wachtwoord
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2100
Merit: 1044
|
 |
May 16, 2014, 12:11:07 PM Last edit: May 16, 2014, 12:38:12 PM by wachtwoord |
|
My new view of the market:  I wouldn't be suprised to see flat for an entire year. Even permabears are drawing uptrends again! 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
|
|
Kupsi
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1193
Merit: 1003
9.9.2012: I predict that single digits... <- FAIL
|
 |
May 16, 2014, 12:15:17 PM |
|
No, not really. Actually, not similar at all. ... I'm talking about the volume.
|
|
|
|
Globb0
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2492
Merit: 2016
Kiss a frog
|
 |
May 16, 2014, 12:23:29 PM |
|
There be dragons
|
|
|
|
zimmah
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1106
Merit: 1005
|
 |
May 16, 2014, 12:24:24 PM |
|
My new view of the market:  I wouldn't be suprised to see flat for an entire year. Even permabears are drawing uptrends again!  pretty funny how someone can draw an exponential growth curve prediction and still be bearish. #justbitcointhings
|
|
|
|
oda.krell
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1470
Merit: 1007
|
 |
May 16, 2014, 12:33:32 PM |
|
No, not really. Actually, not similar at all. ... I'm talking about the volume. Me too. Which of those two look more like "Volume is slowly picking up again a month after the bottom" to you?   Possibly the 'reversal' is more stretched out this time, because the entire correction was more stretched out, so I'm not taking the above as proof that we must go down again. I'm just pointing out that, so far, they look pretty dissimilar to me.
|
|
|
|
TERA
|
 |
May 16, 2014, 12:38:51 PM |
|
Attention: I have just been dubbed with the honorary title of the greatest most bearish type of bear there is: a permabear. This came after projecting a flat short term market and 'only' a 500% per year exponential growth trend.
|
|
|
|
Kupsi
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1193
Merit: 1003
9.9.2012: I predict that single digits... <- FAIL
|
 |
May 16, 2014, 12:41:29 PM |
|
No, not really. Actually, not similar at all. ... I'm talking about the volume. Me too. Which of those two look more like "Volume is slowly picking up again a month after the bottom" to you?   Possibly the 'reversal' is more stretched out this time, because the entire correction was more stretched out, so I'm not taking the above as proof that we must go down again. I'm just pointing out that, so far, they look pretty dissimilar to me. You need to look at Gox which was the biggest exchange in 2013. http://bitcoincharts.com/charts/mtgoxUSD#rg360zigWeeklyzczsg2013-01-01zeg2013-12-31ztgSzm1g10zm2g25zvzl
|
|
|
|
Hunyadi
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1281
Merit: 1000
☑ ♟ ☐ ♚
|
 |
May 16, 2014, 12:45:52 PM |
|
Walls are getting pretty steep...
|
|
|
|
wachtwoord
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2100
Merit: 1044
|
 |
May 16, 2014, 12:46:16 PM |
|
Attention: I have just been dubbed with the honorary title of the greatest most bearish type of bear there is: a permabear. This came after projecting a flat short term market and 'only' a 500% per year exponential growth trend.
No it was based on all your other posts. This post was actually bullish. That is what made me take note. Someone, who thus far was predicting the end of the world as we know it, switching to an (exponential) uptrend. I thought that was worthy to be mentioned 
|
|
|
|
TERA
|
 |
May 16, 2014, 12:47:40 PM |
|
^^^ notice the difference between the two charts: In 2013 there was a spike down from 100 to 80 after the bottom but it immediately rebounded back up and spent all of the consolidation time near the high of 100 rather than near 80. In 2014 there is a spike down from 540 to 420 but there was no rebound and it is spending all of its consolidation time near 420 and nowhere close to 540.
|
|
|
|
|
niothor
|
 |
May 16, 2014, 12:50:41 PM |
|
Attention: I have just been dubbed with the honorary title of the greatest most bearish type of bear there is: a permabear. This came after projecting a flat short term market and 'only' a 500% per year exponential growth trend.
And you just realized that ?
|
|
|
|
TERA
|
 |
May 16, 2014, 12:52:41 PM |
|
Attention: I have just been dubbed with the honorary title of the greatest most bearish type of bear there is: a permabear. This came after projecting a flat short term market and 'only' a 500% per year exponential growth trend.
No it was based on all your other posts. This post was actually bullish. That is what made me take note. Someone, who thus far was predicting the end of the world as we know it, switching to an (exponential) uptrend. I thought that was worthy to be mentioned  Predicting that a short term dip will occur but then rebound all the way back up and then reach new highs is 'the end of the world'. #bitcointhings Attention: I have just been dubbed with the honorary title of the greatest most bearish type of bear there is: a permabear. This came after projecting a flat short term market and 'only' a 500% per year exponential growth trend.
And you just realized that ? I've never been called 'permabear' before. That is supposed to be people who don't think that btc will ever rise again and is a bad long term investment. People like Fonzie.
|
|
|
|
oda.krell
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1470
Merit: 1007
|
 |
May 16, 2014, 12:53:09 PM |
|
No, not really. Actually, not similar at all. ... I'm talking about the volume. Me too. Which of those two look more like "Volume is slowly picking up again a month after the bottom" to you?   Possibly the 'reversal' is more stretched out this time, because the entire correction was more stretched out, so I'm not taking the above as proof that we must go down again. I'm just pointing out that, so far, they look pretty dissimilar to me. You need to look at Gox which was the biggest exchange in 2013. http://bitcoincharts.com/charts/mtgoxUSD#rg360zigWeeklyzczsg2013-01-01zeg2013-12-31ztgSzm1g10zm2g25zvzlNo, I don't. By July / August, gox was in hot water already, and it reflected in volume. More specifically, April 2013 was gox volume in full glory, by the middle of the year they had already taken a hit. I guess to do this the right way, we'd have to sum over gox, stamp, btce and btcchina, but I can't bring myself to do it for such little gain.
|
|
|
|
p0peji
|
 |
May 16, 2014, 12:55:39 PM |
|
Attention: I have just been dubbed with the honorary title of the greatest most bearish type of bear there is: a permabear. This came after projecting a flat short term market and 'only' a 500% per year exponential growth trend.
No it was based on all your other posts. This post was actually bullish. That is what made me take note. Someone, who thus far was predicting the end of the world as we know it, switching to an (exponential) uptrend. I thought that was worthy to be mentioned  Predicting that a short term dip will occur but then rebound all the way back up and then reach new highs is 'the end of the world'. #bitcointhings Attention: I have just been dubbed with the honorary title of the greatest most bearish type of bear there is: a permabear. This came after projecting a flat short term market and 'only' a 500% per year exponential growth trend.
And you just realized that ? I've never been called 'permabear' before. That is supposed to be people who don't think that btc will ever rise again and is a bad long term investment. People like Fonzie. The problem here is that you are talking to bitcoiners, who I start to believe are the same people who would think that MLM is the next best thing and is going to make them rich.
|
|
|
|
edwardspitz
|
 |
May 16, 2014, 12:58:38 PM |
|
I am by no means an expert in chart analysis or indicators. But when I look at the 3d chart and the RSI indicator all I see is the fractal repeating itself one more time:  I find this chart particular interesting because there are other indicators the could point to trend reversal (such as the way we have been right at the top of the descending channel and possibly even broken out a few times). Looking across the 3 sections where we have been overbought you notice that the volume has increased every time. It don't think this means anything... It is just because Kraken has gotten more customers (which of course is a good thing  ) If you think my interpretation is wrong then please enlighten me.
|
|
|
|
wachtwoord
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2100
Merit: 1044
|
 |
May 16, 2014, 12:59:41 PM |
|
Attention: I have just been dubbed with the honorary title of the greatest most bearish type of bear there is: a permabear. This came after projecting a flat short term market and 'only' a 500% per year exponential growth trend.
No it was based on all your other posts. This post was actually bullish. That is what made me take note. Someone, who thus far was predicting the end of the world as we know it, switching to an (exponential) uptrend. I thought that was worthy to be mentioned  Predicting that a short term dip will occur but then rebound all the way back up and then reach new highs is 'the end of the world'. #bitcointhings If the above is your opinion I retract my post. I certainly haven't read all your post but always got the impression you were just outright negative concerning the future (short term or long) of Bitcoin. (The fact that I didn't like the vast majority of your arguments can't have helped either). Therefore your username was labeled permabear in my head for quite a while.
|
|
|
|
Kupsi
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1193
Merit: 1003
9.9.2012: I predict that single digits... <- FAIL
|
 |
May 16, 2014, 12:59:56 PM |
|
^^^ notice the difference between the two charts: In 2013 there was a spike down from 100 to 80 after the bottom but it immediately rebounded back up and spent all of the consolidation time near the high of 100 rather than near 80. In 2014 there is a spike down from 540 to 420 but there was no rebound and it is spending all of its consolidation time near 420 and nowhere close to 540.
In 2014 the spike down was from 440 to 340. It rebounded and the consolidation is here now.
|
|
|
|
ChartBuddy
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1050
Merit: 1000
1PwXK9TpmmaaqaZz2eqcLkPU2C1Fcva39G
|
 |
May 16, 2014, 01:00:45 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
Kupsi
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1193
Merit: 1003
9.9.2012: I predict that single digits... <- FAIL
|
 |
May 16, 2014, 01:04:07 PM |
|
No, I don't. By July / August, gox was in hot water already, and it reflected in volume. More specifically, April 2013 was gox volume in full glory, by the middle of the year they had already taken a hit. I guess to do this the right way, we'd have to sum over gox, stamp, btce and btcchina, but I can't bring myself to do it for such little gain. I agree. But Gox was still bigger than Stamp, BTC-e and BTC China combined, so Gox is most important.
|
|
|
|
|