k2laci
Member
Offline
Activity: 172
Merit: 10
|
|
February 28, 2018, 01:39:47 PM |
|
My rig 6 x1070 VGA. I've tested many pools but there is little difference.
Tested :
- Mining pool hub - Nicehash - Ahashpool - Zpool - Multipool.us
Only a few percent difference.
|
|
|
|
millsys
Member
Offline
Activity: 112
Merit: 10
|
|
February 28, 2018, 01:41:24 PM |
|
FULL 12 RIG 72 GPU NICEHASH TESTOk guys, I've switched one entire farm (72 GPUs, 12 rigs) over to NiceHash (2.0.1.11) - 48 HOUR TEST!!!! https://imgur.com/a/vNodgLast 3 Payouts on AHashPool (Use to be 0.021 at its peak) 19h ago 0.01532754 330b3de0606d1257621e51301da726f8ca02... 43h ago 0.01419105 87ce1e684a440868ea347bcde8766b5ac7f8... 2d ago 0.01409336 67db48c92b113c2c98fc62461144ad8399bd... Lets see how it plays out compared to my AHashPoolPlus 62 GPU Farm How about running the 72 GPU farm on NiceHash for 48 hours and then on AHashPoolPlus for 48 hours? You have to run exact same builds at the exact same time on each platform to have any kind of accurate results. I have daily BTC history for this particular farm going back months! Use to average 0.021 BTC, lately its been 0.014-0.015. Last was 0.0133 just after switchover. NiceHash running 48 hours if it can avg >0.0145 it will have made MORE than NemosMiner/NPlusMiner 1.3.3 on AHashPoolPlus. I also know the full history of my 62 GPU Farm, which is running at about 0.012 BTC/day, so if that remains the same while the 72 GPU mines a higher than >0.0145 then I'll know that at this time, NiceHash is more profitable. I manage all these using Remote Desktop if on NemosMiner. Currently the 62 GPU farm is managed thru AwesomeMiner because its strictly mining X17 on AHashPool at 680MH/s Waiting for 16 more 1080ti cards to build 4 more miners
|
FARM #1 : 60 GPUs spread across 6 rigs (1080ti/1080/1070ti/1070) FARM #2 : 72 GPUs spread across 12 rigs (1070ti x 6) FARM #3 : 16 GPUs spread across 4 rigs (1080ti x 4) AntMiner S9 13.5TH / AntMiner L3+ x 2
|
|
|
Quake4
Member
Offline
Activity: 825
Merit: 18
MindMiner developer
|
|
February 28, 2018, 02:00:48 PM |
|
My testing is continuing. 12:00, 10.3333(3) hours from start. approx. profit $15.14 / d (0.00143105517909BTC). It's still too low for this rig. This balance from ahash?
|
MindMiner - miner manager programm with autoswitch between Algos&Pools. This isnt a fork based on MultiPoolMiner (Nemos, SniffDog, Mega, NPlus & etc)
|
|
|
JCS-CCT
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 154
Merit: 1
|
|
February 28, 2018, 03:38:36 PM |
|
Waiting for 16 more 1080ti cards to build 4 more miners Cool! In a couple of months the 2080 might come out. Can't wait.
|
|
|
|
millsys
Member
Offline
Activity: 112
Merit: 10
|
|
February 28, 2018, 03:46:29 PM |
|
Waiting for 16 more 1080ti cards to build 4 more miners Cool! In a couple of months the 2080 might come out. Can't wait. You mean the 2080 that has the same hash rate as a $900 1080ti that is being announced in a few months but won't ship til Q3/Q4 for $1499?? https://www.tweaktown.com/news/61023/nvidia-price-geforce-gtx-2080-up-1499/index.html
|
FARM #1 : 60 GPUs spread across 6 rigs (1080ti/1080/1070ti/1070) FARM #2 : 72 GPUs spread across 12 rigs (1070ti x 6) FARM #3 : 16 GPUs spread across 4 rigs (1080ti x 4) AntMiner S9 13.5TH / AntMiner L3+ x 2
|
|
|
holda29
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 18
Merit: 0
|
|
February 28, 2018, 05:36:39 PM |
|
After another 24 hours with two identical rigs, one on Ahashpool, second one on Nicehash. Ahashpool 1,1 mBTC/day Nicehash 1,6 mBTC/day
I will stop loosing my money and go somewhere else.
|
|
|
|
L0c0
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 16
Merit: 0
|
|
February 28, 2018, 06:03:12 PM |
|
Apparently if you are a Comcast customer the EarningsTracker won't work correctly (Balance= balance info disabled(cant retrive info)) due to a timeout getting the pool API info from http://sfiles.ucoz.org/sfiles/poolapiref.json. I tried TWC and TorGuard and those worked fine. So if you are on Comcast, this might help you (no promises since it's my first time dicking around with powershell programming). I copied the info from the website into the EarningsTrackerJob.ps1 file, not very elegant but it worked for me. Here's a copy of the file if you're interested: https://mega.nz/#!94NiRKJY!0CMulET7bpbUpJ7JDa0LTuFl6Tw0fdTnajur7joIPw4
|
|
|
|
primo1983
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 72
Merit: 0
|
|
February 28, 2018, 06:46:49 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
JCS-CCT
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 154
Merit: 1
|
|
February 28, 2018, 07:09:25 PM |
|
30% increase in performance with lower power consumption. The price will come down.
|
|
|
|
JCS-CCT
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 154
Merit: 1
|
|
February 28, 2018, 07:16:57 PM |
|
After another 24 hours with two identical rigs, one on Ahashpool, second one on Nicehash. Ahashpool 1,1 mBTC/day Nicehash 1,6 mBTC/day
I will stop loosing my money and go somewhere else.
Have you tried MultiPoolHub?
|
|
|
|
MaxiMan
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 85
Merit: 0
|
|
February 28, 2018, 07:47:33 PM |
|
How About Zergpool? BTW: Nicehash are making payments faster than treshold stated. Just got a payment of 0.0027BTC, im afraid it doesnt support new algos like phi or X17
|
|
|
|
millsys
Member
Offline
Activity: 112
Merit: 10
|
|
February 28, 2018, 08:05:10 PM |
|
30% increase in performance with lower power consumption. The price will come down. That is a huge assumption. Lets just say it does 30% better. Its far better to buy today at $900 for a 1080ti and mine for 4 months, covering about $400 of that $900 cost. By July my 1080ti will be at $500 cost, while you are purchasing that shiny new 2080 for $1500 (3 times the cost) for 30% more hashing power. That is if you are able to get your hands on 4-6 of them to build a mining rig while tens of thousand of other miners are trying to.
|
FARM #1 : 60 GPUs spread across 6 rigs (1080ti/1080/1070ti/1070) FARM #2 : 72 GPUs spread across 12 rigs (1070ti x 6) FARM #3 : 16 GPUs spread across 4 rigs (1080ti x 4) AntMiner S9 13.5TH / AntMiner L3+ x 2
|
|
|
Shotfire
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 3
Merit: 0
|
|
February 28, 2018, 09:04:51 PM |
|
Apparently if you are a Comcast customer the EarningsTracker won't work correctly (Balance= balance info disabled(cant retrive info)) due to a timeout getting the pool API info from http://sfiles.ucoz.org/sfiles/poolapiref.json. I tried TWC and TorGuard and those worked fine. So if you are on Comcast, this might help you (no promises since it's my first time dicking around with powershell programming). I copied the info from the website into the EarningsTrackerJob.ps1 file, not very elegant but it worked for me. Here's a copy of the file if you're interested: https://mega.nz/#!94NiRKJY!0CMulET7bpbUpJ7JDa0LTuFl6Tw0fdTnajur7joIPw4 Big Thanks L0c0, I'm on comcast and that fixed my problem, much appreciated !!!!!! It's been driving me nuts for two weeks. I tried many things but didn't explore that angle. Just out of curiosity how did you discover this fix?
|
|
|
|
JCS-CCT
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 154
Merit: 1
|
|
March 01, 2018, 12:07:15 AM |
|
30% increase in performance with lower power consumption. The price will come down. That is a huge assumption. Lets just say it does 30% better. Its far better to buy today at $900 for a 1080ti and mine for 4 months, covering about $400 of that $900 cost. By July my 1080ti will be at $500 cost, while you are purchasing that shiny new 2080 for $1500 (3 times the cost) for 30% more hashing power. That is if you are able to get your hands on 4-6 of them to build a mining rig while tens of thousand of other miners are trying to. I think you misunderstood me. I'm using 1080tis and won't be buying any next generation card until the price/ROI is the same or better than today's cards. I was just stating I was excited to see the new technology come out.. knowing someday we'll be using them.
|
|
|
|
L0c0
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 16
Merit: 0
|
|
March 01, 2018, 03:36:12 AM |
|
Apparently if you are a Comcast customer the EarningsTracker won't work correctly (Balance= balance info disabled(cant retrive info)) due to a timeout getting the pool API info from http://sfiles.ucoz.org/sfiles/poolapiref.json. I tried TWC and TorGuard and those worked fine. So if you are on Comcast, this might help you (no promises since it's my first time dicking around with powershell programming). I copied the info from the website into the EarningsTrackerJob.ps1 file, not very elegant but it worked for me. Here's a copy of the file if you're interested: https://mega.nz/#!94NiRKJY!0CMulET7bpbUpJ7JDa0LTuFl6Tw0fdTnajur7joIPw4 Big Thanks L0c0, I'm on comcast and that fixed my problem, much appreciated !!!!!! It's been driving me nuts for two weeks. I tried many things but didn't explore that angle. Just out of curiosity how did you discover this fix? You are welcome. This kinda happened by chance, the tracker wasn't working on my rig so I just turned it off, but for work I have a PC under TWC, and for the hell of it I ran the tracker on that PC, it worked without an issue. I then checked with 2 friends who are on Comcast, no dice. Finally I turned on TorGuard and that one did work. Afterwards I just went and started looking inside the .ps1 files, I do no have much experience with powershell, but I'm sort of a mid-level programmer. So after much trial and error, came up with this fix.
|
|
|
|
millsys
Member
Offline
Activity: 112
Merit: 10
|
|
March 01, 2018, 03:55:03 AM |
|
FULL 12 RIG 72 GPU NICEHASH TESTOk guys, I've switched one entire farm (72 GPUs, 12 rigs) over to NiceHash (2.0.1.11) - 48 HOUR TEST!!!! https://imgur.com/a/vNodgLast 3 Payouts on AHashPool (Use to be 0.021 at its peak) 19h ago 0.01532754 330b3de0606d1257621e51301da726f8ca02... 43h ago 0.01419105 87ce1e684a440868ea347bcde8766b5ac7f8... 2d ago 0.01409336 67db48c92b113c2c98fc62461144ad8399bd... Lets see how it plays out compared to my AHashPoolPlus 62 GPU Farm First 24 hours (2/28/2018): Farm #1 (62 gpu) which is still using NemosMiner 2.5/NPlusMiner 1.3.3 on AhashPoolPlus produced .011531 BTC Farm #2 (72 gpu) which is on NiceHash Miner v2.0.1.11 produced .01424642 BTC Farm #2 Typically produces on the high side 14.8% better revenue, so if the 72 gpu farm was on AHashPool I would have expected .013237 best case .01424642 - .013237 = 7.6% better revenue on NiceHash! Lets see how the next 24 play out....
|
FARM #1 : 60 GPUs spread across 6 rigs (1080ti/1080/1070ti/1070) FARM #2 : 72 GPUs spread across 12 rigs (1070ti x 6) FARM #3 : 16 GPUs spread across 4 rigs (1080ti x 4) AntMiner S9 13.5TH / AntMiner L3+ x 2
|
|
|
Traz27
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 21
Merit: 0
|
|
March 01, 2018, 05:10:23 AM |
|
Are you guys monitoring nemosminer across dozens of rigs individually, or is there a way to monitor them from one source like AwesomeMiner? I want to switch back to nemos from AM to determine which has better results but I don't want to go through a clusterfuck of miner configs across all these machines. @millsys , @minerx117
|
|
|
|
Quake4
Member
Offline
Activity: 825
Merit: 18
MindMiner developer
|
|
March 01, 2018, 06:07:05 AM |
|
Farm #1 (62 gpu) which is still using NemosMiner 2.5/NPlusMiner 1.3.3 on AhashPoolPlus produced .011531 BTC Farm #2 (72 gpu) which is on NiceHash Miner v2.0.1.11 produced .01424642 BTC
.01424642 - .013237 = 7.6% better revenue on NiceHash!
Lets see how the next 24 play out....
Currently Ahash (bitcore & x17) more profitable then Nice. Next 24h ahash must ahead of Nicehash. 1070GTX +100 +100 92% Miner Algorithm Speed, H/s BTC/Day USD/Day BTC/GH/Day Pool ccminer-bitcore-2 Bitcore 18,73 M 0,00018381 1,91 0,00981127 AhashPool-BTX claymore-eth-106 Ethash 27,15 M 0,00015668 1,63 0,00577074 NiceHash-Europe ccminer-tpruvot-224 Bitcore 15,96 M 0,00015654 1,63 0,00981127 AhashPool-BTX ccminer-alexis-01 X17 10,56 M 0,00015409 1,60 0,01458931 ZPool-XVG bminer-530 Equihash 461,95 0,00014951 1,55 323,63911793 NiceHash-Europe
|
MindMiner - miner manager programm with autoswitch between Algos&Pools. This isnt a fork based on MultiPoolMiner (Nemos, SniffDog, Mega, NPlus & etc)
|
|
|
Quake4
Member
Offline
Activity: 825
Merit: 18
MindMiner developer
|
|
March 01, 2018, 06:17:56 AM |
|
How About Zergpool?
That's interesting. But too small count of miners.
|
MindMiner - miner manager programm with autoswitch between Algos&Pools. This isnt a fork based on MultiPoolMiner (Nemos, SniffDog, Mega, NPlus & etc)
|
|
|
EVERYUSERNAMEISTAKEN
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 36
Merit: 0
|
|
March 01, 2018, 06:23:56 AM |
|
Currently Ahash (bitcore & x17) more profitable then Nice. Next 24h ahash must ahead of Nicehash. 1070GTX +100 +100 92% Miner Algorithm Speed, H/s BTC/Day USD/Day BTC/GH/Day Pool ccminer-bitcore-2 Bitcore 18,73 M 0,00018381 1,91 0,00981127 AhashPool-BTX claymore-eth-106 Ethash 27,15 M 0,00015668 1,63 0,00577074 NiceHash-Europe ccminer-tpruvot-224 Bitcore 15,96 M 0,00015654 1,63 0,00981127 AhashPool-BTX ccminer-alexis-01 X17 10,56 M 0,00015409 1,60 0,01458931 ZPool-XVG bminer-530 Equihash 461,95 0,00014951 1,55 323,63911793 NiceHash-Europe
Those estimates for AHP are often inflated in Nemos for whatever reason (AHP's API I suspect). The NPlus BTC/day estimates have been fairly accurate for me. Otherwise, you'll have to actually test them both to accurately compare profits.
|
|
|
|
|