[ANN] cudaMiner & ccMiner CUDA based mining applications [Windows/Linux/MacOSX]

[jsamul]

Is anyone else mining MaxCon with a 750ti?

I'm having some difficulty in find settings that don't give just "boo!" all the time.

The settings I've tried are the keccak ones mentioned in the main post in the below link as well as in the comments, all to no avail...

http://cryptomining-blog.com/944-testing-geforce-gtx-750-ti-maxwell-for-alt-crypto-mining-with-cudaminer/

-a keccak -i 0 -l K1000x24 -C 1 -H 0

The card isn't overclocked and I can mine Fugue, Yac, Heavy and plan old scrypt coins just fine.

Any help will be much appreaciated

put -L1024 somewhere in the command line

I tried both -L1024 and also -L 1024 and it's still "boooo" at 75,000 kh/s

Unfortunately I am at work for the next 9 hours but when I get home I'll put in my bat.

I run about 164k on my 750ti's with keccac.

what about

Code:

-a keccak -i 0 -H 2 -m 1 -l T2048x24 -L 2048

?
why would you use "K" with maxwell card anyway?

[1715061968]

1715061968

[1715061968]

1715061968

[Wipeout2097]

The other Christian says we're now doing 9000 kHash/s with a 750Ti on HVC.

He eliminated all branching and warp divergence from the "divergent" HEFTY1 algorithm.
Apparently it wasn't hefty enough to thwart us.

Oh, by the way this beats a AMD R9 290X

Christian

290 at 15.2 Mh/s
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=506774.msg5914122#msg5914122

290x may reach 17 Mh/s

[jsamul]

The other Christian says we're now doing 9000 kHash/s with a 750Ti on HVC.

He eliminated all branching and warp divergence from the "divergent" HEFTY1 algorithm.
Apparently it wasn't hefty enough to thwart us.

Oh, by the way this beats a AMD R9 290X

Christian

i would really appreciate that miner

[cbuchner1]

290 at 15.2 Mh/s
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=506774.msg5914122#msg5914122

290x may reach 17 Mh/s

d'oh!

Well, 2 750Ti's beat it.

[Wipeout2097]

290 at 15.2 Mh/s
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=506774.msg5914122#msg5914122

290x may reach 17 Mh/s

d'oh!

Well, 2 750Ti's beat it.

Yes, those Ti's are amazing.

I can get them for 130€ each, and I'm honestly looking into setting up a rig. Low power consumption, single inexpensive PSU, almost no risers. If they are released single slot , I will not hesitate.

[cbuchner1]

The other Christian says we're now doing 9000 kHash/s with a 750Ti on HVC.

i would really appreciate that miner

Will be adding the -d option and preparing a release, right after I've put my son to bed.

[bigjme]

Will be adding the -d option and preparing a release, right after I've put my son to bed.

Thanks :-)

[cryptomines]

The other Christian says we're now doing 9000 kHash/s with a 750Ti on HVC.

i would really appreciate that miner

Will be adding the -d option and preparing a release, right after I've put my son to bed.

Thank you and you guys rock!!

[Dotcommie]

290 at 15.2 Mh/s
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=506774.msg5914122#msg5914122

290x may reach 17 Mh/s

d'oh!

Well, 2 750Ti's beat it.

I'd say 1 would probably still beat it in profitability if you managed to keep it around the same power consumption as your previous ccminer releases.  My 6 Ti's only use 200-220 for full system power at the wall, so something around 30w each or less. They'd probably drop to only 15-20w if they weren't overclocked.

[Morgahl]

GTX Titan Z... 

then the price tag... 

[jsamul]

GTX Titan Z... 

then the price tag... 

useless card anyway
if it was two-highend-maxwell-gpus card, i would buy it for that price right now

[sin242]

The other Christian says we're now doing 9000 kHash/s with a 750Ti on HVC.

i would really appreciate that miner

Will be adding the -d option and preparing a release, right after I've put my son to bed.

Woot for the -d option!

[djm34]

The other Christian says we're now doing 9000 kHash/s with a 750Ti on HVC.

He eliminated all branching and warp divergence from the "divergent" HEFTY1 algorithm.
Apparently it wasn't hefty enough to thwart us.

Oh, by the way this beats a AMD R9 290X

Christian

290 at 15.2 Mh/s
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=506774.msg5914122#msg5914122

290x may reach 17 Mh/s

just tried the new version on mine, I am around 13Mhash/s (but I am not sure that my parameter are the best either)

[I_M]

The other Christian says we're now doing 9000 kHash/s with a 750Ti on HVC.

He eliminated all branching and warp divergence from the "divergent" HEFTY1 algorithm.
Apparently it wasn't hefty enough to thwart us.

Oh, by the way this beats a AMD R9 290X

Christian

290 at 15.2 Mh/s
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=506774.msg5914122#msg5914122

290x may reach 17 Mh/s

just tried the new version on mine, I am around 13Mhash/s (but I am not sure that my parameter are the best either)

Keep in mind that a 290 is about 4x the cost, 4x the power, and only 2x the performance.  750ti still wins.

[djm34]

GTX Titan Z... 

then the price tag... 

the GTX Titan Z: 2 Gtx780ti for the price of 5  

ps: I think they should check their mathematics library in cuda... (just in case they implement also this sort of calculations)

[Boffinboy]

I have to say Christian, your efforts here + those of the other Christian are pretty heroic!

I've not yet tried HVC, but my sense is that it's less profitable than scrypt jane coins even though it has lower power consumption. Am I incorrect, or is everyone going long on HVC?

Does anyone have a good site to compare the various coins in a single place, and account for power etc.? At the moment things like HVC aren't on the usual Coinwarz etc. so need to visit many sites. http://cryptoage.com/ does seem to be a decent comparison, but lacks the power piece. Though I suppose I am being slightly lazy, as that is pretty easy to calculate and subtract....

As an aside, have you shelved plans to add failover support to Cudaminer or ccminer Christian? This would be really handy!

If people are interested I have a Linux script I use that I think covers it (kindly written by a friend), switching to a failover pool and then rechecking the main pool after a defined period of time.

[djm34]

The other Christian says we're now doing 9000 kHash/s with a 750Ti on HVC.

He eliminated all branching and warp divergence from the "divergent" HEFTY1 algorithm.
Apparently it wasn't hefty enough to thwart us.

Oh, by the way this beats a AMD R9 290X

Christian

290 at 15.2 Mh/s
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=506774.msg5914122#msg5914122

290x may reach 17 Mh/s

just tried the new version on mine, I am around 13Mhash/s (but I am not sure that my parameter are the best either)

Keep in mind that a 290 is about 4x the cost, 4x the power, and only 2x the performance.  750ti still wins.

I wonder, if I will buy one... I think I have 50w left on my psu...
However, I am still undecided because of its performance outside those specific new algos (I have the feeling, it wouldn't bring much more on top of what the 290x and the 780ti are already bringing...)

[see360]

I wonder, if I will buy one... I think I have 50w left on my psu...
However, I am still undecided because of its performance outside those specific new algos (I have the feeling, it wouldn't bring much more on top of what the 290x and the 780ti are already bringing...)

That's exactly my line of thought. I would buy 4 new Maxwell cards today IF they had an improvement on the hash rate of a 780ti. Their latest double Titan is slower than just buying two (overpriced) titans. If NVidia waits much longer the net hashrate of altcoins will make new offerings less attractive. I would buy big Maxwell cards today if they had 'em, but I might buy nothing if they wait two more months to release.

[Rasdisputin]

Is there a way to auto close, and then immediately restart cudaminer if the time between accepted shares is too great? My share rate is suffering horribly because of random pauses. If I close cudaminer and restart it, it works again for a while. If I can't alter this behavior, I'd like to work around it.

Sounds like a vardiff problem with the pool you're using.

Dang. So nothing I can do on my end? Config editing and such?

[bigjme]

personally i am going to jump on some 750Ti's
for £350 they will out perform my 780 for mining, in almost, if not all algo's

they will use in theory around 120W running full blast, i got my 780 using 250W mining Bitleu the other day.
If i am honest, the cards would pay for themself in 2 years just in power savings, never mind the fact they will outperform my 780.

Wont be the same for you guys with huge mining rigs though, but those of us that are still small, its an improvement