RavenX
Member
Offline
Activity: 112
Merit: 10
|
|
March 28, 2014, 11:24:30 PM |
|
does 10Mh/s sound about right for a single 750Ti? or am i way off.
I'm having 12.7MHs with a single Gigabyte 750 Ti "OCable" direct at x16 PCi-E. Can you post your settings and a Screenshot while mining of GPU-Z please? Already did: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=167229.msg5922764#msg5922764With x86 ccminer35 i achieved peaks of 12.8MHs. Now I'm testing x64 ccminer35 version because people says it crashes less. My average rate stays around 12.5~12.6MHs. I'm using win 7 x64.
|
|
|
|
jsamul
|
|
March 28, 2014, 11:33:51 PM |
|
imho: i do not see any benefit in +500 mem for GPU algo like heavycoin (SHA3), you can put there -500 mem to safe some power and keep the hashrate
|
|
|
|
sin242
|
|
March 28, 2014, 11:35:07 PM |
|
imho: i do not see any benefit in +500 mem for GPU algo like heavycoin, you can put there -500 mem to safe some power and keep the hashrate Good tip. If i stay on heavy for any length ill go ahead and do that.
|
Dark: Xk9BoVerBd41JCjWQEhnxoowP7YNUK439z BTC: 1JzPN2h8WGSi7kQeY5wuP4PjVD2hxkHJQM
|
|
|
cbuchner1 (OP)
|
|
March 28, 2014, 11:37:18 PM |
|
will compute 5.0 do any boost for 750Ti cards? didn't measure any boost so far when I tried. Christian
|
|
|
|
RavenX
Member
Offline
Activity: 112
Merit: 10
|
|
March 28, 2014, 11:52:17 PM |
|
imho: i do not see any benefit in +500 mem for GPU algo like heavycoin (SHA3), you can put there -500 mem to safe some power and keep the hashrate very good observation Reducing my Mem Clock OC from +650 to -500 I ketp the same rate.
|
|
|
|
brainape
|
|
March 28, 2014, 11:56:58 PM |
|
I might be a nag with this but... Any progress with X11? I'm currently using CUDAminer (big hat-tip) and found a recent interest in the X11 algos. I'm seeing glorious hashes using AMD without anything Nvidia comparative. I have 4 - 750ti showing up at my door any minute. Finding myself scratching my head and considering sending them back.
|
|
|
|
djm34
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1050
|
|
March 29, 2014, 12:23:32 AM |
|
I might be a nag with this but... Any progress with X11? I'm currently using CUDAminer (big hat-tip) and found a recent interest in the X11 algos. I'm seeing glorious hashes using AMD without anything Nvidia comparative. I have 4 - 750ti showing up at my door any minute. Finding myself scratching my head and considering sending them back. yep... send them back they are completely useless without x11
|
djm34 facebook pageBTC: 1NENYmxwZGHsKFmyjTc5WferTn5VTFb7Ze Pledge for neoscrypt ccminer to that address: 16UoC4DmTz2pvhFvcfTQrzkPTrXkWijzXw
|
|
|
brainape
|
|
March 29, 2014, 12:47:36 AM |
|
I might be a nag with this but... Any progress with X11? I'm currently using CUDAminer (big hat-tip) and found a recent interest in the X11 algos. I'm seeing glorious hashes using AMD without anything Nvidia comparative. I have 4 - 750ti showing up at my door any minute. Finding myself scratching my head and considering sending them back. yep... send them back they are completely useless without x11 Touche. Looking forward to checking out CUDAminer / Maxwell regardless.
|
|
|
|
gazzamc
|
|
March 29, 2014, 12:49:11 AM |
|
does 10Mh/s sound about right for a single 750Ti? or am i way off.
I'm having 12.7MHs with a single Gigabyte 750 Ti "OCable" direct at x16 PCi-E. Thanks, i can't seem to get over 10, and both are directly on the board.. I'll try some different OC setting..
|
|
|
|
|
zelante
|
|
March 29, 2014, 03:00:12 AM |
|
mining HVC upper cmd is ccminer30 0.5 msi 660ti down cmd is ccminer35 0.5 2 x msi 750ti tf
|
|
|
|
becker
|
|
March 29, 2014, 03:33:04 AM |
|
More ccminer weirdness, haven't tried with cudaminer.
On my 8 core 8350 machine with 3 750 ti's, if I run Boinc on 7 threads (haven't tried less, that is just what I run it at), the hashrate immediately goes up, from 11.x megahashes to the mid 12 megahashes. Strange Stuff, this is witchcraft, more than science it appears.
Don't understand that, as my boinc is set to CPU only. Anyway, maybe some can try 1 thread using boinc, and see if that helps hash rate.
|
|
|
|
Coinman422
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 9
Merit: 0
|
|
March 29, 2014, 04:24:32 AM Last edit: March 29, 2014, 04:39:33 AM by Coinman422 |
|
8mh/s for the 780ti (non shared memory, the one with shared memory gives 9.5mh) Did you recompile with compute 3.5, it may-be a little faster. Actually, this coin is really a cpu coin, my 3770 gets around 1.1mh/s (6 threads)
groestl, as implemented now, does a massive amount of random access lookups in S-box tables derived from AES. CPUs have a bit of an advantage due to their big data caches. So the absolute speed-up of a GPU isn't that great. Maybe factor 10. By the way, according to some information I got an AMD R9 290X only does around 6.5 MHash/s. Can anyone confirm this? If so, we've got another nVidia coin here. Christian Groestl runs at 7.5MH/s on 6970 (900/500) and 5.3MH/s on 5850 (850/300). Low mem for running cool what are your config/bat settings for your 6970's? i cant figure out how to get them past 1.5mh/s
|
|
|
|
ivanlabrie
|
|
March 29, 2014, 04:42:07 AM |
|
8mh/s for the 780ti (non shared memory, the one with shared memory gives 9.5mh) Did you recompile with compute 3.5, it may-be a little faster. Actually, this coin is really a cpu coin, my 3770 gets around 1.1mh/s (6 threads)
groestl, as implemented now, does a massive amount of random access lookups in S-box tables derived from AES. CPUs have a bit of an advantage due to their big data caches. So the absolute speed-up of a GPU isn't that great. Maybe factor 10. By the way, according to some information I got an AMD R9 290X only does around 6.5 MHash/s. Can anyone confirm this? If so, we've got another nVidia coin here. Christian Groestl runs at 7.5MH/s on 6970 (900/500) and 5.3MH/s on 5850 (850/300). Low mem for running cool what are your config/bat settings for your 6970's? i cant figure out how to get them past 1.5mh/s I got my 6950 to 10mh/s on groestl...so yeah. { "pools" : [ { "url" : "stratum+tcp://stablehash.com:4502", "user" : "ivanlabrie.1", "pass" : "x" } ], "gpu-platform" : "1", "intensity" : "16", "kernel" : "myriadcoin-groestl", "gpu-engine" : "0-850", "gpu-fan" : "70-100", "gpu-memclock" : "150", "gpu-powertune" : "20", "temp-cutoff" : "95", "temp-overheat" : "85", "temp-target" : "75", "api-listen" : false, "api-mcast-port" : "4028", "api-port" : "4028", "auto-fan" : true, "auto-gpu" : true, "expiry" : "120", "failover-only" : true, "gpu-threads" : "4", "worksize" : "64", "log" : "5", "queue" : "1", "scan-time" : "60", "temp-hysteresis" : "3", "failover-switch-delay" : "60", "no-pool-disable" : true, "kernel-path" : "/usr/local/bin" }
|
|
|
|
Coinman422
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 9
Merit: 0
|
|
March 29, 2014, 04:48:16 AM |
|
8mh/s for the 780ti (non shared memory, the one with shared memory gives 9.5mh) Did you recompile with compute 3.5, it may-be a little faster. Actually, this coin is really a cpu coin, my 3770 gets around 1.1mh/s (6 threads)
groestl, as implemented now, does a massive amount of random access lookups in S-box tables derived from AES. CPUs have a bit of an advantage due to their big data caches. So the absolute speed-up of a GPU isn't that great. Maybe factor 10. By the way, according to some information I got an AMD R9 290X only does around 6.5 MHash/s. Can anyone confirm this? If so, we've got another nVidia coin here. Christian Groestl runs at 7.5MH/s on 6970 (900/500) and 5.3MH/s on 5850 (850/300). Low mem for running cool what are your config/bat settings for your 6970's? i cant figure out how to get them past 1.5mh/s I got my 6950 to 10mh/s on groestl...so yeah. { "pools" : [ { "url" : "stratum+tcp://stablehash.com:4502", "user" : "ivanlabrie.1", "pass" : "x" } ], "gpu-platform" : "1", "intensity" : "16", "kernel" : "myriadcoin-groestl", "gpu-engine" : "0-850", "gpu-fan" : "70-100", "gpu-memclock" : "150", "gpu-powertune" : "20", "temp-cutoff" : "95", "temp-overheat" : "85", "temp-target" : "75", "api-listen" : false, "api-mcast-port" : "4028", "api-port" : "4028", "auto-fan" : true, "auto-gpu" : true, "expiry" : "120", "failover-only" : true, "gpu-threads" : "4", "worksize" : "64", "log" : "5", "queue" : "1", "scan-time" : "60", "temp-hysteresis" : "3", "failover-switch-delay" : "60", "no-pool-disable" : true, "kernel-path" : "/usr/local/bin" } I will try that,This will work for heavycoin right?
|
|
|
|
ivanlabrie
|
|
March 29, 2014, 04:57:14 AM |
|
Nope, that's groestl myriad.
|
|
|
|
Coinman422
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 9
Merit: 0
|
|
March 29, 2014, 05:09:22 AM |
|
Nope, that's groestl myriad.
Damn that sucks, well if anyone can help me with Heavycoin config for a 6970 i would be grateful. Wish it was as easy as it is on my nvidia rig.
|
|
|
|
see360
Member
Offline
Activity: 91
Merit: 10
|
|
March 29, 2014, 05:22:59 AM |
|
Hey Christian & Christian, did you just add myriad groestl capability in your super secret test lab? Couldn't help but notice that the difficulty which has been around 200 for days, but as low as 125 a few hours ago, just jumped to 287.
EDIT: For some reason, running minerd for groestl on 6 CPU threads bumps my 780ti from 21,950 khash/s to 22,520 khash/s on ccminer35.
|
|
|
|
ivanlabrie
|
|
March 29, 2014, 05:37:14 AM |
|
Nope, that's groestl myriad.
Damn that sucks, well if anyone can help me with Heavycoin config for a 6970 i would be grateful. Wish it was as easy as it is on my nvidia rig. Just posted a conf file there, copy it and modify it as you see fit! :p Pretty much the same card, or pretty similar at least.
|
|
|
|
Dotcommie
|
|
March 29, 2014, 06:53:21 AM |
|
FYI I'm getting 11MHash on regular NON-Ti 750's when mining Heavy on 1285 core clock in case people are on the fence about spending the money for the 750ti's (if they even find them in stock)
get about 260khs regular scrypt as well. Could probably get 275 with more overclocking.
|
|
|
|
|