Bitcoin Forum
June 16, 2024, 12:51:18 PM *
News: Voting for pizza day contest
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 [248] 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 »
  Print  
Author Topic: EWBF's CUDA Zcash miner  (Read 2164083 times)
NobodyIsHome
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 74
Merit: 1


View Profile
October 17, 2017, 06:01:06 AM
 #4941

It would be nice if EWBF would develop some free tool for monitoring machines using EWBF miner (like Claymore Ethereum Miner Manager).
Or maybe there is such a free tool but I am not informed?

What would you need this tool to do?
jpl
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 154
Merit: 11


View Profile
October 17, 2017, 06:23:08 AM
Last edit: October 19, 2017, 04:07:33 AM by jpl
 #4942

It would be nice if EWBF would develop some free tool for monitoring machines using EWBF miner (like Claymore Ethereum Miner Manager).
Or maybe there is such a free tool but I am not informed?

From what I have seen so far.. add this to your miner address  --api 127.0.0.1:42000
..then run this in a web browser...   http://127.0.0.1:42000

..... edit.. fixed post  
JamesAdams
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 66
Merit: 10


View Profile WWW
October 17, 2017, 09:35:52 AM
 #4943

I am able to say this miner is stable receiving 400-450 sols on each 1070 mining zcash on the latest release on win7 stock settings
May I please get some suggestions to the better pools for this to maximize the output


Flypool is a good pool that I personally use. The link is https://zcash.flypool.org/.

WORDCOIN
It's never late to buy BTC for $1
Services-backed cryptocurrency of 1 trillion dollars market
Temporel
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 224
Merit: 100


View Profile
October 17, 2017, 10:59:37 AM
 #4944

It would be nice if EWBF would develop some free tool for monitoring machines using EWBF miner (like Claymore Ethereum Miner Manager).
Or maybe there is such a free tool but I am not informed?

From what I have seen so far.. add this to your miner address  --api 127.0.0.1:42000
..then run this in a web browser...   http://127.0.0.1:4200 

I assume you forgot a 0 in the web browser port number, it should also be 42000 not 4200.

--ypsi

port address doesnt matter (in the limits),just be sure to use the same in your browser. Im using port 5555
junforever
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 434
Merit: 100



View Profile
October 17, 2017, 10:36:37 PM
Last edit: October 18, 2017, 04:44:51 AM by junforever
 #4945

is this still the best miner for zcash, or has it been eclipsed ? has anyone gotten stable 800+ sols with 1080ti, with good undervolting ?
Which is your undervolting number to get 800+ ? and also can you helpme with the gpu clock and mem clock values that you are using to get 800+ sols please? Thanks
jpl
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 154
Merit: 11


View Profile
October 18, 2017, 04:30:05 AM
 #4946

It would be nice if EWBF would develop some free tool for monitoring machines using EWBF miner (like Claymore Ethereum Miner Manager).
Or maybe there is such a free tool but I am not informed?

From what I have seen so far.. add this to your miner address  --api 127.0.0.1:42000
..then run this in a web browser...   http://127.0.0.1:4200  

I assume you forgot a 0 in the web browser port number, it should also be 42000 not 4200.

--ypsi

My apologies,  I did forget a 0 (zero) on my post.  http://127.0.0.1:42000 is what I am running.  Thanks for catching that.
.. edit.. looks like I had it on the top part, but not on the bottom.
jpl
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 154
Merit: 11


View Profile
October 18, 2017, 04:56:30 AM
 #4947

I'm mining zec on flypool,.. but it looks very down.  https://cryptowat.ch/
Any suggestions for what you guys' are mining?

thx

... aaaand it's way back up again.  I feel like a stock market investor.. lol
https://cryptowat.ch/bitfinex/zecusd 
jpl
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 154
Merit: 11


View Profile
October 18, 2017, 06:23:43 AM
 #4948

btw... Have any of you tried this from the api zcash flypool?
https://api-zcash.flypool.org/docs/

Some odd results coming from that api.
wilberthh
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 462
Merit: 12

Indonesian Translator, #1 Quality is prioritized.


View Profile
October 18, 2017, 06:49:53 AM
 #4949

btw... Have any of you tried this from the api zcash flypool?
https://api-zcash.flypool.org/docs/

Some odd results coming from that api.

odd? like what?
QuintLeo
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1498
Merit: 1030


View Profile
October 18, 2017, 09:40:43 PM
 #4950

Over the last few days I keep getting gpu 0 has stopped and my small rig just goes to sleep. Is there any way to loop the miner so it starts back up also happens when it loses connection to server.

 Indicates you likely are trying to overclock that card too hard, or pushing the power supply too hard - EBWF will try to restart on it's own, at least in the most recent version, but it has limits on the sort of issues it can handle.


 The base Aorus 1080 ti can probably get to 800 sol/sec without undervolting if you turn the TDP up to 300 watts or so (120% in Afterburner) with +100 core +100 mem clocks - I see 780 more or less at 250 watt stock TDP with those clock settings.

 I suspect any of the "3 slot" well-cooled 1080ti models will be in the same ballpark.



I'm no longer legendary just in my own mind!
Like something I said? Donations gratefully accepted. LYLnTKvLefz9izJFUvEGQEZzSkz34b3N6U (Litecoin)
1GYbjMTPdCuV7dci3iCUiaRrcNuaiQrVYY (Bitcoin)
Lumining
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 322
Merit: 100



View Profile
October 18, 2017, 11:02:39 PM
 #4951

Over the last few days I keep getting gpu 0 has stopped and my small rig just goes to sleep. Is there any way to loop the miner so it starts back up also happens when it loses connection to server.

 Indicates you likely are trying to overclock that card too hard, or pushing the power supply too hard - EBWF will try to restart on it's own, at least in the most recent version, but it has limits on the sort of issues it can handle.


 The base Aorus 1080 ti can probably get to 800 sol/sec without undervolting if you turn the TDP up to 300 watts or so (120% in Afterburner) with +100 core +100 mem clocks - I see 780 more or less at 250 watt stock TDP with those clock settings.

 I suspect any of the "3 slot" well-cooled 1080ti models will be in the same ballpark.



I found out that you're better to go with a medium overclock instead of going to the max. I don't recommend to use 120% electricity for a longer period of time.
For my 1070, I found out that 70% electricity with +150 core and +400 mem clock is way more stable and nearly as fast as a +200 core and +600 mem clock.
70% electricity gives me a return of about 3.5 sol/w and 100% td p is about 2.5 sol/w.

★ ★ ★ ★ ★   DeepOnion    Anonymous and Untraceable Cryptocurrency    TOR INTEGRATED & SECURED   ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
› › › › ›  JOIN THE NEW AIRDROP ✈️        VERIFIED WITH DEEPVAULT  ‹ ‹ ‹ ‹ ‹
▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬   ANN  WHITEPAPER  FACEBOOK  TWITTER  YOUTUBE  FORUM   ▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
usuksobad
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 107
Merit: 10


View Profile
October 18, 2017, 11:19:16 PM
 #4952

Same here, keep it smart.
BadAstroZA
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 168
Merit: 100


View Profile WWW
October 18, 2017, 11:37:35 PM
 #4953

Which manufacturer and which driver versions are you using - Windows 10, right?

I have a rig of  6x Gigabyte Windforce GTX 1070s overclocked to +35 Core Voltage, 88% power limit, +137 core clock and +610 memory and getting the following:



That's on Windows 10 64 bit with GeForce driver 22.21.13.8494 from 7/18/2017
chuck732
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 141
Merit: 10


View Profile
October 19, 2017, 02:27:09 AM
 #4954

I just read  and saw a graph where it seems to be that the dev of EWBF almost double there fee when your on flypool. I hope this is not true.


https://forum.z.cash/t/ewbf-dev-fee-almost-doubled-1-9-to-3-6-average/22460
ZC93
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1
Merit: 0


View Profile
October 19, 2017, 03:29:20 AM
 #4955

Why has EWBF miner doubled its DevFee on Flypool? This occurred when Flypool cut earned shares in half on Sept 28th, DevFee shares did NOT halve like earned shares (DevFee is twice what it was on Flypool). I expect this is a bug due to how you implement the following:

Why does EWBF miner strongly scale DevFee with difficulty? Statistically this is not a 2% DevFee and is realistically very much higher. See: https://forum.z.cash/t/ewbf-dev-fee-almost-doubled-1-9-to-3-6-average/22460/4

I am all for DevFee's, you should be paid for your work. However, I have an issue with misrepresenting the real DevFee. That is dishonest, makes me not trust you, and want to switch to other miner software. Just tell everyone what DevFee is, and let them decide.
jpl
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 154
Merit: 11


View Profile
October 19, 2017, 04:10:43 AM
 #4956

btw... Have any of you tried this from the api zcash flypool?
https://api-zcash.flypool.org/docs/

Some odd results coming from that api.

odd? like what?

At the very bottom,.. it asks for worker, and miner... My results didn't match what it says I'm getting in EWBF.
junforever
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 434
Merit: 100



View Profile
October 19, 2017, 05:17:10 AM
 #4957

I'm mining zec on flypool,.. but it looks very down.  https://cryptowat.ch/
Any suggestions for what you guys' are mining?

thx
For me nanopool was giving the best result 0.0105 ZEC every 8:30 - 9 hours average with 2 gtx 1080ti and one 1070 g1 rev1, but I strongly recommend zcoin at least for me is much much profitable
jpl
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 154
Merit: 11


View Profile
October 19, 2017, 06:40:54 AM
 #4958

I'm mining zec on flypool,.. but it looks very down.  https://cryptowat.ch/
Any suggestions for what you guys' are mining?

thx
For me nanopool was giving the best result 0.0105 ZEC every 8:30 - 9 hours average with 2 gtx 1080ti and one 1070 g1 rev1, but I strongly recommend zcoin at least for me is much much profitable

https://zec.nanopool.org/  ?

I'll check it out and see.  Thanks
Moondoggie
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 392
Merit: 101


View Profile
October 19, 2017, 08:55:50 AM
 #4959

Which manufacturer and which driver versions are you using - Windows 10, right?

I have a rig of  6x Gigabyte Windforce GTX 1070s overclocked to +35 Core Voltage, 88% power limit, +137 core clock and +610 memory and getting the following:



That's on Windows 10 64 bit with GeForce driver 22.21.13.8494 from 7/18/2017

What's this display?
Temporel
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 224
Merit: 100


View Profile
October 19, 2017, 09:52:41 AM
Last edit: October 19, 2017, 06:55:17 PM by Temporel
 #4960

I'm mining zec on flypool,.. but it looks very down.  https://cryptowat.ch/
Any suggestions for what you guys' are mining?

thx
For me nanopool was giving the best result 0.0105 ZEC every 8:30 - 9 hours average with 2 gtx 1080ti and one 1070 g1 rev1, but I strongly recommend zcoin at least for me is much much profitable

maybe it changed since last month but I made a lot of tests early september and nanopool was giving me at least 16% less coins than flypool and Im not the only one:
https://www.reddit.com/r/gpumining/comments/729ixq/flypool_is_the_most_profitable_zcash_pool/
Pages: « 1 ... 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 [248] 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!