[ANN] cudaMiner & ccMiner CUDA based mining applications [Windows/Linux/MacOSX]

[bigjme]

Will try...win 7, I think I needed the updated compile, but we'll see.
Thanks! Expect a few mbtc.

Not a problem, i hope it helps

Take a look at the op message from this thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=475795.0;all

That style info would be pretty helpful.

Carlo

i am going to split it up some, its no where near done, but i want to include that much information.
Once i hear about the logo i wanted to use off cudaminers.net i will open the site up for a while so everyone can see a rough idea of it.

It can of course be changed, and made to be how ever. and im not a graphics designer so expect a simple design unless anyone wants to design it up once they can see it

[ivanlabrie]

linux, windows? how many cards? whats cpu usage like?
x11 does use more cpu and people have found it to be a draw back, on a side note, try this one, its the one i use for 2.2
https://mega.co.nz/#!E5lR0YJI!cTm25l4tfLoJyMBlvIfBKUlc15PHLXMZwMicD0h37NA

it was compiled after version 1.0 so it has some newer code, which may help

Works like a charm

[bigjme]

Glad to hear it

[ovidus]

Will try...win 7, I think I needed the updated compile, but we'll see.
Thanks! Expect a few mbtc.

Not a problem, i hope it helps

Take a look at the op message from this thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=475795.0;all

That style info would be pretty helpful.

Carlo

i am going to split it up some, its no where near done, but i want to include that much information.
Once i hear about the logo i wanted to use off cudaminers.net i will open the site up for a while so everyone can see a rough idea of it.

It can of course be changed, and made to be how ever. and im not a graphics designer so expect a simple design unless anyone wants to design it up once they can see it

what software are you running, in the past i have had alot of success with media wiki for this type of project see(http://www.tlrarchives.com/archives/index.php?title=Main_Page), media wiki has a great framework for these type of things.  If you need any help hit me up, i have a huge background in web design and graphic design, and would like to help this project out

[bigjme]

its wiki style but built as a normal website, writing it in notepad right now

[ovidus]

one reason i use media wiki for projects like this is the media wiki markup language, as well as the extensions for embedding releases direct from github amongst other things, plus makes user contrib easy as most are familiar with the wiki format as it is what is used for wikipedia

[cayars]

Will try...win 7, I think I needed the updated compile, but we'll see.
Thanks! Expect a few mbtc.

Not a problem, i hope it helps

Take a look at the op message from this thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=475795.0;all

That style info would be pretty helpful.

Carlo

i am going to split it up some, its no where near done, but i want to include that much information.
Once i hear about the logo i wanted to use off cudaminers.net i will open the site up for a while so everyone can see a rough idea of it.

It can of course be changed, and made to be how ever. and im not a graphics designer so expect a simple design unless anyone wants to design it up once they can see it

It can certainly be split up of course (especially since I'm not doing the grunt work)

I was only suggesting that we show hash rates for various algos.
Give example config setting for various coins/algos.

What could be really nice is to have different "tables" of hash rates for different cards.  ie 660, 750ti, 780ti etc.
Maybe a table with cards down the left and algo across the top.  We can all help contribute values and hash rates along with any unique config/batch file lines as well as specific cards and OC settings

Maybe another section to consider is how to flash the bios of various cards for ultimate performance.

Ultimately, I'd love to see this site become the "wiki" of all things cuda mining related.  The "one stop" browsing super site for quick info related to a specific card/config or algo.

Maybe a section on power efficiency of Maxwell architecture. Although I'd leave this to later as it's not important to those already in the know.

I'd concentrate on the "meat and potatoes" at first and worry about "pretty, pretty" later after you/we have the basic info on the site.

Carlo

[djm34]

Will try...win 7, I think I needed the updated compile, but we'll see.
Thanks! Expect a few mbtc.

Not a problem, i hope it helps

Take a look at the op message from this thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=475795.0;all

That style info would be pretty helpful.

Carlo

i am going to split it up some, its no where near done, but i want to include that much information.
Once i hear about the logo i wanted to use off cudaminers.net i will open the site up for a while so everyone can see a rough idea of it.

It can of course be changed, and made to be how ever. and im not a graphics designer so expect a simple design unless anyone wants to design it up once they can see it

It can certainly be split up of course (especially since I'm not doing the grunt work)

I was only suggesting that we show hash rates for various algos.
Give example config setting for various coins/algos.

as far as configs for ccminer are concerned, people who can't read the readme file, won't read the wiki either  
(I would put for that section in big red letters something like "read the fucking readme file"   hopefully I am not the one doing it  
but if we want still to help them, one can create an automated config generator, that would nice (pointless but nice))

[skunk]

And for the cudaminer, I got way better results with the 32bit. For every user I helped here, and everywhere else like IRC, the 32bit seems to work better. And BECAUSE there was a 64bit version, everyone was stuck with this one and was wondering why I got 20-40kh more than their cards...

i missed this part... is it just a windoz/cudaminer oddity or should i rebuild a 32bit ccminer on linux too?
thank you.

[djm34]

And for the cudaminer, I got way better results with the 32bit. For every user I helped here, and everywhere else like IRC, the 32bit seems to work better. And BECAUSE there was a 64bit version, everyone was stuck with this one and was wondering why I got 20-40kh more than their cards...

i missed this part... is it just a windoz/cudaminer oddity or should i rebuild a 32bit ccminer on linux too?
thank you.

the best way to know is to try (especially if you are compiling yourself).

[0000000000]

Anybody know what difficulty I should be using for X11 with two 750ti's and what it should look like in the .bat?

Thanks

[cyntheman]

linux, windows? how many cards? whats cpu usage like?
x11 does use more cpu and people have found it to be a draw back, on a side note, try this one, its the one i use for 2.2
https://mega.co.nz/#!E5lR0YJI!cTm25l4tfLoJyMBlvIfBKUlc15PHLXMZwMicD0h37NA

it was compiled after version 1.0 so it has some newer code, which may help

Works like a charm

guys having issues witht his im still only able to hit 1500 and 1200 on two zotac 750 ti

ive ran them without oc and with oc and still the same issue. this was the ccminer 1.0 i grabbed from github

the one you provided doesnt seem to work for me at all.. just goes Nonce does not validate on GPU like 5 times a second and completely fills out the window.

id love to get even 1.8 mhs out of them.. id drool over anything above 2mh 

[bigjme]

Well we will see how using it as a basic basic websote with info on it goes. Then if need be it can always be scrapped and something else put in its place

[0000000000]

linux, windows? how many cards? whats cpu usage like?
x11 does use more cpu and people have found it to be a draw back, on a side note, try this one, its the one i use for 2.2
https://mega.co.nz/#!E5lR0YJI!cTm25l4tfLoJyMBlvIfBKUlc15PHLXMZwMicD0h37NA

it was compiled after version 1.0 so it has some newer code, which may help

Works like a charm

guys having issues witht his im still only able to hit 1500 and 1200 on two zotac 750 ti

ive ran them without oc and with oc and still the same issue. this was the ccminer 1.0 i grabbed from github

the one you provided doesnt seem to work for me at all.. just goes Nonce does not validate on GPU like 5 times a second and completely fills out the window.

id love to get even 1.8 mhs out of them.. id drool over anything above 2mh 

I was having that problem. Decided maybe it was my PC's overclock so I ran prime95 and indeed got errors. Rolled the OC back and now I'm mining X11 no problem. Didn't have an issue with scrypt, ever. Think it was a RAM issue.

If your system is overclocked than try rolling some of your settings back, or just run prime95 for a while and see what happens.

[jk_14]

Kopiemtu v1.3 with OC (337.19 driver) and ccminer support is available:

https://litecointalk.org/index.php?topic=16800.0


new things briefly:

- driver with OC support
- ccminer support
- monitor and mine 'status' option
- Master view corrected
- Master cloning extended
- longer failover time = 5 min
- filesystem modified
- SystemRescueCD 4.2.0 installed

(16GB pendrive should allow for upgrade to any next releases - remotely)

[qwep]

how gives 780 ti and 750 ti in X11

[jk_14]

how gives 780 ti and 750 ti in X11

750Ti = 2.1MH/s

[Amph]

how gives 780 ti and 750 ti in X11

780ti if i'm not mistaken, should give you 4.7MH/s, 750ti 2.1MH/s

[GES]

how gives 780 (no TI) and 770  in X11

[cayars]

Just wondering how many of you guys run mixed rigs (nVidia and AMD)?

Have you found it better to split your rigs to different coins?

Examples: X11, Quark hash rates
AMD 280x: 3069, 2131 (better at X11)
T75ti: 2120, 3180 (better at Quark)
(real results from my rigs)

Plugging these sets of numbers into coinwarz.com for profit.
Of course there are always exceptions.  Example recently SYNC was most profitable regardless of platform.

For example right now the AMDs produce better return on X11 (DRK) while nVidia produces better return on Quark (SRC).

As an example lets say you had 3 of each card:
All pointed to DRK: $3.50(amd) + $1.85 (nvidia)= $5.35 per day x 365 days=$1,952.75
All pointed to SRC: $2.08 (amd) + $3.10 (nvidia)=$5.18 per day x 365 days=$1,890.70
Split to each coin: $3.50 (amd) + $3.10 (nvidia)=$6.60 per day x 365 days=$2,409.00

So as you can see it can make a big difference in profit to track hash rates on the different platforms and pointing each platform to the most appropriate coin!

Carlo