ChartBuddy
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 2156
Merit: 1745
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
|
 |
July 23, 2013, 07:01:31 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
"Your bitcoin is secured in a way that is physically impossible for others to access, no matter for what reason, no matter how good the excuse, no matter a majority of miners, no matter what." -- Greg Maxwell
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
ChartBuddy
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2156
Merit: 1745
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
|
|
July 23, 2013, 08:01:44 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
ChartBuddy
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2156
Merit: 1745
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
|
|
July 23, 2013, 09:01:41 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4mherewego
|
 |
July 23, 2013, 09:18:59 AM |
|
$93k says we are gonna stay above 93
|
|
|
|
|
|
FNG
|
|
July 23, 2013, 09:25:02 AM |
|
$93k says we are gonna stay above 93
and another 1000 @93.7 ok, now 1600 as he removed 93 wall. |
|
|
|
|
dxtwo
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 145
Merit: 100
coins...coins...as far as you can see
|
|
July 23, 2013, 09:25:53 AM |
|
Price is going up!
|
|
|
|
|
|
tutkarz
|
|
July 23, 2013, 09:26:07 AM |
|
someone is laughing at single digit believers. And me too  |
|
|
|
|
|
4mherewego
|
|
July 23, 2013, 09:28:34 AM |
|
93.8, I like this new guy. Probably just change for him, he just adds one digit as he feels like it. Probably bored that the bots keeps minraising him. $94.5 will happen soon!
|
|
|
|
|
BitPirate
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 238
Merit: 100
RMBTB.com: The secure BTC:CNY exchange. 0% fee!
|
|
July 23, 2013, 09:29:23 AM |
|
someone is laughing at single digit believers. And me too BTC velocity would have to drastically increase for single digits to be viable at this stage, IMO. At single digits, the available BTC wouldn't store enough value to be able to support payments. This is the reason you can effectively ignore the single digit argument -- Bitcoin would have to completely fail as a payment medium, or all the speculators would have to go away, in order for us to get there. |
|
|
|
|
|
tutkarz
|
|
July 23, 2013, 09:36:12 AM |
|
someone is laughing at single digit believers. And me too BTC velocity would have to drastically increase for single digits to be viable at this stage, IMO. At single digits, the available BTC wouldn't store enough value to be able to support payments. This is the reason you can effectively ignore the single digit argument -- Bitcoin would have to completely fail as a payment medium, or all the speculators would have to go away, in order for us to get there. i know, but its good you said this because people tend to froget about this or maybe still don't understand. I wonder also how long it would be for double digits to be gone for good. Maybe it's not that far away considering new and new entities starting to accept bitcoin each day. |
|
|
|
|
BitPirate
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 238
Merit: 100
RMBTB.com: The secure BTC:CNY exchange. 0% fee!
|
|
July 23, 2013, 09:45:04 AM |
|
someone is laughing at single digit believers. And me too BTC velocity would have to drastically increase for single digits to be viable at this stage, IMO. At single digits, the available BTC wouldn't store enough value to be able to support payments. This is the reason you can effectively ignore the single digit argument -- Bitcoin would have to completely fail as a payment medium, or all the speculators would have to go away, in order for us to get there. i know, but its good you said this because people tend to froget about this or maybe still don't understand. I wonder also how long it would be for double digits to be gone for good. Maybe it's not that far away considering new and new entities starting to accept bitcoin each day. :-) It's also why the $10K valuations aren't as ridiculous as they sound -- try plugging in, say, 10% of visa volume into the equation :-) Of course we have a Tx limit to deal with first though... My missus (economist) was initially convinced BTC would fail simply because there aren't enough of them...  |
|
|
|
|
|
4mherewego
|
|
July 23, 2013, 09:49:10 AM |
|
When I see the 1k and 600 wall moving around I try to imagine what that guy is thinking. Obviously he is really rich, and he also don't really understand what he is doing. It's nice to know that one loaded guy is starting to get interested in bitcoins. After playing around, reading around and trying to convince his friend, who knows what crazy ideas he might get and might buy for much much more than 1600BTC...
|
|
|
|
|
|
tutkarz
|
|
July 23, 2013, 09:57:18 AM |
|
When I see the 1k and 600 wall moving around I try to imagine what that guy is thinking. Obviously he is really rich, and he also don't really understand what he is doing. It's nice to know that one loaded guy is starting to get interested in bitcoins. After playing around, reading around and trying to convince his friend, who knows what crazy ideas he might get and might buy for much much more than 1600BTC...
first whale who will get in earn the most ... |
|
|
|
|
ChartBuddy
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2156
Merit: 1745
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
|
|
July 23, 2013, 10:01:54 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Traktion
|
|
July 23, 2013, 10:32:26 AM |
|
someone is laughing at single digit believers. And me too BTC velocity would have to drastically increase for single digits to be viable at this stage, IMO. At single digits, the available BTC wouldn't store enough value to be able to support payments. This is the reason you can effectively ignore the single digit argument -- Bitcoin would have to completely fail as a payment medium, or all the speculators would have to go away, in order for us to get there. i know, but its good you said this because people tend to froget about this or maybe still don't understand. I wonder also how long it would be for double digits to be gone for good. Maybe it's not that far away considering new and new entities starting to accept bitcoin each day. :-) It's also why the $10K valuations aren't as ridiculous as they sound -- try plugging in, say, 10% of visa volume into the equation :-) Of course we have a Tx limit to deal with first though... My missus (economist) was initially convinced BTC would fail simply because there aren't enough of them... I don't think any short/medium term bears would argue with that bullish position in the long term. The question is whether this bubble with fully correct before increased adoption begins to push up the price again. |
|
|
|
|
|
Traktion
|
|
July 23, 2013, 10:35:33 AM |
|
Has anyone noticed how little volatility there is at Bitstamp compared to MtGox at the moment? Bitstamp:  MtGox:  P.S. It looks like BitStamp just took a mini nose dive... |
|
|
|
|
|
phoenix1
|
|
July 23, 2013, 10:38:21 AM |
|
Has anyone noticed how little volatility there is at Bitstamp compared to MtGox at the moment?
Bitstamp:
P.S. It looks like BitStamp just took a mini nose dive...
Zoom in and look at the price action of the last 24hrs ... there has been crazy behaviour on Bitstamp |
|
|
|
|
ChartBuddy
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2156
Merit: 1745
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
|
|
July 23, 2013, 11:01:43 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
wonkytonky
|
|
July 23, 2013, 11:26:31 AM |
|
rally up guys.. so i can short higher :-)
|
|
|
|
|
ChartBuddy
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2156
Merit: 1745
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
|
|
July 23, 2013, 12:01:42 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Poll
