ManIkWeet
|
|
March 12, 2014, 11:44:31 AM |
|
Cudaminer work but only boooooo! , Never yay!!! .
Likely a problem with Stratum, or a very slow internet connection. I don't think BTL is oficially supported yet.
|
BTC donations: 18fw6ZjYkN7xNxfVWbsRmBvD6jBAChRQVn (thanks!)
|
|
|
djm34
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1050
|
|
March 12, 2014, 12:15:07 PM |
|
Dont work cudaminer maxwell with BTL and my 2 750 ti I try this pool : http://btl.okaypool.com/and this settings : cudaminer.exe --algo=scrypt-jane:1394480376,4,30 -o stratum+tcp://btl11.okaypool.com:3369 -u xxx.1 -p xxx -l T120x24 Whats Wrong Help Pls . The pool Something I don't get, they release a pool but don't test it ? (this is a general comment, not necessarily for this pool)
|
djm34 facebook pageBTC: 1NENYmxwZGHsKFmyjTc5WferTn5VTFb7Ze Pledge for neoscrypt ccminer to that address: 16UoC4DmTz2pvhFvcfTQrzkPTrXkWijzXw
|
|
|
bigjme
|
|
March 12, 2014, 01:12:27 PM |
|
Last I saw, no pools were working
|
Owner of: cudamining.co.uk
|
|
|
vlax352
Member
Offline
Activity: 95
Merit: 10
|
|
March 12, 2014, 01:23:44 PM |
|
any progres for cudamining heavycoin?
|
|
|
|
myagui
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1154
Merit: 1001
|
|
March 12, 2014, 03:02:59 PM |
|
Would anyone have proper launch settings for 750ti (and/or also 770), for script-jane at nfactor11? I suspect these have been posted already, but having no luck going through the forum search...
I'm currently doing about 58kh/s on each card, but I have no clue if this is far off, or good, or what...
My launch settings (K for the 770, T for the 750ti): cudaminer.exe -a scrypt-jane:CACH -o stratum+tcp://somepool:someport -u someuser -p somepassword -i 0 -L 2 -l K96x2,T5x16
I got these from a couple of autotunes that would most times crash before it was done, and I ran autotune separately for one card at a time.
Cheers, Myagui
|
|
|
|
ghur
|
|
March 12, 2014, 03:07:56 PM |
|
Afaik the lowercase k kernel is preferred over the K kernel in that case. Same with t
|
doge: D8q8dR6tEAcaJ7U65jP6AAkiiL2CFJaHah Automated faucet, pays daily: Qoinpro
|
|
|
djm34
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1050
|
|
March 12, 2014, 03:26:29 PM |
|
what is exactly the purpose of the Kimoto Gravity Well ?
|
djm34 facebook pageBTC: 1NENYmxwZGHsKFmyjTc5WferTn5VTFb7Ze Pledge for neoscrypt ccminer to that address: 16UoC4DmTz2pvhFvcfTQrzkPTrXkWijzXw
|
|
|
GOLDbarISmine
Member
Offline
Activity: 121
Merit: 10
|
|
March 12, 2014, 03:29:26 PM |
|
Would anyone have proper launch settings for 750ti (and/or also 770), for script-jane at nfactor11? I suspect these have been posted already, but having no luck going through the forum search...
I'm currently doing about 58kh/s on each card, but I have no clue if this is far off, or good, or what...
My launch settings (K for the 770, T for the 750ti): cudaminer.exe -a scrypt-jane:CACH -o stratum+tcp://somepool:someport -u someuser -p somepassword -i 0 -L 2 -l K96x2,T5x16
I got these from a couple of autotunes that would most times crash before it was done, and I ran autotune separately for one card at a time.
Cheers, Myagui
for 770 is -i 0 -h 2 -c 0 -m 0 -l K108x1 dont use Lookgap yet and please not for what i observed n=11 has only 20% or ur regular scrypt haash
|
|
|
|
cbuchner1 (OP)
|
|
March 12, 2014, 03:32:59 PM |
|
what is exactly the purpose of the Kimoto Gravity Well ?
Quick adaptation of the difficulty target even to very drastic changes to network hashing rates. It prevents problems with insta-mining at launch (that could otherwise generate many blocks per minute) and with multi-pools hopping onto the coin, and jumping off as quickly as they came. Coins that don't do this tend to get in trouble quickly (see e.g. Aurora Coin which recently had trouble with really long confirmation times) Christian
|
|
|
|
myagui
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1154
Merit: 1001
|
|
March 12, 2014, 04:02:06 PM Last edit: March 12, 2014, 04:17:56 PM by myagui |
|
Afaik the lowercase k kernel is preferred over the K kernel in that case. Same with t
Have been trying with both, but haven't found a setting yet that shows any improvement with lowercase versus uppercase. Thanks for the suggestion though, I might still get there! for 770 is -i 0 -h 2 -c 0 -m 0 -l K108x1 dont use Lookgap yet and please not for what i observed n=11 has only 20% or ur regular scrypt haash This definitely improved my 770 hashing performance. Thanks! - Myagui [edit] Oh, 20% of scrypt performance, is roughly where I'm at now, so no need for much head scratching I suppose! Thanks again!
|
|
|
|
thedude11
Member
Offline
Activity: 87
Merit: 10
|
|
March 12, 2014, 04:23:07 PM |
|
Would anyone have proper launch settings for 750ti (and/or also 770), for script-jane at nfactor11? I suspect these have been posted already, but having no luck going through the forum search...
I'm currently doing about 58kh/s on each card, but I have no clue if this is far off, or good, or what...
My launch settings (K for the 770, T for the 750ti): cudaminer.exe -a scrypt-jane:CACH -o stratum+tcp://somepool:someport -u someuser -p somepassword -i 0 -L 2 -l K96x2,T5x16
I got these from a couple of autotunes that would most times crash before it was done, and I ran autotune separately for one card at a time.
Cheers, Myagui
I get best results with t99x2 for my 750tis with -b 4096 -L 1 with n11. With that kernel I get 60-61 so your 58 is pretty close to what these cards get at this nfactor. Also try t128x2 could possibly get a few kHs more and try ocing it too.
|
|
|
|
|
ManIkWeet
|
|
March 12, 2014, 04:44:47 PM |
|
Yes, but not with CUDA <<< dream smashing smiley
|
BTC donations: 18fw6ZjYkN7xNxfVWbsRmBvD6jBAChRQVn (thanks!)
|
|
|
cbuchner1 (OP)
|
|
March 12, 2014, 05:07:32 PM |
|
any progres for cudamining heavycoin?
Making progress on a nightly basis (heh heh). Remember that currently it's not cudaminer, but a separate project. Christian
|
|
|
|
bigjme
|
|
March 12, 2014, 05:14:26 PM |
|
Making progress on a nightly basis (heh heh). Remember that currently it's not cudaminer, but a separate project.
Christian
cudaminer 2.0
|
Owner of: cudamining.co.uk
|
|
|
djm34
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1050
|
|
March 12, 2014, 05:52:54 PM |
|
bitleu got finally a pool working.
|
djm34 facebook pageBTC: 1NENYmxwZGHsKFmyjTc5WferTn5VTFb7Ze Pledge for neoscrypt ccminer to that address: 16UoC4DmTz2pvhFvcfTQrzkPTrXkWijzXw
|
|
|
69charger
|
|
March 12, 2014, 06:00:49 PM |
|
any progres for cudamining heavycoin?
Making progress on a nightly basis (heh heh). Remember that currently it's not cudaminer, but a separate project. Christian What hashrate are you expecting out of something like the 750ti?
|
|
|
|
MCOnyx
|
|
March 12, 2014, 06:04:46 PM |
|
Anyone knows if the custom cudaminer for Execoin is really custom, or am i fine using newest "original" one from 28th? And am I fine using my commands from Vertcoin? Thanks.
|
|
|
|
btc21
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 17
Merit: 0
|
|
March 12, 2014, 06:06:56 PM |
|
hi to all, i am a problem with cudaminer for Windows for mining LTC, i use a Nvidia GeForce GT 720M but should not be more than 40 Khs per minute , with -H 0 -i 1 -l auto -C 2 , any ideas? http://s28.postimg.org/5qcobq13h/cuda.png
|
|
|
|
cbuchner1 (OP)
|
|
March 12, 2014, 06:13:12 PM |
|
any progres for cudamining heavycoin?
Making progress on a nightly basis (heh heh). Remember that currently it's not cudaminer, but a separate project. Christian What hashrate are you expecting out of something like the 750ti? currently we have no idea, as there's nothing running yet that includes all 5 types of hash.
|
|
|
|
|