manc
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 84
Merit: 0
|
|
January 19, 2018, 02:11:40 PM |
|
What's the best time to put yourself in ahashpool since I've seen people putting -interval 900 says increase earnings is true so, anyone done that experience?
not needed with this version just leave intervals default if you want less switching increase -ActiveMinerGainPct 3 -ActiveMinerGainPct (percent of advantage that active miner has over candidates in term of profit (default 3%) this is new to v2.4 Best Regards Nemo This is a brilliant add in. Thank you.
|
|
|
|
miner14
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 32
Merit: 0
|
|
January 19, 2018, 02:38:42 PM |
|
Just a quick question regarding the variables we can change -Currency USDIs GBP OK? -Location USUK, EU, Europe, europe Having connection issues connecting to coinbase getting exchange rates, so though I'd check first.
|
|
|
|
paskevic
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 18
Merit: 0
|
|
January 19, 2018, 02:57:48 PM Last edit: January 19, 2018, 03:21:17 PM by paskevic |
|
currently testing ver2.4 and can instantly see that reported active time of every algorithm is wrong. says 16s for each 240?sec benchmark. also "exited" time is wrong. edit: benchmarking stopped on phi as it did not have any stratum specified in it command line. sorry but this 2.4 ver should be labeled as alpha at best back to 2.3c beta.
|
|
|
|
millsys
Member
Offline
Activity: 112
Merit: 10
|
|
January 19, 2018, 03:20:07 PM |
|
hi nemosminers, Few days ago I reported about my 6 x gtx 1070 rig crashing and not being stable. I then started with adding and testing with 1 gpu, 2 gpu's, 3 gpus and found that as soon as I add a 4th gpu CPU usage increases a lot and having lower hash-rates then with 3 gpus. During benchmarking it will crash. It doesn't matter which of the 3 remaining gpus I add on any remaining pci slot. Result seems same. I'm using a g3900 CPU and 4gb ram. Could this be the bottleneck? At home i'm running the same motherboard (msi z270 sli plus) with 6 1080ti's with G4400 cpu and 8gb ram now running fine with currently 5 active gpu's. I actually found that on that motherboard 1 pci slot is corrupt. Will test with m2 adapter tonight to see if it will run with 6 If your cpu usage is going up, check event viewer system log for PCI-E communication errors, could be a bad riser Hey millsys, thank you for your reply. I have tested with 3 different gpu's having each their own riser. Chance that all 3 are bad is small but will have a look at it Had same issue, ALL RISERS WERE BAD!!! Seriously, I've RMAd over 18 risers already. I've had rigs seem stable for 6 cards, then move those same 6 cards into a 12 card setup and the problem rears its ugly head because you now have 12 cards screaming PCI-E errors instead of just 6 and the system starts to grind to a halt. Replaced risers with new $6 ebay ones and problem disappeared immediately (cpu usage, event viewer errors, stability). Ebay auction 302483050496 is the only ones I trust now, have ordered over 100 from this source and they have been rock solid. Cheap too, saved a few bucks sending back overpriced/bad ones to Amazon/NewEgg after replacement. Hey millsys, all thought Windows didn't show any pci-e errors I found that while I was running with only 3 cards, 1 of the remaining cards that was not running actually felt really hot and when trying to start mining on it would not work. Had to reboot and found that with that specific card cpu usage increased alot. Replaced the riser and cpu usage lowered to just +-12% instead of 60%+. Now running again with 6 cards to see how it goes, dont want to make any conclusions yet but seems those damn riser caused the issues after all... Will keep the CPU and RAM I have ordered for my next RIG I guess . Thanks again for responding, if it keeps running coming days without crashes will send you some hugs as well Fantastic!!
|
FARM #1 : 60 GPUs spread across 6 rigs (1080ti/1080/1070ti/1070) FARM #2 : 72 GPUs spread across 12 rigs (1070ti x 6) FARM #3 : 16 GPUs spread across 4 rigs (1080ti x 4) AntMiner S9 13.5TH / AntMiner L3+ x 2
|
|
|
tarzanbtc
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 3
Merit: 0
|
|
January 19, 2018, 03:39:55 PM |
|
Any way to integrate XMR-Stak so I can mine using my Ryzen 1700 on Cryptonight?
|
|
|
|
miner14
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 32
Merit: 0
|
|
January 19, 2018, 03:50:35 PM |
|
currently testing ver2.4 and can instantly see that reported active time of every algorithm is wrong. says 16s for each 240?sec benchmark. also "exited" time is wrong. edit: benchmarking stopped on phi as it did not have any stratum specified in it command line. sorry but this 2.4 ver should be labeled as alpha at best back to 2.3c beta. Active time is def wrong, is that used for anything though? As for phi, it worked fine for me https://i.imgur.com/MtWymd6.jpg
|
|
|
|
mihej
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 33
Merit: 0
|
|
January 19, 2018, 04:10:39 PM |
|
Hi, guys! Newb question, but does Nemosminer support claymore or another ethash miner?
|
|
|
|
minerx117 (OP)
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 728
Merit: 256
NemosMiner-v3.8.1.3
|
|
January 19, 2018, 04:25:56 PM |
|
@nemos Dev: did we have to do a new benchmark with the new version or can we copy the stats folder to the new version folder?
new bench
|
NemosMiner-v3.8.1.3
|
|
|
minerx117 (OP)
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 728
Merit: 256
NemosMiner-v3.8.1.3
|
|
January 19, 2018, 04:29:39 PM Last edit: January 19, 2018, 08:27:01 PM by minerx117 |
|
currently testing ver2.4 and can instantly see that reported active time of every algorithm is wrong. says 16s for each 240?sec benchmark. also "exited" time is wrong. edit: benchmarking stopped on phi as it did not have any stratum specified in it command line. sorry but this 2.4 ver should be labeled as alpha at best back to 2.3c beta. thanks i know about the "reported active" showing higher results... i will fix that doesn't effect profit or hashing... im not getting that phi error at all on my rigs... phi is benching and running great.. what pool were you trying? Best Regards Nemo
|
NemosMiner-v3.8.1.3
|
|
|
paskevic
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 18
Merit: 0
|
|
January 19, 2018, 04:30:25 PM |
|
currently testing ver2.4 and can instantly see that reported active time of every algorithm is wrong. says 16s for each 240?sec benchmark. also "exited" time is wrong. edit: benchmarking stopped on phi as it did not have any stratum specified in it command line. sorry but this 2.4 ver should be labeled as alpha at best back to 2.3c beta. Active time is def wrong, is that used for anything though? As for phi, it worked fine for me https://i.imgur.com/MtWymd6.jpgactive time is for yourself like for example i get up in the morning and i can see for how long which algo has been running talking about phi maybe it isn't working as supposed on hashrefinery only. i always benchmark using hashrefinery as it reaches peak hashrate much faster than ahashpool.
|
|
|
|
miner14
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 32
Merit: 0
|
|
January 19, 2018, 04:37:30 PM |
|
Thanks paskevic. And yes I was only using ahash
Is it Ok to copy over the hashrates/benchmarks to several identical machines, I'm assuming it will be.
|
|
|
|
guytechie
|
|
January 19, 2018, 05:00:22 PM |
|
Thanks paskevic. And yes I was only using ahash
Is it Ok to copy over the hashrates/benchmarks to several identical machines, I'm assuming it will be.
If everything is identical, I don't see why not. Especially if you already know performance is exactly the same across the board. For your earlier question of re-using the old version stats, probably not a good idea. Different versions of miners, also some miners may have been dropped, maybe name was changed, etc. It may get you out of the benchmarking hole quicker, but it may not be accurate.
|
Put something in my tip jar if I made your day. BTC: 1MkmBHDjonAFXui6JEx9ZmEemfMtUo9Cmu
|
|
|
miner14
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 32
Merit: 0
|
|
January 19, 2018, 05:18:15 PM |
|
Thanks guytechie, That Question was from someone else, I'd always rebench if different miners were used or updated. No my other Q was about currency and location - but meh just left it on usd and us
|
|
|
|
minerx117 (OP)
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 728
Merit: 256
NemosMiner-v3.8.1.3
|
|
January 19, 2018, 07:54:33 PM |
|
Thanks guytechie, That Question was from someone else, I'd always rebench if different miners were used or updated. No my other Q was about currency and location - but meh just left it on usd and us you can change currency to your local currency i live in New Zealand and use -Currency NZD i have tested GPB NZD AUD USD im sure more will work... Best Regards Nemo
|
NemosMiner-v3.8.1.3
|
|
|
minerx117 (OP)
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 728
Merit: 256
NemosMiner-v3.8.1.3
|
|
January 19, 2018, 07:55:24 PM |
|
What's the best time to put yourself in ahashpool since I've seen people putting -interval 900 says increase earnings is true so, anyone done that experience?
not needed with this version just leave intervals default if you want less switching increase -ActiveMinerGainPct 3 -ActiveMinerGainPct (percent of advantage that active miner has over candidates in term of profit (default 3%) this is new to v2.4 Best Regards Nemo This is a brilliant add in. Thank you. No worrys
|
NemosMiner-v3.8.1.3
|
|
|
StartxPH
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 7
Merit: 0
|
|
January 20, 2018, 12:46:05 AM |
|
Benchmark result sometimes not consistent....?
Should I benchmark 1 vga or all vga ?
would the result matter?
im having erratic figures....
latest : 5 gtx 1080ti Type: NVIDIA
Miner Algorithm Speed mBTC/Day BTC/Day USD/Day BTC/GH/Day Pool ----- --------- ----- -------- ------- ------- ---------- ---- ccminerAlexis78 X17 81.29 MH/s 6.052 0.00605 70.152 0.07445 ahashpool- CcminerTpruvotcuda9 Phi 161.70 MH/s 5.005 0.00500 58.007 0.03095 ahashpool- ccminerAlexis78 Blake2s 34.03 GH/s 4.906 0.00491 56.870 0.00014 ahashpool- ccminerAlexis78 C11 142.98 MH/s 4.511 0.00451 52.286 0.03155 ahashpool- ccminerAlexis78 Sib 107.69 MH/s 4.401 0.00440 51.016 0.04087 ahashpool- ccminerAlexis78 Lyra2RE2 346.59 MH/s 4.176 0.00418 48.409 0.01205 ahashpool- CcminerTpruvot Skunk 260.62 MH/s 3.816 0.00382 44.226 0.01464 ahashpool- ccminerAlexis78 Nist5 404.51 MH/s 3.693 0.00369 42.808 0.00913 ahashpool- ccminerAlexis78 Skein 4.57 GH/s 3.338 0.00334 38.688 0.00073 ahashpool- CcminerTpruvot Bitcore 122.30 MH/s 3.159 0.00316 36.617 0.02583 ahashpool- CcminerKlaust NeoScrypt 7.11 MH/s 2.519 0.00252 29.197 0.35411 ahashpool- ccminerAlexis78 Hsr 101.39 MH/s 2.227 0.00223 25.819 0.02197 ahashpool- CcminerAlexis78cuda9 Xevan 28.40 MH/s 2.062 0.00206 23.898 0.07260 ahashpool- CcminerTpruvotcuda9 Tribus 508.45 MH/s 1.912 0.00191 22.159 0.00376 ahashpool- CcminerTpruvot Lbry 2.33 GH/s 0.839 0.00084 9.727 0.00036 ahashpool- ccminerAlexis78 MyriadGroestl 593.35 MH/s 0.255 0.00026 2.957 0.00043 ahashpool- CcminerTpruvotcuda9 Timetravel 201.50 MH/s 0.000 0.00000 0.000 -
FROM AHASH site:
neoscrypt 4233 9 CRC 2098 2.9 Gh/s 1% 0.48062 blake2s 5766 3 XVG 361 5.9 Th/s 1% 0.11976 xevan 3739 1 BSD 33 330.2 Mh/s 1% 0.10442 m7m 6033 1 XMG 35 1.5 Mh/s 1% 0.06681
---
Should I go with what is highest on ahash site?
|
|
|
|
primo1983
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 72
Merit: 0
|
|
January 20, 2018, 01:28:43 AM |
|
What's happening with this in red, it seems that our colleague above has the same problem, the hashrate down. 3 GTX 1080ti
ccminerAlexis78 Blake2s 17,28 GH/s 3,418 0,00342 39,756 0,00020 ahashpool- CcminerTpruvot Skunk 127,99 MH/s 2,525 0,00253 29,369 0,01973 ahashpool- ccminerAlexis78 Lyra2RE2 170,94 MH/s 2,438 0,00244 28,350 0,01426 ahashpool- ccminerAlexis78 Skein 2,32 GH/s 2,115 0,00212 24,600 0,00091 ahashpool- CcminerTpruvotcuda9 Tribus 249,80 MH/s 1,993 0,00199 23,184 0,00798 ahashpool- ccminerAlexis78 Hsr 48,31 MH/s 1,771 0,00177 20,602 0,03667 ahashpool- ccminerAlexis78 C11 67,65 MH/s 1,706 0,00171 19,842 0,02522 ahashpool- ccminerAlexis78 Nist5 185,27 MH/s 1,543 0,00154 17,948 0,00833 ahashpool- CcminerTpruvotcuda9 Phi 75,57 MH/s 1,538 0,00154 17,886 0,02035 ahashpool- CcminerTpruvot Bitcore 61,86 MH/s 1,518 0,00152 17,656 0,02454 ahashpool- CcminerKlaust NeoScrypt 3,06 MH/s 1,402 0,00140 16,304 0,45782 ahashpool- ccminerAlexis78 X17 44,28 MH/s 1,232 0,00123 14,333 0,02783 ahashpool- CcminerTpruvot Lbry 1,19 GH/s 0,370 0,00037 4,302 0,00031 ahashpool- ccminerAlexis78 Sib 52,07 MH/s 0,356 0,00036 4,142 0,00684 ahashpool- ccminerAlexis78 MyriadGroestl 270,32 MH/s 0,173 0,00017 2,012 0,00064 ahashpool- CcminerTpruvotcuda9 Timetravel 106,77 MH/s 0,00
|
|
|
|
primo1983
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 72
Merit: 0
|
|
January 20, 2018, 01:44:25 AM |
|
Type: NVIDIA Miner Algorithm Speed mBTC/Day BTC/Day USD/Day BTC/GH/Day Pool ----- --------- ----- -------- ------- ------- ---------- ---- ccminerAlexis78 Blake2s 17,28 GH/s 4,129 0,00413 48,310 0,00024 ahashpool- CcminerTpruvot Skunk 127,99 MH/s 2,519 0,00252 29,470 0,01968 ahashpool There is something very wrong with this miner, since it always shows from 32 to 42 US $ day, but in fact what comes in is less than 20 US $ because it gets so low as it actually says there? I think there could be a difference but not so much. Please can anyone tell me why?
|
|
|
|
minerx117 (OP)
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 728
Merit: 256
NemosMiner-v3.8.1.3
|
|
January 20, 2018, 02:04:54 AM Last edit: January 20, 2018, 02:16:40 AM by minerx117 |
|
Type: NVIDIA Miner Algorithm Speed mBTC/Day BTC/Day USD/Day BTC/GH/Day Pool ----- --------- ----- -------- ------- ------- ---------- ---- ccminerAlexis78 Blake2s 17,28 GH/s 4,129 0,00413 48,310 0,00024 ahashpool- CcminerTpruvot Skunk 127,99 MH/s 2,519 0,00252 29,470 0,01968 ahashpool There is something very wrong with this miner, since it always shows from 32 to 42 US $ day, but in fact what comes in is less than 20 US $ because it gets so low as it actually says there? I think there could be a difference but not so much. Please can anyone tell me why? nothing is wrong... that is because your using startahashpool.bat (uses current estimate and 24hr estimate API too request profit) ... try the startahashpool24hr.bat (uses last 24hour Actual API too request profit) i made it for this exact reason i did not like the estimates that MuiltipoolMiner,Sniifdog etc use P.S v2.4.1 is being tested at the moment has been through 6x10603gb rig is currently running/testing on the 6x1080ti rig if all goes well it will be released 2nite... v2.4.1 update: ccminerAlexis78 faster hashrate for: lyra2v2,skein,blake2s,keccak,lbry,nist,phi,veltor Best Regards Nemo
|
NemosMiner-v3.8.1.3
|
|
|
primo1983
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 72
Merit: 0
|
|
January 20, 2018, 02:16:26 AM |
|
Type: NVIDIA Miner Algorithm Speed mBTC/Day BTC/Day USD/Day BTC/GH/Day Pool ----- --------- ----- -------- ------- ------- ---------- ---- ccminerAlexis78 Blake2s 17,28 GH/s 4,129 0,00413 48,310 0,00024 ahashpool- CcminerTpruvot Skunk 127,99 MH/s 2,519 0,00252 29,470 0,01968 ahashpool There is something very wrong with this miner, since it always shows from 32 to 42 US $ day, but in fact what comes in is less than 20 US $ because it gets so low as it actually says there? I think there could be a difference but not so much. Please can anyone tell me why? nothing is wrong at all with this miner... that is because your using startahashpool.bat (uses current estimate and 24hr estimate API too request profit) ... try the startahashpool24hr.bat (uses last 24hour Actual API too request profit) i made it for this exact reason i did not like the estimates that MuiltipoolMiner,Sniifdog etc use P.S v2.4.1 is being tested at the moment has been through 6x10603gb rig is currently running/testing on the 6x1080ti rig if all goes well it will be released 2nite... v2.4.1 update: ccminerAlexis78 faster hashrate for: lyra2v2,skein,blake2s,keccak,lbry,nist,phi,veltor Best Regards Nemo OK, but the estimates could not be half that, since as I said the estimates are always between $ 32 to $ 42, I think at least I should give $ 25 to $ 27 do you agree? But it's giving 20 and sometimes less.
|
|
|
|
|