[NemosMiner] multi algo profit switching NVIDIA/CPU miner

[tpd09]

how do you guys monitor the multi-miner?
thanks

[1714694651]

1714694651

[1714694651]

1714694651

[1714694651]

1714694651

[Mapuo]

since yiimp hashrefinery and zpool has gone down i will update my NemosMiner-MPH to 1.7.4 ... with new coins and miners, i haven't updated it for a while...
and update NemosMiner 2.3 for Mining Pool Hub for Nvidia only

Best Regards
Nemo

thank you!! really looking forward to updated MPH stuff, maybe u could include claymore dual miner with Sia instead of ethminer for the ethash, and also add alexis for neoscrypt?

exciting

yes claymore latest will be in there, i'll update all the ccminers to...

Nemo

Hi, minerx
what happend with NemosMiner-MPH? You post about it more than a month ago.

[minerx117]

Sorry, Been very busy with work & Family atm, i'll get on to it..

Regards
Nemo

[minerx117]

I returned on the old (2.1) version, only replaced the client programs and added new algorithms.
The new version not correctly (possible) calculates the yield, the whole day works C11 and Sib while promising 0.001 (1x1080Ti), then like 12 hours I have typed no more than 0.0002.
Maybe cause in the pool, because hashrefinery for a day with auto-switching (2.2) brought in almost 1.5 times more coins (0.0007).

it was mining sib and c11 because those two were the most profitable... i made a really good profit on sib and c11  yesterday with zpool and Nemos 2.2 .... it is working exactly as it should..

im not sure how your working it out take right now for instance:

Sib = 0.03402 per ghs per day (24hour Actual) x1070 @ 11.45mhs = 0.00038 btc perday

Best regards
Nemo

https://imgur.com/a/I6fsi

[sundownz]

I have one problem -- not sure if pool or software -- I have version 2.2

Some of my machines will hang on Neoscrypt "Tpruvot" and stay on that indefinitely unless I interfere and restart the miner. The main issue, other than sticking that way, is that they will not submit ANY shares that get recognized with a "YES!" for so long they won't even show up on ZPOOL stats page when they do this.

So, again, not sure if the NEMO software or the pool is the culprit. I disabled "Tpruvot" completely on the machines that had the issue.

[minerx117]

i had same issue with neoscrypt yesterday on 2 of my 6 test rigs but they were running ccminerklaust 8.13 at the time.. im testing ccminerklaust 8.14beta-cuda 9 for neoscrypt atm im seeing speed improvements on 1060 and 1070 but sadly the 1080ti is still faster with tpruvot

im not sure what was causing that issue but everything seems to be running fine now (no need to disable miners)

thank-you KlausT please support this Dev:

https://github.com/KlausT/ccminer/releases/download/8.14beta/ccminer-814beta-x64-cuda9.zip

[danspasiva]

i had same issue with neoscrypt yesterday on 2 of my 6 test rigs but they were running ccminerklaust 8.13 at the time.. im testing ccminerklaust 8.14beta-cuda 9 for neoscrypt atm im seeing speed improvements on 1060 and 1070 but sadly the 1080ti is still faster with tpruvot

im not sure what was causing that issue but everything seems to be running fine now (no need to disable miners)

thank-you KlausT please support this Dev:

https://github.com/KlausT/ccminer/releases/download/8.14beta/ccminer-814beta-x64-cuda9.zip

Hey minerx, what intensity do you use for the 1070s?  It's faster with 8.14beta than alexis 7.5?  What speed u getting?

[minerx117]

default intensity for Klaust 8.14beta-cuda9 = 1070 @ 120watt +100core +500mem = 1.15mhs

intensity -i 15 for Alexis78 cuda 7.5 = 1070 @ 120watt +100core +500mem = 1.05mhs

same for the 1060's in my tests slight speed improvement @ same tdp and clocks

Regards
Nemo

[CaHek83]

my rig(4x1070) reboots several times a day. i want to ask what i need to install to make system work more stable my driver version is 384.94.

[kopija]

default intensity for Klaust 8.14beta-cuda9 = 1070 @ 120watt +100core +500mem = 1.15mhs

intensity -i 15 for Alexis78 cuda 7.5 = 1070 @ 120watt +100core +500mem = 1.05mhs

same for the 1060's in my tests slight speed improvement @ same tdp and clocks

Regards
Nemo

How come you are applying memory OC on ccminer-based algos?
In read somewhere that memory underclock is desirable, since it improves core clocks.
Did you try benchmarking without memory OC?

[minerx117]

default intensity for Klaust 8.14beta-cuda9 = 1070 @ 120watt +100core +500mem = 1.15mhs

intensity -i 15 for Alexis78 cuda 7.5 = 1070 @ 120watt +100core +500mem = 1.05mhs

same for the 1060's in my tests slight speed improvement @ same tdp and clocks

Regards
Nemo

How come you are applying memory OC on ccminer-based algos?
In read somewhere that memory underclock is desirable, since it improves core clocks.
Did you try benchmarking without memory OC?

because neoscrypt likes mem oc... Yes i have tried with out mem oc..... its slower...  i run +500mem on all my cards... core varies from = +10core on my 1060's to +100core on my 1070's my 1080ti's are running  +50core +500mem

Regards  
Nemo

[danspasiva]

Hey minerx, I'm still getting higher hashrate on alexis 7.5 than klaus8.14 with  -i 16.6 setting gt 1070's  maybe 2-3% higher on alexis.

Is there an x86 version of klaus 8.14?  maybe that will be faster...

[minerx117]

Hey minerx, I'm still getting higher hashrate on alexis 7.5 than klaus8.14 with  -i 16.6 setting gt 1070's  maybe 2-3% higher on alexis.

Is there an x86 version of klaus 8.14?  maybe that will be faster...

no x86 yet i could compile one...  they are very close anyways hardly anything in it properly depends on the card 

[Max3k]

Do not know how others, but I activated all the algorithms in all clients and realized that except for Alexis (hsr-x86-cuda8) and Tpruvot (x86-2.2.2-cuda9) don't need anything else =) Well, one Xevan Yes EWBF still of course, all other clients  deleted, because the difference is either absent or minimal.

[danspasiva]

Hey minerx, I'm still getting higher hashrate on alexis 7.5 than klaus8.14 with  -i 16.6 setting gt 1070's  maybe 2-3% higher on alexis.

Is there an x86 version of klaus 8.14?  maybe that will be faster...

no x86 yet i could compile one...  they are very close anyways hardly anything in it properly depends on the card  

I think you should try because sometimes the x86 is faster, also was wondering if the xevan miner is your compile/tweaks or if its the epsylon compile?  Also the tpruvot 2.2.2 cuda9?

[minerx117]

Do not know how others, but I activated all the algorithms in all clients and realized that except for Alexis (hsr-x86-cuda8) and Tpruvot (x86-2.2.2-cuda9) don't need anything else =) Well, one Xevan Yes EWBF still of course, all other clients  deleted, because the difference is either absent or minimal.

thanks i have update my miners folder:

only the one miner per algo now,
re tested all algos's found fastest miner for each,
deleted unused miners

Test's done on 1070 and 1060 rigs will test my 1080ti rigs this afternoon and double check speeds with my older miner combo

Latest updates:

https://github.com/nemosminer/NemosMiner-v2.2/archive/master.zip

i'll properly be doing a new release soon..

adding : more info:

last 24hours;

unpaid balance
current balance
paid balance

Best Regards
Nemo

[insaniak]

Does anyone else experience Windows 10 freezing when using NEMOSMINER on zpool multi algo? Sometimes it takes few hours to freeze, sometimes 10-15 minutes.


 Im using 8 1070s. Im not sure why. I get freezing and I also get CC miner has stopped working errors. Its frustrating because im trying everything and cant find a solution. Ive also tried putting GPUS on default with no overclock. Please help if you can!

[Max3k]

Night 4 times appeared this error and everything stopped working... earlier with such did not face, the problem on the side "api.coinbase.com" ?

Invoke-RestMethod : Cannot resolve the remote name: 'api.coinbase.com'
C:\Users\***\Nemos Miner v2.2\NemosMiner-v2.2.ps1:92 sign:14
+ ...    $Rates = Invoke-RestMethod "https://api.coinbase.com/v2/exchange-r ...
+                 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    + CategoryInfo          : InvalidOperation: (System.Net.HttpWebRequest:HttpWebRequest) [Invoke-RestMethod], WebException
    + FullyQualifiedErrorId : WebCmdletWebResponseException,Microsoft.PowerShell.Commands.InvokeRestMethodCommand

[kopija]

Does anyone else experience Windows 10 freezing when using NEMOSMINER on zpool multi algo? Sometimes it takes few hours to freeze, sometimes 10-15 minutes.


 Im using 8 1070s. Im not sure why. I get freezing and I also get CC miner has stopped working errors. Its frustrating because im trying everything and cant find a solution. Ive also tried putting GPUS on default with no overclock. Please help if you can!

My machines freeze also, although it usually takes them days to freeze. I cant find the cause.
But I can help with your other problem
https://www.raymond.cc/blog/disable-program-has-stopped-working-error-dialog-in-windows-server-2008/

[kopija]

i'll properly be doing a new release soon..

Best Regards
Nemo

Could you also check out this new "Watchdog Timer" feature  aaronsace added to his miner?
I have no idea what it is and am too lazy to try it out myself
But it sure looks interesting:
https://github.com/aaronsace/MultiPoolMiner/commit/920ceae4bb4fa7d40c9105e2edc064b56285051e

Also, regarding the "update interval": I am still unsure if 300 is too low or too high.
What are you using? Or still no consensus on that issue?

Also regarding this:

because neoscrypt likes mem oc... Yes i have tried with out mem oc..... its slower...  i run +500mem on all my cards... core varies from = +10core on my 1060's to +100core on my 1070's my 1080ti's are running  +50core +500mem

Thanks for the neoscrypt clarification.
But how come your 1060s are +10 core overclock?
Mine are all stable at +120 with PL set to 90W (75%).