Bitcoin Forum
July 12, 2024, 11:03:24 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 [425] 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 ... 1135 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [ANN] cudaMiner & ccMiner CUDA based mining applications [Windows/Linux/MacOSX]  (Read 3426882 times)
cbuchner1 (OP)
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 756
Merit: 502


View Profile
March 11, 2014, 11:50:28 AM
 #8481


How do you turn-on the temp monitoring ? I didn't see it.


not yet committed, but I have a patch waiting that can be integrated in no time.

I am at work now, so this has to wait a little.

Christian
cbuchner1 (OP)
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 756
Merit: 502


View Profile
March 11, 2014, 11:52:13 AM
 #8482

The strange thing is the TDP which is well below 100% while running and the gpu usage is around 97%

a TDP use below 100% is suspicious for a compute bound algorithm

does it mean we have untapped reserves in the code?  I guess I need to pick up my red telephone to my nVidia performance engineers again ;-)

Christian
ivanlabrie
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 812
Merit: 1000



View Profile
March 11, 2014, 01:06:12 PM
 #8483

The strange thing is the TDP which is well below 100% while running and the gpu usage is around 97%

a TDP use below 100% is suspicious for a compute bound algorithm

does it mean we have untapped reserves in the code?  I guess I need to pick up my red telephone to my nVidia performance engineers again ;-)

Christian

yay!!! Cheesy
ManIkWeet
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 182
Merit: 100


View Profile
March 11, 2014, 01:22:47 PM
 #8484

The strange thing is the TDP which is well below 100% while running and the gpu usage is around 97%

a TDP use below 100% is suspicious for a compute bound algorithm

does it mean we have untapped reserves in the code?  I guess I need to pick up my red telephone to my nVidia performance engineers again ;-)

Christian
Perhaps this is (once again) a PCI bandwidth issue?

BTC donations: 18fw6ZjYkN7xNxfVWbsRmBvD6jBAChRQVn (thanks!)
sin242
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 280
Merit: 250


View Profile
March 11, 2014, 02:26:46 PM
 #8485


I've been looking into the newly released HeavyCoin, which uses 4 well known hash functions
(SHA-256, Keccak-512, Grøestl-512, BLAKE-512) plus a new one called HEFTY1

They claim it's CPU only, which I might actually put to the test.

Christin



Just saw this...  Go get em!!

Dark:  Xk9BoVerBd41JCjWQEhnxoowP7YNUK439z
BTC:  1JzPN2h8WGSi7kQeY5wuP4PjVD2hxkHJQM
antonio8
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1400
Merit: 1000


View Profile
March 11, 2014, 02:32:22 PM
 #8486

Hello, I just installed the new 335.23 driver on my windforce 3X GTX 770, and now Cudaminer is giving the following message:
'[2014-03-11 08:58:15] Unable to query CUDA driver version! Is an nVidia driver installed?'
I use the newest version of Cudaminer given, in combination with CUDA manager (version 1.2.1). If I try to run the miner outside of manager, it starts and then rapidly disappears. My set-up is as following:

Corsair Vengeance 16 GB : 2 x 8 GB
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1 TB
Kingston SSDNow V300 120 GB
Thermalright Macho Rev.A
Intel Core i7 4770K / 3.5 GHz
Asus B85-PLUS
Gigabyte GTX 770 OC Windforce 3X
Windows 7 (completely up to date)

Edit: When I use the rollback function to get back to my previous driver, the error keeps persisting.

Edit 2: Performing a clean install as we speak.

Edit 3: The clean install did not resolve the issue, I did it twice to be sure, but the problems still persists.

I got the same message.

I just rebooted the machine and all was fine.

But I take it since you did a clean install you rebooted.

If you are going to leave your BTC on an exchange please send it to this address instead 1GH3ub3UUHbU5qDJW5u3E9jZ96ZEmzaXtG, I will at least use the money better than someone who steals it from the exchange. Thanks Wink
liomojo1
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 676
Merit: 500


View Profile
March 11, 2014, 02:50:58 PM
 #8487

I can confirm issue with risers . I bought 3 just ti fix my temperature issue , and put one card outside of the box. When on riser the card no mater waht clock makes max 295 khs with 1280 and 1350 mhz the same , and in the mobo it makes 310-315khs with this clock. Risers are usb3 ones.
bigjme
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 350
Merit: 250


View Profile
March 11, 2014, 02:53:29 PM
 #8488

risers are not as fast as directly connected, so expect a drop

Owner of: cudamining.co.uk
DougB62
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 672
Merit: 500


Banned: For Your Protection


View Profile
March 11, 2014, 03:19:13 PM
 #8489

There is: http://www.gpugrid.net/forum_thread.php?id=3647

Thread on forcing p-state to stay @ 3d clocks all the time...

Also - Official NVIDIA 334.89 WHQL Display Driver Feedback Thread re: downclocking at "inconvenient" times...
https://esports.geforce.com/forums/topic/690370/geforce-drivers/official-nvidia-334-89-whql-display-driver-feedback-thread-released-2-18-14-/40
ManIkWeet
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 182
Merit: 100


View Profile
March 11, 2014, 03:22:33 PM
 #8490

There is: http://www.gpugrid.net/forum_thread.php?id=3647

Thread on forcing p-state to stay @ 3d clocks all the time...
Yes but can it be done using code in CudaMiner? Because forcing 3D mode all the time is a waste of energy if you idle.

BTC donations: 18fw6ZjYkN7xNxfVWbsRmBvD6jBAChRQVn (thanks!)
cbuchner1 (OP)
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 756
Merit: 502


View Profile
March 11, 2014, 03:24:13 PM
Last edit: March 11, 2014, 03:44:15 PM by cbuchner1
 #8491

There is: http://www.gpugrid.net/forum_thread.php?id=3647

Thread on forcing p-state to stay @ 3d clocks all the time...
Yes but can it be done using code in CudaMiner? Because forcing 3D mode all the time is a waste of energy if you idle.

nice, if I can find source code to nvidia inspector I could even integrate this functionality in cudaminer.

EDIT: nope, it's not open source. I will try to contact the author about it.

Christian
DougB62
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 672
Merit: 500


Banned: For Your Protection


View Profile
March 11, 2014, 03:29:28 PM
 #8492

There is: http://www.gpugrid.net/forum_thread.php?id=3647

Thread on forcing p-state to stay @ 3d clocks all the time...
Yes but can it be done using code in CudaMiner? Because forcing 3D mode all the time is a waste of energy if you idle.

I honestly couldn't tell you that. But you can set a batch file to implement it, and then run another to reset to stock. Unfortunately, I don't code, so I'm not of any help there. I was just presenting some info that I thought might be relevant. It's done with Nvidia Inspector: http://www.majorgeeks.com/files/details/nvidia_inspector.html

In case anyone is interested.

Edit: I see that Christian is already on it!  Grin
lumberinvestments
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 210
Merit: 100


View Profile
March 11, 2014, 03:30:03 PM
 #8493

New Scrypt Jane coin launched, you might want to throw at it some of your 750 Ti. I am curious what is the speed of these cards at the N-factor of 4.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=510353.0

The mining is pretty scarce for the first months and the dev might not seem interested to dump if they will appear on some exchange. I have thrown all my red team at it.
djm34
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1400
Merit: 1050


View Profile WWW
March 11, 2014, 03:34:07 PM
 #8494

New Scrypt Jane coin launched, you might want to throw at it some of your 750 Ti. I am curious what is the speed of these cards at the N-factor of 4.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=510353.0

The mining is pretty scarce for the first months and the dev might not seem interested to dump if they will appear on some exchange. I have thrown all my red team at it.

50% premine.... what a joke
might be interesting to check though to see how the cards handle N=4

djm34 facebook page
BTC: 1NENYmxwZGHsKFmyjTc5WferTn5VTFb7Ze
Pledge for neoscrypt ccminer to that address: 16UoC4DmTz2pvhFvcfTQrzkPTrXkWijzXw
Lucie
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2
Merit: 0


View Profile
March 11, 2014, 03:34:33 PM
 #8495

And get them to try and fix the need for chrome lmao

so far I do not know how to achieve the same effect. Should I open a DirectX window and render a little spinning cube or what Wink

Ah, now I know: I will have to integrate flash based advertising!

Is this trick only required for windows? If so, you could try to set the time period to 1 ms. (I believe this is what flash does).
The API is: timeBeginPeriod
What this basically does is increase the (global) interrupt time of windows, which among other things allows waiting functions to be more accurate.
Windows has a default period of 15.6 ms. Meaning every WaitForX, Sleep or Timer function has no better accuracy then that.
When 1 process in the system (e.g chrome) requests a lower time period it affects all processes running on the system.  
Hence it might be boosting CudaMiner.
So if someone who gets major benefits of having chrome open and is able to compile the software would like to test this:
Add somewhere at the top of main a call to timeBeginPeriod(1).
At the top of .c file in which main is defined add:
#include <Mmsystem.h>
#pragma comment(lib, "winmm.lib")
69charger
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 173
Merit: 100


View Profile
March 11, 2014, 03:38:26 PM
 #8496

oh ya new 335.23 drivers even faster Smiley http://cryptomining-blog.com/tag/335-23-whql/

His hashrate sucks for that high of an overclock. Getting stable 330kh with a +125 +600 overclock.
I assume you are using -H 1 for this result?

Yes -H 1
69charger
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 173
Merit: 100


View Profile
March 11, 2014, 03:43:34 PM
 #8497

Had to revert back to 334.89 drivers. 335.23 was causing freezes after waking up the monitor while running cudaminer. Hmmm....
cbuchner1 (OP)
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 756
Merit: 502


View Profile
March 11, 2014, 03:46:07 PM
 #8498

Add somewhere at the top of main a call to timeBeginPeriod(1).
At the top of .c file in which main is defined add:
#include <Mmsystem.h>
#pragma comment(lib, "winmm.lib")

oooh, this is hot info. Thanks. I would probably add it in the part of code that initializes CUDA.

Christian
cbuchner1 (OP)
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 756
Merit: 502


View Profile
March 11, 2014, 03:47:42 PM
 #8499

50% premine.... what a joke
might be interesting to check though to see how the cards handle N=4

same concept as Auroracoin.  Depends entirely on the honesty and capability of the devs to pull off a nation wide airdrop.

I believe more in automated airdrops implemented as a wallet feature Wink

Christian
DougB62
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 672
Merit: 500


Banned: For Your Protection


View Profile
March 11, 2014, 03:53:13 PM
 #8500

New Scrypt Jane coin launched, you might want to throw at it some of your 750 Ti. I am curious what is the speed of these cards at the N-factor of 4.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=510353.0

The mining is pretty scarce for the first months and the dev might not seem interested to dump if they will appear on some exchange. I have thrown all my red team at it.


So would that be -a scrypt:4?
Pages: « 1 ... 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 [425] 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 ... 1135 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!