BTC will shut their mouths and they will They will lick their own ass۔
Wow....
How is that possible? ....I mean to lick ass with your mouth shut ? ..and your own ass at that...
I'm by far no expert in that regard, but I'm willing to learn.. please share some of your knowledge..
There's an art to the use of a variety of "mixed metaphors," if we might be so graciously liberal to attempt to interpret the profundity of ThemePen's posts as such.. even looking back at his description of his kiddie bowling link as the "puppets knocking down the bottles."
hahahahaha
We should strive for some language discipline, no? Our attempts at art should at least have some semblance of reality or we may also finding ourselves into the gutters of shitcoinlandia....
My horse riding days are behind me. Getting older and don't want to risk a Christopher Reeve kinda situation. Safer to drive around the property on a 4 wheeler John Deere Gator. And can carry more practical load than horseback.
The horse's strength is now only needed in the body. No one in this modern civilization depends on horse to transport anything. Now everyone uses four wheelers for transportation. Because cars can transport more and more safely than horses.
Oh my...
Have you heard of "terrain?"
Of the several differences between USD and Bitcoin, which one would you choose now? because in general both are also very much needed.
You are starting out your post by coming off as a "know it all." Was that your intention?
In other words, why are you trying to stick us into a box in which we have to choose one or the other. Why not both?
The reality of our current world is that we do have the option of both, and most likely if we are attempting to protect our own interests, we better fucking be choosing both.. or at least figuring out some kind of a reasonable and prudent allocation to both - and it is not even locked into exactly any specific time because if we choose to allocate 0% and 100% today, in a few days we can change our mind and we could choose to allocate 10% and 90%, or whatever other ratio that each of us would like to choose (or even be forced to choose in a different way at a later time, if we make poor allocation choices at earlier points in time.. or we can be stubborn or ignorant about it, too.. that's a choice, no?).
As many people know that any traditional currency has special characteristics which Bitcoin does not have because Bitcoin is not supported by any authority.
Yes.. those are quite likely features rather than bugs. I am not saying that bitcoin does not have faults, but you seem to be going down the path of wanting to criticize bitcoin for some of its central design features, and you are likely not going to get very far in these here parts with those kinds of arguments because many of us have likely been studying the bitcoin space way longer than you (your arguments show a kind of presumptive naivette in terms of your trying to patronizingly 'splain to us how you know things that we do not know)..
Features of traditional currency:
- Divisible — can be converted into smaller pieces for specific uses such as paying a certain amount or micropayment.
- Non-consumable — cannot be consumed for purposes other than the exchange of value.
- Portable — can be easily carried around.
- Durable — doesn't wear out or depreciate over time or under certain conditions.
- Secure — cannot be faked.
- Easy to transfer.
- Rare — cannot be replicated indefinitely.
- Fungible — each part has the same value as its equivalent.
- Recognizable — recognized and accepted as a means of transaction.
These are not exactly completely true.. even if you want to present such purities in regards to fiat. Merely because you say these things do not make them true.. It would likely be a waste of time for me to go through each one of these categories..
As for Bitcoin as a whole, unlike traditional currencies:
- Has no central authority claiming it supports money.
- Is subject to deflation due to artificial scarcity, while central banks can print more money at any time.
- Whether every transaction is forever recorded on an immutable public ledger.
- Requires transaction fees to be paid to miners.
- Transactions are carried out over the internet and include a public address.
Again a lot of deficiencies in your categories and your descriptions, and even though I appreciate that you were not afraid to specify bitcoin, it seems that you neither know what is bitcoin if we were to be referring to onchain bitcoin versus various second/third layers or even that you might be describing some features/dynamics that are not really bitcoin specific, such as referring to shitcoin features.
Oh? I see since you are pretty much copying and pasting from that cited article.. these are not really your ideas anyhow..
I feel like I just wasted 15 minutes responding to this lame bullshit. There are a lot of lame articles out there.. including the one you cited as your authority CageMabok.
Poll
