. Don't be an idiot. If someone tested a 1080 as slower than a 1070, then there are software issues. Do you think the 980 or 980Ti is faster than 970 in the Ethereum mining? I heard the 970 is much faster. |
| Emporium.
Finance | ▐ | .
▌ | Decentralized Peer-to-Peer
Marketplace and DeFi
Liquidity Mining Platform | ▲ | .
● | ▄▄█▀▀██▀██▀▄▄
▄███▀██▀▀▀▀▀ ▄▄
▀ ▄█▀▄█▄
▄▄▄▄▄ ▀ ▀██▄███▄
▄██████▄ ▄▄██████▄
███████▌ ▄███████████
█████████▄ ▀█▄████████████
███████████▄▄▄▀▀▀▀▀████████
▀█████████████▀ ▀▀████▀
▀████████████▄ ██▀
▀████████████▌ ▄▄██▀
▀██████████▌ ▄███▀
▀▀██████ ▄█▀▀ | Available
in +125
Countries | | | ▄███▄
█████
▀███▀
▄▄▄ ▄█████▄ ▄▄▄
█████ ███████ █████
█████ ███████ █████
▄███▄ ▄███▄
███████ ███ ███████
███████ ██▄█████▄██ ███████
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀ ███▀ ▀███ ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
███▄ ▄███
██▀█████▀██
███ | Community
Governance
System | | | ▄▄██████▄▄ ▄▀▄
▀▀▀ ▄██▄
▀██ ▄██▄ ▄█
▄██ ▀▀███▄ ▄███
▄██ ▀█▄ ███
▄██ ▀ ▄███
▄██ ▄▄ ▀███
▄██ ██▀ ███
▄██ ▄████
▄██ ▄█████████▄ █
▀▀ ▄▄▄█████ █▀ ████
▄▄██▀▀██▀ ███▄ ▄███
▄██████████████████████ | Liquidity
Mining
Platform | ◆ | .
▌ | | | ▌ |
|
|
|
giagge
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1134
Merit: 1001
|
|
June 09, 2016, 07:15:49 AM |
|
Thanks! its a nist5 algo ? I have 13 MH/S with Geforce GTX 950 Overclocked Base Clock : 1235MHz / Boost Clock : 1425MHz Mem: 7800Mhz . |
|
|
|
|
QuintLeo
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1498
Merit: 1030
|
|
June 09, 2016, 07:53:40 AM |
|
1070 mh/s with ethereum ? , work on windows 10 x64 ? .
Read up - 27mhs at 100w Win 10 will be available with July update or Insider preview build next week... that hash is only where, on linux? what about win 7? Linux and Win 10 Dont know about win 7 - maybe they release the driver for that.. Very good! only 100w!!! Thanks! And Gtx 1080 ? . The GTX 1080 is slower than the 1070 in mining the Ethereum. There is no point in getting that for mining. You are confused. There is no way the 1080 can be slower than the 1070. It is impossible, 1080 has more cores, faster memory, and wider memory bus. Don't be an idiot. If someone tested a 1080 as slower than a 1070, then there are software issues. The AMD Nano/Fury line are all MUCH higher core count, faster clocks, faster memory, MUCH wider memory bus - and mine SLOWER than my 2-generation old R9 290s, which routinely see 30 MH and I've not pushed them as far as they CAN go (best figure I've seen for the Nano was 27). There appears to be more than just pure "memory bandwidth" involved in how fast Ethereum can be mined by a given model of GPU. |
I'm no longer legendary just in my own mind!
Like something I said? Donations gratefully accepted. LYLnTKvLefz9izJFUvEGQEZzSkz34b3N6U (Litecoin)
1GYbjMTPdCuV7dci3iCUiaRrcNuaiQrVYY (Bitcoin)
|
|
|
QuintLeo
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1498
Merit: 1030
|
|
June 09, 2016, 08:00:36 AM |
|
wow that`s really bad, but i did read somewhere that widows runs it a 1/4 to 1/5 of what you would get under linux.
Not true. Windows 10 has issues with certain recent AMD driver versions and mining, but otherwise Windows can achieve very similar hashrates to LINUX - the BIG differences are: (1) Windows actually has superior tools for managing over/underclock, powertune, voltages, etc (2) LINUX is free, Windows co$t$ (3) Windows for multi-GPU setups is a lot harder to get going at all, and SOMETIMES needs "dummy VGA plugs" to see more than one card on some card models, LINUX tends to need a bit more manual setup to get set up but then tends to just work. (4) Drivers tend to get updated faster for Windows |
I'm no longer legendary just in my own mind!
Like something I said? Donations gratefully accepted. LYLnTKvLefz9izJFUvEGQEZzSkz34b3N6U (Litecoin)
1GYbjMTPdCuV7dci3iCUiaRrcNuaiQrVYY (Bitcoin)
|
|
|
|
Bokelka
|
|
June 09, 2016, 08:49:43 AM |
|
1070 mh/s with ethereum ? , work on windows 10 x64 ? .
Read up - 27mhs at 100w Win 10 will be available with July update or Insider preview build next week... that hash is only where, on linux? what about win 7? Linux and Win 10 Dont know about win 7 - maybe they release the driver for that.. Very good! only 100w!!! Thanks! And Gtx 1080 ? . The GTX 1080 is slower than the 1070 in mining the Ethereum. There is no point in getting that for mining. You are confused. There is no way the 1080 can be slower than the 1070. It is impossible, 1080 has more cores, faster memory, and wider memory bus. Don't be an idiot. If someone tested a 1080 as slower than a 1070, then there are software issues. Do you mine? Have you used 1080 or 1070 to mine? If you have mined with those cards, you would not say that. |
|
|
|
|
restless
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1151
Merit: 1001
|
|
June 09, 2016, 10:39:40 AM |
|
The AMD Nano/Fury line are all MUCH higher core count, faster clocks, faster memory, MUCH wider memory bus - and mine SLOWER than my 2-generation old R9 290s, which routinely see 30 MH and I've not pushed them as far as they CAN go (best figure I've seen for the Nano was 27).
There appears to be more than just pure "memory bandwidth" involved in how fast Ethereum can be mined by a given model of GPU.
With bios mod Fury go upto ~ 35MH, using less power than 290 |
|
|
|
|
|
sanas
|
|
June 09, 2016, 01:03:23 PM |
|
The AMD Nano/Fury line are all MUCH higher core count, faster clocks, faster memory, MUCH wider memory bus - and mine SLOWER than my 2-generation old R9 290s, which routinely see 30 MH and I've not pushed them as far as they CAN go (best figure I've seen for the Nano was 27).
There appears to be more than just pure "memory bandwidth" involved in how fast Ethereum can be mined by a given model of GPU.
With bios mod Fury go upto ~ 35MH, using less power than 290 The Nano chips are handpicked Fury XT chips. They consume lower power than the Fury XT and also 390. |
| .cashaa.... | | | █████
█╬██
█╬█
█╬█
█╬█
█╬█
█╬█
█╬██
█████ | | | | ██████
██╬██
█╬█
█╬█
█╬█
█╬█
█╬█
██╬██
██████ | | | █████
██╬█
█╬█
█╬█
█╬█
█╬█
█╬█
██╬█
█████ |
|
|
|
Persinon
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 22
Merit: 0
|
|
June 09, 2016, 01:09:30 PM |
|
The AMD Nano/Fury line are all MUCH higher core count, faster clocks, faster memory, MUCH wider memory bus - and mine SLOWER than my 2-generation old R9 290s, which routinely see 30 MH and I've not pushed them as far as they CAN go (best figure I've seen for the Nano was 27).
There appears to be more than just pure "memory bandwidth" involved in how fast Ethereum can be mined by a given model of GPU.
With bios mod Fury go upto ~ 35MH, using less power than 290 The Nano is more efficient than the R9 390 even both with undervolt and under clock. It is about 20-40% more efficient. |
|
|
|
|
|
ol92
|
|
June 09, 2016, 01:51:53 PM |
|
1070 mh/s with ethereum ? , work on windows 10 x64 ? .
Read up - 27mhs at 100w Win 10 will be available with July update or Insider preview build next week... that hash is only where, on linux? what about win 7? Linux and Win 10 Dont know about win 7 - maybe they release the driver for that.. Very good! only 100w!!! Thanks! And Gtx 1080 ? . The GTX 1080 is slower than the 1070 in mining the Ethereum. There is no point in getting that for mining. You are confused. There is no way the 1080 can be slower than the 1070. It is impossible, 1080 has more cores, faster memory, and wider memory bus. Don't be an idiot. If someone tested a 1080 as slower than a 1070, then there are software issues. The AMD Nano/Fury line are all MUCH higher core count, faster clocks, faster memory, MUCH wider memory bus - and mine SLOWER than my 2-generation old R9 290s, which routinely see 30 MH and I've not pushed them as far as they CAN go (best figure I've seen for the Nano was 27). There appears to be more than just pure "memory bandwidth" involved in how fast Ethereum can be mined by a given model of GPU. Fury-x can do around 32mh/s on ethereum + 1700mh/s on decred simultaneaously with claymore dual miner. Nano just a little bit less (for nano http://mininghwcomparison.com/list/index.php?brand=amd) |
|
|
|
|
jimlite
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1848
Merit: 1018
|
|
June 09, 2016, 11:49:35 PM |
|
1070 mh/s with ethereum ? , work on windows 10 x64 ? .
Read up - 27mhs at 100w Win 10 will be available with July update or Insider preview build next week... that hash is only where, on linux? what about win 7? Linux and Win 10 Dont know about win 7 - maybe they release the driver for that.. Very good! only 100w!!! Thanks! And Gtx 1080 ? . The GTX 1080 is slower than the 1070 in mining the Ethereum. There is no point in getting that for mining. You are confused. There is no way the 1080 can be slower than the 1070. It is impossible, 1080 has more cores, faster memory, and wider memory bus. Don't be an idiot. If someone tested a 1080 as slower than a 1070, then there are software issues. Do you mine? Have you used 1080 or 1070 to mine? If you have mined with those cards, you would not say that. I don't need to mine with them to say that. The 1070 is just a 1080 with some of the cores disabled and slower memory and memory bus. There is no freaking way a 1070 mines faster than a 1080, period. Unless their is some massive overclock on the 1070 and the correct software/drivers and the 1080 has shit software and drivers. Wake up dude, just cuz someone posts something doesn't mean it is true. There are a lot of variables in every mining rig but the bottom line is if you put a 1080 in the same exact rig it is going to mine faster than a 1070. |
|
|
|
|
vaulter
|
|
June 10, 2016, 01:07:18 AM |
|
1070 mh/s with ethereum ? , work on windows 10 x64 ? .
Read up - 27mhs at 100w Win 10 will be available with July update or Insider preview build next week... that hash is only where, on linux? what about win 7? Linux and Win 10 Dont know about win 7 - maybe they release the driver for that.. Very good! only 100w!!! Thanks! And Gtx 1080 ? . The GTX 1080 is slower than the 1070 in mining the Ethereum. There is no point in getting that for mining. You are confused. There is no way the 1080 can be slower than the 1070. It is impossible, 1080 has more cores, faster memory, and wider memory bus. Don't be an idiot. If someone tested a 1080 as slower than a 1070, then there are software issues. Do you mine? Have you used 1080 or 1070 to mine? If you have mined with those cards, you would not say that. I don't need to mine with them to say that. The 1070 is just a 1080 with some of the cores disabled and slower memory and memory bus. There is no freaking way a 1070 mines faster than a 1080, period. Unless their is some massive overclock on the 1070 and the correct software/drivers and the 1080 has shit software and drivers. Wake up dude, just cuz someone posts something doesn't mean it is true. There are a lot of variables in every mining rig but the bottom line is if you put a 1080 in the same exact rig it is going to mine faster than a 1070. That is a nice position - but youll have to wait 1 week tops when some else will post the 1070 results The reason 1080 is slower in eth right now (it might change in future, hopefully) is the gddr5x memory config - its different to gddr5 and in this case its slower than 1070 its also slower in neoscrypt - all the other compute algos are faster of course |
|
|
|
|
QuintLeo
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1498
Merit: 1030
|
|
June 10, 2016, 07:09:43 AM |
|
The AMD Nano/Fury line are all MUCH higher core count, faster clocks, faster memory, MUCH wider memory bus - and mine SLOWER than my 2-generation old R9 290s, which routinely see 30 MH and I've not pushed them as far as they CAN go (best figure I've seen for the Nano was 27).
There appears to be more than just pure "memory bandwidth" involved in how fast Ethereum can be mined by a given model of GPU.
Fury-x can do around 32mh/s on ethereum + 1700mh/s on decred simultaneaously with claymore dual miner. Nano just a little bit less (for nano http://mininghwcomparison.com/list/index.php?brand=amd) Stock clocks, or overclocked? Efficiency on the Fury/Nano is very good from everything I've seen, but still not impressive that a card with a ton more memory bandwidth and almost twice the Stream units is so poor on hashrate compared to a 2 generation old card. Is that 32Mh at stock clocks, or overclocked? |
I'm no longer legendary just in my own mind!
Like something I said? Donations gratefully accepted. LYLnTKvLefz9izJFUvEGQEZzSkz34b3N6U (Litecoin)
1GYbjMTPdCuV7dci3iCUiaRrcNuaiQrVYY (Bitcoin)
|
|
|
|
agente
|
|
June 10, 2016, 08:50:20 AM |
|
Stock clocks, or overclocked?
Efficiency on the Fury/Nano is very good from everything I've seen, but still not impressive that a card with a ton more memory bandwidth and almost twice the Stream units is so poor on hashrate compared to a 2 generation old card.
Is that 32Mh at stock clocks, or overclocked?
Stock (30mh for me) |
|
|
|
|
|
dumana
|
|
June 10, 2016, 09:59:53 AM |
|
The AMD Nano/Fury line are all MUCH higher core count, faster clocks, faster memory, MUCH wider memory bus - and mine SLOWER than my 2-generation old R9 290s, which routinely see 30 MH and I've not pushed them as far as they CAN go (best figure I've seen for the Nano was 27).
There appears to be more than just pure "memory bandwidth" involved in how fast Ethereum can be mined by a given model of GPU.
Fury-x can do around 32mh/s on ethereum + 1700mh/s on decred simultaneaously with claymore dual miner. Nano just a little bit less (for nano http://mininghwcomparison.com/list/index.php?brand=amd) Stock clocks, or overclocked? Efficiency on the Fury/Nano is very good from everything I've seen, but still not impressive that a card with a ton more memory bandwidth and almost twice the Stream units is so poor on hashrate compared to a 2 generation old card. Is that 32Mh at stock clocks, or overclocked? So for the Fury/nano cards, is it better to dual mine so that the core processors can be utilised fullly? |
|
|
|
|
|
Lucky - Luciano
|
|
June 10, 2016, 10:24:30 AM |
|
Stock clocks, or overclocked?
Efficiency on the Fury/Nano is very good from everything I've seen, but still not impressive that a card with a ton more memory bandwidth and almost twice the Stream units is so poor on hashrate compared to a 2 generation old card.
Is that 32Mh at stock clocks, or overclocked?
Stock (30mh for me) Which model is at question and how many hashes overclocking? |
|
|
|
|
|
