FantoNas
Jr. Member
 Offline
Activity: 152
Merit: 2
|
 |
March 03, 2018, 05:50:58 PM |
|
Why so much fuss over a coin that is rank 200 , you all made a bad investment , move on already.
A wise man told me you pay for what you get. Well a rank 200 coin isn't going to have rank 10 development.
So much fuss ... because the Dev get 600btc for development. Suppose have enougth money to have a 1st rank dev
Is it a good investment, yeah sure it was when the OP made the post but so was every other coin.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
TrebbleUo
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 4
Merit: 0
|
|
March 03, 2018, 07:16:32 PM |
|
Why so much fuss over a coin that is rank 200 , you all made a bad investment , move on already.
A wise man told me you pay for what you get. Well a rank 200 coin isn't going to have rank 10 development.
So much fuss ... because the Dev get 600btc for development. Suppose have enougth money to have a 1st rank dev
Is it a good investment, yeah sure it was when the OP made the post but so was every other coin.
1 btc or 100000 btc the market has ranked this coin as a rank 200 coin for whatever reason. It's not bad as there is 1534 coins listed on CMC but don't expect the developers to be at the same level as Scott Meyers. I am tired of seeing this coin at the top of the Speculation (Altcoins) sections, it's a shit coin with slow development, rank 200 development. Can I be anymore clearer? |
|
|
|
|
|
Jean.Luc
|
|
March 04, 2018, 12:08:08 AM |
|
Why so much fuss over a coin that is rank 200 , you all made a bad investment , move on already.
A wise man told me you pay for what you get. Well a rank 200 coin isn't going to have rank 10 development.
So much fuss ... because the Dev get 600btc for development. Suppose have enougth money to have a 1st rank dev
Is it a good investment, yeah sure it was when the OP made the post but so was every other coin.
1 btc or 100000 btc the market has ranked this coin as a rank 200 coin for whatever reason. It's not bad as there is 1534 coins listed on CMC but don't expect the developers to be at the same level as Scott Meyers. I am tired of seeing this coin at the top of the Speculation (Altcoins) sections, it's a shit coin with slow development, rank 200 development. Can I be anymore clearer? Actually, yes, please. Can you be a bit more clearer. Do you think that it is a shit coin because of the tech (which is actually better than bitcoin) or because you can’t trade it? Huge difference there! |
|
|
|
|
TrebbleUo
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 4
Merit: 0
|
|
March 04, 2018, 06:10:12 AM |
|
Why so much fuss over a coin that is rank 200 , you all made a bad investment , move on already.
A wise man told me you pay for what you get. Well a rank 200 coin isn't going to have rank 10 development.
So much fuss ... because the Dev get 600btc for development. Suppose have enougth money to have a 1st rank dev
Is it a good investment, yeah sure it was when the OP made the post but so was every other coin.
1 btc or 100000 btc the market has ranked this coin as a rank 200 coin for whatever reason. It's not bad as there is 1534 coins listed on CMC but don't expect the developers to be at the same level as Scott Meyers. I am tired of seeing this coin at the top of the Speculation (Altcoins) sections, it's a shit coin with slow development, rank 200 development. Can I be anymore clearer? Actually, yes, please. Can you be a bit more clearer. Do you think that it is a shit coin because of the tech (which is actually better than bitcoin) or because you can’t trade it? Huge difference there! It has the rank it does because it's a shit coin in an important segment. It's not for me to figure out but it's tiring seeing a coin that has hardly any support at the top of this section of bitcointalk. Rank 202 coin as I am typing this , it's a coin on a downhill slope. Stop complaining and move on. Look at the top 20 for safety. |
|
|
|
|
|
Jean.Luc
|
|
March 04, 2018, 08:26:26 AM |
|
Why so much fuss over a coin that is rank 200 , you all made a bad investment , move on already.
A wise man told me you pay for what you get. Well a rank 200 coin isn't going to have rank 10 development.
So much fuss ... because the Dev get 600btc for development. Suppose have enougth money to have a 1st rank dev
Is it a good investment, yeah sure it was when the OP made the post but so was every other coin.
1 btc or 100000 btc the market has ranked this coin as a rank 200 coin for whatever reason. It's not bad as there is 1534 coins listed on CMC but don't expect the developers to be at the same level as Scott Meyers. I am tired of seeing this coin at the top of the Speculation (Altcoins) sections, it's a shit coin with slow development, rank 200 development. Can I be anymore clearer? Actually, yes, please. Can you be a bit more clearer. Do you think that it is a shit coin because of the tech (which is actually better than bitcoin) or because you can’t trade it? Huge difference there! It has the rank it does because it's a shit coin in an important segment. It's not for me to figure out but it's tiring seeing a coin that has hardly any support at the top of this section of bitcointalk. Rank 202 coin as I am typing this , it's a coin on a downhill slope. Stop complaining and move on. Look at the top 20 for safety.Well, I suggest, you do just that if you are not prepared to invest some time in figuring out why people are still investing and supporting this coin. Bye! |
|
|
|
|
BioMike
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1658
Merit: 1001
|
|
March 04, 2018, 12:31:33 PM |
|
Look at the top 20 for safety.
https://soylentnews.org/article.pl?sid=18/03/03/1943233 Hmm... are you sure? (This isn't the first time that this "coin" hits the news with "fixed flaws".) Seriously, there are at least 6 or 7 coins in the top 20 that I would not trust my money to. And if you're in it to make more money, well, you can do that with almost any coin (some of the more suitable ones aren't even in the top 20). |
|
|
|
|
Jaephoenix
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 182
Merit: 2
|
|
March 04, 2018, 02:10:10 PM |
|
Gulden might be a good idea, but a better idea may be to buy some Retainly. ICO going on
|
|
|
|
|
rodriguesgomes
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 14
Merit: 0
|
|
March 04, 2018, 02:54:11 PM |
|
I think because I have never tried it so can not say it is good, but all that if we run well may be good to say, because this investment we are running it so we know which is best for ourselves, what else in project selection and our future investment. In order to run well ..
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tavarez
|
|
March 04, 2018, 03:32:28 PM |
|
gulden is making a steady progress. clean rise is visible not affected in recent days by major pumps and dips of other markets. Once Gulden is adopted as a payment method, this coin's price will skyrocket. It can reach 20-30$ value in the 2018.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jean.Luc
|
|
March 04, 2018, 04:04:39 PM |
|
gulden is making a steady progress. clean rise is visible not affected in recent days by major pumps and dips of other markets. Once Gulden is adopted as a payment method, this coin's price will skyrocket. It can reach 20-30$ value in the 2018.
I did a hypothetical calculation once. What price would Gulden have when it would be equal valued as Bitcoin? Well here we go! Bitcoin amount of coins = 16,804,300 versus Gulden 390,365,100 =23,23 times more Gulden on the market. Devide the Bitcoin price (say $11500) by that 23,23 and we have our hypothetical Gulden price of $495,- But let’s make it even crazier. Bitcoin price was $20000 not so long ago. That makes an astonishing $861,- Have fun trading at current 14 cents. I know what I would do. 🚀🚀 (and are doing) 🤑🤑. |
|
|
|
|
BioMike
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1658
Merit: 1001
|
|
March 04, 2018, 04:40:13 PM |
|
gulden is making a steady progress. clean rise is visible not affected in recent days by major pumps and dips of other markets. Once Gulden is adopted as a payment method, this coin's price will skyrocket. It can reach 20-30$ value in the 2018.
I did a hypothetical calculation once. What price would Gulden have when it would be equal valued as Bitcoin? Well here we go! Bitcoin amount of coins = 16,804,300 versus Gulden 390,365,100 =23,23 times more Gulden on the market. Devide the Bitcoin price (say $11500) by that 23,23 and we have our hypothetical Gulden price of $495,- But let’s make it even crazier. Bitcoin price was $20000 not so long ago. That makes an astonishing $861,- Have fun trading at current 14 cents. I know what I would do. 🚀🚀 (and are doing) 🤑🤑. Hmm... every coin makes those calculations... fun to do, but say little. Let's assume 0.1% of the European market makes use of Gulden, what would its price be than? I think that would be a more interesting calculation. ;-) |
|
|
|
|
|
Jean.Luc
|
|
March 04, 2018, 05:14:25 PM
Last edit: March 04, 2018, 06:36:52 PM by Jean.Luc |
|
gulden is making a steady progress. clean rise is visible not affected in recent days by major pumps and dips of other markets. Once Gulden is adopted as a payment method, this coin's price will skyrocket. It can reach 20-30$ value in the 2018.
I did a hypothetical calculation once. What price would Gulden have when it would be equal valued as Bitcoin? Well here we go! Bitcoin amount of coins = 16,804,300 versus Gulden 390,365,100 =23,23 times more Gulden on the market. Devide the Bitcoin price (say $11500) by that 23,23 and we have our hypothetical Gulden price of $495,- But let’s make it even crazier. Bitcoin price was $20000 not so long ago. That makes an astonishing $861,- Have fun trading at current 14 cents. I know what I would do. 🚀🚀 (and are doing) 🤑🤑. Hmm... every coin makes those calculations... fun to do, but say little. Let's assume 0.1% of the European market makes use of Gulden, what would its price be than? I think that would be a more interesting calculation. ;-) Nice challange. Let’s see. There are (wikipedia) 508milion europeans. Devided by 0,1% = 508’000 users. Now we have 100000 users (Rijk last week) then you could say price could be five times higher, so 14ctx5=70ct. 💪💙 (excluding businesses) But if we have a look at the BNP of Europe which is $18.140.000.000.000 and then take 0,1% then we get a volume for Gulden of 1’814’000’000. Devide by the current volume and 366 days we get: 33. So price could be 33 times current price so $0,14x33= $4,62 So, no matter what calculation you throw at Gulden, it only proves that it is currently way oversold. Nice potential here. 🚀🚀 |
|
|
|
|
FantoNas
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 152
Merit: 2
|
|
March 04, 2018, 08:24:36 PM |
|
gulden is making a steady progress. clean rise is visible not affected in recent days by major pumps and dips of other markets. Once Gulden is adopted as a payment method, this coin's price will skyrocket. It can reach 20-30$ value in the 2018.
I did a hypothetical calculation once. What price would Gulden have when it would be equal valued as Bitcoin? Well here we go! Bitcoin amount of coins = 16,804,300 versus Gulden 390,365,100 =23,23 times more Gulden on the market. Devide the Bitcoin price (say $11500) by that 23,23 and we have our hypothetical Gulden price of $495,- But let’s make it even crazier. Bitcoin price was $20000 not so long ago. That makes an astonishing $861,- Have fun trading at current 14 cents. I know what I would do. 🚀🚀 (and are doing) 🤑🤑. Hmm... every coin makes those calculations... fun to do, but say little. Let's assume 0.1% of the European market makes use of Gulden, what would its price be than? I think that would be a more interesting calculation. ;-) Nice challange. Let’s see. There are (wikipedia) 508milion europeans. Devided by 0,1% = 508’000 users. Now we have 100000 users (Rijk last week) then you could say price could be five times higher, so 14ctx5=70ct. 💪💙 (excluding businesses) But if we have a look at the BNP of Europe which is $18.140.000.000.000 and then take 0,1% then we get a volume for Gulden of 1’814’000’000. Devide by the current volume and 366 days we get: 33. So price could be 33 times current price so $0,14x33= $4,62 So, no matter what calculation you throw at Gulden, it only proves that it is currently way oversold. Nice potential here. 🚀🚀 Yes yes yes in the same tale Santa will come and give gift to good kid |
|
|
|
|
|
|
FantoNas
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 152
Merit: 2
|
|
March 05, 2018, 03:56:18 PM |
|
35 BTC  it's more than x4 the gulden volume of the last 24h !!! |
|
|
|
|
KrustyTheClown
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 120
Merit: 0
|
|
March 05, 2018, 06:41:36 PM |
|
The development is almost done, we are close , not long to go, testers are wrapping up, finishing touches. 10 days for a sneak peak and counting kids. |
|
|
|
|
RichPissman
Member
Offline
Activity: 339
Merit: 10
New Cryptoworld Order
|
|
March 06, 2018, 08:39:15 AM |
|
Sneak peak of one of the Gulden testers:   |
OneTwo Coins, One Rijk, One Founder!
|
|
|
elijahtri
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 20
Merit: 0
|
|
March 06, 2018, 07:35:30 PM |
|
I sold my Gulden for a loss but it was well played by the team. It was my fault I didn't do research on the previous updates, if I had read the August update I would never have invested in this coin 6 months later when they claimed SegSig would not add to the delays. |
|
|
|
|
silviocorrea
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 14
Merit: 0
|
|
March 06, 2018, 08:45:02 PM |
|
The team and technology at the back of the Gulden is really wonderful, they already carried out a manner to shop for and withdrawal in euro. The coin remains undervalued and low, mainly when looking at the overall market cap.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jean.Luc
|
|
March 06, 2018, 09:32:17 PM |
|
I sold my Gulden for a loss but it was well played by the team. It was my fault I didn't do research on the previous updates, if I had read the August update I would never have invested in this coin 6 months later when they claimed SegSig would not add to the delays.
How is that even possible. I don’t get why people loose money on Gulden. March 5th 2015: $0.0011 March 5th 2016: $0.0016 (+45%) March 5th 2017: $0.026 (+1525%) March 5th 2018: $0.14 (+8650%) March 5th 2019: $3.45 ?? |
|
|
|
|
|
