|
bcmine
|
 |
November 08, 2016, 10:43:50 AM |
|
If your polo lisk is pending one thing I thought of if you want to do it is cancel your withdrawal of lisk from polo
sell it for bitcoin, transfer bitcoin to bittrex and buy lisk there and send. Bittrex has had no issues sending Lisk to us all day.
but you will probably lose some value in the process.
but it is another option.
once the transaction is done, i would recommend to make then a customer service to recalculate the bonus or extend the period, because of technical problems - not thinking about conspiracy. otherwise you would get bad promotion at the beginning as a tech developer. maybe its fault of poloniex, what i understand, you cant do anything about it. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The forum strives to allow free discussion of any ideas. All policies are built around this principle. This doesn't mean you can post garbage, though: posts should actually contain ideas, and these ideas should be argued reasonably.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
|
|
mybitcoin101
|
|
November 08, 2016, 11:00:52 AM |
|
i dont envy the bananaman with all these questions. people-please be patient and realize that others are working hard. its no easy task to roll out a ico...escpecially one like arc that is a legit project relax everyone and know you are in good hands  |
|
|
|
|
|
BoldNinja
|
|
November 08, 2016, 11:09:02 AM |
|
If your polo lisk is pending one thing I thought of if you want to do it is cancel your withdrawal of lisk from polo
sell it for bitcoin, transfer bitcoin to bittrex and buy lisk there and send. Bittrex has had no issues sending Lisk to us all day.
but you will probably lose some value in the process.
but it is another option.
once the transaction is done, i would recommend to make then a customer service to recalculate the bonus or extend the period, because of technical problems - not thinking about conspiracy. otherwise you would get bad promotion at the beginning as a tech developer. maybe its fault of poloniex, what i understand, you cant do anything about it. Polo and Bittrex withdrawals are out of ours hands so everyone should contact their support, but if your TX is recorded on a LISK blockchain you will certainly get 120% bonus (before first 24h are up). |
|
|
|
|
CryptoMrM
|
|
November 08, 2016, 11:13:56 AM
Last edit: November 08, 2016, 11:44:44 AM by CryptoMrM |
|
Why is it that yesterday it was on 46% with 460.000 usd, and now it is at 39% with 551.000 usd?
That progress bar (which is a threshold to start the project) was set at 1m USD so we corrected and changed to 2000 BTC equivalent in USD (which is around 1.4 m now) to start the project. I've just started looking at the project and thought it may be neat for the value. Albeit with no major innovations that I can see. I mean from the website "ARK's Core is configured to produce ultra fast transaction speeds approaching 200 transactions per minute. With scaling, higher throughput is possible"
What kind of a special assertion is that.. So 3.3 transactions per second is impressive.. More ironic given the emphasis everywhere on consumer adoption. Visa handles 2000 transactions per second on average.Anyway I understand the jack of all trades thing and what you're trying to do. That's why I think it's neat. Going back to my original issue though..You raised the threshold from $1 million (what it was set at in BTC equivalent) to $1.4 million. Stating the increase in BTC price was the reason. You can still accomplish the same in fiat. There's no reason to raise it. If it went down in value you probably wouldn't be lowering it would you? The threshold is supposed to be the minimum amount you can do the work for. Not as an opportunity for you to raise extra funds. I've now got to think about investing after that. |
|
|
|
|
bctacc32
Full Member
 Offline
Activity: 126
Merit: 100
-
|
|
November 08, 2016, 11:17:55 AM |
|
You raised the threshold from $1 million (what it was set at in BTC equivalent) to $1.4 million. Stating the increase in BTC price was the reason.
one of the devs put the wrong starting valuation in the code. It should have been 2000 BTC which is roughly 1.5 million but was set at 1 million.
|
|
|
|
|
Hhampuz
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2856
Merit: 5930
Meh.
|
|
November 08, 2016, 11:18:01 AM |
|
Why is it that yesterday it was on 46% with 460.000 usd, and now it is at 39% with 551.000 usd?
That progress bar (which is a threshold to start the project) was set at 1m USD so we corrected and changed to 2000 BTC equivalent in USD (which is around 1.4 m now) to start the project. I've just started looking at the project and thought it may be neat for the value. Albeit with no real innovations that I can see. I mean from the website "ARK's Core is configured to produce ultra fast transaction speeds approaching 200 transactions per minute. With scaling, higher throughput is possible" What kind of a special assertion is that.. So 3.3 transactions per second is impressive.. More ironic given the emphasis everywhere on consumer adoption. Visa handles 2000 transactions per second on average. Anyway I understand the jack of all trades thing and what you're trying to do. That's why I think it's neat. Going back to my original issue though..You raised the threshold from $1 million (what it was set at in BTC equivalent) to $1.4 million. Stating the increase in BTC price was the reason. You can still accomplish the same in fiat. There's no reason to raise it. If it went down in value you probably wouldn't be lowering it would you? The threshold is supposed to be the minimum amount you can do the work for. Not as an opportunity for you to raise extra funds. I've now got to think about investing after that. I agree with MrM. |
|
|
|
|
BoldNinja
|
|
November 08, 2016, 11:20:43 AM |
|
Why is it that yesterday it was on 46% with 460.000 usd, and now it is at 39% with 551.000 usd?
That progress bar (which is a threshold to start the project) was set at 1m USD so we corrected and changed to 2000 BTC equivalent in USD (which is around 1.4 m now) to start the project. I've just started looking at the project and thought it may be neat for the value. Albeit with no real innovations that I can see. I mean from the website "ARK's Core is configured to produce ultra fast transaction speeds approaching 200 transactions per minute. With scaling, higher throughput is possible" What kind of a special assertion is that.. So 3.3 transactions per second is impressive.. More ironic given the emphasis everywhere on consumer adoption. Visa handles 2000 transactions per second on average. Anyway I understand the jack of all trades thing and what you're trying to do. That's why I think it's neat. Going back to my original issue though..You raised the threshold from $1 million (what it was set at in BTC equivalent) to $1.4 million. Stating the increase in BTC price was the reason. You can still accomplish the same in fiat. There's no reason to raise it. If it went down in value you probably wouldn't be lowering it would you? The threshold is supposed to be the minimum amount you can do the work for. Not as an opportunity for you to raise extra funds. I've now got to think about investing after that. I agree with MrM. Minimum was always set at 2000 BTC read the OP which is currently ~1.4m |
|
|
|
|
BoldNinja
|
|
November 08, 2016, 11:22:18 AM |
|
We are already at over 3 million LISKS exchanged! Thank you for your support! Still a little over 7 hours to get your 120% LISK / 30% bonus in! How much LISK / BTC will be exchanged after first 24h ? |
|
|
|
|
CryptoMrM
|
|
November 08, 2016, 11:33:55 AM |
|
Minimum was always set at 2000 BTC read the OP which is currently ~1.4m
Just saw that the dev allegedly entered the wrong valuation. So it's less of an increase than I thought. On October 15th when the OP was announced Bitcoin was $635 and at $615 on October 11th when you likely had already decided the thresholds (if I'm guessing). Might have even been before then. That's 2000*636 = $1,270,000 or $1,230,000 for the latter. It's not too much of a difference now anyway. |
|
|
|
|
CoconutMojito
Member
Offline
Activity: 82
Merit: 10
|
|
November 08, 2016, 11:37:15 AM |
|
We are already at over 3 million LISKS exchanged! Thank you for your support! Still a little over 7 hours to get your 120% LISK / 30% bonus in! How much LISK / BTC will be exchanged after first 24h ? I think we can do $1m in the first 24 hours. |
|
|
|
|
Wysi
|
|
November 08, 2016, 11:46:17 AM |
|
Epic Lisk grab, well played.
|
|
|
|
|
bcmine
|
|
November 08, 2016, 11:47:56 AM |
|
If your polo lisk is pending one thing I thought of if you want to do it is cancel your withdrawal of lisk from polo
sell it for bitcoin, transfer bitcoin to bittrex and buy lisk there and send. Bittrex has had no issues sending Lisk to us all day.
but you will probably lose some value in the process.
but it is another option.
once the transaction is done, i would recommend to make then a customer service to recalculate the bonus or extend the period, because of technical problems - not thinking about conspiracy. otherwise you would get bad promotion at the beginning as a tech developer. maybe its fault of poloniex, what i understand, you cant do anything about it. Polo and Bittrex withdrawals are out of ours hands so everyone should contact their support, but if your TX is recorded on a LISK blockchain you will certainly get 120% bonus (before first 24h are up). Oldgamejunk: diggi, The nature of the LSK wallet causes the delay, it is not our fault:-) nee, its not polos fault, they are saying. its lisks fault, so lisks support should be contacted. well. |
|
|
|
|
|
bcmine
|
|
November 08, 2016, 11:50:29 AM |
|
i asked in the polo trollbox and got that answer
Atlanta: christof, No, I can't speed it up. There is a delay with this wallet at the moment. I do appreciate your patience while it progresses.
Hope you guys make it! Oldgamejunk: diggi, The nature of the LSK wallet causes the delay, it is not our fault:-) so its not a tech problem. its natural caused LOL |
|
|
|
|
|
BoldNinja
|
|
November 08, 2016, 11:50:51 AM |
|
Minimum was always set at 2000 BTC read the OP which is currently ~1.4m
Just saw that the dev allegedly entered the wrong valuation. So it's less of an increase than I thought. On October 15th when the OP was announced Bitcoin was $635 and at $615 on October 11th when you likely had already decided the thresholds (if I'm guessing). Might have even been before then. That's 2000*636 = $1,270,000 or $1,230,000 for the latter. It's not too much of a difference now anyway. Yeah sorry about that we had that progress fixed set when we where still testing our TEC website to 1m, we are now using 2000 BTC as a reference on our website, but to get this project moving we need ~ 1.25m equivalent you are correct. Lets just do everything we can to get past that point ASAP so we can all be assured this thing is happening! |
|
|
|
|
gjsteele71
|
|
November 08, 2016, 11:52:32 AM |
|
It has been 12 hours since I send the two LSK transfers to the same address for ARK. After I did it I read it would be taken care of manually so I did not say anything. It has not been taken care of manually. I attempted to join your Slack to see what I need to do, and could not get on.
Is there anything I need to do, or anyone I need to contact to get this credited during the 120% period?
Thanks
|
|
|
|
|
BoldNinja
|
|
November 08, 2016, 11:56:07 AM |
|
It has been 12 hours since I send the two LSK transfers to the same address for ARK. After I did it I read it would be taken care of manually so I did not say anything. It has not been taken care of manually. I attempted to join your Slack to see what I need to do, and could not get on.
Is there anything I need to do, or anyone I need to contact to get this credited during the 120% period?
Thanks
If your transactions are on a LISK blockchain explorer then you will get 120% bonus don't worry - double check. You can also send an email to tec@ark.io and our dev will take a look at it. To join our slack go to : https://ark.io/join-ark-slack to get auto-invite. |
|
|
|
JL901_NL
Member
Offline
Activity: 85
Merit: 10
|
|
November 08, 2016, 12:09:46 PM |
|
Can someone tell me why Lisk price are decreasing? I projected that since there is a bonus on Lisk at Ark that Lisk will be bought more and the price will increase, but it does not...
|
|
|
|
|
|
BoldNinja
|
|
November 08, 2016, 12:17:41 PM |
|
Can someone tell me why Lisk price are decreasing? I projected that since there is a bonus on Lisk at Ark that Lisk will be bought more and the price will increase, but it does not...
Someone is playing with the market - my advice don't get to emotional if you are trading and buying / selling LISK. |
|
|
|
|
ShooterXD
|
|
November 08, 2016, 12:20:57 PM |
|
No doubt this TEC can reach 10mi$ easily!
Lets go guys! Get your tickets to ARK
|
|
|
|
JL901_NL
Member
Offline
Activity: 85
Merit: 10
|
|
November 08, 2016, 12:24:08 PM |
|
Can someone tell me why Lisk price are decreasing? I projected that since there is a bonus on Lisk at Ark that Lisk will be bought more and the price will increase, but it does not...
Someone is playing with the market - my advice don't get to emotional if you are trading and buying / selling LISK. haha no i do not get emotional, i was just wondering because you would expect that the Lisk price would do the opposite of what it does now haha |
|
|
|
|
|
