Bitcoin Forum
November 01, 2024, 10:33:26 AM *
News: Bitcoin Pumpkin Carving Contest
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 [527] 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 ... 760 »
  Print  
Author Topic: Claymore's ZCash/BTG AMD GPU Miner v12.6 (Windows/Linux)  (Read 3839171 times)
hhdllhflower
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 18
Merit: 0


View Profile
January 12, 2017, 04:41:28 AM
 #10521

v11.0

Driver 15.12
R9 Nano   393 H/s
R9 Fury    387 H/s

*intensity is automatically reduce to 7 by the miner


Driver 16.11
RX 480    260 H/s



i got the same issues
my desktop with r9 290 ,fury x ,fury nano  it works fine (8G memory  set Virtual Memory size 16 GB)
but my miner with 6* fury nano it doesn't work (16G memory SAME set Virtual Memory size 16 GB)   intensity is automatically reduce to 7

 
D8V1D
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 163
Merit: 100


View Profile
January 12, 2017, 04:41:54 AM
 #10522

v11.0

Driver 15.12
R9 Nano   393 H/s
R9 Fury    387 H/s

*intensity is automatically reduce to 7 by the miner


Driver 16.11
RX 480    260 H/s


i am getting 398 and 401 with Fury's using version 10 with 16.11 at intensity of 6

These were my results for v10.0, intensity 8.
R9 Nano   a1  350h/s
R9 Fury    a2  375h/s
RX 480     a2  260h/s

All my card are stock, no mods.
kev7112001
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 479
Merit: 250


View Profile
January 12, 2017, 05:17:25 AM
Last edit: January 12, 2017, 06:07:09 AM by kev7112001
 #10523

As I said before, assembler has good speed but very bad compatibility. If you use 15.12 drivers and it does not work for you - please report, I will check these issues.
If you don't want to install 15.12 drivers - use "-asm 0" option. In next update I will add version check and display warning or set "-asm 0" automatically for incompatible drivers.

ok so the asm is no faster on 16.x drivers on 290/x i was getting 355 on 9.3 which is still fastest 4 me now on another rig with a 7970 and a 290 the 7970 starts out at 286+ hangs there for a min then slowly goes into 270 range up then down for about 1 min then after that it decrements 1 sol every sec from 270+ range till it hits 0 this is on 15.12 asm so far ver 10 with -a 1-2 does ~265 on it

14.12 drivers get the 265 15.12 have the 7970 at 260 miner v11 doesnt like 14.12 freezes pc off and on

MCXNOW MODERATOR
gennadiv
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 139
Merit: 100


View Profile
January 12, 2017, 05:18:17 AM
 #10524

R 9 380 (3 CARDS) ZEC - Total Speed: 575.656 H/s, Total Shares: 16, Rejected: 0,
ZEC: GPU0 192.428 H/s, GPU1 191.068 H/s, GPU2 192.131 H/s
capler
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 113
Merit: 10


View Profile
January 12, 2017, 06:38:39 AM
 #10525

Hi. What about Linux version Huh
chafer99
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 99
Merit: 10


View Profile
January 12, 2017, 06:50:25 AM
 #10526

R 9 380 (3 CARDS) ZEC - Total Speed: 575.656 H/s, Total Shares: 16, Rejected: 0,
ZEC: GPU0 192.428 H/s, GPU1 191.068 H/s, GPU2 192.131 H/s

4 x R380 - 720H/s (180 per card).
orbital_station1
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 24
Merit: 0


View Profile
January 12, 2017, 06:52:43 AM
 #10527

R9 390 1120/1500, stock bios ~340 H/s

Thx claymore, much better than v10.
UnclWish
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1484
Merit: 253


View Profile
January 12, 2017, 07:06:06 AM
 #10528

@Claymore
Was it not possible to make v11 and ASM compatible for 16.11.XX drivers?
I don't think many people are using the 15.12.XX drivers.
Do you think newer versions will be compatible with 16.11.XX drivers?
I have 270X and 280X. Latest 16.12.2 drivers installed. v.11 and ASM algorythm is work perfect.
My 280X with modded bios and overclocked memory gives 290-300 H/s


R9 Nano and Fury wont work on the 16.11.5 drivers. I'll try the new 16.12 drivers and see if it works.

Just tested: R9 Nano and Fury, aka Fiji cards will not work on 16.11.5 nor 16.12.2 drivers.
What do you mean "wont work"? Your cards not work? Or miner not work? Or asm not work?
omshree
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 270
Merit: 100


View Profile
January 12, 2017, 07:11:07 AM
 #10529

Claymore, the r9 pro duos are not compatible with 15.12!!!!!!!

Donate if you like 1ANALSEXXGMd6HaN6CzQXtURLC5H9TjKoo
Claymore (OP)
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1610
Merit: 1325

Miners developer


View Profile
January 12, 2017, 07:12:44 AM
 #10530

v11.0

Driver 15.12
R9 Nano   393 H/s
R9 Fury    387 H/s

*intensity is automatically reduce to 7 by the miner


Driver 16.11
RX 480    260 H/s


i am getting 398 and 401 with Fury's using version 10 with 16.11 at intensity of 6

These were my results for v10.0, intensity 8.
R9 Nano   a1  350h/s
R9 Fury    a2  375h/s
RX 480     a2  260h/s

All my card are stock, no mods.


Hmm, it seems I have slower Nano card, I see only 370H/s instead of 393H/s. Can you please share your Nano card details? Manufacturer, model.

Please read Readme and FAQ in the first post of this thread before asking any questions, probably the answer is already there.
List of my miners: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3019607
grizscom
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 245
Merit: 256


View Profile WWW
January 12, 2017, 07:32:46 AM
 #10531

Why would you remove support for thousands of loyal Customers? The PiMPs deserve to have Claymore, and you deserve to earn the dev fee that you get from us. Please release linux support. Thank you very much.
+1
And please add more stability for Remote manager.
It is crashing some times.

http://ethereumpool.co/ - Stable, fair & transparent Ethereum mining pool
Golku
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 263
Merit: 100


View Profile
January 12, 2017, 07:33:11 AM
 #10532

@Claymore


The older cards are optimized well at the last update
but I dont see any improvement for the RX versions
when will we get a update for the new cards?
cracker666
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 79
Merit: 10


View Profile
January 12, 2017, 07:36:11 AM
 #10533

will their be a speed up for the R8 380 tonga
KrokoTill
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 51
Merit: 0


View Profile
January 12, 2017, 07:37:14 AM
 #10534

Driver 16.12.2,
10.0 -> 11.0
370 1150/1500 155 -> 169
280 1000/1500 210 -> 250
290 1000/1250 300 -> 320

Very good work with Pitcairn & Tahiti kernels Mr C!  Smiley
omshree
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 270
Merit: 100


View Profile
January 12, 2017, 07:44:37 AM
 #10535

Claymore, the r9 pro duos are not compatible with 15.12!!!!!!!

SOLVED

All use 16.3.2,  works w asm, 410+ on fijis

Donate if you like 1ANALSEXXGMd6HaN6CzQXtURLC5H9TjKoo
Claymore (OP)
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1610
Merit: 1325

Miners developer


View Profile
January 12, 2017, 07:48:01 AM
 #10536

@Claymore
The older cards are optimized well at the last update
but I dont see any improvement for the RX versions
when will we get a update for the new cards?

I'm already working on it.

will their be a speed up for the R8 380 tonga

Yes I will add asm kernel for Tonga in next update (1-2 days).

Please read Readme and FAQ in the first post of this thread before asking any questions, probably the answer is already there.
List of my miners: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3019607
D8V1D
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 163
Merit: 100


View Profile
January 12, 2017, 07:54:39 AM
 #10537

v11.0

Driver 15.12
R9 Nano   393 H/s
R9 Fury    387 H/s

*intensity is automatically reduce to 7 by the miner


Driver 16.11
RX 480    260 H/s


i am getting 398 and 401 with Fury's using version 10 with 16.11 at intensity of 6

These were my results for v10.0, intensity 8.
R9 Nano   a1  350h/s
R9 Fury    a2  375h/s
RX 480     a2  260h/s

All my card are stock, no mods.


Hmm, it seems I have slower Nano card, I see only 370H/s instead of 393H/s. Can you please share your Nano card details? Manufacturer, model.

I have 7 R9 Nano; 6 Sapphire and 1 ASUS.


Is your card thermal throttling the clock speed due to high temperature?
Those R9 Nanos can get pretty hot, I have 4 extra fans blowing on them.
cracker666
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 79
Merit: 10


View Profile
January 12, 2017, 07:56:58 AM
 #10538

@Claymore
The older cards are optimized well at the last update
but I dont see any improvement for the RX versions
when will we get a update for the new cards?

I'm already working on it.

will their be a speed up for the R8 380 tonga

Yes I will add asm kernel for Tonga in next update (1-2 days).

nice and great work
restless
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1151
Merit: 1001


View Profile
January 12, 2017, 07:57:51 AM
 #10539

Nice update for Tahiti, but altho on my 290(hawaii) asm kernel works I don't see speed update... any idea what to try?
15.12 everywhere
7950 jumped from 180 to 220 (stock), 290 stay at ~ 250-260
I have a rig with 3x7950 and 1x290 - now they are almost equal in speed :S
Great job as always Cheesy :bows:
farmacedus
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 9
Merit: 0


View Profile
January 12, 2017, 08:01:16 AM
 #10540

Hi. When the raising speed 470-480 cards?
Pages: « 1 ... 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 [527] 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 ... 760 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!