Arghhh
|
 |
May 16, 2014, 01:11:12 PM |
|
My new view of the market:
I wouldn't be suprised to see flat for an entire year.
I wouldn't be surprised to see that you're fucking wrong for the 10th time. Remember your case-in-point during October?
Anyone who thinks bitcoin is staying 500 for a year is delusional. You're not fooling anyone. Yes I could be wrong. My type of assertion is 'I wouldn't be suprised' and you don't see me placing any bets do you. And why do you think I'm trying to 'fool' someone? What motive could I possibly have for claiming the market will be flat? You drew a flat line back in October 2013, and you drew a flat line now, have you ever asked yourself that in order for your prediction to be so dead wrong back then, that there must be some personal bias, or fundamentals that you've yet to grasp? Here's a question: what makes you think prices will flatline around 500, with the huge out turn of adoption news capped off by a possible exchange or two opening in the US?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
|
TERA
|
 |
May 16, 2014, 01:12:17 PM |
|
^^^ notice the difference between the two charts: In 2013 there was a spike down from 100 to 80 after the bottom but it immediately rebounded back up and spent all of the consolidation time near the high of 100 rather than near 80. In 2014 there is a spike down from 540 to 420 but there was no rebound and it is spending all of its consolidation time near 420 and nowhere close to 540.
In 2014 the spike down was from 440 to 340. It rebounded and the consolidation is here now. I am referring to the first spike down that occured AFTER the reversal 2013: 66 ->105 -> THE SPIKE=80 ->100 ->100->100->100->100 consolidating at high of spike 2014: 340->540-> THE SPIKE=420 ->440->440->440->440->440 consolidating at low of spike
|
|
|
|
TERA
|
 |
May 16, 2014, 01:19:38 PM |
|
My new view of the market:
I wouldn't be suprised to see flat for an entire year.
I wouldn't be surprised to see that you're fucking wrong for the 10th time. Remember your case-in-point during October?
Anyone who thinks bitcoin is staying 500 for a year is delusional. You're not fooling anyone. Yes I could be wrong. My type of assertion is 'I wouldn't be suprised' and you don't see me placing any bets do you. And why do you think I'm trying to 'fool' someone? What motive could I possibly have for claiming the market will be flat? You drew a flat line back in October 2013, and you drew a flat line now, have you ever asked yourself that in order for your prediction to be so dead wrong back then, that there must be some personal bias, or fundamentals that you've yet to grasp? Here's a question: what makes you think prices will flatline around 500, with the huge out turn of adoption news capped off by a possible exchange or two opening in the US? I'm thinking of a slow transfer of wealth between China and government/hacker/gox coins to the new adopters in the west. There are a ton of huge blocks of coins floating around in the market that have been unaccounted for and alot of it probably needs to be sold. However, it is apparent now that they are in no rush to 'dump' and cause a price drop. So it'll be a slow grind as all the coins are bought out at current rates. ^That's my funadmental-based in speculations. In charting terms, I see a lot of negative indicators on the weekly chart. We are about to go below the weekly ichimoku cloud even. However, the fundamentals of bitcoin are bullish. So the bullish investors counteracting against the bearish chart = flat. In 2013 I didn't know what I was doing. There weren't even any negative indicators on the chart then. It was completely bullish, and I was just drawing random lines.
|
|
|
|
Kupsi
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1193
Merit: 1003
9.9.2012: I predict that single digits... <- FAIL
|
 |
May 16, 2014, 01:22:25 PM |
|
^^^ notice the difference between the two charts: In 2013 there was a spike down from 100 to 80 after the bottom but it immediately rebounded back up and spent all of the consolidation time near the high of 100 rather than near 80. In 2014 there is a spike down from 540 to 420 but there was no rebound and it is spending all of its consolidation time near 420 and nowhere close to 540.
In 2014 the spike down was from 440 to 340. It rebounded and the consolidation is here now. I am referring to the first spike down that occured AFTER the reversal 2013: 66 ->105 -> THE SPIKE=80 ->100 ->100->100->100->100 consolidating at high of spike 2014: 340->540-> THE SPIKE=420 ->440->440->440->440->440 consolidating at low of spike OK. I understand you. But the spike to 80 didn't rebound to 100 immediately.
|
|
|
|
TERA
|
 |
May 16, 2014, 01:26:29 PM |
|
^^^ notice the difference between the two charts: In 2013 there was a spike down from 100 to 80 after the bottom but it immediately rebounded back up and spent all of the consolidation time near the high of 100 rather than near 80. In 2014 there is a spike down from 540 to 420 but there was no rebound and it is spending all of its consolidation time near 420 and nowhere close to 540.
In 2014 the spike down was from 440 to 340. It rebounded and the consolidation is here now. I am referring to the first spike down that occured AFTER the reversal 2013: 66 ->105 -> THE SPIKE=80 ->100 ->100->100->100->100 consolidating at high of spike 2014: 340->540-> THE SPIKE=420 ->440->440->440->440->440 consolidating at low of spike OK. I understand you. But the spike to 80 didn't rebound to 100 immediately. It rose steady in a diagonal line for 2 weeks .
|
|
|
|
Blue
|
 |
May 16, 2014, 01:26:41 PM |
|
Why is it that bulls speak so emotionally and inappropriately while bears speak so calmly and rationally?
Yeah why is that, fonzie and igoor and mah37 are all such rational posters. yeah right. I want fonzie back ! Now !!
|
|
|
|
dreamspark
|
 |
May 16, 2014, 01:28:17 PM |
|
I am by no means an expert in chart analysis or indicators. But when I look at the 3d chart and the RSI indicator all I see is the fractal repeating itself one more time:  I find this chart particular interesting because there are other indicators the could point to trend reversal (such as the way we have been right at the top of the descending channel and possibly even broken out a few times). Looking across the 3 sections where we have been overbought you notice that the volume has increased every time. It don't think this means anything... It is just because Kraken has gotten more customers (which of course is a good thing  ) If you think my interpretation is wrong then please enlighten me. I think that if you want to do long term analysis thats fair over a period of time you should use an exchange that gets more than a peak of 5700BTC on the 3d chart. Not saying your observations aren't legit just that volume can tell you a lot and kraken doesn't have much.
|
|
|
|
Kupsi
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1193
Merit: 1003
9.9.2012: I predict that single digits... <- FAIL
|
 |
May 16, 2014, 01:40:04 PM |
|
Someone want to buy @ Stamp  Edit: It was a 1400 buy wall at 445, but it was removed and divided into smaller bids.
|
|
|
|
TERA
|
 |
May 16, 2014, 01:50:58 PM |
|
I hate huobi. Why is it on the order book I can see 200CNY of the ask side but only 30 CNY of the bid side.
|
|
|
|
macsga
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1484
Merit: 1002
Strange, yet attractive.
|
 |
May 16, 2014, 01:51:45 PM |
|
PREPARE TEH TRAINZ!!!1  CH00CH00!!!1
|
|
|
|
ChartBuddy
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1050
Merit: 1000
1PwXK9TpmmaaqaZz2eqcLkPU2C1Fcva39G
|
 |
May 16, 2014, 02:00:46 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
TERA
|
 |
May 16, 2014, 02:01:59 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
macsga
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1484
Merit: 1002
Strange, yet attractive.
|
 |
May 16, 2014, 02:09:23 PM |
|
At last, this thread finally starts looking familiar again! 
|
|
|
|
RUEHL
|
 |
May 16, 2014, 02:11:19 PM |
|
huOOobii + biiTTtstammPpeedde = 
|
|
|
|
edwardspitz
|
 |
May 16, 2014, 02:27:24 PM |
|
I am by no means an expert in chart analysis or indicators. But when I look at the 3d chart and the RSI indicator all I see is the fractal repeating itself one more time:  I find this chart particular interesting because there are other indicators the could point to trend reversal (such as the way we have been right at the top of the descending channel and possibly even broken out a few times). Looking across the 3 sections where we have been overbought you notice that the volume has increased every time. It don't think this means anything... It is just because Kraken has gotten more customers (which of course is a good thing  ) If you think my interpretation is wrong then please enlighten me. I think that if you want to do long term analysis thats fair over a period of time you should use an exchange that gets more than a peak of 5700BTC on the 3d chart. Not saying your observations aren't legit just that volume can tell you a lot and kraken doesn't have much. Thanks for the feedback. I tried the same thing on Stamp and I think it shows the same pattern. However on Stamp the volume has been decreasing when looking across the 3 sections.
|
|
|
|
seljo
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1145
Merit: 1002
Hodling.
|
 |
May 16, 2014, 02:44:29 PM |
|
This one! 
|
|
|
|
bigdave
|
 |
May 16, 2014, 02:56:42 PM |
|
I'd love to see one more drop to the 430-435 range before we go back up again.
|
|
|
|
ChartBuddy
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1050
Merit: 1000
1PwXK9TpmmaaqaZz2eqcLkPU2C1Fcva39G
|
 |
May 16, 2014, 03:00:46 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
Bronstad
Member

Offline
Activity: 92
Merit: 10
|
 |
May 16, 2014, 03:03:25 PM |
|
I'd love to see one more drop to the 430-435 range before we go back up again.
Don't get greedy. 
|
|
|
|
Blue
|
 |
May 16, 2014, 03:05:31 PM |
|
huoby outa steam ! ... drop trickle incoming
and
hey ! boy !
|
|
|
|
|