JayJuanGee
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3892
Merit: 11124
Self-Custody is a right. Say no to"Non-custodial"
|
|
May 10, 2022, 11:35:43 PM |
|
Yah, well, I just bought some today as well, I missed the local low of $30,500 though. But, my short-term speculation record is usually pretty bad. Almost as bad as proudhon's? Wow.. you must suck really badly if you are comparing your performance to proudhon's performance, especially proudhon's price projections. On the other hand, most of us already have some pretty good ideas that such donkey-breathed being, aka proudhon, is either a ringer or he has extensive brain-damage (probably a bit of both). .In any event, it would be good to call him age-appropriate names wherever and whenever possible... he get's a lot of scholarly motives (if that is the right name?) from such.. since he is sort of stuck at 12 and a half years.. for some reason? - even though we should not be feeding those kinds of damaged juvenile animals.. it only encourages them to spout out more puzzled pieces of disinformation.. like they are stuck in a time-warp, never got past the 6th grade in terms of calculation skills, and still believes that bitcoin is a baby (believes in santa claus too).. just like them.
|
|
|
|
PoolMinor
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1843
Merit: 1338
XXXVII Fnord is toast without bread
|
|
May 10, 2022, 11:39:07 PM |
|
The stonk market right now feels exactly like it did around October 2011.
In the spring and summer leading up to 10/2011 there had been a huge rally with the S&P 500 reaching new ATHs.
Then came the crash starting around July 2011.
Once the bottom of market was reached in October, I distinctly remember the fear in the MSM that the market had much further to fall. At least back to July 2010 levels.
It never did.
The stonk market climbed a wall of worry to reach new ATHs by Feb 2012 and never looked back.
Moral of the story: When the MSM starts chanting that the market is going to crash much lower, it probably won't.
Simple comparison: When Warren Buffet starts telling you that BTC is a safe investment it will be time to go full fiat. Hahahahaha! His 'updated' Average S2F ratio model puts the possibility of crossing above $100K for the first time around late 2024/2025. Which is literally what most bitcoiners would have believed is easily achievable before his model even came along. Like 'No shit, Sherlock.' Yeah, let's revise my PlanB model further out to a 95% probability, so when it happens I can say my model was right all along. When charting with TA it is important not to have an opinion on the path before it presents itself. If you already have a story, the lines on the chart can be manipulated to fit that story. As a participant in this thread, I know I get much more feedback when I post bullish TA versus bearish TA. He apparently changed his first model to reflect a higher amount of praise he would receive to promote the 100K narrative.
|
|
|
|
PoolMinor
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1843
Merit: 1338
XXXVII Fnord is toast without bread
|
Sup everyone, just wanted to tell you that my Daily DCA is now active till 2023. I will be buying daily for the next 237 days. Lowest BTC will go according to my analysis which I posted on 27th Jan is $24k which is 200 Weekly Moving Average. If we take time into consideration for the price to meet the Weekly 200 MA, it will be near about $24k.This changes the price drop from current price from 46% to 30%. Have a good week ahead, happy buying.Maybe you are hitting on another developing pet peeve of mine? Daily cost averaging seems to be a misleading attempt at a euphemism... and the term is not daily cost averaging, it is dollar cost averaging (this correction about the "proper" term does not have to do with the dollar.. but instead getting away from expectation that there is any kind of meaningful justification to be maniacally in regards to buying every day.. which is more of an advanced practice rather than an entry-level practice). Proof that you do not read before you jump to conclusions. Daily DCA Daily DOLLAR COST AVERAGING
|
|
|
|
proudhon
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2198
Merit: 1311
|
|
|
|
|
Biodom
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3934
Merit: 4455
|
|
May 11, 2022, 12:00:50 AM Merited by JayJuanGee (1) |
|
Stepping in here, because this translates to a significant probability that I will lose almost all of my BTC: I doubt that we are even close to max pain...
bears are going to push the BTC price down as low as they can and hold it there as long as they can.
Other than "buy a time machine, go back, and bat-slap myself a few months ago", do you have any suggestions for someone who fell into a margin debt trap? There are no right answers in this all-wrong situation, but I want to pick your brain. If I had been willing to "cash out" (I hate that term), I could have exited this position at $47k-48k last month, and walked away with more BTC than I started with. I didn't do that, because selling BTC is unthinkable. Instead, for much of the past week, I was liquidating other assets and pouring proceeds into the distressed account. I drew the "no more!" line on Sunday, because I could lose absolutely everything this way. To begin with, most of my liquid or liquidatable assets were in BTC - now trapped as collateral in the account that first ate all of my BTC as I added collateral to avoid losing BTC, and then has been eating everything else, too. Other things elsewhere are safe, but mostly gone already. I am good at hunkering down and waiting out bear markets, as long as I am not at liquidation risk! So for example, max pain could be going down to the 200-week moving average or even going below that and maybe staying there for a certain amount of time... sure it does not seem plausible.. but for sure manipulators shoot to achieve the implausible and to sustain it for as long as they are able.. and we know that the 200-week moving average is currently at about $21,750.
In essence, we can try to give probabilities of what max pain might be.. and for sure that is not going to be easy.. including that even seemingly low probability events could end up happening.... and for sure many guys will continue to buy. all the way down.. and for sure I would need to reassess my cashflow if we were to go below $25k..
If we go down to $25k (never mind lower), I lack sufficient assets to avoid selling most of my BTC - or worse, having it sold for me in a huge market-dump into a red candlestick, with a penalty. I can try to scrape along searching for the bottom, selling the least BTC possible with each drop (as I luckly did today). That risks my missing the crash, and getting liquidated - or miscalculating, and getting liquidated. For this reason, I have not been eating properly, sleeping properly, taking care of myself, or taking care of other things in my life - including things that could make money! I have caught it at the edge many times - each time before, liquidating other assets and pouring them in; this time, selling BTC. Now that I am run down to selling BTC, and I would be selling each local bottom before the next drop, I would sell low every time - bleeding out piece by piece, until almost nothing is left. This has been ongoing for months, in a downward spiral of ballooning debt and shrinking assets - worsened by desperate, "must do something" attempts to make money trading altcoins on margin (!), in a chain-reaction of "I know better than this!" mistakes that seemed necessary to fix earlier mistakes. My whole life is a wreck, and I am personally a mess - but never mind that; I am struggling to save my BTC, the important thing. In February's worst crash, a trusted friend advised me to exit at $35k with whatever BTC I could recover - just in case we dropped low enough to wipe me out. I replied that if I were to dump my BTC at $35k, and it turned out to be unnecessary, then I would kill myself. I meant that seriously; I was not just joking about it, as I am now (for the moment). In February, not dumping turned out to be the correct choice. Before today, I never sold even one satoshi for dollars (other than spending in normal use of Bitcoin as money).If we really go down to $25k or lower soon, the correct choice now would be to exit at $31k $30,500, dropping as I write this. Thus I would lose most of my BTC that I have held for years, to save some scraps. But I do not think that I am even psychologically capable of selling BTC, unless forced. Not selling in the bull market - and especially not selling in the bear market! I can't do it. I just can't. It is not "only money", because Bitcoin is not "only money". I've lost a lot of dollars before, laughed, and walked away - but this is Bitcoin. And if I were to dump Bitcoin at $31k $30,500, and the bottom was already in - eh, you guessed it. ☠️ So, bearing in mind that I am not strictly rational about BTC in the sense of "an economically rational actor", what is the least-bad choice?mindrust myself out? As my friend argued, the difference is that mindrust was trying to save his worthless fiat shitcoins; he was at no risk, as long as 1 BTC = 1 BTC. I am trying to save bitcoins, not dollars; and I would sell the least necessary to free up whatever little bit remains. I calculate PnL in BTC, not USD. Though having dollars is nice, because it means I can look for a good opportunity to cash out to BTC. Anyway, this option potentially carries a very expensive cost externality, as aforesaid; but I do consider all options, even the ones I immediately reject. Keep scraping along, searching for the bottom? I can currently survive down to about $29,200; with some income that I expect soon, I could push that a bit below $29k a few days from now. For every $1k drop below that, I will need to sell off a larger and larger proportion of my BTC - that is, if I catch it before the liquidator bot. But if the bottom is already in - or even if it is almost in (say, if the bottom is $28,500) - then scraping along saves BTC, just as I saved >1 BTC today by selling 0.5 BTC. Also, should I absolutely stop pouring any more assets into this account? It is a money-eating, asset-eating sinkhole - as an "economically rational actor" would have recognized long ago. The incoming money that could be used to push down my liquidation price by a hair, could also be used to buy BTC (whether now - or later during a bull run, because "incoming money" is an airdrop of an altcoin that's down much worse than BTC). But if spending it on BTC safely in my wallet causes liquidation of that account, it would be the most expensive BTC purchase ever! I emphasize again that there are no right answers in this wrong situation. There are only dilemmas, educated guesses, and attempts to pick the least-bad option. If you would be so kind as to bounce around some ideas, I will be thankful - and I may or may not do whatever you suggest. Either way, I will not blame you for the results of my own decisions, or for unheeded suggestions made in good faith (= with intent to maximize BTC, not maximize dollars) - just as I didn't blame my friend for urging me to dump and get out at $35k in February, even though it turned out to be unnecessary, and we visited $47k just over a month later. And the posing of questions in a conversational way does not preclude the offering of other thoughts. [Edited to fix a thought that got logically disconnected in the writing process, due the second-order effects of being glued to the chart without adequately eating or sleeping.] You seem to be on margin in btc. The only time I was on margin, 20 years ago, the end result was zeroing of my account in the Internet crash of 2001-2002. imho, btc should be bought with cash only. If you borrow money to buy btc (imho, not advisable for most with the exception of people with a huge cash flow), then borrow it OUTSIDE of the bitcoin-buying account. Just an opinion, not financial advice.
|
|
|
|
ChartBuddy
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2352
Merit: 1803
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
|
|
May 11, 2022, 12:04:59 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
JayJuanGee
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3892
Merit: 11124
Self-Custody is a right. Say no to"Non-custodial"
|
|
May 11, 2022, 12:07:12 AM |
|
Sorry but I couldn't resist... this one is for you JJG Everyone knew the chart was gonna fail at some point You deserve a bat-slappening for that comment, dude... Whoaza!!!!! To the extent the information contained therein is even accurate, it looks good for 2021, but given our current spot price, and our recent BTC price dynamics, it does not look so great in terms of what could be in store for 2022. You failed to cheer me up, BitcoinBunny.,. therefore a batslappening is due. ? You deserve a batslappening for sharing such an ambiguous and distracting picture and failing/refusing to explain ur lil selfie for having had provided such imagenationings for wwwwwweeeeee largely innocent WO peeps. No excuses, Hueristic!!!!!!!! Please try not to interact with me Jay.
Ok.... I will take your vices and try harder... just like my idol Boxer in Animal Farm. In other words, no batslap for you... you suck.? You're into legs/arms? Nothing wrong with that. You must be gay.
|
|
|
|
spiderbrain
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 889
Merit: 1013
|
|
May 11, 2022, 12:17:02 AM |
|
Wow I woke up proudhon and the greatest bullish statement he has made since 2012.
Is this the end of btc?
At least I got my solar array approvals this week.
my power cost dropped bigly.
this is so 2018.
I found out the secret how proudhon used to calculate bitcoin price before... But now I guess he/she using some new logic. I trust him fully with my money. No questions asked. Buy bitcoin Is this confirmed by sources?
|
|
|
|
Hamza2424
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1148
Merit: 1102
Payment Gateway Allows Recurring Payments
|
|
May 11, 2022, 12:26:22 AM Last edit: May 11, 2022, 12:42:59 AM by Hamza2424 |
|
Proof that you do not read before you jump to conclusions. Daily DCA Daily DOLLAR COST AVERAGING
Exactly Bro DCA straightway is still gonna work for the upcoming 5 years let me explain if an investment of $30M or Less like $5M is made with that being said then a Holding gap from that to the next Halving will be like 2 to 3 years after that Halving the Block will 1.5 Rewarding then BTC Price to Cost of Mining Block will decide the price. That will be easily around $1M. You can calculate your profits there these Strategies are good for the Countries Under High Debits to pay. Not Day Dreaming the Realized value of BTC is the proof as you can see from the chart currently the realized value is around 25k and ATH is 69k but after 2 Halvings due to Realized value and ATH will be close to the ATH.
|
|
|
|
ChartBuddy
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2352
Merit: 1803
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
|
|
May 11, 2022, 01:04:55 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
death_wish
Member
Offline
Activity: 70
Merit: 320
Take profit in BTC. Account PnL in BTC. BTC=money.
|
|
May 11, 2022, 01:43:01 AM |
|
Newbie question here: Is it prohibited to threaten or extort ChartBuddy? I think that if his charts do not show number going up, I may want to knee-cap him and post hacked naked pics of his sister, Tickerina. Or if he doesn't have knees because he's a robot, I could delete his config files, or drop tables in his database, or something like that. You seem to be on margin in btc.
No. I would never do something so stupid as to take a leveraged long on a highly volatile asset. Instead, I shorted the dollar at high leverage. The dollar's fundamentals are wretchedly bad. In the long term, it is practically guaranteed to depreciate severely. Shorting the dollar is smart - at least in theory. The problem is that "the market can stay irrational longer than you can stay solvent", and the dollar is now in a bull-run bubble. The only time I was on margin, 20 years ago, the end result was zeroing of my account in the Internet crash of 2001-2002.
When I tried trading tech stocks in the same time period, I managed to lose half the portfolio's original value without any margin at all. I am talented! You went all the way to zero, but you needed margin to do it. You have no skills at losing money fast. See, I can laugh about that. Because the loss was in dollars - not in Bitcoin, which did not yet exist. It's only money! imho, btc should be bought with cash only. If you borrow money to buy btc (imho, not advisable for most with the exception of people with a huge cash flow), then borrow it OUTSIDE of the bitcoin-buying account.
See this: The problem is not borrowing money to buy BTC. (Is it a problem for Saylor?) The problem is borrowing money on the worst possible terms. Positively malicious terms.
For most other types of loans, a borrower's default is not in the lender's best interest. Collecting on defaulted accounts is lossy, and high-overhead. Therefore, even the harsher parts of the lending terms tend to be tempered by the lender's desire not to need to deal with delinquent or defaulted accounts. Most lenders seek to minimize defaults.
The entities offering cryptocurrency margin accounts have a perverse incentive to stack the loan terms to maximize borrower defaults. Want to buy BTC at a discount? Set up an exchange, offer margin accounts, wait for the dip, and then stockpile BTC in cascading liquidations!
The whole cryptocurrency margin ecosystem has the incentives of loan-sharking. Those incentives are exploited in full accord with the ethics of people who also profit from pump-and-dump Ponzi-coins.
You need to be either stupid or crazy to take a loan on these terms, for almost any purpose.
|
|
|
|
ImThour
Copper Member
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1498
Merit: 1618
Bitcoin Bottom was at $15.4k
|
|
May 11, 2022, 01:56:51 AM |
|
Sup everyone, just wanted to tell you that my Daily DCA is now active till 2023. I will be buying daily for the next 237 days. Lowest BTC will go according to my analysis which I posted on 27th Jan is $24k which is 200 Weekly Moving Average. If we take time into consideration for the price to meet the Weekly 200 MA, it will be near about $24k.This changes the price drop from current price from 46% to 30%. Have a good week ahead, happy buying.Maybe you are hitting on another developing pet peeve of mine? Daily cost averaging seems to be a misleading attempt at a euphemism... and the term is not daily cost averaging, it is dollar cost averaging (this correction about the "proper" term does not have to do with the dollar.. but instead getting away from expectation that there is any kind of meaningful justification to be maniacally in regards to buying every day.. which is more of an advanced practice rather than an entry-level practice). Proof that you do not read before you jump to conclusions. Daily DCA Daily DOLLAR COST AVERAGING Not meant for everyone to read it properly, I guess? Also, there is no particular strategy on when and how you accumulate, you just do it.
|
|
|
|
Heater
|
Newbie question here: Is it prohibited to threaten or extort ChartBuddy? I think that if his charts do not show number going up, I may want to knee-cap him and post hacked naked pics of his sister, Tickerina. Or if he doesn't have knees because he's a robot, I could delete his config files, or drop tables in his database, or something like that. You seem to be on margin in btc.
No. I would never do something so stupid as to take a leveraged long on a highly volatile asset. Instead, I shorted the dollar at high leverage. The dollar's fundamentals are wretchedly bad. In the long term, it is practically guaranteed to depreciate severely. Shorting the dollar is smart - at least in theory. The problem is that "the market can stay irrational longer than you can stay solvent", and the dollar is now in a bull-run bubble. The only time I was on margin, 20 years ago, the end result was zeroing of my account in the Internet crash of 2001-2002.
When I tried trading tech stocks in the same time period, I managed to lose half the portfolio's original value without any margin at all. I am talented! You went all the way to zero, but you needed margin to do it. You have no skills at losing money fast. See, I can laugh about that. Because the loss was in dollars - not in Bitcoin, which did not yet exist. It's only money! imho, btc should be bought with cash only. If you borrow money to buy btc (imho, not advisable for most with the exception of people with a huge cash flow), then borrow it OUTSIDE of the bitcoin-buying account.
See this: The problem is not borrowing money to buy BTC. (Is it a problem for Saylor?) The problem is borrowing money on the worst possible terms. Positively malicious terms.
For most other types of loans, a borrower's default is not in the lender's best interest. Collecting on defaulted accounts is lossy, and high-overhead. Therefore, even the harsher parts of the lending terms tend to be tempered by the lender's desire not to need to deal with delinquent or defaulted accounts. Most lenders seek to minimize defaults.
The entities offering cryptocurrency margin accounts have a perverse incentive to stack the loan terms to maximize borrower defaults. Want to buy BTC at a discount? Set up an exchange, offer margin accounts, wait for the dip, and then stockpile BTC in cascading liquidations!
The whole cryptocurrency margin ecosystem has the incentives of loan-sharking. Those incentives are exploited in full accord with the ethics of people who also profit from pump-and-dump Ponzi-coins.
You need to be either stupid or crazy to take a loan on these terms, for almost any purpose.
Can you sell half of your position? It might help you sleep better if there is no chance of a total wipeout. At any point in time, there is a 50/50 chance of the pricing going up or down. You need to be positioned accordingly.
|
|
|
|
ChartBuddy
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2352
Merit: 1803
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
|
|
May 11, 2022, 02:04:54 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
OROBTC
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2926
Merit: 1863
|
|
May 11, 2022, 02:06:21 AM Merited by JayJuanGee (1) |
|
Yah, well, I just bought some today as well, I missed the local low of $30,500 though. But, my short-term speculation record is usually pretty bad. Almost as bad as proudhon's? Wow.. you must suck really badly if you are comparing your performance to proudhon's performance, especially proudhon's price projections. On the other hand, most of us already have some pretty good ideas that such donkey-breathed being, aka proudhon, is either a ringer or he has extensive brain-damage (probably a bit of both). .In any event, it would be good to call him age-appropriate names wherever and whenever possible... he get's a lot of scholarly motives (if that is the right name?) from such.. since he is sort of stuck at 12 and a half years.. for some reason? - even though we should not be feeding those kinds of damaged juvenile animals.. it only encourages them to spout out more puzzled pieces of disinformation.. like they are stuck in a time-warp, never got past the 6th grade in terms of calculation skills, and still believes that bitcoin is a baby (believes in santa claus too).. just like them.I have a long history of short-term speculation going the other way on me right after I buy or sell... I buy, the price goes down. Maybe 80% of the time! Anyone could make short-term money taking the other side of my trade. Longer term I do better. proudhon is probably my favorite character here at W.O. For real. Though you and the DUDE are close runners-up.
|
|
|
|
AlcoHoDL
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2548
Merit: 4728
Addicted to HoDLing!
|
|
May 11, 2022, 02:18:21 AM Merited by JayJuanGee (1) |
|
One of the benefits of buying BTC early is that the average buy price of one's stash can be very low. So low, that dips like the one we're currently experiencing can be treated as almost non-events. Informed, hardened HoDLers, the ones who understand Bitcoin and have endured the 2017-2020 bear season, can go through such dips without any fear or uncertainty of what's coming. But even newbies in Bitcoin should not fear the volatility. We're still so early in Bitcoin's journey, that any amount of selling to keep fiat in a bank is much more risky in the long term than HoDLing and waiting. There are those who are willing to take the risk and ride the short-term wave, like LFC_Bitcoin's well-played sell near the top and subsequent buy near the local bottom. Good for him and I'm happy that it worked out, but I believe luck played a big part in it -- it could have gone the other way. I'm not even considering taking such risk -- Bitcoin is just too precious to sell and risk not being able to buy back lower. What I do is DCA by buying small/medium-sized chunks of corn to add to my stash whenever I can. Not as profitable as selling high and buying low (if I'm lucky), but it's 100% safe (in the sense that my stash is always increasing and always stays under my full control), and still taking advantage of each BTFD opportunity as it comes. As for the worth of one's stash, I'd use the 200-Week Moving Average (200-WMA) as a reliable, robust wealth size metric. The 200-WMA has grown to be my go-to metric when it comes to past Bitcoin performance and future expectations. The problem with observing spot price and zooming in, is that patterns tend to get dissolved and lost into the randomness of the short-term price action. The magic comes when zooming out -- patterns spring out of the noise and become clearly visible, while noise is averaged out and disappears. You can let your monitor and your eyes/brain do the averaging, or you can let math & science do it. I choose the latter option, combined with Bitcoin's 4-year Halving cycle, hence the 200-WMA. Two things: 1. The 200-WMA is monotonically increasing (i.e, has never decreased at any point in its history), 2. Spot price has practically never dropped below the 200-WMA for any significant length of time. Those two things should be enough to see where things are going. Measuring one's Bitcoin wealth in terms of the 200-WMA is a safe, conservative lower bound, that's backed not by weeks or months, but by 13+ years' worth of historical data. It's currently at $21,719. Of course, with Bitcoin anything is possible, any model can break, as seems to be the case with Plan B's S2F model, and HoDLers should be prepared for anything. Still, IMHO, the odds of Bitcoin's spot price getting and staying lower than the 200-WMA for a significant amount of time are pretty low to non-existent. tl;dr: Don't be a weak hand, don't be scared by dips, no matter how deep they may appear to be. Just zoom out and use math & science to separate the trend from the noise. The 200-WMA indicator should put your mind at ease regarding where we're going. Yes, spot price and the 200-WMA tend to meet every once in a long while, but only briefly, before spot price quickly shoots upwards. Still worried and thinking of selling? You do what you have to do, but I fear that along with the fiat you're going to get, you'll soon have to put an 'M.' in between your first name and surname. Not to mention the batslaps and rusty pipes you're going to be receiving... Your choice.
|
|
|
|
JayJuanGee
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3892
Merit: 11124
Self-Custody is a right. Say no to"Non-custodial"
|
|
May 11, 2022, 02:18:38 AM |
|
Terrawhat?
Seriously, if it hadn't been mentioned, I never would have known it existed.
Who cranks out all these garbage "stablecoins" anyway? And why would anyone trust them?
well, bitcoin peeps were applauding them buying $3 bil in btc to support their scheme. nobody (or almost nobody) was complaining. That's the best joke. Buying BTC for advertisement and then being forced to sell it at a loss 1 month later. These guys get the award for the most gigantic paper hands ever, trading like a noob. I give at least 60/40 chance that we should expect the same from Saylor (that he might sell into a margin call this year). It seems that EVERYONE who either buys bitcoin on margin OR does some bitcoin-unrelated stuff, is being shaken off eventually. Bitcoin is like a wild stallion that does not allow anyone to saddle it. You deserve a battening slappening for that one, biodom. [edited out]
That's true. You could call it "The ultimate whale-hunt" Like deserves like. So did 30k fall
and do we finally leave the artificial
28.8k-69.8k slot
btw as of today my personal guarantee of 70k in may made last year means I may go down as the greatest btc jinx ever.
how bout that jjg?
I doubt that your being wrong or whatever had any effect at all on the BTC price. You were just wrong, and that's all.. .. except the fact that you remain stubbornly affixed on that largely unimportant number that for all intents and purposes we have reached.. even though technically, we were $1k shy of actually reaching it. Are you sorry that you asked? yet? btw as of today my personal guarantee of 70k in may made last year means I may go down as the greatest btc jinx ever. I think we really could see $70k this month. Things are looking pretty bullish from here. Have you ever considered renaming your lil donkey-breath selfie? How about "Proud Annoying Hon"? I know it is bit long, but still. Is bitcoinity done? I have been wondering the same.. .it's been down for a few days...
|
|
|
|
Biodom
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3934
Merit: 4455
|
|
May 11, 2022, 02:30:29 AM |
|
Newbie question here: Is it prohibited to threaten or extort ChartBuddy? I think that if his charts do not show number going up, I may want to knee-cap him and post hacked naked pics of his sister, Tickerina. Or if he doesn't have knees because he's a robot, I could delete his config files, or drop tables in his database, or something like that. You seem to be on margin in btc.
No. I would never do something so stupid as to take a leveraged long on a highly volatile asset. Instead, I shorted the dollar at high leverage. The dollar's fundamentals are wretchedly bad. In the long term, it is practically guaranteed to depreciate severely. Shorting the dollar is smart - at least in theory. The problem is that "the market can stay irrational longer than you can stay solvent", and the dollar is now in a bull-run bubble. The only time I was on margin, 20 years ago, the end result was zeroing of my account in the Internet crash of 2001-2002.
When I tried trading tech stocks in the same time period, I managed to lose half the portfolio's original value without any margin at all. I am talented! You went all the way to zero, but you needed margin to do it. You have no skills at losing money fast. See, I can laugh about that. Because the loss was in dollars - not in Bitcoin, which did not yet exist. It's only money! imho, btc should be bought with cash only. If you borrow money to buy btc (imho, not advisable for most with the exception of people with a huge cash flow), then borrow it OUTSIDE of the bitcoin-buying account.
See this: The problem is not borrowing money to buy BTC. (Is it a problem for Saylor?) The problem is borrowing money on the worst possible terms. Positively malicious terms.
For most other types of loans, a borrower's default is not in the lender's best interest. Collecting on defaulted accounts is lossy, and high-overhead. Therefore, even the harsher parts of the lending terms tend to be tempered by the lender's desire not to need to deal with delinquent or defaulted accounts. Most lenders seek to minimize defaults.
The entities offering cryptocurrency margin accounts have a perverse incentive to stack the loan terms to maximize borrower defaults. Want to buy BTC at a discount? Set up an exchange, offer margin accounts, wait for the dip, and then stockpile BTC in cascading liquidations!
The whole cryptocurrency margin ecosystem has the incentives of loan-sharking. Those incentives are exploited in full accord with the ethics of people who also profit from pump-and-dump Ponzi-coins.
You need to be either stupid or crazy to take a loan on these terms, for almost any purpose.
I don't typically short anything. FAANG looked like a short, but still I hesitated. Well..i can now buy 30-50% MORE FAANG for my cash if i want to, but i won't.
|
|
|
|
jojo69
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3332
Merit: 4615
diamond-handed zealot
|
|
May 11, 2022, 02:43:08 AM Merited by JayJuanGee (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
JayJuanGee
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3892
Merit: 11124
Self-Custody is a right. Say no to"Non-custodial"
|
|
May 11, 2022, 03:00:44 AM |
|
Sad how people reacted when I said BTC will be the best buy at realized price i.e. $24.5k which also is 200 WMA.
First off.. any kind of "I told you so" tone is unbecoming of a wall observer gentlemen.. even if you proclaim NOT to be one.. Second: I am wondering whether you just throw random numbers out of your ass? hahahahahaha Just asking? Yeah, if you throw out a bunch of random numbers, then sooner or later, you are going to be correct about some of the random numbers that you threw out there, but I doubt that your being correct (if it happens) constitutes an "I told you so." Sure, if you are feeling gleeful that you made bank, then there is no problem with that. I doubt anyone would be hating on you, even if you were to make more money based on whatever play that you made based on your BTC price projections. As I type this post, the 200-week moving average is $21,736. https://www.lookintobitcoin.com/charts/200-week-moving-average-heatmap/Do you want to proclaim that you are referring to some other 200WMA.. if so, you better specify how you would get the 200-week MA to be $24.5k when it is actually $21,736. In that regard, at least we should be attempting to use the same referents.. or specify if we are using some other measure in order to throw out our proclamation of number representations. I will concede that it may well not make a whole hell of a lot of difference whether the BTC price goes to $24.5k or $21.7k or somewhere in that ballpark, and I have quite a few doubts about whether technical analysis is really telling us much of anything in regards to where the BTC price is going to go.. even though some of the averages can give us some clues about where we are at.. and even to attempt to figure out how much of a bargain that we might be getting at this particular price.. especially if the more bullish case ends up playing out - of course, based on a variety of fundamentals. By the way, regarding your assertion that $24.5k is inevitable... I would be careful in regards to believing any kind of BTC price movement to be inevitable, unless it had already happened... So, if you are trying to proclaim that something in the future is "inevitable" you are bound to be overly calculating such an outcome. Now this Luna dump will surely make me reach my target + Saylor is now in unrealized loss.
You have some kind of a theory about what Saylor is going to do? You must have been reading a lot of nonsense if you believe that being in "unrealized loss" is going to cause any kind of behavior besides possibly buying a wee bit moar coinz, perhaps? perhaps? but hey.. let's see if it matters to be bringing up the status of Saylor's coins? You may well be too much of a newbie to remember Tim Draper? Do you know the story? Do I need to tell some brief version of it? Largely, in about June 2014, Draper had publicly bought the US Fed Marshall auction coins of around 30k BTC for a bit over $600 per coin, and the reason that he bought that many is because he was bidding more than the spot price, and so he thought that he was a genius for getting all of the coins, but you know what happened to the BTC price? He was largely negative on those coins until late 2016... .. Yeah there were a few blips in which his coins went into profits in mid 2016, but they went back into the negative after the supposed Bitfinex hack.... and so part of the point is that he was being called a fool for around three years, and no coiners and naysayers were suggesting a variety of theories about "poor Tim".. blah blah blah.. And, how did that work out? Saylor is in a much better position than ole Tim Draper, even though Draper did quite well for his lil selfie in spite of so many doubters and conspiratorial folks who cannot appreciate the power of conviction. $30k support to break pretty soon, I don't wish BTC to go below 200 WMA anytime soon.
Bitcoin no gives no shits what you wish. There will be a short pump towards $38k before going back to under $30k.
Is that how it works? When most of you are talking, I am buying because I believed myself. Nothing wrong with buying regularly and also buying on dips... just as long as you do not presume that you have your purchase target price and timeline in the bag because there are no such guarantees in bitcoinlandia.. .. and careful when you presume that you are doing smarter things than the rest of us or that you know more than other guys here. Is bitcoinity done? For Bitstamp it is, since 6th May Oh? That little hint helped me to identify a fix that I could make to my set up, and I switched over to another exchange.. That looks much nicer to have a data feed (and a price) working/showing again... Great!!!!! What next ? I am hoping for a good volume because The Total Capital of the crypto market is now Droped from an esitamed Value of the $2T to the $1.4T the total loss of or transfer of the value is more then $600B.
Making temper run if a good volume expected on these support levels.
Are you lost, buddy (not referring to chart buddy.. chart buddy seems to know where we are at, even though sometimes not cooperating very well in terms of his/her/their (jk) posts)? Why would we give anything approaching two ratt's asses about "the total capital of the crypto" blah blah blah? We be talking about king daddy in these here parts... get a grip Hamza!!!! snap out of it!!!
|
|
|
|
|